>>4531>Doesn't post sources/links
<waaaaaaah spoonfeed me because I can't use catalog and search!!!!
Fucking redditors>Bourgeoisie morality; a philosophy birthed to excuse current conditions or one given to by a higher bound.
Fine. Bourg morality is shit, that still doesn't discount the existence of morality., nor the logical component >the body that children have is also the same with other adults
No, have you SEEN a child's anatomy or do you have the observational skills of a crosseyed clown? This is not some subjective view, this is a morphological, biological fact. The body of a child is different to an adults, and to be attracted to a drawn version, is functionally the same.
<inb4 Lucky Star or some other shit
Those aren't lolicon shit because they're not even human shapes, the same way Phineas and Ferb barely represent humans, it's getting off to a set of colored rough shapes than an actual huan body (as well as some being aroused by the concept of a character being under-age). >Which you don't even bother linking in the thread or even toss in points they had
Because it's tiresome, this discussion has been had and finished months ago. If you want it so bad look it up. CTRL+F is not that hard to use>wikipedia for moralism
1) wikipedia is shit
2) Moralism is a PHILOSOPHY which is not the same as an ideology. >we can just call it liberalism
I agree that liberalism is bad, but see LIBERALS and capitalists are the ones arguing FOR lolishit and alternatively pedoshit. >isn't an argument.
I mean neither was your false equivalency, that's the point, you made a false comparison creating a false argument to back your claim.