[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon
Please give feedback on proposals, new on Mondays : /meta/
New /roulette/ topic: /spoox/ - Paranormal, horror and the occult.
New board: /AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.


File: 1640561397537.png (305.33 KB, 474x355, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.662177

Crimea was Russian territory originally, given to Ukraine by Kruschev in 1954. It was given to them legally, based on documents and all.
On the other hand, it seems to me like all Putin did was just annex crimea and do a pseudoreferendum there which doesn't mean shit.

 No.662183

>>662177
why does it matter to you?

 No.662184

I mean, 'legal' depends on what system of law you want to use, but by international standards no, it wasn't legal.

 No.662185

>>662183
Бо я з України, а ти америкос вонючий

 No.662186

>>662184
by international standards no, it wasn't legal.
Wasn't Crimea's 1954 annexation to Ukraine also illegal based on international standards too? (cold war)

 No.662189

>>662186
Well that was a voluntary transfer between two states (or one state depending on how you look at it) so no I wouldn't say that was illegal by international standards.

 No.662192

It wasn't legal but just.

 No.662195

There was a referendum in Crimea that overwhelmingly went to the Russian side. Whether or not it was legal depends on whether that referendum was binding or not.

 No.662205

>>662195
It's easy to argue that result is illegitimate though when force has already been used to conquer the territory and the conquerer is the one administering the referendum.

In international law it doesn't matter if the majority of the population of a region of one country wants to join another country, it's still not legal for the country to invade to enforce that.

 No.662219

>>662177
What is more official and authentic is a question for idealists. We could engage in historical masturbation and say that it's all still Soviet territory because the dissolution of the USSR wasn't legal because it was enacted against a legally binding referendum.

>Putin did was just annex crimea and do a pseudoreferendum

You are wrong, the population in Crimea generally prefers to be part of the Russian federation. And the reason for that is Washington's color revolution in Ukraine. They handed state-power to ethnic-hate-type right-wingers, who scared the fuck out of the Crimeans, which included state officials publicly praising Hitler who wanted to genocide the ethnic group that makes up the majority of people living in Crimea.

Nazis tried to genocide Slavs, US backs neo-nazis 70yrs later, Slavs go back to Russia, US surprisedpicachuface

It has to be appreciated how much situational ignorance on the part of the US was necessary to make the geo-strategical moves that handed Crimea to Putin. The criticism that befalls Putin is that he did not observe proper diplomatic form. Crimea should have formed a provisional government that declared it self independent before it could join the Russian federation.

I want to stress this one more time the US gave Crimea to Russia.

 No.662236

>>662219
>
>It has to be appreciated how much situational ignorance on the part of the US was necessary to make the geo-strategical moves that handed Crimea to Putin. The criticism that befalls Putin is that he did not observe proper diplomatic form. Crimea should have formed a provisional government that declared it self independent before it could join the Russian federation.

It did, the Crimean independent government voted to join Russia in less than 24 hours.

 No.662254

>leftypol supporting imperialism because russia was once communist
every time

 No.662365

>>662236
>It did, the Crimean independent government voted to join Russia in less than 24 hours.
Oh i guess i missed that, yeah i'm feeling a little stupid now.

 No.662371

>>662254
It is not imperialist action, the west's intervention into putting sanctions on Russia is far more imperialist than anything Russia did as the West has the full backing of NATO, UN, EU and other such institutions against Russia
>>662365
Your post was very smart comrade, so don't feel discouraged.

 No.662529

>>662254
OP asked whether something was legal or not. As communists we don't recognize bourgeoise law. To rephrase, the question was whether the act was technically legal or not under bourgeoise law.

Legality is mostly consistent but when need be, the ruling class will not hesitate to do whatever the fuck it wants anyways. Liberalism rests on the idea that law is just, but when it comes to real life, the only thing that matters is that the idea remains, not the enforcement of the idea.

 No.662560

File: 1640590206718.png (291.26 KB, 680x263, putinlegal.png)

>>662177
if Putin is Darth Sidious, then who's Nute Gunray?

