>>215>Animals don't care
Tell that to the bear that tears your head off for being near its cubs by accident (let alone on purpose). >In anglo saxon society, adulthood started around 11-12 years
Out of the fact that people died very young and there was a pressing, unhealthy need for child-birth, not to mention 11-12 is pushing the envelope to its limits when the average was 14-15, an age that isn't legal today but is certainly adolescent.
Honestly what are you trying to even argue?>Yes, you do
No I don't. I hate actual paedophiles who ACT on their urges, because they deserve it, I'd say you'd understand if you ever cared for a child, but I would fear for their safety with you. I also don't hate you, you're just an anon to laugh at.>No concessions to tyrants
<Help help I'm being oppressed
Paedos who act on their urges get the bullet, no-one cares about your opinion and you'll find a large number of people, anarchists or MLs will condemn you.>Muh gender neutral societies
name one of any prominence that arose around the same time period as Egypt, Mesopotamian cultures or Indus Valley civilizations. Esoteric tribes that have "third genders" for their girly boys are outliers. >Matriarchal societes
Name one. Mayan, Incan, Aztec, Egyptian Babylonian, Assyrian, Mongolian, Japanese, Greek, Roman, German, Anglo-Saxon, Chinese, etc. have all been patriarchal. The Amazons are mythologious and are more than likely a single small city-state out of hundreds and thousands. Outliers are not proof>dogs humping puppies
1) Not a regular occurrence and certainly not on the watch of the mother.
2) This is a sign that the dog is under stress and being treated incorrectly.>Education
Yeah you're a retard. Children below the age of 12 are not capable of making their own decisions because they cannot properly interpret fiction from reality. This is why advertising got cracked down on in the 90s, because an adult is going to be cleverer than a 5 year old… not even mentioning the fact that any average adult can grab and restrain a child with minimal difficulty. > In other societies, sex or at least marriage with girls even younger than that was seen as normal.
Marriage and sex is not the same thing. >People "do" regardless of what the law says
<Hurr People still kill even with a criminal law so no need for law
The presence of a law
A) Forces someone to mentally reckon with it before going through with it.
B) Allows a justice system to prosecute a crime on the basis of the law.
FFS this basic fucking legal understanding, Not even basic criminology.>Neuroscience
<Posts opinion article of something not declared to be proven
Holy fuck you're that "Free will don't exist" faggot who got BTFO months ago. >railroad everyone into gender roles
<Muh evul gender roles
Oh get stuffed you butthurt contrarian. People are influenced by their material conditions, Hammer away a feminist liberal agenda focused on "fugg de roles" and people will follow that, because that's what they think is hip and progressive. Yet the net result is a clear negative in regards to women's conditions. Women in the 1950s, for all their Stepfordisms and the patriarchy had lower suicide rates and better living standards than women in the decades following. Compare this to the USSR, where labour for women was allowed from the beginning yet gender roles were accepted as something natural, and changes in said roles could not be forced. Gender roles are normal and are statistically in the majority. Even in a lesbian couple there is generally a more feminine and submissive person and a more dominant and masculine one, because gender roles are complementary and not just some arbitrary construct. It's not something like a fashion trend that just becomes popular, it is inherently natural because one role supports the other and vice-versa. >what in the fuck is the point of any leftist society if no one is allowed to self actualize
<Ugh I can't self actualize unless I act like a contrarian butch dyke for no reason because fuck everyone but my (selfish) self
<Ugh I can't self actualize unless kids are legal!
I'd say get bent, but you'd enjoy that. Being leftist doesn't mean being a hedonistic libertine, and since everyone is working for the common good, they are supposed to take everyone else into account when doing something that affects others.
Not that poster but might as well address this:>It's not murder if the person is something I don't like
You're ignoring the fact that crimes are tried through legal process, and thus if killing is the punishment, that makes it an execution.>If you detach this from the material conditions of our time
LMAO are you seriously trying to claim that "trauma" is caused by material conditions and not the rape? >A culture formed around this
Around what? The sanctity of self-ownership and consent? the proven fact that children cannot give said consent? Part of the entire socialist movement is based on the fact that Capitalism violates these principles and yet people still believe in them despite both Capital and Feudal systems abusing them.>That also went so well for the gays
<imagine comparing pedophiles to homosexuals
Yeah you're either a troll or a genuine arse
<Implying that homosexuality isn't pandered to in the West to make people accept more and more libertine shite.
Homosexuality is hardly optimal, but most people have a problem with flamboyant faggots, and child-predators, not with people who are just gay in their private life. >Grooming works both ways
Ah so you're also a "parents groom their kids" shill. Good to know
Regardless this is my final response. Feel free to continue flailing angrily about how paedos are "normal" and just like the gays, and that gender is a construct and other idpol rubbish. Just remember, this is an anonymous online forum. Try pushing your shit in real life and "concerned citizens" will react…