[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1744776503486.jpg (10.85 KB, 318x159, images(4).jpg)

 

The fact of the matter is that in most, if not all, South American and Hispano-American countries, women are discriminated against as a matter of course, from citizenship laws to professional life to paternalistic familial structures and domestic abuse, even feminicide. This is clearly not a purely Hispanic affair, since, with perhaps the exception of Scandinavia, it exists in various degrees throughout the world. But the fact of the matter is that even if it’s often used as a pro-American/Israel or neocon club to bludgeon Latinos on other, unrelated issues like American interventionism.

I look at it as being similar to Soviet charges against US treatment of black citizens. Did pointing out the Jim Crow laws make Siberian gulags or Eastern European oppression any more acceptable? Of course not, although it may have scored Moscow some points in the world arena by pointing out American hypocrisy. At the end of the day, though, the answer to Stalinist accusations of racism should have been the civil rights movement, not a denial of segregation. Likewise, to my mind, the oppression of women and minorities and homosexuals in Latin America is not directly related to the Inter-American conflict, but it is very important to me, and I don’t see that there’s any contradiction in my struggle to fight for my wife’s right to marry who she pleases, legally own land and work at any job she wants to in Guatemala and her right to return to and live in Mexico.

I don’t think that the knee-jerk reaction that many people, especially those who don’t live in the region, have to dismiss any and all criticism of Latin American states and/or societies as apologism is helpful at all. In fact, it plays into the rhetoric of pro west puppet LatAm states that justify blatant gender discrimination, macho culture and the persistence of transphobic violence or legal discrimination as we have seen with the surge of new conservative Christian moments in places like Central America. For my part, an equitable solution to a fractured Latin America conflict should be about self determination for Latinos not about and their struggle to create a commkncounter-hegemonic project.

The point is not to attack Hispanic Culture it is to not pretend it is some noble cause above all. Its okay to critique, it's not perfect, especially as a Marxist it is okay to do so.

>>2226147
> Did pointing out the Jim Crow laws make Siberian gulags or Eastern European oppression any more acceptable? Of course not

someone educate this fool about the differences between the gulag system and the US prison system. I think he might find them surprising.

>>2226166
It's a copy-paste from this thread >>2222201 Given the direction that thread went, we'll soon have True Socialists justifying interventionism in Latin America.

>>2226217
If the Soviet Union still existed, I would be all for it. Fuck, let China do it. Speaking as an Ecuadorian, this fucking continent is a lost cause without some drastic changes, like a Cultural Revolution.

>>2226413
anon obviously meant burger interventionism with the liberal veneer of "we're protecting women from patriarchy" which was the same excuses used in the middle east

I don't find any critique of "Hispanic Culture" referring to Latam and "Latinos" to be very coherent. Still, your conclusion is right

tldr: nation-states are reactionary and only replicate capitalist relations. Who could've guessed.

>>2226147
>The point is not to attack Hispanic Culture
Not that there's a problem with that. Communists aren't supposed to defend culture, quite the opposite in fact.

>from citizenship laws to professional life

Communists aren't supposed to debate government policy either.

>>2226147
>it’s often used as a pro-American/Israel or neocon club to bludgeon Latinos on other, unrelated issues like American interventionism.
Is it? American intervention in LATAM looks like economic freedom and shit like this. Never heard culture being used in particular.

>>2227276
Yeah even the worst latam shithole is less reactionary than America today lol.

>>2227280
I sincerely doubt that

>>2227663
I don't remember latam ever lynching people based on race or sexuality.

>>2226217
Anyway, if one thinks latinos and arabs treat womens right the same way, theyre retarded. Would you rather be a woman in Brazil or Afghanistan?

>>2227667
>>2227667
Well, then you are extremely ignorant because LatAm having the highest murder rates on the planet also means they have the highest rate of femicides and for example targeted killings of trans people than any other region (combined).

>>2228332

Very few of those killings are a result of etnic violence, most are over land dispute, and common thuggery

>>2227797

>arab

>afeghanistan

Retard

>>2228401
>land dispute
>not ethnic violence

My brother in Christ, land disputes in Latin America are innately tied to ethnicity.

>>2227797
>Afghanistan
>Arab

80IQ latinx moment


Unique IPs: 13

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]