Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 20:40:36 No. 691370
no, there wasn't
yes they were
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 20:45:54 No. 691378
This topic is too big for just a couple of responses. Ancient Greece, Switzerland - liberals claim those are real, in some cases "pure" democracies. Are they really though, given analysis? Is the bourgeoisie reigned in somehow in Switzerland?
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:12:09 No. 691418
>>691378 >Is the bourgeoisie reigned in somehow in Switzerland?
The direct democracy system in Switzerland is slightly more democratic than regular electoral democracy. But that system is the result of the conditions of Switzerland. The cause is that it's not even remotely possible to attack that country, the terrain neutralizes military projection wholesale. Resulting in a national bourgeoisie that has to bribe the population, to have a bourgeois dictatorship.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:15:01 No. 691430
>>691378 >Ancient Greece
Wha…are you really claiming they were democratic? Has Cockshott planted this seed in you?
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:17:00 No. 691432
How does not being able to expand necessitate more democracy? The bourgeoisie can operate as normal given it conduct imperialism through law and trade anyways.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:21:05 No. 691439
NEP Russia, Tito's Yugoslavia, Xi's China
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:23:28 No. 691448
All of them stuffy dictatorships in practice.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:24:48 No. 691455
Jesus man, stop being such a fucking idiot…
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:27:09 No. 691462
I think his point was more that Switzerland's geography affords it a high degree of security. This in turn allows it the luxury of decentralization and localized democracy.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:31:47 No. 691473
Safavid Persia, Ottoman Empire, Mughal India, Tsardom of Muscovy, Yuan & Qing Dynasty
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:32:32 No. 691475
Based and Hazpilled.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:41:13 No. 691494
>Has there even been a society based on deprivation and domination of a class of “lowers” that was genuinely democratic Really think about that question and tell me what you think is correct
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 21:52:56 No. 691514
Why don't we see more democracy in other secure places like the UK, US, Meiji-era Japan?
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 22:49:52 No. 691618
If anything centralization is the more efficient way for government. There's no reason to decentralize for the sake of it.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 22:55:23 No. 691624
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 23:06:52 No. 691642
Minority rule, i.e. the way things have been in every society bigger than a hamlet.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 23:08:47 No. 691643
How are they dictatorships then?
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 23:11:05 No. 691648
Workers lacked/lack a means by which to elect their leadership, with things like trade unions either not existing independently or having little power.
Anonymous 2022-01-14 (Fri) 23:22:22 No. 691671
But that's bullshit.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 01:31:55 No. 691827
Security is necessary but not sufficient for a healthy democracy.
Depends on the conditions of the country. Switzerland is very small, stable, defensible, etc. There isn't really a need for strong centralization, which is why they have been so successful without it.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 02:55:14 No. 691917
The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Remember that only the nobility were citizens.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 03:04:33 No. 691925
Liberum Veto moment
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 20:43:54 No. 692925
It's the other way around, bigger countries typically benefit more from decentralization of power because of the variety of geographies, people, etc.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 21:23:23 No. 692955
There's no such thing as democracy, never has been, never will be. Humans are a social AND hierarchical species, the closest you will get to democracy is when the strong protect the weak rather than exploiting them.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 21:54:27 No. 692983
I've never really studied it seriously but I was reading some of Caesar's memoirs recently.
I might be mistaken, but it sounded like Ancient Rome went through a surprise series of privatizations before Caesar was able to invade and people more or less joined with Caesar against his enemies in the Roman government. Surprise privatizations through the country into chaos, prompting Caesar's invasion.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 21:56:39 No. 692989
Caesar was an opportunist. The real revolutionary of the 1st century BCE was Catalina.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 21:59:05 No. 692994
it's still a democracy even when what constitutes "citizen" is narrow. all that's required is that people vote
we shouldn't fight the ancient athenians on the definition of the concept when they invented it
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:03:00 No. 692996
The athenians were colonizers and slavers, fuck their concepts, fuck thrm, and fuck you for trying to revive their slaver imperialist society
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:21:45 No. 693019
Their democratic system is actually really good, it was just put into practice in a sexist slave society. In a socialist society I think it would work well.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:26:39 No. 693023
I don’t think they were sexist
I just think they were pedophilic faggots that needed to cope with knowing how impulsive they were
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:29:46 No. 693029
>>693023 >require women to always have a male guardian <not sexist
What did he mean by this?
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:33:27 No. 693035 >>692996
they were notorious homosexuals, woman abusers and imperialists
but i think a lot of it is still cool
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:34:36 No. 693036
cool aesthetic, cool philosophy
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:39:11 No. 693042
my point is that there's no point being conservative or possessive of the concept, since it came from a feudal slave-holder society anyways
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:47:21 No. 693049
>>693035 >being gay is bad
did you get lost faggot?
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:49:05 No. 693051
As opposed to what exactly? Electoral oligarchies that have been perverted to mean democracy?
Worst take in the thread.
But no, in fact slave holding societies weren't the only ones to experiment in democratic rule. In fact peasants during feudalism in parts of central and western Europe often used an assembly decision-making system that was quite like the Athenian system. This system was overthrown in France by the liberal revolution that ushered in capitalism. For some reason this has been largely overlooked by historians of government.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:50:59 No. 693055
*Peasants during feudalism in parts of central and western Europe, when not subject to the authority of their feudal lords, often used an assembly decision-making system at a local level that was quite like the Athenian system.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:52:52 No. 693057
if you're an invalid this is what you think and if you are an assassin of the truth this is what you'd posit
however, for the sake of this conversation i enjoy reading your thoughts on the exclusion of this group of people or that group of people over nuance and i think it does justice to our parade of communism and anti fascism in this conversation
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:54:26 No. 693065
Athens was not a real democracy because they had a huge slave population, on top of non-voting citizenry, on top of non-citizen residents. Just the voter-to-slave ratio was like 1:4 - the vast major of the population's voice was not heard and wasn't considered. It's a dictatorship of the upper classes, except they were bigger than in today's society. And even then, there were probably elites among the demos (voters) who manipulated things similarly to how the elites manufacture consent now, lobby, whatever.
