[ overboard / cytube] [ leftypol / b / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime ] [ meta ] [ GET / ref]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)


File: 1613757829328.jpg (5.93 MB, 3711x3281, Russian_Imperial_Family_19….jpg)

 No.86716[Last 50 Posts]

Was it moral to kill the Czar's children?
>>

 No.86721

Wrong question.
>>

 No.86722

Whether or not it was moral was irrelevant
When the crown passes through the bloodline all who are in it have a target on their head
Royals have always known this and have gladly slew each other’s children with nary a thought
Sucks for Nicholas that he believed in the absolute rule of the imperial throne to the bitter end
>>

 No.86723

>children
>>

 No.86725

>>86723
Yea, also they were all adults save Alexei
>>

 No.86726

>>86716
No. But it was definitely a net positive for the future children of the Soviet Union. Killing a spoiled tsarist child is nothing in comparison to letting peasant and worker's children being subject to starvation.
>>

 No.86727

Yes and not only that it was based
>>

 No.86735

File: 1613758424967.png (11.41 KB, 79x108, stirner07.png)

>Was it moral to kill the Czar's children?
>moral
Probably not. Does it matter?
>>

 No.86743

File: 1613758598385.jpg (64.46 KB, 1127x1015, oops.jpg)

>was it moral
The real villain here is monarchy politicizing children.
>>

 No.86746

"Women and children are special" is reactionary idealism.
>>

 No.86747

>>

 No.86752

>>86747
There is no meaningful distinction between enemies of the revolution, gender and age are invoked as a way to shield reactionary idols from destruction by pretending there is some sacred rule stating that they are immune from it.
>>

 No.86753

File: 1613758926836.png (6.14 KB, 77x73, stirner-eye-2.png)

>>86747
It's not on anyonne to prove a negative. Can you prove us women and children are special outside of nebulous christen nonsense about innocence?
>>

 No.86756

>>86752
>>86753
>Why shouldn’t communists just be wanton murderers?
<Muh spooks
You know, there’s a reason Marx despised that faggot Max Stirner
>>

 No.86764

>>86752
It depends on the context. If you say "Women and children are special" to defend Tsardom, then yes, you're a reactionary. If you say "Women and children are special" to encourage proletarian solidarity, then no, you're not a revolutionary. To be honest, the way you divorce a slogan from its situation context is more idealist.
>>

 No.86766

File: 1613759395407.png (5.69 KB, 77x73, stirner-eye-4.png)

>>86756
>You know, there’s a reason Marx despised that faggot Max Stirner
Except Marx actively rejected the humanist nonsense of his earlier years, thanks in part to his and engles discourse with Stirner. you're talking out yer ass, son.
>>

 No.86771

>>86753
"Women and children are special" is a positive assertion, not negative. Saying women and children are special because it helps reinforce proletarian humanism. Only faggots hate women and children.
>>

 No.86775

File: 1613759535733.png (6.06 KB, 77x73, stirner-eye-3.png)

>>86771
Yes, you were asking us to prove they are not. Which first you have to try to show us they are.
>>

 No.86781

>>86735
>>86743
But if morality doesn't matter, why are you guys even socialists? Purely "practical" reasons?
>>

 No.86790

File: 1613760198062.jpg (52.39 KB, 725x299, austerity-isnt-working-2.jpg)

>>86781
>why are you guys even socialists? Purely "practical" reasons?
Yes. I am not a socialist or a leftist personally so I may not be the best to respond but I recognize that Socialism is in my, my family and those i loves naked class interests apart from anything else.
What is your moral argument for socialism, if you do not mind me asking?
>>

 No.86796

>>86722
I doubt the soviets gave a shit about their bloodline. Their execution was simply a turn of events in the war. No one in the working classes was going to complain about a 300 years old oppressive dynasty being shot anyway.
>>

 No.86830

>moral
Lmao
>>

 No.86832

The life of a worker is worth more than all the royals to have ever breathed.
>>

 No.86839

>>86832
This
Idk why everyone is ranting about
>Muh spooks muh morals don’t real
When this is the objectively correct answer
The life of a single worker is worth more than the life of every king, prince, emperor, lord, queen, pharaoh, etc.
>>

