Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:33:50 No. 593146
>>586431 >Why do you hate third world countries? Braindrain is killing these countries and we can't afford welfare for all them. People who are pro-immigration are people who just want the collapse of their own nation. People who are "anti-immigration" are still effectively "pro-immigration", as these two things are nothing more then a false dichotomy for what is a singular system of things. To even argue in regards to "anti-immigration" policy is to wholly misunderstand the relation between the state and the economy, and seeing it as some kind of genuine mediatior of capitalism rather then a monopoly on violence that functions as a tool of class rule. The whole immigration debate is one giant red herring that obfuscates the actual realtions of capitalism, and the fact that you can honestly state support for lobbying and trusting the bourgeoisie government to consiquentially engage in policy allegedly antithetical to itself means you still have liberal brainworms that you refuse to address. Hungary and it's continued flow of immigration despite said "policy" should already be proof enough to you, but apparently you all fall for SocDem logic the very minute immigration becomes a topic.
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:37:17 No. 593151
>>593110 not the gentile-stan
>In Nazi Germany, the corporations already dominated from the get go, and so could just hit the peddle full throttle in regards to their interests and the growth of their industries. In Fascist Italy, the government played footsies with said corporations that had them constantly have to bargain and offer up things to them to get even the bare minimum done, with the whole thing being a squabble of differing bourgeoisie interests within the government and "out" of it. This is probaby because Germany had a successful bourgeois revolution whereas Italy's was put down and independence from Austria led directly to the Kingdom of Italy. The bourgeois did not have complete power, resulting in the constant faffing around to appease the bourgeoisie, while maintaining a monarchy/dictatorship.
Also, to be fair, I dont know much about Italy post roman empire. perhaps I should read up on it
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:37:39 No. 593152
>>585317 >Ancaps are just mask-on fascists Imagine my shock
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:39:37 No. 593155
>>585650 Hot take
Nobody is white
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:53:43 No. 593169
>>593155 Galaxy brain take: Anybody to the south of me isn't white
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:54:29 No. 593171
>>593110 >>593151 Also Nazi Germany didn't really engage in corporatism, at least in the sense of creating official bodies to represent capitalists operating in certain sectors of the economy. This was only true for agriculture plus a single official trade union was created, but nothing else.
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:54:34 No. 593172
>>593155 That's true though. Whites have been mutts since the beginning.
Anonymous 2021-11-11 (Thu) 01:56:36 No. 593175
>>593171 >Also Nazi Germany didn't really engage in corporatism Never said they did. Bourgeoisie domination was far more direct, there was really no need for anything like Italian "corporations".
Anonymous 2021-11-28 (Sun) 11:16:45 No. 621507
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX5oGShopDU Frenchies, is the situation over there really this bad? I thought we were fucked here in Germany but Jesus Christ…
screenie anon 2021-11-30 (Tue) 14:51:16 No. 624062
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8IGBDK1BH8 He announced. This vid is a fucking masterpiece. He’d going to win…
Anonymous 2021-12-14 (Tue) 20:09:27 No. 645701
>>585513 >>585513 > the PSL dude from the Empire Files Do you mean Mike Prysner, the most based man ever?
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 10:59:20 No. 646567
>>585204 Our lil cousins at /pol/ think because he's Jewish, he is there purposely to divide and conquer Le Pen voters.
But overall, he never really gave any real policies besides what makes the people rile up. So, he is definitely a populist. We won't know his other motivations, but I am sure it would include supporting Israel.
Overall, I am not too worried. I think Macron would easily win if it was just the two of them.
Frenchies are not burgers.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 11:10:39 No. 646572
>>646567 >Our lil cousins at /pol/ think because he's Jewish, he is there purposely to divide and conquer Le Pen voters. I think it'd be funny if that were true, but no one believes /pol/ in the end because they've cried wolf about the Jews too much. It'd be like a South Park episode.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 11:12:35 No. 646573
>>646572 It's ironic that places like /pol/ filled with a combination of edgelords having a joke and gayops+retards who thought it was serious, have cried wolf so much it just lends credibility to the pro-zionist claim of oppression
Useful idiots.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 11:14:53 No. 646574
>>646567 I also think it's a bit suspicious, because he's guaranteed to spoil Le Pen. Seems to me like a way to dissent among the constantly-growing ranks of french reaction, similar to the Clintons encouraging Donald Trump's presidential run in 2016.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 13:53:37 No. 646630
>>646627 Extremely difficult*
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 14:13:26 No. 646642
>>646574 >I also think it's a bit suspicious, because he's guaranteed to spoil Le Pen. Seems to me like a way to dissent among the constantly-growing ranks of french reaction, similar to the Clintons encouraging Donald Trump's presidential run in 2016. This didn't make sense a few weeks ago when you were proposing it and it still doesn't make sense now, anon. Go and see how elections work.Whichever gets to the second round will be supported by the other.
