[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music ] [ meta ] [ GET / ref]

/anime/ - Anime

Graphical arts and related topics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)


File: 1608528758980-0.jpg (568.61 KB, 1040x1471, aadf168277a98703bfd831f150….jpg)

File: 1608528758980-1.jpg (1.09 MB, 898x1300, 1588491884031.jpg)

File: 1608528758980-2.jpg (389.87 KB, 850x1207, 1574358580817.jpg)

 No.151[Last 50 Posts]

Flat is justice
>>

 No.152

File: 1608528759086.png (239.82 KB, 1024x1024, c80e1dd4786cba6aad7222c935….png)

>>

 No.153

File: 1608528759176-0.jpg (900.25 KB, 1000x1200, f79d30148533014c3db5c75606….jpg)

File: 1608528759176-1.png (1.01 MB, 1043x1504, 1b54c3ffc8e433f76476408218….png)

>>

 No.154

File: 1608528759315.png (722.6 KB, 1149x1395, DFC.png)

>>

 No.155

File: 1608528759415.jpg (62.71 KB, 639x359, 1588067730967.jpg)

>>

 No.156

oppai btfo
>>

 No.157

>>156
Cheka'd
>>

 No.158

Bamping
>>

 No.159

File: 1608528759608.jpg (31.74 KB, 350x315, flat-chest.jpg)

>>

 No.160

File: 1608528759660.jpg (101.49 KB, 1280x720, a5e4d6_6191967.jpg)

>>

 No.161

File: 1608528759712.jpg (68.08 KB, 850x475, 1564617934081.jpg)

flat always wins
>>

 No.162

File: 1608528759768.png (1.35 MB, 1049x1474, f69745a625f1ad830364eee5d0….png)

>>

 No.163

No and fuck you.
>>

 No.164

File: 1608528759913.png (497.31 KB, 1000x1000, 1570495192112.png)

>>

 No.165

File: 1608528760002.jpg (776.06 KB, 4947x7000, koneko.jpg)

>No koneko
Come on
>>

 No.166

File: 1608528760110-0.png (871.66 KB, 2000x1343, 04bbc5dfae06eaa5a5dc028f5d….png)

File: 1608528760110-1.jpg (133.46 KB, 1000x1600, 2162905ae454bb459d0a32b3ff….jpg)

File: 1608528760110-2.png (6.48 MB, 2894x4093, 706f07b15d8605318fcb84798e….png)

>>

 No.167

File: 1608528760482.mp4 (818.01 KB, 1280x720, Uruha Rushia - Flat Is Jus….mp4)

>>

 No.168

File: 1608528760685-0.jpg (425.07 KB, 851x987, 57a6a57dbdda33bdba57514a7a….jpg)

File: 1608528760685-1.png (498.16 KB, 1000x1274, 448ae15f7c61bb2d9d3467ed82….png)

File: 1608528760685-2.jpg (123.26 KB, 845x1200, 80181660_p0.jpg)

>>

 No.169

File: 1608528760813-0.jpg (505.2 KB, 3375x2396, 1587478196594.jpg)

File: 1608528760813-1.jpg (3.73 MB, 2508x3541, 1587283658304.jpg)

File: 1608528760813-2.jpg (45.02 KB, 600x654, 1587419609365.jpg)

>>

 No.170

File: 1608528760956.jpg (63.77 KB, 600x840, 1405540317877.jpg)

>>

 No.171

>>151
Flat is cute and for bullying
>>

 No.172

File: 1608528761054.jpg (576.97 KB, 1280x1280, b9070423850df5cc5b9b7abba4….jpg)

>>171
Don't bully!
>>

 No.173

>>169
tummy rub! so cute
>>

 No.174

File: 1608528761161-0.jpg (123.26 KB, 845x1200, 00a650d57f52da5672ab7ace07….jpg)

File: 1608528761161-1.jpg (224.94 KB, 932x1500, 1403368560_292961907.jpg)

File: 1608528761161-2.jpg (585.15 KB, 644x1000, b4c052c1cb47edfc018ca73b9d….jpg)

>>

 No.175

File: 1608528761260.jpg (91.39 KB, 684x626, pirate pomf.jpg)

>>172
BULLI
>>

 No.176

File: 1608528761317.jpg (1.01 MB, 1536x858, Ophis_in_DxD_HERO.jpg)

>discount loli-con thread spotted
>>

 No.177

File: 1608528761388.jpg (23.97 KB, 300x300, 1526214578217.jpg)

>>

 No.178

File: 1608528761447-0.jpg (852.04 KB, 1006x1601, 5f3414dcfe2003e232391242e7….jpg)

File: 1608528761447-1.jpg (217.12 KB, 800x1000, 48835888_p0.jpg)

File: 1608528761447-2.jpg (377.04 KB, 720x960, 1f30e63a22d61b34062b293c21….jpg)

>>

 No.179

File: 1608528761564.jpg (370.8 KB, 605x860, 97c5bbf5a13fcfff523d066af8….jpg)

>>176
For such perceptiveness, I will share with you an ancient treasure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLsTJfk2Y34
>>

 No.180

>>179
LOL WTF
>>

 No.181

>>179
A song about failure.
>>

 No.182

>>181
Brush your teeth, it smells rotten

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJRM1wYE74U
>>

 No.183

File: 1608528761744.png (53.75 KB, 430x297, nipples and nothing else.PNG)

>>

 No.184

File: 1608528761825.png (171.06 KB, 397x798, loli vs petite.png)

>>183
>girls
>GIRLS
There is a difference between GIRLS and WOMEN in terms of maturity, and a MASSIVE difference between Loli and petite. A large portion of the thread is straight-up loli posting.
>>

 No.185

>>182
It's abundantly clear you're projecting.
>>

 No.186

>>184
Lolis are wack and undialectical.
>>

 No.187

>>184
>having an aneurysm over drawn images

>"so why don't straight men read/fap to yaoi"

they do
then they try to have sex with crossdressers and post on 4chan about how they needed to be comforted by them because they started crying as it wasn't anything they expected it to be from the 2D porn
drink bleach you /pol/ack tier retard
>>

 No.188

>>187
>they do
No they don't, if you jerk it to gay shit, you're gay or bisexual.
>then they try to have sex with crossdressers and post on 4chan about how they needed to be comforted
Source: your ass and posts on /b/, on a site whose slogan includs the statement, "Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact"
You honestly sound like those retards who claim moot is intentionally making people gay.
>Muh pol!
>drink bleach
Cry harder pedo.
>>

 No.189

File: 1608528762057.jpg (149.58 KB, 400x400, 1590735162008.jpg)

>>184
>Unironic ficticious X = Actual Y

Videogames enjoyment killing =/= actually killing people etc.

And the Yaoi argument somewhat applies considering often weebs only consider 2D waman or men attractive (similar to your example men only attracted to 2D traps but not to real ones)

Now go away and stay gone for making a retartded argument
>>

 No.190

File: 1608528762125-0.png (361.84 KB, 661x660, liking lolis is paedophili….png)

File: 1608528762125-1.mp4 (2.89 MB, 476x268, loli anime PSA clip.mp4)

>>189
>Videogames enjoyment killing =/= actually killing people
Its this meme again. There are plenty of studies indicating that violent and REALISTIC video-games can provoke aggressive and erratic behaviour. Nobody claims Mario killing Bowser make people violent, they talk about Call of Duty 3 and other desensitizing rubbish like that.
I still remember that one kid who decided to try out GTA in real life. Lucky he was a kid and the cops didn't shoootonsight him.
>It's not a real girl so its totally ok!!!!!
&ltIt's just fictional pedophilia so its ok
The point was never about "hurting" fictional characters but about how the people who view and "enjoy" such content are essentially escaping into a paedo fantasy.
>Yaoi argument somewhat applies considering often weebs only consider 2D waman or men attractive
Because they're socially isolated and borderline mental. Its the same shit as men or women who expect real men or women to be super-models and then bulk up like balloons or become anorexics, its downright odious, and pushed by capitalist consumerism. This also applies to lolicon.
>inb4 lolicons don't like real girls
1) Says who? A survey or study where the subjects are very unlikely to admit to being closeted pedos and risk themselves being arrested or monitored
2) See video related
>go away
No
>stay gone
No
>retarded argument
Compared to your brilliant lack of one?
>>

 No.191

File: 1608528762293.jpg (159.81 KB, 896x1024, CiVQH4H.jpg)

>>190
> they talk about Call of Duty 3 and other desensitizing rubbish like that.
>>Source my ass
There are as fart as we know around 2 studies with somewhat maybe correlating violent behavior.
Since you are full of shit and didn't post any source I'll do the same and recall from the top of my head
1-Had the conclussion that it did augment the parts of the brain that are related with violence however they couldn't proof that it was a long lasting effect that then caused violent behaviour
2-Was an study about Behavior indicating that by taking evil paths you are most likely to be of evilish praxis, however it extended only to pranks and was only tested as a short therm thing by inmediatly after finishing a round of infamous and even then they had to be suggested to prank other participants by the scientists

>It's just fictional ___ so its ok

Yes

>>inb4 lolicons don't like real girls

>1) Says who?