 No.86863

File: 1613762674164.png (3.92 MB, 3400x3082, grace-reprimands.png)

>>86716
I would do much worse to your revolutionary leaders.
So I guess it's fair game.
>>

 No.86866

>>86863
You wouldn't do shit, you're an autistic NEET and virgin.
>>

 No.86868

>>86716
Moral? Maybe not
Based? Absolutely and we shall do the same with porky’s sons and daughters
>>

 No.86869

File: 1613763005090.jpg (307.7 KB, 2048x1218, 1572989517156.jpg)

>moral
>>

 No.86886

It was distasteful, but so was killing the czar. It had to be done though, you can't have little Anastasia marrying some Duke and coming back to the SFSR with an army to reclaim her "legitimate" title.
>>

 No.86891

It’s politics.
>>

 No.86895

>>86868
No, just re-educate them. Being bourgeois doesn't involve hereditary privilege unlike monarchy.
>>

 No.86898

>>86895
This, being a porky is way less spooked than being a monarch, monarch’s justify it with shit like “muh god” “muh divine right” “muh royal bloodline”
Porky is just like
>Me owns this u work kek fookin prole
>>

 No.86900

File: 1613764032158.jpg (58.43 KB, 992x558, HT_elliot_rodger_jt_140525….jpg)

>>86866
>HAHA, HAVE SEX, INCEL!
>You wouldn't do shit, you're an autistic NEET and virgin
>>

 No.86901

>moral
>>

 No.86905

It was a highly ideological move–the idea being that the enemies of the revolution require a figuredhead to rally under instead of being motivated by the self-interest of oligarchs that fund and supply them. Russia was invaded by a dozen other countries immediately after the revolution anyway. Depriving the enemies of the revolution of their material base to fight is how the Bolsheviks won the war, not by killing a captive figurehead who no longer had any power.
>>

 No.86923

>>86900
>Rodger stabbed three men to death in his apartment, apparently one by one on their arrival. About three hours later he drove to a sorority house, and after failing to get inside shot three women outside, two of whom died.
lol he died a virgin
>>

 No.86935

>millions of kids starve every day
<I sleep
>Czar's children gets murdered
<real shit
>>

 No.86938

File: 1613765044168-0.png (227.24 KB, 566x635, egoball.png)

File: 1613765044168-1.png (92.02 KB, 496x360, goddammit karl.png)

>>86756
>You know, there’s a reason Marx despised that faggot Max Stirner
Max would trigger that 'tism something fierce though lol
>>

 No.86943

>>86938
people are retarded to assoom Stirner wasn’t relevant. he was probably just as popular in the academic underground as someone like Marx prior to Marx’s own death, which is why Von Hartmann felt the need to comment on him.
>>

 No.86946

>>86863
Anarco-capitalism is a more relevant ideology than monachism
>>

 No.86949

>>86905
It was, however, cathartic. And we don't begrudge people catharsis.
>>

 No.86953

>>86943
A lot of Stirner's critiques are on point. The main problem that I have with Stirner is that he thinks we can arrive at a pure Subject once we remove all the spooks. We can't. It's impossible to remove every spook in existence. The only thing we can do is to choose which spook applies to us.
>>

 No.86958

File: 1613765620615.jpg (391.54 KB, 934x1024, Caesarion.jpg)

It's wasn't anything new.
Among hereditary states, it was common to eradicate a rivals bloodline, so there wouldn't be any claims to the throne. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarion
However, this was not a heriditary state usurping another.
I would assume they intended to remove the reactionary variable of royal blood from the plan.
>>

 No.86959

File: 1613765694432.jpg (88.66 KB, 450x509, Grace glare.jpg)

>>86946
This board has threads on fascism, an ideology that has been irrelevant since the end of WW2.
>>

 No.86961

>>86959
>Irrelevant since WWII
<Half of the Cold War was legit just the US arming fascists and telling them to go hog wild killing reds
Okay, monarchoid
>>

 No.86964

>>86938
>Here lies Karl Marx, destroyer of Max Stirner.
Imagine tagging Marx's grave with this epitaph, kek
>>

