Anonymous 2021-12-18 (Sat) 01:32:12 No. 650219
>>644553 >>649124 These are some good lists.
Anonymous 2021-12-18 (Sat) 02:00:07 No. 650245
>>645321 2nd pic is exactly how american libs think
Anonymous 2021-12-18 (Sat) 02:01:04 No. 650246
>>650230 Nah, J. Sakai just seems like a very bitter Japanese internment inmate who is more radical than Kochiyama. I mean he’s wrong on casting all white workers as without revolutionary potential, but the pattern of white moderates ruining revolutionary organizations is pretty spot on.
Anonymous 2021-12-18 (Sat) 05:51:04 No. 650514
>>650246 Post a picture of J Sakai.
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 14:45:28 No. 652504
Another common glowie take I've seen is acting like America is literally the world police.
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 14:48:48 No. 652507
They sure love money and im posting for free.
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 14:59:58 No. 652514
>>650863 Why is there a net around the sun?
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 16:44:17 No. 652653
Aight lets contribute the latest r/stupidpol
reddit moment too. One mod, an exmod and likely more others are trying to make a case for the deposition of the subreddit founder u/guccibananabricks, on the grounds that he's too tough on rightoids and """authoritarian""".
Can we Vote to Remove Certain Moderators? https://old.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/rjdmnm/can_we_vote_to_remove_certain_moderators/ >I speak for the majority of people when I say there’s certain moderators in this subreddit who’s “work” and the “changes” that they’ve brought about have been terrible and annoying. >I just don’t want this sub that’s been a source of interesting debate and great content from fellow fed up leftists to die due to pretentious elitist clowns who NO ONE likes. which is the sequel to this one which is too long to quote but I'll leave you with this tidbit
https://old.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/riu9d6/i_used_to_be_a_mod_here_figured_id_better_post/ Which on top of being false(gucci confirmed you can still post with scores as low as 2 as long as its 800 chars or more)
is basically manufacturing consent for admin intervention to remove gucci and put their own puppet as head mod on behalf of one mod, one exmod and a bunch of rightoids/outsiders and covidiots . Instead of raising the issue of managing the score system with fellow mods. Very suspect.
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 19:23:26 No. 652815
>>652809
Anonymous 2021-12-19 (Sun) 19:54:25 No. 652879
>>652653 >often based entirely on their stance on COVID Lame
> or china BASED Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 22:08:13 No. 654500
>>652514 I think it's supposed to be some kind of weird representation of solar radiation.
Anonymous 2021-12-20 (Mon) 23:49:54 No. 654637
>>645584 What an embarrassing post
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 01:15:09 No. 654753
>>654637 t. Durex, Trojan, Monsanto, Pfizer, ViacomCBS, AT&T, COMCAST, News Corp, Disney, Janssen, Teva, Your local pimp, Amazon, your local e-thot, onlyfans, the CIA, the FBI, MI6 etc.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 02:02:53 No. 654798
In general:
-Fedjacketing
-Getting mad at the existence of the term fedjacketing
-Repeating anti-communist propaganda/slander and framing it as a positive thing, for example saying "Based Che Guevara hating degeneracy" as a backdoor way of propagating the anti-communist myth that Guevara was homophobic.
-Disliking Antifa/BLM riots (Btw, this includes when radlibs say that all rioters are "white outside agitators"/"destroying BIPOC-owned businesses")
-"Anti-imperialists" such as Ben Norton who take such knee-jerk anti-US positions that they end up supporting US interests, such as Norton supporting the Thai monarchy,
>>652827 is 100% correct here.
Wrt to /leftypol/ specifically:
-Obsessively Pro-China people who frame users who critically support China as a counter to US hegemony and don't believe US propaganda but still think it's capitalist as Pro-US libs, therefore making actual Pro-US libs seem reasonable and nuanced on China and pushing people towards that camp.
-Implying consensus where none exists/trying to say that /leftypol/ as a whole believes one thing when it doesn't, therefore either smearing users who disagree with the idea(s) attempting to be shilled and forcing those that are ambivalent or don't express the opposing opinion to conform to the belief that is being shilled out of peer pressure, or smearing /leftypol/ as a whole and making users who believe the idea(s) that /leftypol/ said not to believe in turn against the userbase as a whole.
