[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon
Please give feedback on proposals, new on Mondays : /meta/
New /roulette/ topic: /spoox/ - Paranormal, horror and the occult.
New board: /AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1638873354895-0.jpeg (1.27 MB, 2048x1444, EFBCB703-DC77-4FC2-87D1-3….jpeg)

File: 1638873354895-1.jpeg (361.94 KB, 1332x850, 63CDC346-B90F-4F5E-8404-0….jpeg)

 No.634507[View All]

>Most Europeans gleefully supported far-right parties as a consequence of seeing dirty brown people on the street
>Europeans blame their own filth on Americans despite embracing fascism multiple times in their history like the dogs they are
>Europe currently embracing “Fortress Evropa”, which is the idea of slaughtering refugees and migrants at the border who are fleeing either European economic imperialism, European imperialist warmongering, or climate catastrophe primarily caused by Europeans and Americans
>Europeans gleefully support Fortress Europe and want to slaughter as many muslims and brown immigrants as they can
>Every single person denying climate change and ecology in this board is either a European or American cockroach utterly devoted to sacrificing the Global South to themselves, each and every one of these people WILL support the Fourth Reich I don’t give a fuck if you call yourselves communists since you think Indians, Africans, Arabs, Latins, and everyone else need to die for your consumption
469 posts and 53 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.679365

>>679353
No Euroach, no American, in fact not a single New Worlder would ever turn fascist before an European, we're nothing like you, we don't fetichize putting refugees in death camps or shooting immigrants with live ammunition at the border (euroach policians get elected by promising to do such atrocities).

 No.679367

>>677587
The entire ideology behing fortress evropa is a belief Euroaches are a single racial-cultural group, superior to anyone else and who need to be fortified against the "non-white non-western corruption", fuck off

 No.679368

>>679353
Seeing as Europe was the birthplace of fascism and le whites….. yes.
just kidding. as fun as it is to read the infiltrated fascist chat log disclosures of US antifa orgs, they're incomparable to european anarchists and antifas

 No.679373

>>677587
And Europe is a peninsula, NOT a continent, the false narrative that Europe is a continent was made but by yes you've guesses it, Euroaches themselves due to a false sense of greatness and superiority

 No.679383

>>679378
>When they captured a village they would kill a child and force everyone to eat a piece of it.

Stopped reading there, cannibalism is an euroach practice, who they project to justify massacres of people they deem subhumans

https://www.stronghold-nation.com/history/ref/the-battle-of-maarra

 No.679387

As for the Ottoman massacres, isn't it funny how the absolute majority of these came to be when the Ottomans have decided to "modernize" by adopting ethno-chauvinistic ideas from France and Germany?

 No.679409

>>679378
>>679392
>Literally no sources given for any of the claims on the Moors.

 No.679413

>>679381
my biological lineage is monke

 No.679416

>>679381
>Twitter and facebook are representative of the real world
Also, that doesn't make sense, and "interracial" procreation still has you having a biological lineage. These people would have never gotten together as well if you're implying that no one "naturally" wants to have such relationships.

 No.679657

>>678676
>Literally shit that dates back to the 90s and thus isn’t actually connected to the refugees other than “Muh shitskins bad”
Kill yourself

 No.679667

>Fag pretending to be me as always, nigha who should unironically have his head cut off and shipped in a box to his mother
>Eurofaggots finally revealing that they think all migrants are criminals and rapists and should absolutely be destroyed, and also “interracial” relationships dilute bloodlines or some such
<European leftypolers unironically believe in blood quantums, segregation, and the notion that miscegenation dilutes “purity”

You rats just can’t help but prove me right, can you? Why shouldn’t Europe be conquered, burned, and rebuilt by communists? Why shouldn’t China make you all bend the knee?

 No.679675

>>679667
>Euro fascism bad
>Chinese fascism good
Ban this /pol/jak with chinese characteristics already.

 No.679687

>>679675
Weren’t you just ranting about how a dirty negro and a beautiful hwite being in a consensual relationship is actually errrrr destroying European purity you polfag scum?
I know how you cowards operate, you proudly post nazi-tier shit then start calling anyone that opposes your disgusting views “/pol/“
Besides, don’t you also openly claim that the only fate befitting of Africans, Arabs, Asians, etc. is to live in chains?