Lets buy into the premise and think of the only paper I can recal where they might be a linkage

There are several studies where they monitor the flow and erectile function of the penis

spoiler: The results were that pedos into little girls were more narrow in their likings, being almost exclusively liking real little girls while serial pedo offenders that were more lenient into other sexualities and kinks and so on were more related to Pansexual hypersexuality and compulsion rather than being exclusively pedophilic in nature and the legit little girls lenient pedos are more narrowed in their likings only being attracted to a certain age of little real girls

tl;dr: even by using the only study I can recall with a somewhat positive correlation the only people who overlaped the pedophilic and loli type of shit were Compulsive hypersexual offenders (in which case you can apply almost everything. They like ebony? and little girls? correlation!) and the exclusive offender pedophiles likings were narrow down to 3DPDCP

And now the studies that don't buy into your premise:
>The multiple studies about media trying to correlate likings in fiction to real life having little to no correlation like the ones mentioned
>The corelation of countries where sexualized free media in countries has a more healthy sexual life-style in all metrics when comparing them to less sexually liberated countries

those are the main 2 at the top of my head

And since you didnt source anything you can get fucked
>>

 No.192

File: 1608528762361-0.jpg (74.33 KB, 640x1136, lolicon paedo.jpg)

File: 1608528762361-1.jpg (33.02 KB, 562x442, lolicon paedo.jpg)

>>191
>source
Every article speaking about video games and violence (whether defending video-gmaes or not) refer to Call of Duty or other. Google is your friend faggot.
>as fart as we know around 2 studies with somewhat maybe correlating violent behavior.
Your lack of research does not excuse your ignorance.

Craig A. Anderson and Wayne A. Warburton, “The Impact of Violent Video Games: An Overview,” Growing Up Fast and Furious, 2012
Craig A. Anderson and Brad J. Bushman, “Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature,” Psychological Science, Sep. 2001

American Academy of Pediatrics, “Joint Statement on the Impact of Entertainment Violence on Children Congressional Public Health Summit,” AAP website, July 26, 2000

Mike Jaccarino, “‘Training Simulation:’ Mass Killers Often Share Obsession with Violent Video Games,” foxnews.com, Sep. 12, 2013

Tracy Dietz, “An Examination of Violence and Gender Role Portrayals in Video Games: Implications for Gender Socialization and Aggressive Behavior,” Sex Roles, 1998

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-changing-culture/201212/yes-violent-video-games-do-cause-aggression

Also link to the kid I was talking about: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/11/30/an-11-year-old-played-grand-theft-auto-then-led-cops-on-a-high-speed-chase-in-the-family-car/

I can go on if you like but my point is made. There are far more than "two" articles on the correlation of violent videogames to IRL violence or actions in general. Media influences the mind, why do you think the CIA invested so much in anti-soviet propaganda in Hollywood?

>Yes

then you're a piece of shit
>Muh rape rates prove porn is fine.png
That fucking image is a garbage goal-post shifting strawman.
1) Japan's economy and repressed culture is, for a major part, the reason rapes are not high in occurrence. Instead the population suffers in other ways, for example people marrying vocaloids and body-pillows, with many males admitting that their first sexual encounters were their mothers etc. etc.
2) japan has literal place where you can hire 16 year old consorts and have them dress as schoolgirls
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/57eaaf23-0cef-48c8-961f-41f2563b38aa
3) Japan has a far higher HDI, the highest in the world in fact, while Britain is notorious for its poor living conditions compared to the rest of Europe.
>There are several studies
You just made a few statements and provided no actual citations or sources, just your own conclusions of supposed articles.
>Pansexual hypersexuality and compulsion rather than being exclusively pedophilic
That's moving gateposts
>There are several studies where they monitor the flow and erectile function of the penis
1) Chikatilo had literal erectile dysfunction, those measurements would be useless with someone like him
2) These are largely voluntary studies, people who are confident in themselves NOT reacting or are proud of the fact that they are paedos.

Lets see if someone else can explain the inherent problem of lolicon in general:
- https://medium.com/@Asmith1014/japans-loli-problem-8996849979b2
- https://www.clipzui.com/video/l3t4j5t2k3h5u363z416c4.html

I might post the studies I have later, but judging by your shite response… it probably won't be worth the effort
>>

 No.193

I feel like something that gets missed in this debate is that lolis exist on a spectrum of realisticness. Sometimes it's straight up creepy pedo shit, sometimes it's sort of a weird cuteness artifact from the parallel animu world. Like sometimes lolis are basically indistinguishable from other characters besides being small and flat-chested; the cuteness factor appeals and the flat-chested thing isn't necessarily pedo, plenty of adult women have that, and some bisexual people appreciate the androgyny.
>>

 No.194

>>193
>spectrum of realisticness
That's quite true, my statement about pedos is obviously aimed at actually realistic child bodies.

With a character like Koneko ( >>165 ) they're petite but not child-like
With obviously underage (et relatively realistic shit like >>166
>>168 >>169 it gets way worse.
With stuff like Lucky Star, you're a step away from fapping to some Phineas&Ferb tier shit so its more hyper-sexuality towards a drawing of shapes than pedoshit.
>sometimes lolis are basically indistinguishable from other characters besides being small and flat-chested
That is called being Petite, like I mentioned with Koneko.
It's quite different to an actual child character with obvious child-proporitions. That is the point being made in the pic from post >>184
>>

 No.195

File: 1608528762513.jpg (50.45 KB, 613x771, 1566576873822.jpg)

I am still going to post lolis. Go ahead and stop me.
>>

 No.196

>>195
The problem isn't lolis, its sexualizing them.
>>

 No.197

File: 1608528762609.png (96.55 KB, 683x700, 1576941961654.png)

>>196
I am going to do that too
>>

 No.198

>>197
Kutabare
>>

 No.199

File: 1608528762714.jpg (115.38 KB, 860x932, IMG_20191019_021504.jpg)

>>198
wwwwwww
>>

 No.200

File: 1608528762774.png (143.03 KB, 529x553, dd757e0f19c1f9daf9edd51a2b….png)

>>192
>Craig A. Anderson and Wayne A. Warburton, “The Impact of Violent Video Games: An Overview,” Growing Up Fast and Furious, 2012
Craig A. Anderson and Brad J. Bushman, “Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature,” Psychological Science, Sep. 2001

Because this could be an entire book in its own because of the massive ammount of citations and meta-analysis that this relies on I will just buy everything here as legitimate

-A lot of the violent game discussion IRL relies heavily in the egg and the chicken dylema where its not known if people with antisocial traits or violent traits use videogames for escapism or videogames produce antisocial people. The study tries to follow short therm and long therm behavior changes of people playing videogames long therm however the long therm meta analysis does not compare the behavior change in comparion of old aging people nor does it show the type of videogames they played or how many hours per week (mainly refering o figure 2 and 3) thorugh 40 years in two thousand fucking 3, which is a massive fucking issue considering extremely gory videogames havent been around for that long.
-This lists a wide array of not only supposed downsides but upsides as well
-This targets mainly kids with a compulsion of playing videogames 8+ hours

In the conclussion can be read: >In this chapter we have detailed the evidence that video games can
be used for a wide array of helpful purposes, but that there can be many negative consequences for playing violent games, especially when played excessively.

