Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:08:48 No. 689918
>>689792 >50 books >volume 35 uygha what?
>apathy reject doomerism embrace revolutionary optimism
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:14:26 No. 689924
>all 50 books and after reading volume 35 how long did that take
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:16:45 No. 689927
>>689924 About an hour it’s only 1.6GB
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:28:46 No. 689939
>>689792 Buy a comfy chair and wait for the revolution to happen. Simple as.
sage sage 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:38:34 No. 689948
>>689942 you do realize OP is complaining about private property being "abolished" (non-existent scenario anyways)
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:43:19 No. 689949
>>689948 No I’m complaining about fascism coming after
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 17:59:24 No. 689970
It's the porkies who are coping. In an earlier time, financial trickery like Bitcoin and Tesla would've been enough to allay any petit bourgeois reaction. But even those candies aren't sweet enough, and the collective privileged American suburban petit bougies are gaining strength, spurred on by attacks from "woke Marxism". Additionally, the East Asian countries are following a different mode of capitalism (the Imperial German model), so we are effectively seeing the death knell of Anglo-American capitalism which will either devour itself in its homelands or seek to establish the Thousand Year Global Market through a third world war (and ultimately lose). Thanks for reading my schizo post.
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 18:25:19 No. 690004
Don't fucking read Marx's capital in 2022, you idiot. Try to understand the modern world, whatever shithole you live in. World changed a lot since marx's times.
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 18:29:24 No. 690008
>>690004 Not really
Outsourcing has been around for decades and runs off almost the exact ideas including labourers in the colonies being used as reserve labour for wage workers in the colonial core
Laws of transactions might aswell haven’t changed a bit and hence neither did the capitalist mode of production
The only thing that may have changed is LTV being a unit of value and not the relation between demand and supply RELATIVE(this matters a lot because not every product in their expanded form can be compared in their value in all contexts) to the market they’re in. Oh well
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 18:43:40 No. 690024
>>690004 name a single fundamental change in society since marx’s times
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 18:45:57 No. 690026
>>690008 >LTV being a unit of value and not the relation between demand and supply this is what happens when you don’t read Capital, he literally argued this already
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 18:52:38 No. 690030
>>690026 Yeah I’m just gonna hide this comment because LTV is controversial enough among leftists to this day that this comment may set off a flood of angry comments
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 20:54:23 No. 690102
>>690100 I know this is obvious satire
But apple is unironically only successful because they followed every revenue and exploitation tactic Marx mentioned
Overpricing
Outsourcing
Colonial expansion
Reserve labour
Extended days of labour
Day and night workers etc
Anonymous 2022-01-13 (Thu) 20:56:47 No. 690103
>>690102 Apple has never produced an actual innovation
And nearly all of their products are shitty in comparison to literally every other smartphone and hardware manufacturer
Fucking phones aren’t even modifiable using hardware not made by apple
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 02:32:24 No. 690405
>>689970 >privileged American suburban petit bougies are gaining strength Their class is dying off, Jan 6th was the high point and it showed that without lumpen footsoldiers the petite bouj reaction is nothing and will just seethe in silence as organized labor and porkies megacorps wear them down
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 12:39:45 No. 690843
>How tf does one cope? You read Volumes 2 and 3 next
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 15:48:43 No. 691012
>>690843 Halfway through vol 2
All I got out of it was the same info on transactions in the first and finance advice
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 16:15:29 No. 691031
>>689792 demoralising thread
sage
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 15:07:08 No. 692394
>>690024 I think Marx is relevant. But bullshit jobs, for example.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 15:19:46 No. 692402
>production and consumption of valueless goods for the sake of infinite profits That's not how profits work, dog.
Unique IPs: 24