 No.662615

>>662177
>Was Putin's annexation of Crimea legal?
>>662185
>Бо я з України, а ти америкос вонючий
You should take him to court anon.

 No.662681

>>662185
Нам поебать, хохол гниломудый

 No.662719

>>662219
> They handed state-power to ethnic-hate-type right-wingers, who scared the fuck out of the Crimeans, which included state officials publicly praising Hitler who wanted to genocide the ethnic group that makes up the majority of people living in Crimea.
please less watching RT.com, more talking with actual Russians and Russian-speakers living in Ukraine

 No.662769

>>662177
who the fuck cares. legality has 0 weight in international and geopolitical relations

>On the other hand, it seems to me like all Putin did was just annex crimea and do a pseudoreferendum there which doesn't mean shit.

right of people to dispose of themselves ? moron.

 No.662770

>>662719
what is wrong in what he said ? didnt the fascist ukrainian ban the russian language ?

 No.662771

>>662177
a legal system must have some legitimacy

>by international standards no, it wasn't legal.

yes it was once they voted for it

 No.662774

>>662254
>because russia was once communist
kys propaganda gobbling moron
we defend them cause nato is an aggressive imperialist org, that does threaten russia more and more and started the crisis, only in the US interest, that support a fascist governement there, and the ukrainian people got massively shafted in the process
also make the risk of an actual large scale war (mb even nuclear) a lot higher. Only a completely braindead retard lb or an imperialist fuck can support the war rethoric against russia for the ukrainian

 No.663030

>>662771
>yes it was once they voted for it
they didn't vote for shit moron, you can't just decide to separate from the country whenever you feel like it, the referendum has to be legitimate and approved by the government like it was in the UK, here all it was a pseudoreferendum bullshit with guys illegally on your territory holding AK-47 telling you how to vote
The big difference is crimea was given to ukraine in 1954 legally, goddamn, go read about it, there was an official procedure with documents and such, not some guys with weapons telling you how to vote

 No.663124

>>663030
>they didn't vote for shit moron, you can't just decide
To be fair, they could an they did.

>the referendum has to be legitimate and approved by the government

People may not feel the need to ask a government for permission if said government is imposed by a foreign power.
You can't complain about not going through proper channels when you've overthrown a government, that's a little too much hypocrisy.

>it was a pseudoreferendum bullshit with guys illegally on your territory holding AK-47 telling you how to vote

Military forces don't have that kind of power anymore, you saw what happened in Afghanistan all the military power the US had, and they still couldn't force their will on a population and they tried for 20 years. The Russian paramilitary forces in Crimea were peanuts in comparison, and they operated for how long ? a few weeks ? If you want to go with this argument you have to explain how they did it.

>The big difference is crimea was given to Ukraine in 1954 legally, goddamn.

So you want to restore the Soviet Union from the 1950s ? That would mean restoring the Iron Curtain and a hole bunch of other stuff.
Did you really think that one through ?

 No.663127

>is annexation legal
ITS IN THE FUCKING DEFINITION YOU FUCKING

 No.663135

>>662177
no it was not legal
yes it was pretty based

 No.663136

File: 1640632573303.jpeg (15.67 KB, 390x310, d40.jpeg)

>legal

 No.663160

>>663136
Shut the fuck up burger

 No.663209

>>662770
>didnt the fascist ukrainian ban the russian language
No? Where do you even get your news from?

 No.663268

Fuck Putin

 No.663269

>>663124
>To be fair, they could an they did.
they couldn't, idiot. If anyone could decide to vote for anything just like that then tomorrow any country in the world would split into pieces because people from the hood would just decide on a referendum that they don't belong to this country any more, and the world would turn into a fucking mess.

>People may not feel the need to ask a government for permission if said government is imposed by a foreign power.

then why the fuck was referendum on a FOREIGN TERRITORY imposed by Kremlin?
yeah, right, it's just a coincidence that a) russian military appeared in Crimea b) like a week or two later there was a referendum in Crimea. No power at all by the russian military.

