Why did ISIS run to Africa of all places? And why west Africa?
>>2098138>>2098138>ISIS and other groups have taken advantage of that.…and who has a history of creating or controlling Jihadi groups?
Like military, think tank, diplomatic and intel figures openly talking about it.
>Bouteflika also defeated the Western project to create a “Sahelistan,” which would have been formed to the detriment of Algeria, Mali, and Niger. This para-Islamic state, in the image of the Gulf States, would have confiscated the rent extracted from exploitation of petroleum, uranium, and other minerals for the exclusive benefit of its emirs. The project was completely in line with the objectives of the U.S. strategy of domination.
>De Gaulle had entertained the idea of a “Grand French Sahara.” But the tenacity of the Algerian FLN and the radicalization of Mali under the Union Soudanaise of Modibo Keita put an end to the project for good in 1962–63. Today, the Sahelistan project is not French—even if Nicolas Sarkozy did come to support it. It is a plan formulated by a loose nexus of political Islamist groups and benefits from the possibly favorable view of the United States, followed by its European Union lieutenants.
>“Islamic” Sahelistan would allow for the creation of a large state covering a good part of the Sahara found in Mali, Mauritania, Niger, and Algeria, an area endowed with important mineral resources: uranium, oil, and gas. These resources would not be available mainly to France, but primarily to the dominant powers of the triad (the United States, Europe, and Japan). This “kingdom,” modeled on Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Emirates, could easily buy the support of its scattered population, and its emirs could transform the fraction of the rent left to them into vast personal fortunes. The Gulf remains, for the triad powers, the model of the best ally/useful servant, in spite of the fiercely archaic nature of its social system, based in part on slavery. The established governments in Sahelistan would refrain from supporting acts of terrorism on their territory, without necessarily refraining from possibly supporting them elsewhere. France, which had succeeded in preserving out of its abandoned “Grand Sahara” project control over Niger and its uranium resources, would have only a secondary place in Sahelistan. The Algerian government showed that it understood the aim quite well. It knows that the formation of a Sahelistan aims to include southern Algeria and not just northern Mali.
Samir Amin, roughly a decade ago
>>2102108>This is not a racist view, by the way; even Che ended up agreeing with thisThe fact that ANYONE feels EVEN SLIGHTLY WORRIED about allegations of fucking RACISM… for saying that an economically deprived nation has a weak military, should show you how fucking buckbroken at the very least this board's culture has been by Occupy Wall Street and the flood of idpol.
I'm not complaining, just stating the obvious and reminding everyone that this isn't normal and needs to be worked out of our minds.
>>2108544Not everything is betof lack of pussy.
But economic deprivation is a good reason.
>>2108548>>2102108Have you considered that Africans aren't used to that kind of fighting?
>>2098265I mean lumping all these groups together with yakuza is kind of insane
I don't think ISIS is capable of doing a furuto style atrocity, they mostly kill in a quick and painless way at least
>>2108558That map explains precisely nothing.
International mining groups are also investing in Australia. Yet you don't see Jihadi groups in the Australian bush.
What you are doing is eliminating any agency from Africans. Nothing can happen *from* them, or *because* of them, but only *to* them. Anything bad that happens there is necessarily because some white people somewhere is doing something to them.
It can't be because they are split along sectarian or ethnic lines, because they believe in superstitions (and indeed often reactionary ideas).
No, the black man is NOBLE. The black man is BEAUTIFUL and PEACEFUL.
So by definition anything bad happening in Africa cannot possibly because of Africans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrf2C3Gzpz4 >>2108718because "international mining groups" are owned by australia and are integrated into the supply chain of western imperialism. why would the US use their secret police to arm and train terrorist to attack their puppet that pays them tribute? the whole point is that they attack people who try to get out of paying them tribute
>Anything bad because white peopleno this specific bad thing that happened that the thread is about was done to them by people working for american capitalists
the maps explain that the CIA started arming and training terrorists because African countries were moving away from being neocolonies for the US and France dependent on resource extraction to working with China to independently develop their own economies, and that threatens the petroleum monopolies bottom line
Unique IPs: 26