3- One of the charts used indicate the same correlation / likeness of being violent by playing videogames
or being a fucking male

>American Academy of Pediatrics, “Joint Statement on the Impact of Entertainment Violence on Children Congressional Public Health Summit,” AAP website, July 26, 2000

Which is included in the paper above and overlaps a lot of the same studies and authors do not deny the benefits of playing specifically violent videogames

in the paper that you quoted above:
>Perhaps the best brief summary of the evidence presented here
is articulated in a statement produced by 13 researchers into violent
video game effects (including the authors of this chapter)

Lastly I cannot for the love of god find anyone citing this book so its even harder for me to criticise or praise problems or good points because no one else has done the heavy lifting of disecting this, I suspect because it's not a scientific paper which bypasses a lot of the redflags that I just pointed out that would have preassured the authors of this chapter to go through a high publish low tier sci journo or being denied in a rigorous one

Seeing that you didnt even seem to question that or the fact that is a book not a scientific study and that the last link you posted in your retarded list is a fucking article in psychologytoday I am just not going to bother to read several pages for you

>Most japanese ppl are actually suffering because this reason

>I'll paint broad strokes by doing armchair psychology
Okay retard

>Japan has literal place where you can hire 16 year old consorts and have them dress as schoolgirls

And in the west teen idols and child beauty queens are a thing

I am not saying is cool but is not something Jpan has a monopoly on or that there is no equivalents in the west

>Chikatilo had literal erectile dysfunction, those measurements would be useless with someone like him

I really doubt that most serial offenders are Chikatilo
>These are largely voluntary studies, people who are confident in themselves NOT reacting or are proud of the fact that they are paedos.
The one I plucked out my ass like the studies you posted were made in jail with a pool sample of people in the category of "Denial of arousal with arousal"
>That's moving gateposts
How so
The people overlaping the pedo and loli shit were also compulsory hypersexual offenders which you can use to correlate anything since they basically would put their dick into anything

>I might post the studies I have later, but judging by your shite response… it probably won't be worth the effort

If the "studies" are like the first citation of that list then yeah don't bother
>>

 No.201

File: 1608528762868.jpg (41.51 KB, 600x417, Only cure.jpg)

>>200
>All this no-arguement nitpicking and bitching and strawmanning and goal-post moving to defend a fallacious position in a denialist defense of fucking drawn kiddie-porn and gun-fetish vidya.
&ltwhen you have nothing in life to do except to spam reddit-spaced arguments about how your consumption of a clearly capitalist product is totally legit and not a petty waste of time engaged in mind-rotting degeneracy.
Thank you for proving my final sentence correct, you aren't worth a damn, let alone my time and effort; arguing with a sophist is pointless.

I also thank you for proving why unironic weebs and /v/-tards deserve a GULAG sentence.
>>

 No.202

File: 1608528762923.png (553.62 KB, 1280x958, 2b8815b4438d656dafa3400240….png)

>>

 No.203

File: 1608528763025.jpg (158.89 KB, 850x1203, Mother Earth Chan.jpg)

>>202
Earth-chan is best mother
>>

 No.204

File: 1608528763084.jpg (302.15 KB, 2000x2717, 7233cc4b1ad9066ac00067c77d….jpg)

>>

 No.205

>>203
MODS MODS MODS MODS
>>

 No.206

File: 1608528763186.png (33.66 KB, 308x540, neu.png)

Epic thread, epic posters.

>>188
Imagine hating someone for something they didn't choose lmao. It's not like brains are complex structures and the paths formed are different for every person lmao.

Lemme let you in on a little secret bro: All human variation is natural human variation. Suckle on my double dinch brocesco.
>>

 No.207

>>206
Should we tolerate psychopaths too then?
>>

 No.208

File: 1608528763289.jpg (47.35 KB, 427x700, 1459870996544.jpg)

>>207
Lmao nice one dude, a real GOTCHA! They are people too tbh brochongo. What do you want to do with them? Kill them? Sounds like eugenics to me bro.

You can easily convince a psychopath that its within his/her own material interest to cooperate with and respect other individuals. I can't speak on this issue for them though, and they aren't a monolith. There are varying degrees of Antisocial personality disorder.
>>

 No.209

File: 1608528763343.png (83.46 KB, 435x445, sweaty fed.png)

>>206
>All human variation is natural human variation
Ah so cannibalism is fine then? Great! Let me call Cannibal Cafe and tell them they don't need to be underground anymore!
>hating someone for something they didn't choose
Except, unlike animals, we can choose. That's why a person who merely feels attraction to children but does not act on it, and someone who does are different, and the latter is a criminal, because as willful conscious beings, we have the awareness to NOT fuck everyone in sight like hormonal animals. Hedonism can go mount itself on a pole.
>the paths formed are different for every person
Except that generally the paths follow a certain trend and most people who are paedos are such minor outliers as to be dismissed.
>>208
>Eugenics
False equivalencies like that get you nowhere.
>You can easily convince a psychopath that its within his/her own material interest to cooperate with and respect other individuals
And they can also rationally reach such conclusions on their own, which is why many are able to become respected/powerful people.

Restraint exists and not using it is on you.// but go ahead bait-fag, keep stirring things up.
>>

 No.210

File: 1608528763413.png (102.51 KB, 624x434, 1555621647408.png)

>>209
>Ah so cannibalism is fine then?
Damn you really like hitting me with these gotchas bro. Natural is an abstract term, It doesn't mean it's "Good", It just means it "is". If someone tries to eat you, you are well within your rights as an individual to stop them. Just as If someone tries any other infringement It is within your rights to react. The word "Rights" here is not used in the state endowed/god endowed sense, but In the sense that you are free to do all that you wish, so long as you apply the will to do It.
>Except, unlike animals, we can choose.
The science is not so certain on this. Generally, we see that the subconscious makes the decisions, the thinking self makes the excuses for it.
>Except that generally the paths follow a certain trend
We are not Insular from the material conditions around us. You should know this. There is a social standard on how we should act, and generally we try to follow regardless of our personal desires or needs. For the vast majority of human history there was no "pedophilia" or at least, the distinction wasn't made from regular men. This is a recent trend. We can see through history that morals and morality change, they are fluid.
>False equivalencies like that get you nowhere.
But It's okay when you use them?
>Restraint exists and not using it is on you.
I'm all for restraint, what I'm trying to tell you that seething hatred for someone because of something they didn't choose isn't rational.
>>

 No.211

File: 1608528763481.jpg (142.32 KB, 1920x1440, but.jpg)

I'm a different poster, but
>>208
You can easily convince a psychopath that its within his/her own material interest to cooperate with and respect other individuals
What if it's not? It's often more efficient to lie and exploit than to engage in productive, prosocial behaviour. Add to that, many psychopaths exhibit high levels of sadism, and a lifelong desire to hurt other people. Non psychopaths are inhibited by a sense of morality and shame, and generally have less desires to abuse others.
>Sounds like eugenics to me bro
And? Why should we allow genetically determined traits, that cause murder, molestation, rape and the worst crimes against humanity to exist or even accumulate in the human population, just because they evolved through evolution?
To allow these traits to spread is not a morally neutral position, it is complicit in the generation of psychopathic abuse.
>>210
>For the vast majority of human history there was no "pedophilia"
It's pretty obvious your a pedophile, so there is no need to get defensive here or say something really stupid like 'pedophilia is just a made up term' Show me a single piece of evidence and then find a few more, that proves that
>For the vast majority of human history there was no "pedophilia" or at least, the distinction wasn't made from regular men. >This is a recent trend.
upon which I will discard it because we know today that sexual contact with children fucks them up for life. Therefore any attempt at slowing down moral judgement against heinous crimes with "muh moral relativity" is worth scorn and suspicion at best. It is to be brushed aside and the real meat of the problem.

Lolicon seems to me to be largely irremovable from pedophilia. I'm not sure if it increases paedophilic urges, or if it can help to control them, in which case it could have legitimate use to help keep pedophiles from viewing real child porn or sexually abusing children.
I would say pedophilia is a mental illness sort of issue, a potentially very dangerous, but still an involuntary condition. It should be treated medically before legally. Possibly pedophilia is curable or treatable with psychological treatment, or hormones/castration to kill the sex drive, while hopefully not interfering with an individuals quality of life otherwise.
>>

 No.212

File: 1608528763546.png (1.31 MB, 1594x2004, 79948297_p0.png)

>>

 No.213

>>210
>Natural doesn't mean good
No shit, and if you understand that, then what's your point? We're leftists, not "free-love" centrist liberals
>If someone tries to eat you, you are well within your rights as an individual to stop them
So then what the hell are you arguing for? And I'm wondering how a 5 year old can defend themselves against an adult reliably, while also being able to identify an adult as a threat.
>science is not so certain on this.
I think therefore I am. And urge or an instinct is not the primary driving force of our decisions, our mind is unless we end up in a stressful situation where the mind cedes to instinctual actions (fight or flight) this does not apply to soething like pre-meditated murder or paedophilia, unless you're very obviously mentally ill, in which case you are defunct.
Animal "paedos" tend to not survive long because
A) They run the risk of being killed by parent animals
B) they rarely cannot pass on genes as they're usually unsuitable mates
So even if paedos naturally can evolve, they are also outliers/accidents that are swiftly culled. But the existence of society makes this more complex.
>we see that the subconscious makes the decisions, the thinking self makes the excuses for it.
Who is we? Freud? The Id, Ego and Superego and other mental factors can only influence but not control the mind
>For the vast majority of human history there was no "pedophilia"
False. It has never been fine for humanity to have sex with under-aged persons, the reason being originally natural (they are not physically ready and therefore the sexual act and subsequent possibility of pregnancy is more likely to be harmful, not to mention the dangers a pregnant woman faced as hunter-gatherers)
>Muh social standards
Social standards arose not only from material conditions but from the very same instincts you keep referring to. Thus the largely patriarchal origins of societies, as men physically stronger and less emotional than women and also do not bear children. A sexual dimorphism that evolved; men large and cunning who can hunt and defend, while women are lighter and lither and thus able to pick up on details and take indirect approaches. This evolved over time into gender roles. The current over-saturation of society has made such roles become less defined, however this is more of a cancerous symptom of capitalism reaching its late stage than an actual problem with the roles.
>It's okay when you use them
Except that I did not, outside of irony and sarcasm.
> what I'm trying to tell you that seething hatred for someone because of something they didn't choose isn't rational
I don't have a seething hatred for them, I have a dislike for the content and attempts at apologia for it. By all means do what you want with your life, but don't try to defend it as something "fine" or try to normalize it.
>>