 No.86965

No. It may have been practically beneficial, however. I know I wouldn't have done it unless it could be proven to me that killing them would lead to more bloodshed. But since I aim for the emancipation of all, that includes people born into ruling-class positions. Heavy is the head that wears the crown, after all. Especially for aristocratic women used as breeding stock for title propagation. I find the personal antipathy felt toward royals and the like to be disturbingly antimaterialist. Like, sure, hate Nichalas for his shitty actions, but people seem to jerk off about his offsprimg deserving it too.
>>

 No.86966

>>86965
*unless it could be proven to me that NOT killing them would lead to more bloodshed
>>

 No.86971

>>86959
Spain and Portugal were openly fascist into the 1970s, NATO had (has) fascist GLADIO death squads throughout the second half of the 20th century across Europe, and fascist reaction is still around worldwide.
>>

 No.86988

File: 1613767178959.png (238.32 KB, 441x697, gracecute3.png)

>>86961
Leftists give more hot air and credit to fascism as this kind of foil than larping fascists themselves.
>>86961
>>86971
Royal states were involved in the Cold War, no less.
The fascist states you describe post-WW2 were conservative-leaning dictatorships or tangentially aligned to that ideology… At least, the larping fascists themselves would say, I'd think.
>>

 No.86989

>>86988
>Imagine simping somebody because they came out of a royal pussy
God what a retard
>>

 No.87004

@86988
No (You)'s until you post pics of yourself, avatarfagging monarcuck.
>>

 No.87008

>>86988
>conservative-leaning dictatorships
The usual horseshit that the likes of Reagan used to justify arming every fascist the world over. Portuguese fascism was overthrown by communists.
>>

 No.87009

>>86989
Surely the principled stance on monarchism would be to support it because it gives anyone the chance to become a king (by performing a putsch).
>>

 No.87016

>>87009
Literally no
Not anyone gets to become King
If you oust the King his inbred child or brother comes to power
If you really press the matter some other lesser inbred cunt lower on the totem pole who still has “superior blood” (i.e. inbred warlord ancestry) can start a civil war to gain the throne like the bastard Europeans did for over a thousand pointless years following the fall of Rome.
>>

 No.87034

>>86988
Fascists were and are still relevant bc they have a real working ideology unlike neolibs and conservatives they are our biggest enemies bc the actually see the problems in the world and critique them unlike libs
>>

 No.87038

File: 1613769661448.png (3.48 MB, 4156x5105, Grace guitar.png)

>>86989
All I have to do to find my ideology propagating itself is wait on a few royal pussies to reproduce royal children.
Meanwhile, (You):
>autistically waiting for a paradigm shift to change the course of human history and the entire normalfag masses to rise up and actually care
>>

 No.87050

>>87038
>All I need is to….
Nothing
By definition you lost
The royals have been thoroughly cowed into submission by the bourgeoisie
And the fact that your ideology effectively requires the bourgeoisie to have a “come to Jesus” moment and put their long defeated and cowed enemies back into power, it is entirely nonsensical and futile
A Queen is never going to come and save you from your humdrum life
At least communism actually does have an ability to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of our defeat, so long as the masses and the working class exists socialism will never truly die
As for you, as stated, the very basis of what you “need” that you yourself espouse means that you have already lost and lost even before the Soviet Union was born
The execution of Nicholas was the final nail in the coffin
All that remains of the ancien regime are powerless puppets of the bourgeoisie and various US neocolonies
>>

 No.87067

File: 1613770583439.jpg (276.06 KB, 1280x720, diderot wall.jpg)

lol @ monarchists, does the higher quality leather enhance the boot-licking experience, I wonder?
>>

 No.87071

File: 1613770710159.png (75.39 KB, 370x450, 0909090213.png)

>>87050
>At least communism actually does have an ability to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of our defeat
It's far more likely to imagine someone taking on royalism Bokassa-style even than what you're aiming for. And the royal trees that still stand in the forest, like I said, grow with each generation.

You say, imagine simping for somebody because they came out of a royal pussy–but to base your government on something so life-affirming and substantial like the relationship between father and son stands true for all ages.

