[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/edu/ - Education

Learn, learn, and learn!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon


File: 1653163299194-0.png (30.86 KB, 1002x77, but muh mud pies.png)

File: 1653163299194-1.png (42.55 KB, 1004x119, human labor power.png)

 No.10747

>>982469
>Any basic study of economics shows you the stupidity of the LTV

anyone who says this

1. has not even read volume 1 of das kapital

2. confuses value and price

3. has unironically used the mud pies argument, insisting that marx is saying that worthless labor creates use value, even though he has said the opposite (pic 1)

4. thinks capitalists reinvest profits in the company even though profits are defined as whatever the capitalist pockets *after* dealing with business expenses and maintenance costs and paying off investors and workers.

5. thinks capitalists "deserve" the surplus value because they "took on risk"

6. thinks subjective theories of value are more scientific than labor theory of value, because again, they are confusing price with labor.

7. imagines that marx is ignoring the use values of natural resources, or thinks that Marx "didn't consider" natural resources at all (pic 2).

8. Imagines that automation disproves LTV even though Marx writes endlessly about the effects of automation upon value, price, and profit.

9. Thinks differing skill levels at particular forms of labor disproves LTV, doesn't realize that there is a "social average" of "necessary labor time" needed to produce a commodity, and that the division of labor has all but eliminated the need for skilled artisans in most areas of work. And besides, skilled labor is simply labor that has itself accumulated labor value in the form of years of experience.

 No.10748

you are a crying soyjak, consider yourself debunked

 No.10749

additional reference

 No.10750

Shouldn't you post this in the >>5576 or >>4210 theads?

 No.10751

>>10747
where do those picture quotes come from?

 No.10759

you don’t need to debunk every last thing some idiot says on the internet

 No.10773

>>10759
not OP but this particular idiocy pops up again and again so I think it's worthwhile


Unique IPs: 5

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]