 No.214

File: 1608528763712.jpg (167.28 KB, 745x1000, 1535591750864.jpg)

I love lolis!
>>

 No.215

File: 1608528763802.jpg (41.57 KB, 471x480, 5688-607240001.jpg)

>>211
>It's often more efficient to lie and exploit than to engage in productive, prosocial behaviour.
Your own words. I have experience that the opposite is true.
>And?
Haha very cool. It's not murder if the person is something I don't like.
>Show me a single piece of evidence and then find a few more, that proves that
The definition of adulthood has changed over the millennia, a man marrying a young girl wasn't seen as something heinous, if she was on her menses, she was an adult. Simple.
>We know today that sexual contact with children fucks them up for life.
If you detach this from the material conditions of our time, sure. A culture has formed around this. Of course you're going to feel negatively about something If everyone around you is saying it's horrific and evil. Grooming works both ways.
>psychological treatment
That went so well for the gays lmao.
>hormones/castration
That also went so well for the gays lmao.

>>213
>I'm wondering how a 5 year old can defend themselves against an adult reliably.
This is still an issue when its illegal. People "do" regardless of what the law says.
>able to identify an adult as a threat
Education. Children can identify threats pretty well already. The ones you see on TV are the exception, not the rule.
>Animal "paedos" tend to not survive long
Animals don't care. Lmao. I guess all those dogs humping puppies gotta be put down :(((( Some male lions kill their own cubs so they can mate with the female again.
>Who is we?
Neuroscience. https://www.nature.com/articles/477023a
>It has never been fine for humanity to have sex with under-aged persons
Except when it was. The average life span of a human in the cro-magnun period was 18 years, but I'm sure they waited as long as possible before they got in there. In anglo saxon society, adulthood started around 11-12 years. Not pedophilia by the actual meaning of the word, but the current social definition includes everyone under the AoC. In other societies, sex or at least marriage with girls even younger than that was seen as normal.
>Muh gender roles
Uh oh. This doesn't explain The matriarchal societies and gender neutral societies that formed. So what your saying is, we should railroad everyone into gender roles, just because it is the natural and moral thing to do? Please tell me, what in the fuck is the point of any leftist society if no one is allowed to self actualize, except for the people who fit your narrow vision of the perfect humanity? What makes you any different from a facist?
>Except that I did not
You really did.
>I don't have a seething hatred for them
Yes, you do. Pretending otherwise doesn't make your arguments any more valid, just stop.
>By all means do what you want with your life
And I shall. No concessions to tyrants.
>>

 No.216

>>215
>Animals don't care
Tell that to the bear that tears your head off for being near its cubs by accident (let alone on purpose).
>In anglo saxon society, adulthood started around 11-12 years
Out of the fact that people died very young and there was a pressing, unhealthy need for child-birth, not to mention 11-12 is pushing the envelope to its limits when the average was 14-15, an age that isn't legal today but is certainly adolescent.
Honestly what are you trying to even argue?
>Yes, you do
No I don't. I hate actual paedophiles who ACT on their urges, because they deserve it, I'd say you'd understand if you ever cared for a child, but I would fear for their safety with you. I also don't hate you, you're just an anon to laugh at.
>No concessions to tyrants
&ltHelp help I'm being oppressed
Paedos who act on their urges get the bullet, no-one cares about your opinion and you'll find a large number of people, anarchists or MLs will condemn you.
>Muh gender neutral societies
name one of any prominence that arose around the same time period as Egypt, Mesopotamian cultures or Indus Valley civilizations. Esoteric tribes that have "third genders" for their girly boys are outliers.
>Matriarchal societes
Name one. Mayan, Incan, Aztec, Egyptian Babylonian, Assyrian, Mongolian, Japanese, Greek, Roman, German, Anglo-Saxon, Chinese, etc. have all been patriarchal. The Amazons are mythologious and are more than likely a single small city-state out of hundreds and thousands. Outliers are not proof
>dogs humping puppies
1) Not a regular occurrence and certainly not on the watch of the mother.
2) This is a sign that the dog is under stress and being treated incorrectly.
>Education
&ltAt 5
Yeah you're a retard. Children below the age of 12 are not capable of making their own decisions because they cannot properly interpret fiction from reality. This is why advertising got cracked down on in the 90s, because an adult is going to be cleverer than a 5 year old… not even mentioning the fact that any average adult can grab and restrain a child with minimal difficulty.
> In other societies, sex or at least marriage with girls even younger than that was seen as normal.
Marriage and sex is not the same thing.
>People "do" regardless of what the law says
&ltHurr People still kill even with a criminal law so no need for law
The presence of a law
A) Forces someone to mentally reckon with it before going through with it.
B) Allows a justice system to prosecute a crime on the basis of the law.
FFS this basic fucking legal understanding, Not even basic criminology.
>Neuroscience
&ltPosts opinion article of something not declared to be proven
Holy fuck you're that "Free will don't exist" faggot who got BTFO months ago.
>railroad everyone into gender roles
&ltMuh evul gender roles
Oh get stuffed you butthurt contrarian. People are influenced by their material conditions, Hammer away a feminist liberal agenda focused on "fugg de roles" and people will follow that, because that's what they think is hip and progressive. Yet the net result is a clear negative in regards to women's conditions. Women in the 1950s, for all their Stepfordisms and the patriarchy had lower suicide rates and better living standards than women in the decades following. Compare this to the USSR, where labour for women was allowed from the beginning yet gender roles were accepted as something natural, and changes in said roles could not be forced. Gender roles are normal and are statistically in the majority. Even in a lesbian couple there is generally a more feminine and submissive person and a more dominant and masculine one, because gender roles are complementary and not just some arbitrary construct. It's not something like a fashion trend that just becomes popular, it is inherently natural because one role supports the other and vice-versa.
>what in the fuck is the point of any leftist society if no one is allowed to self actualize
&ltUgh I can't self actualize unless I act like a contrarian butch dyke for no reason because fuck everyone but my (selfish) self
&ltUgh I can't self actualize unless kids are legal!
I'd say get bent, but you'd enjoy that. Being leftist doesn't mean being a hedonistic libertine, and since everyone is working for the common good, they are supposed to take everyone else into account when doing something that affects others.

Not that poster but might as well address this:
>It's not murder if the person is something I don't like
You're ignoring the fact that crimes are tried through legal process, and thus if killing is the punishment, that makes it an execution.
>If you detach this from the material conditions of our time
LMAO are you seriously trying to claim that "trauma" is caused by material conditions and not the rape?
>A culture formed around this
Around what? The sanctity of self-ownership and consent? the proven fact that children cannot give said consent? Part of the entire socialist movement is based on the fact that Capitalism violates these principles and yet people still believe in them despite both Capital and Feudal systems abusing them.
>That also went so well for the gays
&ltimagine comparing pedophiles to homosexuals
Yeah you're either a troll or a genuine arse
Also
&ltImplying that homosexuality isn't pandered to in the West to make people accept more and more libertine shite.
Homosexuality is hardly optimal, but most people have a problem with flamboyant faggots, and child-predators, not with people who are just gay in their private life.
>Grooming works both ways
Ah so you're also a "parents groom their kids" shill. Good to know

Regardless this is my final response. Feel free to continue flailing angrily about how paedos are "normal" and just like the gays, and that gender is a construct and other idpol rubbish. Just remember, this is an anonymous online forum. Try pushing your shit in real life and "concerned citizens" will react…
>>

 No.217

File: 1608528763932.jpg (68.9 KB, 1200x630, indoctrination.jpg)