Royalism could boast having most of human history. Monarchy will always be desirable for this reason.
>>

 No.87080

File: 1613771031852.png (2.2 MB, 1920x1080, grace.png)

>>87071
Monarchism can only work under Feudalism I'm sorry Grace you are down for
>>

 No.87082

File: 1613771244529.gif (401.02 KB, 128x330, FB5936D4-1593-4099-BC56-F4….gif)

>>87071
>Unironically basing your society on the sexual gratification you get from watching the familial relationships among inbreds
My God
Even the most pathological porky worshippers aren’t this mentally fucked
>>

 No.87083

When you take a piece off a chess board, does the piece remain relevant to winning the game?
Stalin, the czars, trotsky, lenin, mao, et cetera, are irrelevant. Stalinism, czarism, trotskyism, leninism, maoism are the main points of focus. Threads about dead people belong on /b/
>>

 No.87110

>>87071
Feudalism is over anon you need to let go
>>

 No.87114

The problem with royal eradication is it's always so hard to be sure you've killed all of them. And even then, you very often get pretenders later being used to further the same agenda of the people backing them. There's some great examples of this during the Roman republic/empire and even today lineages of the Russian monarchy have survived to make claims to the Russian throne. Cutting the head off the beast is ultimately always an incomplete, ideological solution to a problem that has its roots in a material base.
>>

 No.87115

File: 1613772186481.jpg (350.21 KB, 1536x1536, yVZ3o-NE.jpg large.jpg)

>>87082
It isn't such a bad thing.
It is true, that while most people say, that monarchy is natural… I have been also saying that monarchy is rare and unique–it is rare to find the supremacy of one man among men, like >>87080 anon hints to me.

>Even the most pathological porky worshippers aren’t this mentally fucked

Porkies don't even know what the word economic means. It is based off oikonomikos denoting household management. Aristotle says, that a household is ideally a monarchy–while man isn't an economic animal and said to be rather political, the ideal of monarchy is a political household where people are united under one ruler, one king.

>>87083
>Threads about dead people belong on /b/
You're saying this because you post on /b/.
>>

 No.87120

Absolutely, they deserved to be turned into swiss cheese
>>

 No.87121

>>87115
>Nero
Great example, 20 years after his death a pretender resurfaced in the Parthian Empire to lead a resistance movement against Rome (Nero was considered a hero there for negotiating a peace). People will use the visage or unverifiable relations to dead people to further whatever agenda they please.
>>

 No.87122

>>87115
>It isn't such a bad thing.
Whatever you say anon
>>

 No.87125

>>

 No.87132

>>87114
I don't see why people keep insisting that they were killed for their bloodline. The execution was pretty improvised and hastily put. The city where the tsar was being held was besieged by the whites, and the Ural soviet took the decision to kill them before letting the whites rescue them (the city fell a week later).
>>

 No.87886

You guys just love getting baited, don't'cha? This could have been a cool thread but you let it derail thanks to a single silly troll.
>>

 No.87901

>>86756
You would drop all of your idealistic zeal for good too if you witnessed the full extent of violence anti-communists were and still are willing to dish out for us. Where are these morals when they murdered entire families of communists and put their corpses to hang in the sun? Where are these morals when the military dictatorship stole the children of socialists in Latin America to sold them to rich families? Where are these morals when entire villages got burned to the ground for supporting communism?
>>

 No.87916

>>86721
fpbp
of course it is not "moral" to kill the emperor's underage children but hey, opie, why do you ask about these kids specifically and not, say, peasant child #1200 through #1205 that was killed?
>>

 No.87926

>>87901
I have no reason to be willing to sacrifice my life, freedom, and security for the communist cause without a moral conviction to do so; if simply lying low is evidently better to do then personal self-interest cannot be the sole motivator.