Anonymous 2022-01-15 (Sat) 22:58:31 No. 693081
It was a democracy of its free male citizens. This should be properly juxtaposed with other city-states of the period which were oligarchies of their free male citizens or outright dictatorships. The lack of a land requirement for participation alone was a radical departure in Athens compared to its contemporaries and dramatically reduced the class character of its governance.
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:05:21 No. 693216
Kill youself conservatoid.
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:07:13 No. 693221
>>693057 >i enjoy reading your thoughts on the exclusion of this group of people or that group of people over nuance and i think it does justice to our parade of communism and anti fascism in this conversation
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:14:40 No. 693234
what i am saying is that even if something sounds crazy or off the wall, if it is an honest opinion i respect that another person brings it into consideration as long as they are honest
and with the spirit of leftist discussion, it sounds like some leftist shit to say "ah yeah, fuck them, they owned slaves or were ancient capitalists" or whatever
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:17:24 No. 693239
how is it crazy or off the wall? you do realize where you're posting, right?
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:27:28 No. 693248
well, it is not a big deal here, but i only go through the pains of illustrating this for the intrinsic truth of the matter for the sake of honest and intrinsic truth. it is one thing to propagate a catch phrase but another thing to seriously think you need to exclude history or ancient studies or whatever for this nuance or that nuance when that ancient time was much different from the present time
evidently even if there are things about a certain society we dislike, there are also things which are still relevant to the present in one way or another, and there are there aspects of that ancient society which existed independently from the thing you don't like about the ancient society
i do agree though that a society must be mad to live in such a way as to base much of your labor on slavery. egypt did the same thing, albeit likely worse, but are we then supposed to do the same here in egypt and basically every other society?
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:32:02 No. 693255
i just think that democracy can mean anything, so there's no need to exclude stuff from its definition considering its historical flexibility
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 00:44:40 No. 693265 >>693255 >i just think that democracy can mean anything
Then why even make the thread or have a discussion? If democracy is anything and everything, who cares?
It is of course not anything, and a robust discussion about its meaning and utility should be had, so that if nothing else we stop getting newfags who conflate electoral governments explicitly rejecting democracy and modeled after ancient oligarchies as "democratic" in any fashion.
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 01:28:07 No. 693320
Some peasant areas in Russia also used such systems where they elected stewards(starosta).
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 01:28:59 No. 693322
>>691366 >Was there ever any society based on private property that was actually democratic,
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 14:17:07 No. 693871
alright. i do think democracy can be unironically more useful for proletarian action and organization than even insurrection (at times), and i don't have a dogmatic, meaningless opposition to it like a lot of supposedly "radical" leftists
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 18:38:43 No. 694176
How does Switzerland keep itself from falling to capitalist oligarchy, assumingly? That country has lots of big porky financial/multinational companies; there's no way people are actually getting more than in any other western European country.
Anonymous 2022-01-16 (Sun) 19:09:59 No. 694232
Switzerland is an electoral oligarchy like any other, it just has more direct decision-making than most.
Anonymous 2022-01-18 (Tue) 18:26:51 No. 697050
How about this question - is Singapore a real dictatorship of the state, or is the bourgeoisie the ones with control? Has the state managed to wrangle the capitalists in any non-socialist country?
Anonymous 2022-01-18 (Tue) 18:31:25 No. 697053
>>691366 >Was there ever any society based on private property that was actually democratic, or were they all dictatorships of the upper class, more or less providing for the welfare of lower-class citizens?
To even ask the question reveals a lack of understanding of what private property is. Private property is an arrangement where one party owns property that other people work to produce value. It's an inherently undemocratic arrangement. Even if politically all things were made as equitable as possible, there would still be intrinsic power in the rights of ownership. If there weren't then it wouldn't be ownership and it wouldn't be private property.
Anonymous 2022-01-18 (Tue) 20:12:09 No. 697169
There are in fact a lot of democracies, but they are of course flawed ones. Think America, France, Spain etc., in those countries people do vote at the municipal, state, and federal level and do get some change made, though with the influence of money in politics as usual. But by and large the people are enfranchised and the figures they vote for do get at least some of their campaign promises done, despite opposition (which mind you is just another part of democratic voice). Governments have a mandate from the people and even if you want to look at it materialistically, still want to win votes every cycle, still have to worry about mid-term results, and overall largely keep to people's expectation of their voices mattering. It's a balancing act that involves wealthy private interests but still a kind of democracy.
Anonymous 2022-01-18 (Tue) 20:23:17 No. 697177
>>691648 >Workers lacked/lack a means by which to elect their leadership
Why should they?
The party is more educated in marxism than worker, workers meddling with planning and politics could only throw AES into disarray
Anonymous 2022-01-19 (Wed) 14:03:13 No. 698526
Except Rome had a fifth of its population be slaves, women among others were never allowed to vote, and there was a lot less social mobility then as there is now… in a flawed, but actual democracy for the masses of people.
Unique IPs: 24