>>216
>Tell that to the bear that tears your head off for being near its cubs by accident (let alone on purpose).
That has literally nothing to do with pedophilia.
>Out of the fact that people died very young and there was a pressing,
I've seen pedophiles use this as justification for it being natural. Fact is, even in societies with higher than average for the time life spans, they still practiced it.
>when the average was 14-15
In roman society. Even then they still married them younger in some cases.
>I'd say you'd understand if you ever cared for a child
You know nothing.
>I also don't hate you, you're just an anon to laugh at.
Haha yes I am laughing at you bro, I am very cool headed and not angry right now!
>no-one cares about your opinion and you'll find a large number of people, anarchists or MLs will condemn you.
Sure, but I've got nothing but support from people IRL, so that's to be seen. Larpers posturing as tough men on the internet =/= society at large. I'm not a hypocrite, I believe in the emancipation of all people.
>Gender/sex garbo
And the majority of society being something does not make it an inherent good and natural. If this is so, then it stands that capitalism is a fantastic system because the majority of people live in capitalistic societies. So unfortunate that chauvinistic patriarchal societies keep doing a genocide on people who don't fit their world view.
>Not a regular occurrence and certainly not on the watch of the mother.
Riiight…
>This is a sign that the dog is under stress and being treated incorrectly.
Wow fuck, all the dogs I've seen must be under stress cause they seem to hump eveything they see lmao.
>Children below the age of 12 are not capable of making their own decisions because they cannot properly interpret fiction from reality.
What? What in the fuck? That isn't even remotely true, maybe for toddlers it is but that is some serious fucking bullshit. Have you ever even talked to a child before? Also It is extremely easy to tell them that If a man in a van asks you to hop in, you don't. A concept so simple, a 5 year old could understand.
>The presence of a law
Literally means nothing. They don't exist, not outside our minds. This crypto-spiritual bullshit is cancer. Most people break the law multiple times in their life, usually without any care.
>Marriage and sex is not the same thing.
"No sex before marriage" They consummated their love, actually, I'm sure the man just waited patiently before he slid his meat down the hole.
>Holy fuck you're that "Free will don't exist" faggot who got BTFO months ago.
Not me. Also, there are references and other articles you could look up about this.
>Oh get stuffed you butthurt contrarian.
Pot calling the kettle black lmao. Let me say this: Any new system you make, basing it's morals on the old system, will inevitably look like the old system. You are complicit in the exploitation of individuals, just because it is their "role".
>Being leftist doesn't mean being a hedonistic libertine
Yeah, but it also doesn't mean making humanity carbon copies of one another, alienated and struggling within. Never being able to achieve maximum potential because they are too pained from bottling their emotions.
>that makes it an execution
He was defending eugenics. Context.
>LMAO are you seriously trying to claim that "trauma" is caused by material conditions and not the rape?
Nice one dude, actual rape is an infringement. Statutory doesn't mean it's forced. It's only rape from a legal standpoint. Again, this can't be separated from the material conditions of our time. I should point out here that I think manipulation, coercion and lying with malicious intent are infringements and should be punishable.
>Around what? The sanctity of self-ownership and consent?
Self ownership for me and not for thee.
>the proven fact that children cannot give said consent?
That's what society says, yes.
>Yeah you're either a troll or a genuine arse
So why bother saying that it's not the same when you don't like homosexuals and think it's a slippery slope. Just come out as a fascist already, It's not healthy to repress yourself.
>Ah so you're also a "parents groom their kids" shill. Good to know
No, not parents. Society. See pic attached. We are all indoctrinated and groomed to be perfect consumers and align with current thinking.
>idpol rubbish
Jesus H. Christ. Labels label me not. We are all individuals and trying to neatly fit us all into groups and files is counter-productive. Because a label can never truly represent a person and their needs. I wish we could remove all of them and rather express ourselves as individuals within a larger collective and not conform the expectations of labels.
>Try pushing your shit in real life and "concerned citizens" will react…
I have, I'm still here.

Just another internet tough guy to yeet on. Let me ask you a question. Have you ever tried to kill someone? To fly into a rage and pursue the death of another, to see the absolute horror and fear of death in the eyes of another living thinking being. Catching yourself in the moment and feeling absolute disgust in oneself coming to a realization of the true horror of this world. Seeing the moment over and over and fucking over again for the rest of your life. That shit changes you. With all this big talk about killing and reaction, It's clear to me you never have. Do you fantasize about it?
>>

 No.218

File: 1608528763993.jpg (362.72 KB, 715x1000, 3853d138e5e05a5a33ea60c076….jpg)

Shut the fuck up and post flat chests
>>

 No.219

File: 1608528764066.jpg (187 KB, 850x1205, sample_cca3068da04692c1e4b….jpg)

>>218
Soz, ruined a thread for no good reason.
>>

 No.220

File: 1608528764124.jpg (31.14 KB, 634x358, achshually puberty starts ….jpg)

>>215
Mate your trying to defend having sex with children. Humanity has largely moved out of the barbarity of socially accepted abuse to the extent of child molestation or similarly damaging practices like slavery. I gave you a way out with psychological treatment or hormones/castration. You can take it or leave it, but just know that once you get discovered as a pedophile that's going to be a mercy.

I don't expect you to suddenly consider the rights of other people, the main reason I'm replying to you is to shame you, and feed my own ego.

That being said I will reply to your arguments as well:
>I have experience that the opposite is true.
then you haven't met many skilled manipulators, which I doubt consider your weaseling nature here.
>It's not murder if the person is something I don't like.
Eugenics could be more efficiently employed for example, through a program of screening for pedo genes and sterilizing or editing the genomes of pedophiles. Pedophiles obviously shouldn't have children, regardless of your "opinions" here. Child molestors can be executed for efficiency, if society and the victims deem them unworthy of rehabilitation.
>The definition of adulthood has changed over the millennia, a man marrying a young girl wasn't seen as something heinous, if she was on her menses, she was an adult.
Yes and were never bringing that back, your fantasizing about repealing century old child protection acts so you can have sex with young girls that totally want to lose their virginity to some neckbeard pedo, is frankly disgusting.
>If you detach this from the material conditions of our time, sure. Grooming works both ways.
No
>That went so well for the gays lmao.
DAE pedophilia is the same and equally dangerous as being gay, and should be treated the same?
>This is still an issue when its illegal.
>Bro we should just decriminalize child molestation, it will be better when it's legal bro.
>People "do" regardless of what the law says
But that's wrong you fucking retard. People are inhibited by the law, people draw social boundaries around the law, although in this case no one would support pedophilia if the laws were changed.
Just look at what happened in Russia, after the security apparatus started to fall, and living conditions crashed. All of the sudden child sex exploitation increased massively, after children were made homeless and the threat of arrest was made lower. Under a socialist society we have the option of closing the gaps on discovering child sex exploitation, and eliminating pedo genes from the gene pool. Pedophilia can be done away with completely, and I don't give a fuck if you think that's a human rights issue.
>Education. Children can identify threats pretty well already.
No they can't retard.
>The ones you see on TV are the exception, not the rule.
>it's okay for vulnerable children to get molested.
No, but it's okay to gas child molestors.
>Animals don't care
Ahh yes, most animals are known to be completely indifferent to other creatures handling their young.
>actually 40 000-10 000 years ago humans had an average life expectancy of 18 years so pedophilia was probably a thing.
18-20 average life span includes a very very high amount of miscarraiges and infant deaths, Most people would have lived longer than that if they managed to reach adulthood. I think it's likely that children in prehistoric times would have matured faster, given there was no need to learn more advanced skills and life knowledge, in addition these were young people having sex wih other young people, not adults. I had girlfriends in my teenage years, and that worked out fine, but they would tell me all the time when creepy adult men would hit on them, and how disturbing that was. I've had to tell off plenty of "ephebophiles" before.
>In anglo saxon society, adulthood started around 11-12 years.
fucking anglos
>11-12 years. Not pedophilia by the actual meaning of the word
and now we know your age preference, jesus.
>rees over discussion of gender roles
this has got to be bait.
>Please tell me, what in the fuck is the point of any leftist society if no one is allowed to self actualize, except for the people who fit your narrow vision of the perfect humanity? What makes you any different from a facist?
Holy guacamole, cope harder on the way to gulag, nonce, your not tricking anyone, you have zero fucking self awareness.
>And I shall.
No you won't, the second your outed as an aspiring/child abuser, and you will be, your life is completely outside of your control. Forever. Your existence then, is only at the will and judgment of the justice system.
>>216
>Paedos who act on their urges get the bullet, no-one cares about your opinion and you'll find a large number of people, anarchists or MLs will condemn you.
This. IRL everyone will condemn you. There is no hope for pedos trying to normalize sex with children, or hijack the workers struggle.
>Being leftist doesn't mean being a hedonistic libertine, and since everyone is working for the common good, they are supposed to take everyone else into account when doing something that affects others.
Agreed.
The common good comes before selfish interests from angry pedos.

Glad to see someone else speaking up against this nonce apolagia shit.

Try pushing your shit in real life and "concerned citizens" will react…

Pls do pedo poster, it would make our work simpler.

>>219
You ruined a 2d some what pedophilic thread to rant about how your oppressed for not being able to have sex with kids. Actually please feel shame for once, and don't kill yourself before you get v&.