I have to ask, why do you feel such anger at the idea of communists holding morals? Do you truly want to be a savage that would slaughter an entire village with machetes? Do you want to be the same man as your enemy, a sadistic animal? No, of course not, you do what is needed to be done, but with absolutely no morality whatsoever the pleasure of violence will surely turn you into a beast. Just look at the joy imperialist troopers feel slaughtering the innocent; there is no shame in being better than such men.
>>

 No.87933

>>86781
historic necessity from which you can derive an objective morality but don't let stirneroids found out
>>

 No.87934

>>87933
The real problem autists have is that they think anyone that adheres to any sort of morality believes in “objective morality” when most people know morality is relative and the goals of the communist movement reflect a relative morality from the perspective of the proletariat
>>

 No.87942

yea but only in that specific context in perfect conditions they should've send em to trial execute the tsar and maybe his wife send the rest to labour camps with new identities
>>

 No.87945

>>86895
yeah in theory we don't even "need" to kill porky just expropiate their shit
>>

 No.87969

>>87934
thats not relative or subjective morality thats historically determined morality and it's not the same since we can actually understand history in a rational way and figure out in which direction it is heading objective morality must follow the path of history which means the only objective morality is the morality of the revolutionary class
>>

 No.87974

>>87969
Okay so now explain why Shining Path executed peasants with machetes
>>

 No.87982

it was a heated gaming moment
>>

 No.87987

>>86964
>Imagine tagging Marx's grave with this epitaph, kek
I will do this one day. Screenshot this.
>>

 No.87993

>>87974
because they thought it was necessary the real problem with them is that they followed some retarded dogmatic cultist ideology that could justify doing something like that
>>

 No.87994

>>

 No.88013

>>87993
also mautists and other pseudo marxists have a glorified conception of violence they are the kind of people who forget all context that justifies revolutionary violence and think violence for violences sake is enough justification like they would see shit like the romanov's killing and think the only way to be good commies is by killing the families of your enemies
>>

 No.88724

File: 1613882744907.jpg (146.95 KB, 719x456, IMG_20210208_070642.jpg)

Die
>>

 No.88732

File: 1613882988963.png (153.33 KB, 500x457, unknown (2).png)

>>

 No.88735

>>86943
this was composed by a Stirnerbro who influenced Nietzsche
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGU1P6lBW6Q
>>

 No.88762

>>86781
>why are you guys even socialists?
Because Marx discovered the laws of motion of politics and communism is inevitable (barring enormous disasters). Moralistic appeals can be useful cynically and sure we would like people to live in a society that actually works, but the ground truth of it all is that we understand the mechanics of the system and can see where it logically goes. It's also in my interests to struggle for improvement since historically that's what you have to do even for modest reforms.
>>

 No.88768

>>86781
Morality according to who? The only good place for monarchs is gulag just like Puyi, if they still can be persuade. But the 1917 is necessary to show the monarchs that the power of the people matters above all.
>>

 No.88769

>>86781
Yes? Its in my self interest to have power over the owners, and co own and direct the production and distribution of things along with me friends family and equal social class. Its in the self interest of all workers to be socialist, therefore it is in my interest to be a socialist and share ownership of the means with my fellow labourers and toilers
>>

 No.88786

File: 1613888186797.jpg (293.58 KB, 720x1431, Screenshot_2021-02-21-13-1….jpg)

>>

 No.89308

File: 1613936672074-0.png (2.29 MB, 1644x1480, Grace & liberty-tan No God….png)

File: 1613936672074-1.png (2.47 MB, 2000x2000, Monarchy vs Anarchy.png)

File: 1613936672074-2.mp4 (6.24 MB, 640x360, EVERY MAN A KING (NEW VERS….mp4)

>>86946
Honestly, coming back to this post,
You say that because you're both anarkiddies, don't you? Basically, demofags.
I personally want to vomit when I see an "anarcho-monarchist" myself, but every man a king?
>>

 No.89319

>>

 No.89324

File: 1613937313028.jpg (1.22 MB, 2833x2125, 09781240891289041089424890….jpg)

>>

 No.89383

>>86716
Moral? Very spooky.
But i would kill them again.
>>

 No.89388

Morality has nothing to do with it.
>>

 No.89644

>>86863
have sex
>>

 No.89719

>>86716
yes and it was based
>>

 No.89720

File: 1613971734200.jpg (126.76 KB, 800x491, 163e2b3ce84f74ab4a7627695d….jpg)

>>

 No.89726

>>88724
based
>>

 No.91009

>>86863
Grace is a slut after all. There are many hentai about it. The monarchs fall & the peasants take what's theirs.

