Anonymous 2021-05-07 (Fri) 10:29:42 No. 5606
>>5604 Thank you, I already got the first recommendation.
Anonymous 2021-05-07 (Fri) 21:14:22 No. 5607
>>5604 >Clausewitz, On War. based
Anonymous 2021-05-07 (Fri) 21:17:16 No. 5608
>>5604 >>5607 basically this
Anonymous 2021-05-10 (Mon) 15:46:20 No. 5663
bump
Anonymous 2021-05-13 (Thu) 18:32:39 No. 5693
bump.
Anonymous 2021-05-20 (Thu) 22:13:55 No. 5746
bump.
Anonymous 2021-05-21 (Fri) 15:40:23 No. 5770
I love war and want to know the strategies
Anonymous 2021-05-22 (Sat) 12:29:36 No. 5778
>>5771 >Pull your aim down as you spray to compensate for recoil that's smart
But what's a jiggle peak
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 14:37:49 No. 5964
Do we know how Trotsky was good at war? Where did he get trained
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 14:45:50 No. 5965
I have another question that I've always wondered
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 20:08:31 No. 5972
>>5965 >Is a tactic bad because it is well known? No, definitely not. It should be assumed the enemy can read the same books you can.
>Are the lessons still worth learning? I think they are. It's been a long time since I read it but there are ideas there like:
>Appear weak when you are strong, appear strong when you are weak. So basically it's about managing information. Now isn't that very timely?
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 21:14:10 No. 5973
>>5972 It is.
I'm going to read it now
I have one question about the enemies with the same knowledge and tactics
Who comes out on top? Would it be just a flip coin's chance of either one's victory?
The one with the most discipline to the old ways wins or the one who finds a way to deviate and create a new path through the blueprint wins
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 21:42:31 No. 5977
>>5973 >I have one question about the enemies with the same knowledge and tactics >Who comes out on top? Would it be just a flip coin's chance of either one's victory? war could be seen as a game of imperfect information. Both sides are seeking for more information to strategize and exploit around.
Sometimes the information is bad, and you really can't account for that.
Even if a general knew whole armies could fit into a swamp, would he really put forward resources to scout it?
Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 21:45:52 No. 5978
>>5973 >Who comes out on top? The one with the superior logistics and resources.
Anonymous 2021-07-23 (Fri) 13:42:23 No. 6543
>>5978 sure those two are important but it's not just one or two things.
>>5973 Anon I suggest you read up on asymmetric and guerilla warfare, as well as insurrections and other smaller and other more niche topics. There are plenty of ways in which a small and poorly equipped army can defeat a larger and stronger foe
Anonymous 2021-07-23 (Fri) 13:43:06 No. 6544
>>6543 I meant to say smaller and niche types of conflict
Anonymous 2021-07-23 (Fri) 15:05:27 No. 6545
>>5978 >The one with the superior logistics and resources. "Captains think tactics, colonels think strategy, generals think logistics."
(To which one might be tempted to add something like "ministers think diplomacy.")
Unique IPs: 1