Also wait a minute
>typing and formatting style
>ignoring arguments and attempting to grift your agenda through sophism
>no your the guilty one
>blogposting
>triggered by talk of eugenics
>randomly trying to promote tolerance of psychopathy/aspd
>soz

ahh it's you ASPD-kun
Yes after this cringe I am most definitely taking your balls, and your internet posting priviledges.
I had a feeling you were a pedo lol. I wonder if that's what you got arrested for.
>>

 No.221

File: 1608528764190-0.jpg (224.52 KB, 1232x1532, 39b9d39770d05463512f85f7a0….jpg)

File: 1608528764190-1.jpg (266.7 KB, 640x896, 0fcb7ef6354616cc4fa6f03b6d….jpg)

File: 1608528764190-2.png (322.21 KB, 1303x1455, 457c7e00eeaaa8661674a60bd1….png)

>>220
go argue here >>>/leftypol/503554
this is 2D thread
>>

 No.222

>>217
>literally nothing to do with pedophilia
&ltmother bear preventing you from possibly harming her cubs in any way (such as rape and murder)
Ok fag
>pedophiles use this as justification for it being natural
Except it isn't it was a measure of survival lik e the way primitive people revert to things like cannibalism and ritual sacrifice.
>Even then they still married them younge
Marriage is not the same as sex. Its just a written document saying "you two are now a couple by law, bye". Also, considering the loathsome debauchery Roman nobles were known for, this is not commendable.
>even in societies with higher than average for the time life spans, they still practiced it.
This was practiced regularly into the 1500s, when life-spans among the poor were low.
>chauvinistic patriarchal societies
Cry harder, false equivalencies do not an argument make.
>Right
Indeed, I've interacted with dogs on the regular, have you?
>fuck, all the dogs I've seen must be under stress cause they seem to hump eveything they see
1) Most dogs in America ARE stressed, because people baby them and treat them like a cool toy to play with. This is demonstrated very well in the Dog Whisperer, where Caesar Milan explains what behaviors cause what negative actions
2) We are talking about puppies specifically; chairs, people's legs etc. are common… puppies, not so
>That isn't even remotely true
Yes it is. Children can be very easily manipulated. Nobody said they cn't understand a glaring lie when they seee one, but that's not what I said.
https://www.apa.org/pubs/info/reports/advertising-children
>Literally means nothing
&ltthe law which shapes societal actions
Ok dumbass

How do you function? You seem too stupid to exist…. then again I've seen worse from /pol/
>>

 No.223

>>222
BASED lad
>>

 No.224

File: 1608528764416.jpg (266.18 KB, 850x1202, sample_897c5da7b6437aea7f7….jpg)

>>

 No.225

File: 1608528764483-0.png (1.12 MB, 1254x1770, 0dd54a2c19479d6f8c899d018c….png)

File: 1608528764483-1.jpg (928.16 KB, 1234x694, 57173511_p0.jpg)

File: 1608528764483-2.jpg (352.13 KB, 1143x1000, 37929330_p0.jpg)

>>

 No.226

File: 1608528764652-0.jpg (311.86 KB, 1448x2048, 2b6833de686d6c5d5a55d7d15f….jpg)

File: 1608528764652-1.jpg (1.1 MB, 2480x3508, 45246bf0fd51f93f185f83e429….jpg)

File: 1608528764652-2.png (1.28 MB, 1974x2301, 4ceb9fa06bea2d65b4349b3aeb….png)

>>

 No.227

File: 1608528764867.jpg (59.94 KB, 640x640, BAMP13-HSPrhngeKWlKO66kKqD….jpg)

>>222
>humans r bears bro!!!!
Shit dude, I guess human women get extremely violent when anyone or anything goes near their kids, because we iz juss be the same as da bears!
>Except it isn't
What is the definition of natural?
>Marriage is not the same as sex.
No, but It gives permission for sex.
>Also, considering the loathsome debauchery Roman nobles were known for
It wasn't just practiced by nobles.
>This was practiced regularly into the 1500s, when life-spans among the poor were low.
And?
>Cry harder, false equivalencies do not an argument make.
Nigga, why? Just because male dominated societies got big first doesn't mean they are the "natural order" or our truly supreme god given way of life.
>Indeed, I've interacted with dogs on the regular, have you?
Everyone has interacted with dogs, doesn't make you an expert in dog psychology.
>Nobody said they cn't understand a glaring lie when they seee one, but that's not what I said.
You said they can't tell the difference between reality and fiction. That is a massive statement, my brocesco, and goes way further than "can be manipulated".
>Ok dumbass
Seethe harder.
>How do you function?
Pure male rage.
>>

 No.228

File: 1608528764943.gif (481.04 KB, 197x198, 1f94851a-3d76-4316-8c34-c2….gif)

>>220
Your turn, big boy.

>Mate your trying to defend having sex with children.

Look how ridiculous u r bro!
>Humanity has largely moved out of the barbarity of socially accepted abuse to the extent of child molestation or similarly damaging practices like slavery
>slavery
LMAO
>I don't expect you to suddenly consider the rights of other people
Don't you literally want to take away people's rights?
>then you haven't met many skilled manipulators, which I doubt consider your weaseling nature here.
I am a font of pure dialectical thought. Calling me a weasel is extremely offensive.
>through a program of screening for pedo genes and sterilizing or editing the genomes of pedophiles
It's not hereditary. And eugenics has been long dismissed as psuedoscience, but sure tell me how you know more than the scientific community and why they're all wrong.
>Yes and were never bringing that back, your fantasizing about repealing century old child protection
>century old
It hasn't even been that long, femme.
>No
Yes.
>DAE pedophilia is the same and equally dangerous as being gay, and should be treated the same?
Not what I was saying. Gays that got chemically castrated usually killed themselves, and those who underwent conversion therapy were usually found balls deep in another man not long after.
Im telling you It doesn't work, you can't just mind break someone to make them something they're not. It's not sustainable.
>Bro we should just decriminalize child molestation, it will be better when it's legal bro.
Straw-manning me is pretty unwholesome.
>But that's wrong you fucking retard.
It's literally true. Unless you were some stick in the mud, straight and narrow goodie twoshoes. Everyone I know has commited crime. With no regrets.
>and eliminating pedo genes
It's not genetic.
>it's okay for vulnerable children to get molested
Strawman x2. I didn't say It was okay, If you seriously got that from what I said, you lack reading comprehension. What I am telling you Is that the kids you hear about are not in the majority. The majority of kids know not to trust strangers, and travel in groups.
>Ahh yes, most animals are known to be completely indifferent to other creatures handling their young.
That's true for most reptilians, actually, but that wasn't my point. The point is that animals don't draw an artificial barrier between biological adulthood and social adulthood. If you dtf, you dtf.
>I think it's likely that children in prehistoric times would have matured faster
Nice speculation based on literally nothing.
>in addition these were young people having sex wih other young people, not adults
Penis in vagoo is still penis in vagoo. These day's it's still illegal if they're both kids, and they both get put on the offender's register.
>but they would tell me all the time when creepy adult men would hit on them
"all the time" okay lmao. When did you grow up, femme?
>fucking anglos
Wow, that's racismus.
>and now we know your age preference, jesus.
Big yikers bro, my AoA is actually 50-69
>this has got to be bait.
You are bait, baby.
>Holy guacamole, cope harder on the way to gulag, nonce, your not tricking anyone, you have zero fucking self awareness.
My self-awareness is maxed out bro. I am physically incapable of coping. Also nonce is anglo slang. Fucking anglos.
>No you won't
I will, tbh. Please keep in mind that people around me know my sexual preferences. There has been no problemos so far.
>hijack the workers struggle.
Literally no. The struggle for the workers takes far greater priority over anyone's sexual preferences. This is just an image board, friend. A post here isn't indicative of any conspiracy top shoehorn sexuality into the greatest struggle of our time.
>You ruined a 2d some what pedophilic thread to rant about how your oppressed for not being able to have sex with kids.
"Ruined" So you thought it was good before I posted? :^) My initial post in this thread was a short reply to the drama already in thread. I didn't really expect to get two big eugenicist bois to come and gang bang me.
>ahh it's you ASPD-kun
Literally who? Look man, I'm not really much of an active poster. If there's anyone you think I am, I'm not. Please don't go harassing people because you think I'm them.