 No.663283

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1243541.shtml
>But the US is continuously escalating tensions in Eastern Ukraine. Since the beginning of this year, the US has sent strategic bombers, including B-52s and B-1Bs to approach areas such as Black Sea. In November, the US sent strategic bombers and conducted simulated nuclear strikes against Russia, and entered airspace 20 kilometers away from Russian border, in an obviously provocative move. In addition, Washington released information such as it would impose economic sanctions on Russia and deploy more troops in Eastern Europe to pile on maximum pressure. It is like throwing matches onto dry firewood from time to time, but avoiding the flames deliberately. To the US, the more tense the Ukraine situation becomes, the more European countries will depend on the US. Setting up a common enemy among NATO is conducive to uniting allies. Washington is the biggest beneficiary of this dangerous game.

>And the biggest loser will be Ukraine, a country that has been in turmoil and division. Washington has painted its geopolitical competition between great powers with a thick layer of ideology. It has tried to portray what is happening on the Russian-Ukrainian border as a tragic story about "aggression" and "counter-aggression," as well as making Ukraine a pawn on the European chessboard as it pushes eastward. Since the disintegration of the Soviet Union, many countries, including Ukraine, have experienced "color revolutions" supported by the US. But most of these countries ended up in tragedy, as the US has neither the will nor the ability to provide them with substantial assistance. The US has been providing huge military aid to Ukraine over the years, weaponizing it from top to toe. However, it has explicitly excluded any possibility of fighting for Ukraine. Washington's policy of creating crises is likely to turn Ukraine into a regional powder keg.

 No.663287

True chads don't ask for permission

 No.663307


 No.663322

People in Crimea speak Russian, not Ukrainian. They identify as Russian. Totally justified.

 No.663504

>>663269
>If anyone could decide to vote for anything just like that then tomorrow any country in the world would split into pieces because people from the hood would just decide on a referendum that they don't belong to this country any more, and the world would turn into a fucking mess.
Abstract idealism completely divorced from material context. Politics is not based on pure voluntarism and good manners. Thank god the reality doesn't need your seal of approval, otherwise my own nation and language would be genocided a century ago.
>then why the fuck was referendum on a FOREIGN TERRITORY imposed by Kremlin?
Did you forget what the referendum was about in the first place? Hint: it was about a certain presupposition in your question. It turned the referendum into a founding act of the new legal order on that territory. And it's not the first time in history that an illegal referendum established new legality. Whole new countries have been established that way. I'll leave it up to you to think about why it be like that, but it's certainly not because God enunciated his magic and righteous words.
>it's just a coincidence that a) russian military appeared in Crimea b) like a week or two later there was a referendum in Crimea. No power at all by the russian military.
Why should it have been a coincidence? Should the referendum fall from the sky, and should Kiev prevent the referendum from taking place in order for its result to be legitimated by the supreme power of some divine idiot on leftypol? Seems a bit absurd, no?

 No.663581

>>662177
>Was Putin's annexation of Crimea legal?
Crimea was Russia's, gave by a some sort of lend to Ukraine.
Lugansk and Donetsk (both forming the Dombas region) is supported by Russia, not annexed, because they (Russians/Russian ruling class) don't want their Russian-speaking ethnic groups being eradicateted. Russia is very celeous witht communities speaking Russian (see Osetia)
If Ukraine want to be ful retarded against Russians, that's what you get.

 No.663583

>>662254
See:
>>663581
>implying any of this is imperialism

 No.663584

>>663136
/thread

 No.663586

>>663136
Yep, /thread/
OP cares about "legal" but not about the legal status of the Russians that were threatened by the rightwing militias, and probably would got vote suppressed/re-educated in re-education camps.

 No.664698

>>662254
Or supporting imperialism because it is antagonistic to western imperialism…

 No.666811

>>663504
>And it's not the first time in history that an illegal referendum established new legality. Whole new countries have been established that way. I'll leave it up to you to think about why it be like that, but it's certainly not because God enunciated his magic and righteous words.
…ok. And? It doesn't change anything. By this logic any country can go and attack any other country right now just because X years ago times were different. Where is that logic going to lead, genius? Crimea was given LEGALLY to Ukraine, but was taken from it ILLEGALLY, and by the way not by Soviet Union which doesn't even exist any more. What?