 No.679736

>>679667
>Competition between blocks is bad for the proletariat on both sides. Because overall more surplus is divested from productive forces and redirected into un-productive means for power-projection like military. China does not do much power projection, that has given them an economic bonus. My guess: that's the winning strategy for the 21 century.

 No.679738

>>679736 (me)
darn it, unintended green-text

 No.680226

>>679449
>And no one should "naturally" want to fuck children and animals but some people do
Then why even make a naturalist argument in the first place you fag? Also, how is two adults having sex comparable to what you stated?

 No.680248

>>679667
Based.
>>679675
Cringe.

The future is Chinese cope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Century

 No.680774

>>679667
I'm not a lefty so I'm more in tune with reality than the other posters here. I know damn well you think white people are broken on a genetic level, but to think about race biologically is inherently anti Marxist so your super ego copes by saying that European people are reactionary due to social causes. But I know what you actually think in your id. You see us a rival species, and that is a perfectly healthy view.

 No.680778

>>680774
>that is a perfectly healthy view.
Agree with everything except that insane part.
Greenflag poster is insanely racist because he grew up in a very racist society. As a third worlder, his ideas are transparently racist and generally insane and non leftist.

 No.680786

>>680774
Haha, no, I think Europeans are assholes as are many American whites, but American whites tend to be nicer and more likable and less xenophobic than Europeans; Americans are also just a more honest people

I don’t think it’s “genetic”, Europeans just use this cope when called out because if it were genetic then their behavior is somehow now justified because they can’t act any other way and cannot change their ways. It’s a cowardly, pathetic, and weak argument; Europeans could be better, but simply choose not to be.

Now, do I think race “biologically” is anti-Marxist? No, I think the concept of race is actually against actual biology. Now head off back to /pol/, buddy boyo

 No.680789

>>679667
Kekekekek which one posts were pretending to be you?

 No.680793

>>680789
What I meant to say was, "which posts were pretending to be you?"

 No.680796

>>680786
>concept of race is actually against actual biolo
Then you don't know biology. There's a reason Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin are laughing stocks. And I know damn well you wouldn't want your daughter bringing home a white guy in the future.

 No.680802

>>680786
Europeans as a whole? Which color Europeans? All of them?
Black Americans can be horrible people. Entire communities are made up of coping black people and entirely anti-social black people. I really hate it when you infantilize non whites. You realize this is a colonialist mindest?

Anyways, as long as you only paint your fellow black burgers as helpless idiots and don't do it for the rest of the world then I'm ok with it. Try that shit with any other country and I'll find you and cut your fingers so you cant type anymore.

 No.680828

>>680796
Oh boy, I wonder if this nigha is about to go grab his favorite /pol/ infographs
>Randomly mentioning Gould and Lewontin
They aren’t the reason biologists discount the pre-scientific notion of “race” you polyp chimpanzee
>>680802
Nigha if I had the chance I’d send your penis to your mother in a little box, fucking pol faggor scumfuck

 No.680831

>Undisguised /pol/faggots finally arrive promoting unironic race “science” and threatening torture while pushing white supremacist memes
I rest my fucking case, die

 No.680851

>>680828
>Nigha if I had the chance I’d send your penis to your mother in a little box, fucking pol faggor scumfuck
Black americans are this violent? Damn…
I'll move to Europe before moving to the US then… seems burgers are inherently predisposed to insane levels of cruelty and violence.

 No.680855

>>680828
By biologists you mean fringe cranks who are biology equivalent of flat earth people

 No.680860

>>680855
No, by biologists I mean people that actually study genetics and human anatomy instead of polyp fags and some random colonial governors from the 1700s

 No.680861

>>680851
There is absolutely nothing wrong with violence against people who deserve it, like polyps such as yourself

 No.680863

>>680851
To be clear, i was exposing the clownery of green flag.
I dont think europeans are more predisposed to fascism because they're white or whatever, nor do I have a weird hard on for white americans, just as much as I dont believe mexicans are "primed" for drug traffficking.

 No.680865

>>680861
You should be careful where you point that violence then, because what you spew on a daily basis has ideologically more in common with polyps than with marxists.

 No.681303

>>681275
Somehow I doubt you’re a geneticist. Because the geneticists I know would tell you that at best there might be distinct clines that map onto categories that were predetermined beforehand.