I thought this was dead and buried. Oh well. This is the final post to end the saga, let them post the 2d In peace now.
>>

 No.229

File: 1608528765003.jpg (44.18 KB, 389x398, stop embarassing yourself.jpg)

>>227
>>228
>All this garbage text wall and crap memes
&ltNo fucking argument just deflection and excuses
&ltposting here instead of the linked leftypol thread actually relating to your pro-pedo topic
Get out.
>>

 No.230

File: 1608528765090-0.png (7.75 MB, 2508x3541, 742701766aab64584d3c120444….png)

File: 1608528765090-1.jpg (257.75 KB, 1430x2048, f08268255b4012a966f9723852….jpg)

File: 1608528765090-2.png (380.32 KB, 879x1048, 8991fb6e4d77190a0a43c83620….png)

>>

 No.231

Uuuuuuuuuuuh yeah can I get some flat chests but then adults and not child proportions cool thanks. Flat chest tall girls plz.
>>

 No.232

File: 1608528765506.png (309.09 KB, 753x1200, 386144ce030da87e9dc8d8ce22….png)

How flat is flat enough?
>>

 No.1282

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiZ8dcMJneU

trapman ads presents

a loli with a huge fucking dick
>>

 No.1283

>>231
There's an anime about a tall flat-chested girl who fights a lot to keep up her confidence over her lack of breasts.
>>

 No.1288

File: 1608528837886.png (244.29 KB, 710x609, loligagging.png)

>Be me, get curious about other boards other than /hobby/ and /leftypol/ and here
>Everything is dead… including /dead/
>Decide to lurk on /GET/ for a few minutes
>Only real active board is /trash/
&ltHow fitting
>Oh well, maybe it'll be like /trash/ was on 8ch/leftypol/, that was a fun place. Heard Tomoko poster was there
>Scroll through thread…
>Can feel myself losing braincells, scroll faster
>Go for the newest ~50 posts
&ltnone of the charm that /trash/ had
>MFW It's all a set of porn, horny posting and lolicon/gay shit
&ltall backed with the most autistic screeching I have heard since 8ch/a/ kicked the bucket
&ltfaggot and nigger are filtered because "muh slurs" because its radlib central now
>MFW Tomoko poster has gone around the bend worse than Ba'atko when he went liberal
>MFW this is the second most active board
&ltIt's like /b/, /d/ and /lgbt/ fucked each other and somehow anally gestated a deformed monstraosity
>MFW /GET/ is the older board
&ltFuck this, I want /GET/ to go back to being what it was 2 years ago.
To all you lolicons in this thread… I'm sorry. I still hate your guts, but honestly I'll take honest to god lewds to that brain-dead mess. Peace niggas.
>>

 No.1298

File: 1608528838601.png (109.13 KB, 305x323, akari smug.png)

>>1288
&ltBe me
>>

 No.1299

File: 1608528838700.png (528.56 KB, 1000x1000, get out of GET.png)

>>1288
&ltfaggot and nigger are filtered because "muh slurs"
Newfag detected
kys those are historical 4chan wordfilters
>>

 No.1301

>>

 No.1302

>>1283
oooh which one
>>

 No.1303

File: 1608528838954.jpg (19.06 KB, 320x241, wrong belong.jpg)

>>1299
>Newfag detected
&lthistorical filters
>>

 No.1304

>>1302
Okami-San and Her Seven Companions
>>

 No.1326

>>1303
>Posts le ebin meme
Funny XDDDD
>>

 No.1328

>>1326
COPE HARDER
>>

 No.1334

>>1328
you are actually retarded, aren't you
>>

 No.1338

File: 1608528841174-0.jpeg (141.71 KB, 990x1400, EIM9mQEXYAI1-WQ.jpeg)

File: 1608528841174-1.jpeg (168.48 KB, 956x1450, EIM9mQFXUAAyznS.jpeg)

File: 1608528841174-2.jpeg (126.13 KB, 732x1100, EIM9mQGWwAAMCXf.jpeg)

>>

 No.1339

>>1334
>No argument
C.O.P.E faggot
>>

 No.1340

>>1338
Can someone explain the appeal here? I genuinely don't get it with these 3 pics
>>

 No.1343

>>1340
They're very cute.
Why are you in this thread even? What the fuck is wrong with you?
>>

 No.1344

>>1340
Benis go into bagginia
>>

 No.1345

>>1343
I like petite grills, I just don't see why cute needs lewd stuff attached… the girl looks dead-inside… its terrible.
>>

 No.1355

>>1339
>>1303
>>1328
>>1339
>doesn't know about the historic wordfilters
>muh cope
Hey newfag maybe you should look at this.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/4chan-word-filter
>>

 No.1356

File: 1608528842194.jpg (748.85 KB, 834x1204, 918729766c2afd98e8043f3bd4….jpg)

>>1345
that's just the kuudere look, you're projecting the dead inside stuff
>>

 No.1357

>>1355
>4chan-word-filter
&lt4CHAN
you're a retard, stop.
>>

 No.1358

>>1356
I know that shit m8, its just the 3 genuinely look horrible and I don't know why.
>>

 No.1366

>>1358
It's their eyes (small/obscured pupils) and the colour.
>>

 No.1367

>>1358
Maybe because of the chains and the band-aids?
>>

 No.1369

>>1366
>>1367
Yeah probably this is why. Sorry for going on about this, it sort of just bugged me for some reason; that annoying niggling in the back of your head that won't go away until you find an out.
>>

 No.1371

>>1369
Don't worry bro, I don't like that kind of porn either.
>>

 No.1385

File: 1608528844290.jpg (278.29 KB, 1047x1565, 811254c6e67336fefe7cb16be7….jpg)

>>

 No.1404

File: 1608528845608.jpg (422.47 KB, 1542x976, 917128a9dc717f101d0435bdfb….jpg)

>>

 No.1414

File: 1608528846495-0.jpg (242.23 KB, 620x753, ef4c39654986a9ccb5197a21bf….jpg)

File: 1608528846495-1.jpg (131.38 KB, 1195x1666, 80097c174e933a317e14669645….jpg)

File: 1608528846495-2.jpg (398.26 KB, 2892x4096, 40056ce4e8a32786c30835b647….jpg)

>>

 No.1725

File: 1608528865986.mp4 (119.6 KB, 480x360, 0f47d8dcc2bbe2252a68427b26….mp4)

>>1414
>Lewding Jahy in her child form
>>

 No.1727

>>1725
>can't tell difference between reality and fantasy
>muh thoughtcrimes
also, there's no "Lewding" happening anywhere in those pics
>>

 No.1728

>>1727
Not him but
>tell difference between reality and fantasy
is a shitty fucking argument
On the otherhand
>here's no "Lewding" happening anywhere in those pics
is a good argument.
>>

 No.1729

>>1727
>Getting this defensive over some dumb gulag joke
You alright buddy?
>There's no lewding
She's basically showing her ass in the second and third pic.
>>

 No.1845

File: 1608528873227.jpg (676.19 KB, 3541x5016, __jahy_jahy_sama_wa_kujike….jpg)

>>1729
stop looking at it, pervert
>>

 No.1855

>>1845
Please post more anon
>>

 No.1856

File: 1608528874072-0.png (1.39 MB, 1053x1666, 5a32a8649486022f51c81fdcf6….png)

File: 1608528874072-1.png (623.01 KB, 665x912, 4ede7167ae2f39a98483f13fe2….png)

File: 1608528874072-2.jpg (153.18 KB, 1157x1700, f543ece0e7edf84358421bf1d5….jpg)

>>

 No.1876

File: 1608528876087-0.png (563.04 KB, 820x1158, __cirno_and_tanned_cirno_t….png)

File: 1608528876087-1.png (1.18 MB, 1204x1700, __cirno_and_rumia_touhou_d….png)

File: 1608528876087-2.pdf (11.72 MB, 127-Article Text-449-5-10-….pdf)

2D=3D normalfags need to read Galbraith.
>>

 No.1887

File: 1608528877301-0.jpg (85.49 KB, 686x900, 30ee2f2443b503ed2c102b063d….jpg)

File: 1608528877301-1.png (2.49 MB, 1500x2273, 00f6501b8b2e0178647c84218c….png)

File: 1608528877301-2.jpg (608.51 KB, 755x1000, 6a5a3919376a9b1b923dba5afa….jpg)

wish I had an ice fairy to keep me cool..
>>

 No.1888

>>1876
Fuck off and stop reviving dead arguments with opinionshite.
>>

 No.1895

>>1887
more Cirno please, thanks
>>

 No.1896

File: 1608528878224-0.png (729.12 KB, 1000x1415, 1550781212122.png)

File: 1608528878224-1.jpg (2.62 MB, 2028x2700, 5aece3c967a8c2b1ab23fc3f74….jpg)

File: 1608528878224-2.jpg (412.11 KB, 1920x1200, cbb858a83a1ed2c1775308f754….jpg)

>>

 No.1905

File: 1608528878995-0.jpg (398.85 KB, 707x1000, 843dc13daaf721fe2926f5c03b….jpg)

File: 1608528878995-1.png (630.15 KB, 750x1062, f2a6fc915fe74da6fd9eb17931….png)

File: 1608528878995-2.jpg (377.43 KB, 1280x1817, d4e350347bff718a324e55719a….jpg)

>>

 No.1906

Cirno is cute.
>>

 No.1912

File: 1608528879992-0.jpg (654.25 KB, 1000x1415, 1520248700557.jpg)