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 14:21:49 No. 646647
>>646642 I know how french elections work; fact is that campaigning against each other may involve attacks on one another, which would reduce the likelihood of a given reactionary frenchie to come out for the other candidate. For example, if Le Pen tries to paint him as "foreign" due to his algerian background, and then doesn't make it to the second round, some disgruntled voters might just stay home.
also i haven't posted about this before
Anonymous 2021-12-15 (Wed) 18:43:23 No. 646981
Fuck France
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 09:26:28 No. 647934
Lol Solidarność has just written a favorable op-ed on Zemmour in their magazine. They said : "Rural conservatives are counting on you, Monsieur Zemmour !" They also interviewed Marine Le Pen. Really makes one think.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 09:58:58 No. 647956
**I'm not scared by Zemmour. Of course I hope that he loses, and in truth I would much rather see Macron win a second time. But what makes Zemmour dangerous isn't what he appears to be. What scares me about Zemmour is what mere his presence represents. Zemmour is not a neo-Nazi or a fascist. He doesn't truly believe in what he preaches. He doesn't threaten any liberal democratic institutions - if anything, it's the opposite. His purpose is to pacify the populace, by telling them what they want and giving it to them in a controlled and safe manner. He wins debates because he is allowed to. What Zemmour really represents is impotence. He represents the failure of the Yellow Vests, and of the left. If he wins, we will see more Zemmours in the future. If he loses, we will see more Zemmours in the future. What Zemmour represents is the void in the political space that he is filling in.**
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 10:15:33 No. 647960
>>646624 > He is like an anti-Semitic person's caricature of a Jewish guy who trying to trick a bunch of gullible morons with spectacle that I almost admire it like you would admire a good liar. yeah, exactly
/pol/tards will get fucked over by another zionist
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 11:55:06 No. 648029
>>647956 >What Zemmour really represents is impotence. Good post. I think the only rational response to Zemmour is total cynicism. It won't help at all, but neither will Zemmour, and at least you'll keep your dignity.
Anonymous 2021-12-16 (Thu) 13:52:14 No. 648103
NOOOOOOO LEMOUR NOOOOOOOOO DON'T DO IT LEMOUR
Anonymous 2021-12-17 (Fri) 21:24:04 No. 649978
>>647956 Uhhh
Wouldn’t that mean what Zemmour represents is porky EU cucks tearing off the mask and replacing the “nice” fascism of neoliberalism with the bullet and the whip?
Anonymous 2021-12-17 (Fri) 21:47:46 No. 650011
>>649978 No, you fucking idiot. Don't twist my words with your bullshit.
Anonymous 2021-12-17 (Fri) 21:52:02 No. 650022
>>649978 Zemmour is backed by the billionaire Vincent Bolloré who shares his idpol and own several medias.
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 20:56:29 No. 652978
>>646833 the arab is front and center, actually
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 21:49:30 No. 653028
>>650022 Ce n’est supris pas pour moi ou chaque joue en France.
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 00:40:27 No. 653311
Wont he just split and divide the far right though?
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 00:46:17 No. 653321
>>653311 Non, les politics de France est tres reactionarie en temp modern. Personnes aiment Zemmour meme recevoit le chance c’est un probleme avec France, non juste le chance ou les chances de l’autres aiment son gagnent les elections
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 03:27:14 No. 653493
>>647956 Unusual objectivity for this sphere.
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 04:31:50 No. 653529
>>646981 b-b-but my patriotic social democracy..
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 04:33:26 No. 653530
phone posting god will forgive my typos
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 04:44:49 No. 653537
>>653311 yes he is deployed to take away votes from le pen
macron and others are unaffected
sage 2021-12-29 (Wed) 03:56:18 No. 665103
>>586333 >that vid I laugh and then I remember that this is how most conservatives see the world.
Unique IPs: 37