[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/games/ - Games

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon


 No.19431

Who tf would take this dumbass game seriously? The color pallet and set design is cartoonish, the character and weapon designs are cartoonish, the sound design is cartoonish, the game takes no skill to play a problem compounded by the limited movement mechanics which makes aimbotting deadly and the overwatch concept of ults is fucking idiotic and doesn’t work because nothing else about the mechanics in this dumbass game work either ahahahahahahaha the fucking cover art says it all about this csgo wannabe

 No.19436

Might help if you identified your game OP.

 No.19439

>>19436
It’s valorant

 No.19440

>>19439
never heard of it

 No.19442


 No.19449

Okay. So the game is made to appease stake-holders. But it's just a fun little game to play with some satisfying teamwork innit. What's the big deal?

>cartoonish bad

Why?
>wanting to be like other game bad
Why?
>ult mechanics don't work
In practice or theory?

 No.19452

>>19449
>cartoonish bad
Personal preference. I like edgy bloody, gory games with dark colour pallets and valorant can’t make up those personal faults with its mechanics
>wanting to be like other game bad
Yes because it does everything csgo does either the same or worse
>put mechanics don’t work
Because it’s designed as a competitive shooter you don’t want your opponents at the last second to fast an attack you can’t do shit to defend against randomly that’s fucking awful to put up with

 No.19454

File: 1656263163157.jpg (207.2 KB, 1242x1394, a80.jpg)


 No.19455

>>19452
>personal preference
So why is it bad?
>either same or worse
Well… which is it? It can't be both now cannit?
>Because it’s designed as a competitive shooter you don’t want your opponents at the last second to fast an attack you can’t do shit to defend against randomly that’s fucking awful to put up with
Can you retry that sentence, this time in english?

 No.19457

>>19455
>why is it bad
I just fucking said personal preference I can understand that other people can like it
>either the same or worse
I’m referring to those mechanics as if they were individuals not as if they were all the same hence why some mechanics are either Z good or shittier than csgos
>rewrite in English
Competitive shooters shouldn’t have ultra because that makes matches decided by which legends the most broken at any time during the games history not off player skill

 No.19458

>>19457
>comp shooters shouldn't have X because… I don't like it
Okay. I understand you now. Still unsure what porn or cringe are reflecting in your vernacular.

 No.19463

>>19458
Look up the fandom

Like any other and like overwatch it’s awful. But I still stand on my belief about character based attacks being fucking awful in competitive shooters, an example of when this goes bad is the banning of ice climbers in smash melee as they had an attack called wobbling, an infinite true combo that got them banned from nearly every tournament in North America as there was no way to actually parry it. I’m not under the belief valorant is ever gonna be perfectly balanced and sure as hell it’s not gonna maintain consistent balance for a long ass time without frequent occurrences of mass DCs from frustration at some new broken legend or mechanic introduced

 No.19467

>>19431
I like the game actually. Its basically the only game I play.
I dont give a fuck about lore, about character names, I don't give a fuck about anything really. Its a free game and I play it unranked, fool around, I am constantly joking about shit, its just fun.

Counter strike games are way too serious and the skill of some people is absolutely insane. I just want to fool around and have fun.

 No.19490

>>19463
>but the fandom
Do you know what the word fan stands for? What it means?

You naming a different game is irrelevant. Wobbling should be legal in top64. IF there was no way to parry it, why has no icies ever won a major? Oh because your bullshit knowledge on a game that isn't even applicable here isn't even valid to begin with.

 No.19493

>>19490
>why have no icies ever won a major
Because last time one got close but queued up against a jiggly puff main and the entire match was then standing around until both of them got kicked because if either did anything they’d be locked in an infinite

 No.19499

>>19490
because wobbling was banned as the same time as stalling,and they have no counter to a peach/jigglypuch touching themselves on the ledge/below the stage.

 No.19514

>>19490
Fly Amanita won Press Start in the version of reality that only exists in my own head.
also Chu Dat won BoBC2 over m2k but idk if the rest of the bracket was deep enough to count as a major
You're right that wobbling isn't some OP unstoppable move, though. A flat-out full ban was a mistake. But that guy was also talking about the difficulty of balancing character abilities/ults. Imbalance of those things isn't inherently bad, however I can see it being a problem (to some people) if the most powerful ability at a given time isn't just strong or overcentralizing, but somehow obnoxious - for instance, mechanics that bring the whole game to a halt. Like the days of the Quick-Fix meta in competitive TF2. Boy, it sure is fun to push into a Heavy on last for 30 minutes.


Unique IPs: 12

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]