File: 1608528879992-1.jpg (121.9 KB, 1000x1500, 1521131706022.jpg)

File: 1608528879992-2.jpg (380.42 KB, 1187x1920, 1521131775843.jpg)

>>

 No.1913

File: 1608528880106-0.jpg (258.2 KB, 425x600, 1520376801851.jpg)

File: 1608528880106-1.jpg (1.08 MB, 1200x1600, 1520377629103.jpg)

File: 1608528880106-2.jpg (98.57 KB, 576x768, RUAb_1cuvJCdcpXLxeoF-UnL1g….jpg)

>>

 No.1914

File: 1608528880216-0.jpg (75.96 KB, 597x1024, 1552936794532.jpg)

File: 1608528880216-1.jpg (90.08 KB, 650x933, 926a87de2a2ca72747dadf02d9….jpg)

File: 1608528880216-2.jpg (129.79 KB, 845x1284, 1525130560363.jpg)

>>

 No.1916

File: 1608528880373-0.jpg (1.53 MB, 1240x1754, f5889ad9f407baf85890dc9527….jpg)

File: 1608528880373-1.jpg (232.8 KB, 840x940, 2481cb14e91e1e6de4588fd622….jpg)

File: 1608528880373-2.jpg (74.26 KB, 590x742, 1311222005812.jpg)

>>

 No.1918

>>1914
Only pic 1 is NSFW though. You do realize you can spoiler images individually?
>>

 No.1919

>>1913
>Zero 2
Pathetic
>>

 No.1923

>>1916
delicious, Cirno is so sweet
>>

 No.1924

File: 1608528880956.jpg (259.95 KB, 990x1400, b228e51dc60494f44ba264fa34….jpg)

>>

 No.1925

>>1924
Sorry to spoil this. I was checking to make sure the new spoiler pic is working,
>>

 No.1927

>>1925
why is she so oily?
>>

 No.1932

>>1927
Sunscreen.
>>

 No.1935

File: 1608528881747-0.png (247.09 KB, 630x996, f0c9b0f783d293eb440f8b52d0….png)

File: 1608528881747-1.jpg (279.05 KB, 600x720, a380efd3e54d4fcabef19d7a1c….jpg)

File: 1608528881747-2.png (3.95 MB, 1500x2128, f1e86e06168aace28a11bc0afe….png)

>>

 No.1998

File: 1608528886379-0.png (4.03 MB, 2200x1553, 82640ae9850d0c38b5ce2dd8d3….png)

File: 1608528886379-1.png (2.85 MB, 3000x1750, a6145c0f93622b0bf090864cf7….png)

File: 1608528886379-2.jpg (1.01 MB, 3541x2962, 9e3b1e32a4fb8cccbc76a266f1….jpg)

>>

 No.1999

File: 1608528886739.webm (4.91 MB, 480x270, 1412073775488.webm)

>>

 No.2028

File: 1608528888852.jpg (588.08 KB, 1616x1074, 9860c4762600a1a6786d0ff9a0….jpg)

>>

 No.2038

>>1404
>>2028
Who is the artist?
>>

 No.2040

File: 1608528889705.jpg (169.8 KB, 1050x1120, e6d7d8392dff503150badf7086….jpg)

>>

 No.2047

>Flat == Loli
Why.
>>

 No.2050

>>2047
nonces gonna nonce
>>

 No.2107

File: 1608528894264.jpg (1.28 MB, 1469x1096, c99b4451232fb9973f4ffccc43….jpg)

>>

 No.2286

File: 1608528905866-0.png (1.76 MB, 1158x1637, cf70110129a0cb4c6cdbb06559….png)

File: 1608528905866-1.png (2.8 MB, 1430x1923, 66f4042468f24abffd7e59bb22….png)

File: 1608528905866-2.png (1.27 MB, 1158x1637, 2b53e9bda8284aa26a59dd4e13….png)

>>

 No.2306

File: 1608528907369.jpg (1.18 MB, 2480x3508, 1596810998769.jpg)

>>199
thanks! it means alot to me
>>

 No.2309

>>2040
cute
>>

 No.2310

>>197
you're a legend
>>

 No.2376

OH GOD….. OOOOOOHHHHHH…… MY.. GOD..
I'M… I'M NOOOONCIIIINNNNGGGGGG AAAAAHGGGGGGHHHHHGGGHHHH
>>

 No.2419

File: 1608528916057.png (374.37 KB, 796x1024, 54869332dfe267840dac4d55fc….png)

>>

 No.2491

>>219
Who's the artist?
>>

 No.2503

File: 1608528921377-0.jpg (66.52 KB, 623x820, 83605634_p0_.jpg)

File: 1608528921377-1.jpg (92.62 KB, 567x876, 73247878_p0_.jpg)

File: 1608528921377-2.jpg (76.68 KB, 557x836, 78488370_p0_.jpg)

>>

 No.2505

>>2503
thicc lolis are a blessing upon this world and there should be more of them
>>

 No.2695

File: 1608528935073-0.png (343.51 KB, 752x1062, 29ef844442c885048ad78d8c0a….png)

File: 1608528935073-1.jpg (59.07 KB, 512x386, bebf2b14c1a058c3f39d24dd41….jpg)

File: 1608528935073-2.jpg (465.22 KB, 707x1000, 0eb1b85fc67b0602b2753d8b4c….jpg)

>>

 No.2749

File: 1608528939241.png (562.23 KB, 893x1200, 23747bdab7dee29aba678a0c9f….png)

>>

 No.2876

File: 1608528947803.png (260.04 KB, 424x1026, 1528649356122.png)

>>2505
Yes!
>>

 No.3012

File: 1608528957666-0.jpg (106.88 KB, 850x1190, 3e62165f5a418a1f82a95ae342….jpg)

File: 1608528957666-1.jpg (219.74 KB, 1000x1500, c16bbf59fe01c207dc0cb4f2e3….jpg)

File: 1608528957666-2.jpg (90.56 KB, 620x840, ef5dbb3d9cc85ac53eada2cdf6….jpg)

>>

 No.3104

File: 1608528964188-0.jpg (375.28 KB, 823x1169, __original_drawn_by_ryouma….jpg)

File: 1608528964188-1.png (1.1 MB, 1500x1027, 433d9bc2f60e60d3f99ee4e40b….png)

File: 1608528964188-2.jpg (747.25 KB, 1528x1080, 3990f7e411605c0199d1d9992d….jpg)

>>

 No.3303

File: 1608528978910-0.jpg (76.24 KB, 552x849, 74427865_p0_.jpg)

File: 1608528978910-1.jpg (81.26 KB, 614x869, 77577427_p0_.jpg)

File: 1608528978910-2.jpg (81.7 KB, 612x787, 82823572_p0_.jpg)

>>

 No.5655

good thread
>>

 No.5658

Advertise this place at bunkerchan.xyZ/Anime .
>>

 No.5676

Wrong
See >>233
>>

 No.5677

>>5676
Based
>>

 No.5694

Spoiler?
>>

 No.5719

File: 1609963953874.png (942.43 KB, 1362x1521, 0a032f37ed40bb12cda9756f1d….png)

>>5694
Importing the thread took all the spoilers
>>

 No.5724

No spoilers on the loli could be a positive for some posters.
>>

 No.5733

File: 1610253488904.jpg (37.43 KB, 712x673, hardol.jpg)

>delicious
>nothing to even suck on
>>

 No.5734

File: 1610265337065.jpg (136.71 KB, 827x1624, pas astolfo.jpg)

>>5733
>nothing to even suck on
Anon how did your' father breast feed you as a child?
>>

 No.5803

File: 1610960062182.png (212.29 KB, 600x906, 56339901_p7.png)

Reminder that when a flat-chested girl hugs you she's holding you closer to her heart.
>>

 No.6097

File: 1613878356247.jpg (121.48 KB, 682x1000, etna.jpg)

uoh
>>

 No.6098

>>5734
At least Astolfo and my father have a dick
>>

 No.6099

>>6098
So that's what you're sucking on.
>>

 No.6351

File: 1615305450994.gif (15.35 KB, 220x170, LA PICARDIA GRACIOSA DE NI….gif)

*breathes in*
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>

 No.7841

File: 1622301383445.jpg (316.64 KB, 670x1500, cca4f07b91f9f5056b6dbd3965….jpg)

>>

 No.7853

>can't perform the sacred art of paizuri
smh
t. boober enjoyer
>>

 No.7854

>>1916
I want to breed cirno
>>

 No.7855

File: 1622362592746.jpg (471.07 KB, 850x602, 530217e6ae3eb49db53557cfc9….jpg)

>>

 No.7856

File: 1622362713969.png (1.07 MB, 999x1399, 06735c8eefec8e2b30e657744b….png)


Unique IPs: 14

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music ] [ meta ] [ GET / ref]