>Why should it have been a coincidence?

bruh you just admitted to yourself the whole russian propaganda bullshit. russia didn't take crimea legally, besides, it was a morally wrong thing to do, to annex land from a supposedly brotherly country. what the fuck are you even arguing for? that just because some bald dude in a lecture said it's the west's fault it's ok for russia to just go and invade/annex any territory it wants?

>>662219
>Nazis tried to genocide Slavs, US backs neo-nazis 70yrs later, Slavs go back to Russia, US surprisedpicachuface
there are no nazis in Ukraine, idiot, go there and check yourself. It's a fake created by russian propaganda. Visit Ukraine and see for yourself, liar. Same as this bald pseudoscientist in the video talked about fascist elements at Maidan, there were none there, I've been to Maidan, fascism in Ukraine is a fairytale spread by kremlin bots, I grew up in Ukraine and me or anyone I know never witnessed any nazis or whatever bullshit you've been fed

 No.666825

>>666811
What about all the memorials to Nazis in West Ukraine?

 No.666847

>>666825
Just memorials to national heroes and god fearing patriots. Slava Ukraini

 No.666861

File: 1640877440495.jpg (58.19 KB, 599x337, azovnato.jpg)

>>666811
>there are no nazis in Ukraine

 No.666886

>>666861
False flag created by russians

 No.666887

>>666886
So true bestie

 No.666889


 No.666901

File: 1640880405622.gif (142.47 KB, 1221x1007, yourself.gif)

>>666811
<there are no nazis in Ukraine, idiot, go there and check yourself.
Tell it to comrade Texas disingenuous cunt, then promptly picrel…
http://www.russelltexasbentley.com/

 No.666903

>>666886
The reason we're not on 8chan anymore is because one of these dudes who clearly was a nazi shot up a mosque.

 No.666958

>>666811
>there are no nazis in Ukraine

 No.667048

>>666958
False flag

 No.667168


 No.667284

>>662177
Dont care, fuck Kiev.

 No.667335

File: 1640904235608.jpg (137.78 KB, 757x596, Ukraine cons.jpg)

>>662177
America hasn't invaded Russia yet and they have oil. I think that equals legal under the present world order. Ukraine is now Afghanistan; a training camp for desperate neo-nazis/terrorists. They won't last any longer than the foreign aid.

When you lose the election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Ukrainian_parliamentary_election
But take over the police and military anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion

98 years old, the devil cannot live forever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger
The Awful Story of South America's Most Evil Dictator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mDoL3iAGLo

 No.667338

>>666811
>but was taken from it ILLEGALLY, and by the way not by Soviet Union which doesn't even exist any more. What?{Why anti-communists Ukrainians like you care about the legality of the USSR you people despise. You hate it so much but still, want Crimea back.
and then what? suppress Russians, kill their voter rights, send them into re-education camps, assassinate dissident voices as you did in one of your own oblasts during the euromaidan?
No, fuck off. Russia will not allow being Armenia'd.
Why don't you important matters in your hand, like the massive emigration you have been suffering since the euromaidan, almost de-populating some areas of Ukraine?
>>666811
> russia didn't take crimea legally
it did, it was a lend, just they can administer because the moron gorbashit was too sad for the ukrainians killed during the ww2 (he oposed Stalin using ukrainians as the shock front, but he was an idiot, who else but the first oblast invaded to counter the nazis).
>>666811
> it was a morally wrong thing to do
It was a moral wrong what?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Odessa_clashes
was this moraly right?
Do you know Crimea was just a response of these groups that were violently looking up for Russians just to kill them?
>>666811
>there are no nazis in Ukraine, idiot
>Who's Stanislau
>who's prrotozoo
>what's azov battilion
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/analysis-u-s-cozies-kiev-government-including-far-right-n66061
the thing is so escandaleous, the liberals in D.C. screched about the U.S. government supporting the euromaidan being produced by nazis. There are pictures of John Kerry in the ukrainian congress with nazi flags hanging from the wall, are you this retarded or are you posing as ukrainian?