 No.681331

https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

 No.681344

>>681343
Post proof that you’re a geneticist or hell, even that Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould are Laughingstocks.

 No.681348

>>681343
The genetic distance between “races” is far smaller than between different species. You’re using “clines” here wrong, btw.

 No.681352

While the US and all of the New World have our big share of reactionary scum, abhorrent and despicable views such XIX century "scientific" racism, extreme ethnic and cultural chauvinism are topics of outrage in the whole continent, in Europe you get elected by promising to use live ammunition against refugees at the border, or by promising to put brown people in concentration camps, in the New World you're put in a jail by saying such things, and with the support of the absolute majority

 No.681412

>>681391
Which Fruit flies? Two specimens of drosophilia melanogastor? And what differences between the coyote and wolves? Why are these example relevant, for that matter? There are two subspecies of chimpanzee who look virtually identical but whose genetic distance is far greater than of human races. You’re only building the case that taxonomy doesn’t mean much in classifying human groups.

 No.681414

>>681393
> Biological anthropologist Jonathan M. Marks agrees with Edwards that correlations between geographical areas and genetics obviously exist in human populations but goes on to write: "What is unclear is what this has to do with 'race' as that term has been used through much in the twentieth century—the mere fact that we can find groups to be different and can reliably allot people to them is trivial. Again, the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin's analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species, and Edwards' critique does not contradict that interpretation."[7] The view that while geographic clustering of biological traits does exist, this does not lend biological validity to racial groups, was proposed by several evolutionary anthropologists and geneticists prior to the publication of Edwards' critique of Lewontin.

 No.681419

>>681398
One is paywalled and the other isn’t even a scientific article but one from a popular journal. You could try and get more than ONE guy to say no one takes Lewontin and Gould seriously
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369848615000035
> Lewis et al. (2011) attempted to restore the reputation of Samuel George Morton, a 19th century physician who reported on the skull sizes of different folk-races. Whereas Gould (1978) claimed that Morton's conclusions were invalid because they reflected unconscious bias, Lewis et al. alleged that Morton's findings were, in fact, supported, and Gould's analysis biased. We take strong exception to Lewis et al.’s thesis that Morton was “right.” We maintain that Gould was right to reject Morton's analysis as inappropriate and misleading, but wrong to believe that a more appropriate analysis was available. Lewis et al. fail to recognize that there is, given the dataset available, no appropriate way to answer any of the plausibly interesting questions about the “populations” in question (which in many cases are not populations in any biologically meaningful sense). We challenge the premise shared by both Gould and Lewis et al. that Morton's confused data can be used to draw any meaningful conclusions. This, we argue, reveals the importance of properly focusing on the questions asked, rather than more narrowly on the data gathered.

 No.681436

>>681433
>Can’t argue
<Procees to mald about “muh troons”
Many such cases

 No.681456

>>681451
>I posted logical fallacy
You only said “so we have to define race the way it has consistently been defined socially? That’s retarded
>Post hairline
Hello, interracial sex pest anon. I didn’t know you were balding? How’s failing to get a job with the an undergrad biology degree going for you?

 No.681508

>>681352
Yea this was basically my point
Remember that in the US, Trump only won because the DNC sank Bernie Sanders and barely anyone voted
Meanwhile a cop killed a single black man and millions of Americans mobilized in quite militant protests
In Europe the more you promise to harm refugees and migrants the more popular you are

 No.684942

>>681508
Fuck Eur*ids bro, I unironically wished that their shitty neonazi memes that le ayrabs and blacks will replace them all were true

 No.687956

>>681456
>so we have to define race the way it has consistently been defined socially? That’s retarded
Because those early definitions were from centuries before we had DNA analysis.

 No.688144

>>687956
So what?

 No.688152

File: 1641986041877.jpg (91.73 KB, 680x463, 1638636121528.jpg)

>>687956
>He thinks this is relevant to the socially defined concept of race

 No.690031

>>688144
>>688152
Classifications change as the science improves. People used to think mushrooms were plants

 No.690073

>>677708
>I can’t wait until your shithole of a continent descends into another world war, death and destruction is all
What a fucking incel lmao
Dont break your keyboard

 No.690260

>>690031
>Says that classifications change based upon advances in science
<Argues race realism with dogs and coyotes
In other words, actual scientists no longer discuss race, but ancestry.


Unique IPs: 19
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /