/hobby/ - Hobby

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email\|_^[~m-x{9`Kh⛚6QC⚞M.o;a/SjzR♤ <$0w:&U#ZX*7Y ?nObE☔k>f)sp(☢ABl!♾J☖2vre☸c]TDN5I84☺\=t%WVq@'1F3G♆u
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1613839910866.png (866.92 KB, 1280x768, gaze.png)

Kino Anonymous 02/20/21 (Sat) 16:51:50 No.14306

>the man's gaze
>the placement of the bottle
What did Tarkovsky mean by this?

Anonymous 02/20/21 (Sat) 17:19:13 No.14307

Isn't this Solaris?
If so the answer should be obvious if you've seen the film to the end

Great movie btw.

Anonymous 02/20/21 (Sat) 17:36:33 No.14308

>>14307
It is indeed Tarkovsky's Solaris.

Yes, of course I've seen it end to end but I want to know what you think about this scene.

Anonymous 02/20/21 (Sat) 22:39:25 No.14311

Haven't seen it yet, but is this going to turn into a Soviet film thread? That'd be pretty cool.

Anonymous 02/21/21 (Sun) 12:18:40 No.14316

Was Tarkovsky a Marxist?

Anonymous 02/21/21 (Sun) 22:45:39 No.14336

>>14316
his kinos sure were dialectic as all fuck

Anonymous 02/22/21 (Mon) 03:23:40 No.14344

>>14308
I've only seen it once, more than ten years ago. Where to get kino movies?

Anonymous 02/22/21 (Mon) 04:50:27 No.14345

>>14306
Man, that movie was incomprehensible to me.

Unique IPs: 5

Delete Post [ File] Password

Reason