-Being excessively hostile towards new users that are already leftists, or being hostile towards people for a perceived transgression unrelated to politics, such as "Reddit spacing" or telling someone to "Go back" for some completely random shit.
-Posting CP (This one is obvious, but it bears repeating)
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 02:51:22 No. 654873
>>652653 I remember that he supported the Jihadi insurrection in Syria and the reactionary manifestations in Hong Kong and now the reactionaries that he invited en masse are trying to boot him out. Let him and his lie in the bed he made.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 03:37:28 No. 654925
>>652653 >covidiot I thought you guise were all about workers rights?
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 08:26:40 No. 655108
>>652653 Gucci has bad takes but he isn't being challenged for those bad takes he is being challenged for his unironically good and common sense takes which just shows how increasingly retarded stupidpol has gotten over time. Fits the name I guess.
sage sage 2021-12-21 (Tue) 09:12:33 No. 655132
>>655124 fuck off Langley no one likes you
go drone strike another poor guy's wedding and remember that that hellfire missile will feel like frostbite compared to what you lot are in for after you die
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 09:16:53 No. 655134
>>655132 You're right, "The Glowzone" does sound better.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 16:27:32 No. 655425
Anything about a "second American civil war". 10/10 times it's glowies trying to draw out extremist right wing nutjobs . (And that's a good thing.)
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 16:33:51 No. 655430
>>652653 Critical support for Gucci against the Rosa-killers
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:01:18 No. 655484
>>654798 >the Feds get people to be on the side they oppose What?
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:03:09 No. 655490
>>645063 sex is based communist praxis to create more revolutionaries
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:16:24 No. 655518
>>655484 It seems you misread my post.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:21:59 No. 655530
>>655484 Everybody calling the Grayzone "glow" is mad and projecting because the glow "Syrian Revolution" they all supported failed.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:36:03 No. 655563
>>655518 No I didn’t you Redditoid
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:38:09 No. 655570
>>655563 Stfu and stop engaging with me in bad faith, /pol/ “convert”.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:40:10 No. 655576
Haven’t you noticed how feds will all have this smug “witty” attitude when they’re online? They sound exactly like redditfags
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:44:22 No. 655585
>>654798 >-"Anti-imperialists" such as Ben Norton who take such knee-jerk anti-US positions that they end up supporting US interests, such as Norton supporting the Thai monarchy The Thai monarchy started to get friendlier to China and thus the NED funded the “protests” there. Ben Norton just uncovered the glow
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 17:47:01 No. 655590
>>655585 >The Thai monarchy started to get friendlier to China and thus the NED funded the “protests” there. Ben Norton just uncovered the glow I was not aware of that. However, even if it doesn’t glow per se, it still seems a tad odd that he dedicated that much of his time in support of it.
Anonymous 2021-12-21 (Tue) 23:38:31 No. 656096
>>656094 [data-board] > .files > :nth-child(1):not(.multifile) > a::before, [data-board] > .files > :nth-child(1).multifile > a::before { display: none; }
in options->css
Anonymous 2021-12-23 (Thu) 12:21:19 No. 657709
>>655590 Why wouldn't he? That's what they do.
Anonymous 2022-01-02 (Sun) 23:47:23 No. 671330
>>654798 >-Fedjacketing People who whine about fedjacketing are feds themselves
Anonymous 2022-01-02 (Sun) 23:51:26 No. 671336
>>655590 > it still seems a tad odd that he dedicated that much of his time in support of it. Because it’s big news. An ally of the US is the target of Fed influence is pretty bizarre
Anonymous 2022-01-03 (Mon) 00:16:29 No. 671354
Idk I feel there are some takes that don't necessarily fedjacket someone but are weirdly serving of their agenda and spouted instead as a result of shaping certain parts of the discourse indirectly, like controlling the platforms, setting the profitable trends and setting the example with mainstream takes. It's dishonest and opportunistic but not necessarily a hint of a greater threat.
Anonymous 2022-01-03 (Mon) 00:20:09 No. 671360
>>654798 >-Repeating anti-communist propaganda/slander and framing it as a positive thing, for example saying "Based Che Guevara hating degeneracy" as a backdoor way of propagating the anti-communist myth that Guevara was homophobic. This one is always a dead giveaway. Similar falsehoods in the same vein are
>Stalin shot communists! >DPRK is fascist! Unique IPs: 32