Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:19:56 No. 682927
BUY GAYSEX COIN THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT THE POWER OF $GAYSEX
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:22:26 No. 682930
>>682927 >implying I don't already know the power Regardless, the rise of buttcoins and memecoins clearly indicates the accelerating process of late stage capitalism - wild speculation on literally anything and essentially nothing.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:24:51 No. 682933
>>682930 Has someone made a tulip coin yet?
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:28:00 No. 682937
fiat is easier to exchange for the average person that isn't a dedicated porky a big motivation for silver/goldbug rhetoric is that it can separate precious bourgie you from the unwashed masses
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:29:15 No. 682939
Why buy silver over gold when having even modest amount of silver (in terms of value) will need a big suitcase for transportation when equivalent amount of gold coins fit in a jacket pocket?
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:32:42 No. 682941
>>682937 Silver is currently something like $22 per ounce, less than a third of its peak price in the early 1980s. Lots of plebs can still afford some.
>>682939 You'd need only about five ounces of silver for $100 worth of groceries, it is entirely feasible as a medium of exchange for normal purchases. Regardless, I'm not arguing that it would be the best currency in an ideal society, I'm saying if enough people withdraw their fiat and buy either gold or silver, it *would* inevitably destroy our current capitalist monetary system, which is headed for destruction anyway.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:36:13 No. 682943
>>682941 the problem isn't prices, the problem is everyday fungibility
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:39:45 No. 682945
>>682943 I understand that, and I'm not advocating for silver as the ideal currency under ideal political circumstances. What I am saying is that purchasing silver is accelerationist praxis, our monetary system is doomed regardless, and if leftists don't acquire some precious metals soon there is a high likelihood that the main beneficiaries of the impending monetary collapse will be rightoids of various stripes.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:40:21 No. 682946
Nope pure fantasy.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:40:32 No. 682948
Why not just put your money into a credit union?
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:46:49 No. 682952
>>682948 Less bad than a big corporate bank I suppose. However, the reality is global capitalism is facing a systemic crisis that its masters cannot escape from. Interest rates are far below inflation and the debt burdens are unsustainable. Food and energy prices will continue to rise and hyperinflation is likely. Before the end of this decade you might be paying $100 for a Happy Meal.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:48:26 No. 682953
>>682952 If fiat loses it's purchasing power I don't think precious metals will remain useful either. In such cases bullets and fuel are better investments.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:52:42 No. 682958
>>682953 It depends on the nature and scale of collapse. Bullets, food, land, fuel (and most important friends) are the only things that give you a shot under total Mad Max conditions.
However, precious metals are better if the US and Europe are headed to Weimar Germany or post-Soviet conditions, as I believe they are. People weren't going around eating each other in Berlin in 1920, but they were poor as shit if they didn't have silver or gold.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:56:08 No. 682962
>>682933 Based fellow class traitor petite bourgeois investor. Nice reference.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 07:57:49 No. 682964
too few of us to affect the price
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 08:06:42 No. 682966
>>682964 Globally there are 100 million+ members of literal communist parties.
Regardless, rightoids are already buying PMs for ideological and personal reasons. Some normies are starting to buy PMs because of inflation fears, and assuming inflation keeps accelerating, so will that process.
Also "never doubt small group dedicated people something something"
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 08:34:45 No. 682985
>>682975 The resulting rightoid chimpout would be so spectacular that it could only accelerate the acceleration, especially because the government would have to be extremely desperate at that point.
At any rate that's an argument for silver, and both gold and silver can be hidden pretty easily.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 09:29:30 No. 683040
>>682945 that's not how any of this works
accelerationism is liberal retardation that can't understand the real nature of collapse and crisis
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 10:39:07 No. 683116
funny coincidence OP, I bought 20oz of silver just before new year's. partly because gold is overvalued but mostly because I finally found somewhere in Europe where you can buy silver and gold with bitcoinit still hasn't shipped ;_;
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 10:50:46 No. 683136
>>682920 fractional reserve banking is a meme, lending creates deposits not vice versa.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 11:29:02 No. 683184
>>683136 based and MMT pilled
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 11:33:50 No. 683189
>>682920 How about bronze?
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 11:48:53 No. 683198
>>683189 bronze is mostly copper
Sweden used copper money in the 1600's-1700's. it's.. not too practical
what might be worthwhile is speculating on an increase in the price of copper
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 13:59:54 No. 683308
>>683224 I've looked at auctions at the local pawn shop. silver goes for about ½ market price. almost worthwhile setting up for silver purification
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 14:42:05 No. 683348
>>682920 Silver prices looked over a century are very volatile. An price peaks are short lived, that makes it a bad idea to buy high, isn't there something that is more stable ?
There was a price troth in march 2020 and a price peak in August 2020 and now it's trending downwards. Why would you buy now ? Should you not wait for it to reach the bottom of the troth before you buy.
Your graphic is very confusing by the way.
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 15:21:38 No. 683391
>>683348 how do you know prices haven't reached a minimum?
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 15:29:32 No. 683404
>>683348 https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/m1.asp that's what the graph is measuring. the federal reserve printed a fuckton in 2020 cuz the pandemic made it freak out
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 16:49:26 No. 683496
>>683391 >how do you know prices haven't reached a minimum? You have to know what a commodity costs in labor time, so you know the actual value of the commodity.
Exchange value (market prices) fluctuate below and above the actual value. If exchange value drops below actual value, it's a good time to buy, because that's a guarantee that prices will go up, because nobody can sell below the cost of production forever. To find the perfect time to buy you have to find out the material factors of production. I don't know if commodity speculation is worth it though because producers hate speculators driving up material input prices, therefore they negotiate long term supply contracts that bypass speculators. So in the open market it's just a zero sum game of speculators trying to game each other out of their money, and there is also the possibility that money printing, spills out of pure finance and leads to inflation for speculative commodities.
>>683395 it says that stablecoins are stable because they are backed by fiat currency, which would make them a poor instrument to insure against unstable fiat currency.
>>683404 oh the graph in OP isn't showing silver, it's showing the quantity of dollar currency, got it.
sage sage 2022-01-09 (Sun) 16:59:22 No. 683510
OP is fucking retarded
Anonymous 2022-01-09 (Sun) 17:43:01 No. 683570
>>683496 >You have to know what a commodity costs in labor time, so you know the actual value of the commodity. yes anon, but I'm asking the other anon how they know this. because I suspect they're just looking at the price and going "it's totally going to go lower you guise!" with nothing to back it up
Unique IPs: 13