/b/ - Random

This is the regional military commands of the United States and the regional military commands of the People's Republic of China.

Even if you think China has a couple examples of belligerent foreign policy, how do you think these are even remotely comparable?

I used to like this movie when I was still undergoing edgelord phase as newly recruited wage slave in manual labour setting. It was one of few films I watched more than thrice as I liked sober 90s aesthetics and I liked Pitt's performance.

I tried to watch it again recently but realized I could not really enjoy it and I had to quit it by mid act.

I'm still trying to understand why my attitude toward this film changed so much over few years and I suspect two things.

1. My attitude toward women changed by a lot. I was not incel per se but I was struggling in relationship department as I didn't know how to make comfortable around me for a long time. Now I'm much more comfortable with myself and didn't have much trouble talking to one or befriending one that lead to intimate moments.

Then I realized I worked in radically different environment from 90s or early 2000s. There are visibly more women in every sectors. There are wage gap but it's diminishing rapidly and I wouldn't be surprised if majority of women actually achieve financial independence as economical function of marriage is becoming obsolete.

This two factors reshaped my understanding of 'feminist' movement and masculinity. I am not saying women can do no wrong. I personally know of few incidents where they abused their newly found political / societal leverage to their unfair advantage. I wasn't target of such 'attack' but I am well aware of its existence and hope for its constructive resolution as we progresses toward new equilibrium.

What I cannot stand however is reassertion of masculinity as antithesis or reaction against rise of women in sociopolitical sphere. Not only do I sense weakness and schizophrenic inconsistency in their appeal to authority/nature, I never benefited from 'male dominant' atmosphere and I have little incentive to back their propaganda.

And I don't want to chimp out in 'safe space' exchanging punches with insecure retards. That's not what I need or want.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

No but seriously, why?

Hello, my fellow workers.

I tired hearing about my old man & uncle worshipping Beatles like they're so genious or something (like "hurr durr without Lennon the Beatles won't shine, no it was Ringo bla bla bla, no it was sir Paul etc etc")

They indeed made some songs about the working class but also sort of embracing idpol. My pa & uncle, both of them are libs (They unironically worship billionaires & believe in self-made man). So how do you think about the Beatles? Were they libs or not?

PSA (I don't want to really talk about music taste, but this is something that had annoyed me recently)

If Sonic the Hedgehog were to commit a crime against humanity, which do you think it would be?

Бей жида политрука, рожа просит кирпича!

Post your based or cringe MP4, WEBM files here

Previous thread: >>1041002

'One can always produce the theoretical discourse that amounts to saying: in any case, sexuality can in no circumstances be the object of punishment. And when one punishes rape one should be punishing physical violence and nothing but that. And to say that it is nothing more than an act of aggression: that there is no difference, in principle, between sticking one's fist into someone's face or one's penis into their sex …. [T]here are problems [if we are to say that rape is more serious than a punch in the face], because what we're saying amounts to this: sexuality as such, in the body, has a preponderant place, the sexual organ isn't like a hand, hair, or a nose. It therefore has to be protected,surrounded, invested in any case with legislation that isn't that pertaining to the rest of the body' - Foucault

Feminists and Simps forever seething.