>>658493>I hear this from anarchists but where does this value come from, is there specific literature that talks about the freedom without taking someone's freedom away?It can come from anyone ranging from Kropotkin or Goldman, but if you want something to turn to, I'd recommend Malatestas "method of freedom".
https://libcom.org/files/Errico_Malatesta_Davide_Turcato_Paul_Sharkey-The_m.pdf
>The conclusion, indeed, is this: either we all apply our minds to thinking aboutsocial reorganisation, and right away, at the very same moment that the old
structures are being swept away, and we shall have a more humane and more just
society, open to future advances; or we shall leave such matters to the “leaders”
and we shall have a new government; and this will do exactly what governments
have always done—make the masses pay for the limited and bad services it
provides, taking away their freedom while allowing the parasites and the
privileged of all stripes the freedom to exploit them by every means.
>We must pay attention to the practical problems of life: production, trade,communications, relations between anarchist groups and those who retain a
belief in authority, between communist collectives and individualists, between
the city and the countryside. We must make sure to use to our advantage the
forces of nature and raw materials, and that we attend to industrial and
agricultural distribution—according to the conditions prevailing at the time in
the various different countries—public education, childcare and care for the
handicapped, health and medical services, protection both against common
criminals and those, more insidious, who continue to attempt to suppress the
freedom of others in the interests of individuals and parties, etc.