https://hanime.tv/videos/hentai/oujo-onna-kishi-w-dogehin-roshutsu-chijoku-no-misemono-dorei-1

https://hanime.tv/videos/hentai/kyonyuu-princess-saimin-1
>>

 No.91012

>>91009
Coomers are going to horny gulag anyway. Bastards like you shall be lynch.
>>

 No.91088

>>86716
Imagine an alternate timeline where the kept the kids alive and brought them into Marxist-Leninism. Perhaps when Gorby was succumbing to Pizza fever, the new monarch of the Soviets might of been able to hold down the fort, I mean they would have the support of the monarchists.
>>

 No.91102

>>91012
Eat my ass, monarchist.
>>

 No.91114

I don't know, was it moral for the Tsars to live like gods in comparison to their fellow countrymen? Was it moral for the millions of toiling peasants to toil, suffer, live like animals, and die an early death while the royal family did objectively nothing to improve their living conditions? Was it moral for them to let life go on like this without even lifting a finger to try and provide their people a respectable standard of living while living lavishly? Why is it that the lives of the tsars children matter so much more to you than the lives of the children amongst the workers and peasantry?
>>

 No.91263

>>91114
whataboutism
>>

 No.91265

>>91263
>whataboutism
liberal invention to ignore westoid faggotry and jim crow
>>

 No.91956

File: 1614127075718-0.jpg (48.43 KB, 453x503, 57b14e0f773e13ec55d47eec9c….jpg)

File: 1614127075718-1.mp4 (299.54 KB, 640x640, mpUDEgrAAkAq4_6P.mp4)

>>91114
>I don't know, was it moral for the Tsars to live like gods in comparison to their fellow countrymen?
Yes, there should be royal splendor.

From Bossuet's Politics Drawn from Holy Scripture:
>God forbade the ostentation which vanity inspires, and the mad swelling of a heart intoxicated by its riches; but he willed nonetheless that the courts of kings be striking and magnificent, to impress a certain respect upon on peoples… And even today, at the rites of kings, as we have already seen, the Church offers this prayer: "May the glorious dignity and majesty of the palace make shine in all eyes the great splendor of the royal power, such that light, like that of the flash of lightning, may illuminate it from all sides." All these are words chosen to express the magnificence of a royal court, which is asked of God as a necessary support of royalty.

>Men are the true riches of a king… One is delighted when he sees, under good kings, the incredible multitude of people and the astonishing largeness of the armies. By contrast one is ashamed of Achab and of the kingdom of Israel exhausted of people, when one sees his army encamp "like two little flocks of goats"–while the Syrian army which faced it covered the face of the earth… In the enumeration of the immense riches of Solomon, there is nothing finer than these words: "Judah and Israel were innumerable, as the sand of the sea in the multitude." …But here is the pinnacle of felicity and of richness. It is that this whole innumerable people "ate and drank of the fruit of its hands, every one under his vine and under his fig-tree, and rejoicing." For joy makes bodies healthy and vigorous, and makes profitable the innocent repast that one consumes with his family."


>>91009
>>91012
The peril of coomunism…
I am not looking at that hentai

>>91102
Sorry, but coomers go to the Bastille.
>>

 No.91988

File: 1614129233782.jpg (71.69 KB, 500x650, the-guillotine-large.jpg)

>>91956
>coomers go to the Bastille.
How compelling. Follow your liege, simp.
>>

 No.91995

>>91956
the cope is fucking real in this post.
>>

 No.92038

>>91956
??? I thought you were about monarchy as a concept (with tyranny and roman dictators) more than about defending specific monarchs.
I mean,who are supposed to be "legitimate kings" in France for exemple,does Napoleon descendants even count,or is he "less" legitimate than the Habsurg dude.
And does genes even really matter at that point when they are so "diluted" ?
You wouln't happen to be baiting on purpose the dude who gets mad at socdem flags wouldn't you ?
>>

 No.92042

>>86716
No, but it was a necessary evil. In China it didn't need to happen, and Mao recognized that.
>>

 No.92057

>>92042
>evil

>The tzar’s diary is the best of all testimony. From day to day and from year to year drags along upon its pages the depressing record of spiritual emptiness. “Walked long and killed two crows. Drank tea by daylight.” Promenades on foot, rides in a boat. And then again crows, and again tea. All on the borderline of physiology. Recollections of church ceremonies are jotted down in the same tone as a drinking party.