 No.672222

>>667338
>Why don't you important matters in your hand, like the massive emigration you have been suffering since the euromaidan, almost de-populating some areas of Ukraine?
The migration situation is exactly the same as in any developing country. Like polish or balts go to germany/england. There is no catastrophe. I live in Kyiv and its fine. And finally, russia will return Crimea to Ukraine without any shot and will pay reparations.
Now in Ukraine live about 42-43 million people. The main reason of population reduction is a large number of old people. Now the number of population is stable.
Only with Ukraine crimea has a future.

>>667338
>it did, it was a lend, just they can administer because the moron gorbashit was too sad for the ukrainians killed during the ww2 (he oposed Stalin using ukrainians as the shock front, but he was an idiot, who else but the first oblast invaded to counter the nazis).
No, it wasn't legal. If you don't want to be part of Ukraine: suitcase, station, russia! Crimea is subsidy region, so it was not Kyiv who robbing. All processes you wrote are participated in continental Ukraine too. But now we have decentralisation, road bilding … Minimal wage now is higher then in russia. Economic growth despite the eighth years of the war. All thanks to NATO. God bless America. If you think in Russia it's any better you're a naive dumb fuck, russia for all its oil and gas money has done nothing for its citizens, same 3rd world country it always was

 No.672312

Dont know if it was legal but it sure as hell was based

 No.672464

>>662219
Why don't you cut it short by just saying that "Tehy ar blynching black plepeple in US too.?#"

 No.672506

>>672222
>And finally, russia will return Crimea to Ukraine without any shot and will pay reparations
that sounds like pure wishful thinking, I see no way that ever happens

>Only with Ukraine crimea has a future.

what ? why ? a russian speaking population being prevented from government job was their best future ?

>But now we have decentralisation, road bilding … Minimal wage now is higher then in russia.

that seem doubtful, given your government is begging russia to export more oil through the ukrainian pipeline and most of the trade was with russia. even with USA giving free shit, given the amount of corruption, I somehow doubt things have improved for the average ukrainian.

>All thanks to NATO. God bless America.

right, I guess causing a civil war was worth it…

>russia for all its oil and gas money has done nothing for its citizens, same 3rd world country it always was

and ukraine did ?

 No.672539

>>672506
>and ukraine did ?
At least we have no lazy russian alcoholics. All russians are alcoholics that do nothing and achieve nothing. Ukrainians are hard-working people that till their land and earn their bread, only for it to be redistributed to lazy russians in the USSR.

 No.672543

>>672539
>Ukrainians are hard-working people that till their land and earn their bread
Lmao

 No.674155

File: 1641340061775.jpg (249.93 KB, 1080x1548, RussianSubsidies.jpg)

>>672539
The exact opposite is true.

After Euromaidan birthrates collapsed and there were far more refugees, many intermarrying with Poles, and used as cheap slave labor and cheap women. Your porky president who sold his chocolate company to a Rothschild investment banking firm was a total failure and cocksleeve. Some "nationalist" you are.
As far as "much morality muh laws" you literally banned the Communist party and the Party of Regions after Euromaidan, nothing even remotely "democratic" if you are going to pull that spooks shit.

 No.675854

>>674155
москаль єбнутий

 No.683576

>>672506
>what ? why ? a russian speaking population being prevented from government job was their best future ?
are you serious about russian speaking population??!! Ahahah It's fully bullshit))) you're so funny )) Why crimean people now saying that in Ukraine they live better? It's a lot of videos with proofs… You allready paying reparations and your children will pay)) i would like to see your face when Crimea will return))) good luck, dont die, we need those who will pay reparations)) Crimea is Ukraine)

 No.683603

if the people in power decide we can't dispose of them, then it is illegal to dispose of them

 No.683609

>>683576
Ukraininas are not a nation anon.

 No.683626

The referendum wasn't legit and was done at the barrel of a gun. BUT if it had been legit chances are that they would have voted for Union with Russia.

 No.692086

File: 1642226067190.mp4 (1.3 MB, 202x360, majmun.mp4)



Unique IPs: 50

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]