Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 19:51:40 No. 11206
no. read marx
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 20:07:42 No. 11207
marx didn't "predict" things, he described and criticized political economy. That said there are 21st century guides on reading his books, like David Harvey's "companion to capital."
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 21:43:03 No. 11208
>>11207 He did make predictions, you cumrag. What about the prediction that the amount of workers would increase and their conditions would continue to worsen until revolution was inevitable?
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 22:09:28 No. 11210
>>11207 >>11207 >like David Harvey's "companion to capital." Bad advice. Harvey rejects the LTV
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 22:15:44 No. 11211
>>11210 he doesn't. if you listen to his lectures he explains how marx himself rejects ricardo's labor theory of value and marx introduces "socially necessary labor time" which is a more nuanced version of ricardo's theory, and handles all the bourgeois objections to LTV. so no. harvey believes marx came up with a better LTV. he does not reject Marx's LTV, he rejects ricardo's LTV
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 22:18:00 No. 11212
>>11208 marx is not a seer. his predictions are general. he doesn't provide a date which is why OP's question is irrelevant. he mentions general trends but never suggestions anything would happen "by the 21st century"
what marx was primarily set out to do was criticize bourgeois political economy and build a framework for scientific (i.e. non utopian) socialism.
Anonymous 2022-07-11 (Mon) 22:41:32 No. 11213
shit thread
Anonymous 2022-07-12 (Tue) 03:27:27 No. 11221
>>11213 >uuhhhh shid thred dont reply <in the process of saying this, he replies what did he mean by this?
Anonymous 2022-07-12 (Tue) 04:45:10 No. 11223
>>11205 bro he's not nostradamus
Anonymous 2022-07-12 (Tue) 11:47:31 No. 11224
>>11221 it's a shit thread
what do you want me to say
Anonymous 2022-07-13 (Wed) 00:08:53 No. 11228
>>11205 Jairus Banaji's
Theory as History