>In the days preceding the opening of the State Duma, when the whole country was shaking with convulsions, Nicholas wrote: “April 14. Took a walk in a thin shirt and took up paddling again. Had tea in a balcony. Stana dined and took a ride with us. Read.” Not a word as to the subject of his reading. Some sentimental English romance? Or a report from the Police Department? “April 15: Accepted Witte’s resignation. Marie and Dmitri to dinner. Drove them home to the palace.”


>On the day of the decision to dissolve the Duma, when the court as well as the liberal circles were going through a paroxysm of fright, the tzar wrote in his diary: “July 7. Friday. Very busy morning. Half hour late to breakfast with the officers … A storm came up and it was very muggy. We walked together. Received Goremykin. Signed a decree dissolving the Duma! Dined with Olga and Petia. Read all evening.” An exclamation point after the coming dissolution of the Duma is the highest expression of his emotions. The deputies of the dispersed Duma summoned the people to refuse to pay taxes. A series of military uprisings followed: in Sveaborg, Kronstadt, on ships, in army units. The revolutionary terror against high officials was renewed on an unheard-of scale. The tzar writes: “July 9. Sunday. It has happened! The Duma was closed today. At breakfast after Mass long faces were noticeable among many … The weather was fine. On our walk we met Uncle Misha who came over yesterday from Gatchina. Was quietly busy until dinner and all evening. Went padding in a canoe.” It was in a canoe he went paddling – that is told. But with what he was busy all evening is not indicated. So it was always.
>>

 No.92062

File: 1614134050952.png (2.66 MB, 3408x2800, Gr01m.png)

>>92038
>I thought you were about monarchy as a concept
Especially.
w/ an absolutist touch (meaning, 1500s-1600s)
>(with tyranny and roman dictators)
My main reason for this is I get tired of the tyrannophobia hysteria
>does Napoleon descendants even count,or is he "less" legitimate than the Habsurg dude
I'm not so picky about bloodline/dynasties which seem like an excuse for larpers to have political parties. Let there be new blood.
But Great Man Theorylets often take an anti-royalist spin… I dislike anti-royalist Great Man theory takes.
>And does genes even really matter at that point when they are so "diluted" ?
It's not so much about purity.
Hereditary rule is appealing like a preservation technique.

>>92057
What do you expect from a diary, anon?

>>91988
So scary, a guillotine.
So happy I will destroy those.
>>

 No.92071

File: 1614134792520.png (219.09 KB, 342x372, 1592712623499.png)

>>92062
You better not be jerking off to getting bullied.
>>

 No.92113

>>92042
>evil
Every monarch should be shot. We tried the Chinese approach and the fucker not only bailed on us when we fought the French, but then later turned traitor because he couldn’t handle living like a normal citizen.
I suppose it’s karma that most of his children died young and he himself died penniless in exile. Fuck Bảo Đại.
>>

 No.92130

File: 1614137245725.png (130.41 KB, 421x446, 40e64ab29ec3e11c7dc427581f….png)

>>92071
Me? A coomer? Very funny, anon.
Plus two anons said I was baiting people.
Who exactly is being bullied?
>>

 No.92139

>>92130
based and cute
>>

 No.92146

>>86716
It wasn't ideal but it was necessary for the situation they found themselves in. Anyone stating anything else is just an edgy roleplayer
>>

 No.92247

yes it was, they would've fled to the west, claim the russian throne and spread lies about the ussr, they deserved it.
>>

 No.92256

>>91956
>I'm not looking into that hentai
>Cope again
Lol how weak
>>

 No.92258

Grace is secretly a fan of Juche.
>>

 No.92264

>>92062
>>91988
Guillotine is so old-fashioned. Why don't use this machine & be done with it?

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fukouna-shoujo-03
>>

 No.92343

Was it moral? No
Was it based? Yes
>>

 No.93158

>>91012
Based
>>

 No.99113


Unique IPs: 60

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / cytube] [ leftypol / b / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime ] [ meta ] [ GET / ref]