It's on libgen as a djvu…
It's even on archive.org, uygha you need to work on your web searching skills.https://archive.org/details/the-iceman-inheritance/
Sounds about scientific racism
It does seems to be bit "Yakubian"
So I bothered to read through this and it's just straight up race science, like Richard Lynn style stuff but written in reverse.
But it's a scientifically accurate inverse of white race science that was used to subjugate my ancestors. So I would have to kill you for trying to disagree with it. If you had an infant son I'd put an ice pill through the soft spot of his head while you were forced to watch than I'd beat you and force feel you his brains and you wouldn't be able to do suit due to my raw strength. I'd sit your head open if you dared to resist.(This is a (white) pol psycho astroturfing btw.)
Garbage book that tries to do the same shit as /pol/ 'race realism' but in reverse. Beyond Sakai-tier nonsense.
black people have every right to hate white people and it is a fact that western european nations robbed the African continent and oprsssed the people, but this is just fucking cringe
casting white people as this race of born conquerors who are pre-disposed to subjugate and conquer is pathetic and actually makes black people as a whole look bad
It reminds me of a similar book, It was called something along "Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D." and was about how the black race will be always conquered and subjugated by the "white"(in that guy's version Arab and Berbers were also white and only got dark cause they raped african women)
>The Destruction of Black Civilization took Chancellor Williams sixteen years of research and field study to compile. The book, which was to serve as a reinterpretation of the history of the African race, was intended to be ""a general rebellion against the subtle message from even the most 'liberal' white authors (and their Negro disciples): 'You belong to a race of nobodies. You have no worthwhile history to point to with pride.'"" The book was written at a time when many black students, educators, and scholars were starting to piece together the connection between the way their history was taught and the way they were perceived by others and by themselves. They began to question assumptions made about their history and took it upon themselves to create a new body of historical research. The book is premised on the question: ""If the Blacks were among the very first builders of civilization and their land the birthplace of civilization, what has happened to them that has left them since then, at the bottom of world society, precisely what happened? The Caucasian answer is simple and well-known: The Blacks have always been at the bottom."" Williams instead contends that many elements—nature, imperialism, and stolen legacies— have aided in the destruction of the black civilization. The Destruction of Black Civilization is revelatory and revolutionary because it offers a new approach to the research, teaching, and study of African history by shifting the main focus from the history of Arabs and Europeans in Africa to the Africans themselves, offering instead ""a history of blacks that is a history of blacks. Because only from history can we learn what our strengths were and, especially, in what particular aspect we are weak and vulnerable. Our history can then become at once the foundation and guiding light for united efforts in serious[ly] planning what we should be about now."" It was part of the evolution of the black revolution that took place in the 1970s, as the focus shifted from politics to matters of the mind.
>>9827>black people have every right to hate white people and it is a fact that western european nations robbed the African continent and oprsssed the people, but this is just fucking cringe
So is race real or not? If race is just a social construct then how do you have the right to hate people over it? If whites aren't genetically primed to kill black people then blacks really don't have a right to hate them
>>9830>If whites aren't genetically primed to kill black people then blacks really don't have a right to hate them
Not that I agree with the conclusion, but that wouldn't be the only premise to lead to such a conclusion.
I think I wasn‘t quite clear in what I said. I tried to say, I‘m not saying black people are in the right to hate white people, but it’s silly to think that only in the scenario where white people are biologically predisposed to attack black people they would be justified in hating white people. Central and western Europeans created race theories and the labels „black“ and „white“ in which they placed black people at the bottom of this racial hierarchy (an idea that actually stems from Arabs and was adopted by the Spanish due to their colonization by Arabs) to justify the brutality and exploitation towards non-whites to satisfy their economic interests. Europe (the east excluded) and its colonies dehumanized other kinds of people in the truest sense of the word, afflicting especially indigenous and black people. When Africa gained its independence the West used it‘s power to overthrow African governments and continue to exploit Africa, many of the issues like food insecurity and corruption being a product of the West, while in places like Europe they tell themselves they are aiding Africa. Black people also experience racism in the West by white people, but not just white people, and if they bring it up, they are met with backlash reactions from white society, who prefer to think it‘s an issue of the past. I mean I‘m not even done with list, but black people feeling frustrated towards white people is pretty justified.
You use the same censorship tactics to defend protected minorities and shut down opposition that the liberals use.
delirating again, seek medical assistance.
i appreciate the concern, but i'm doing fine. It's funny to me that you say conservatives and liberals are the same, yet the same could be said about your group.
that is because you are suffering schizophrenic illusions and seeing everything as the same thing, like i told once, find a doctor.
>>9832>an idea that actually stems from Arabs and was adopted by the Spanish due to their colonization by Arabs
surprised this isn't well known, modern european racial science came from arab racial ethnography which was based on vauge explanations in the Toral that were expanded upon
basically in their version all white and brown people(Greeks, Arabs, Spanish, Romans) were the same race, decadents of Shem, the default race basically, that had the best traits of all, all black people, southern Indians and SEA's were sons of Ham and every Turkic raider or someone with small eyes were sons of Japheth
Abū’l-Ghāzī wrote the Shajara-i Tarākima>that recount the origins of the Turks. The account begins with descent from Adam to Noah, who after the flood sends his three sons to repopulate the earth: Ham was sent to Africa, Shem to Iran, and Japheth went to the banks of the Itil and Yaik rivers and had eight sons named Turk, Khazar, Saqlab, Rus, Mongol, Chin, Kemeri, and Tarikh. As he was dying, he established Turk as his successor
You just used the word „race“ but is that the proper term when discussing the categories that were conceptualized by Arabs? As you‘ve just said, they are the descendants of a specific origin. In old German one would refer to that as „Geschlecht“. Not sure what the proper terminology is in English.
There are two way to look at these works
as Satire this would be hilarious, cause it's taking racial pseudo-science that was developed by racists and using it against white people without ever changing it
Casting whites(and incidentally Arabs) as a barbaric conquering people who can only steal and subjugate, like how the Krags were presented in Earth Sea
as satire this works well, but taking it as fact, well then this is just spouting pseudo-science to make yourself feel good
what's funny is that a lot of these afro-centrists turn white people into basically supermen, all of them super brutes and genetic freaks who are just genetically disposed to conquer other races and they will always win
Frances Cress Welsing for e.g believed that If white people were allowed to exist they would always come out on top, you'd expect some German Nazi to say this shit, but it came from black proto-Hotep who believed the Egyptians were black until the white Assyrians and hitties, Persians conquered and destroyed black civilization and raped black women for generations to create the modern "brown" Egyptian people
it's not satire, a lot of black petty bourgeois unironically think this. they invert white supremacy to make themselves feel better about it. they'll advocate european style patriarchy and frame it as a dig at the white man. i guess it's just an assimilation strategy