/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Ok uygha<br/><br/>Demand 1. Fuck OP in the ass

Literally just purge everyone in the staff every two-three months and turn every board except /b/ to have reviewed posts before being uploaded, that way /pol/shitposting is kept at minimum plus it will encourage effortposts

ban leftcom posters<br/>ban anarkiddies<br/>ban glowies<br/>ban avatarfags<br/>ban furfags<br/>ban jannies<br/>eat a dick<br/>etc

I dunno but I'm pretty blackpilled after the pretty comfy period post-split where I got to come on .org for effortposts and the bunker was still there for inane schizoposting. Now post-merge has settled down a bit it's just like some weird demoralized hybrid of /pol/ and r/stupidpol. I kinda hate it here now.

I hear this shit started because of disagreements between the mods over how to moderate /b/. It's a fucking waste of time to even debate that. Let anons post whatever the fuck they want on /b/ and let mods delete whatever they fuck they want from /b/ as well. No worthwhile discussion happens there.

not samefag this time but something i think is relevant<br/><a href="/meta/res/8589.html#8594">&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/8594</a><br/><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('431967', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#431967">&gt;&gt;431967</a><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('432036', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#432036">&gt;&gt;432036</a><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('432057', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#432057">&gt;&gt;432057</a><br/><span class="quote">&gt;&gt;432069</span><br/>bad times create real uyghas<br/>real uyghas be straight chillin<br/>straight chillin creates bitch uyghas<br/>bitch uyghas create bad times<br/><br/>or something but WE CANNOT GIVE IN TO DESPERATION NOW. leftypol needs some real uyghas now more than ever. we have to be the real uyghas since jannies prove themselves bitch uyghas time and time and time again.<br/><br/>so i repeat. <span class="heading">VOICE YOUR DEMANDS NOW!</span>

additional demands made on meta <br/><a href="/meta/res/8627.html#8627">&gt;&gt;&gt;/meta/8627</a><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('432156', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#432156">&gt;&gt;432156</a><br/>understood. thank you for your service soldier o7

Full support from me, but I've made my complaints in the past, especially in the short era of the mods shilling their favored e-celebs and bypassing the trash thread where it belongs. The element was supposed to make things more transparent, but apparently it doesn't matter, because shit will still be kept under wraps until the last second and things blow up. Mods need to get over themselves and treat this like an actual volunteer jobs, or fuck off and leave the job to "boring" but rigorous people.

locking thread, we have a thread for supporting the glorious watermelon military junta already.

COMMENCE THE SHITPOSTING

krates and comatoast have stepped down and a lot of the active mods have been banned.

Site was going to shit anyway, don't really care if the mods want to fight over it's corpse.

This shit came out of absolutely nowhere - like a few weeks ago, the posting here was not bad, all of a sudden we started getting the glowie and nazi threads again, and then this random coup?<br/><br/>I'm relatively new around here, only started lurking on bunkerchan last october (never used image boards before), but I can't see what the average user can do around here to change things. On discord it's much easier to see and isolate problematic mods and users because everything has a name attached, there's ways to engage with those managing the server, but here it seems we're just at the whim of a bunch of self-appointed mods.

JEWS DID WTC

Lumpen poster reporting in. Making a bait thread in 3,2,1..

If this is the demands thread I am once again going to repost my demands here from the other thread:<br/><br/>Here is my suggestion out right ban any and all soyjack posting ironic or not, it has ran its course and its stale just like all other memes from cuckchan. ITs not funny it never was funny and those that defend it are the problem.<br/><br/>Rightoids shall be given no quarter they come in bad faith and contribute nothing to these boards, giving them any sort of attention always leads to derailing.

thank you for your contributions. your posts are ultimately the one thing that would make this place worth spending time in. i have to sleep but keep contributing long as (((they))) dont just shut this down again. if they do, its gonna be time for an uprising. you restore my faith in this place

So then, Anons, is this the Terror, Thermidor, or the Brumaire?<br/><br/><span class="spoiler">Or Cultural Revolution time at last?</span><br/><br/>Are the dialectics in motion, again?

Lenin hats are obviously comprador posters

wat happen? ????

I haven't used the site other than /games/ and /hobby/ in the last few days wtf happened? Was I right and there were /pol/yps in the mod team?<br/><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('431745', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#431745">&gt;&gt;431745</a><br/><span class="quote">&gt;except /b/ </span><br/><span class="quote">&gt;that way /pol/shitposting is kept at minimum</span><br/>lmao<br/><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('431967', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#431967">&gt;&gt;431967</a><br/>This<br/><br/><a onclick="highlightReply('433644', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#433644">&gt;&gt;433644</a><br/>Go back megafaggot

Guys wtf I always thought Comatoast was the sysadmin? Also is he out or in? I'm getting conflicting information <br/>Who's sysadmin and able to make Watermelon sole mod?

Someone please reply to me <a onclick="highlightReply('433821', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#433821">&gt;&gt;433821</a>

This is how we unionise the board: <br/><br/>Okay, so basically this is the gestalt official proposal, I was going to write a document with all the ins and outs of my reasoning, for that, you can go back through this chat and read what I have to say. Essentially, my belief is this: 1) there is somewhat of a consensus among mods and regular attendees to mod related discussions that some form of board democratisation is favourable 2) there are numerous different beliefs on what that should be or what it will look like 3) there is fairly wide consensus that the system of moderation decision making currently in place is not fit for purpose. 4) there is also a fairly wide consensus that, although democratisation is favourable to basically all, most recognise to a great or lesser degree real issues, among these, how can we prevent the subversion of such a system. 4) this leaves us in a position that, we must widen the scope of the decision making process on the board, I.e, democratise it, add more voices to the pool of those eligible to vote, while also making sure that pool does not become subverted with bad faith actors.<br/>My proposal therefore aims precisely to target these concerns, in order to complete the above objective of democratisation to some degree.<br/>While the ideal situation would be in my opinion direct democracy, there are very real threats to this, and very real problems with its implementation. Therefore, I suggest measures in order to smooth over implementation issues in a gradual, increasingly democratic fashion.<br/>Thus, in practical terms, I would like the mods to vote on these 3 separate but cohesive proposals 1) that a union of posters be allowed to created by the posters, this union will act as the mechanism by which posters can discuss issues with the board. It will be owned by the posters, so that it’s independence from the moderation team can be assured. Initially, this union would be a place of discussion, and the will of the board discerned by the individuals who made up the voting body of the union. These individuals would be, those collections of posters who are currently engaged in the board moderation and have been long term. Gradually, more and more people would be added to the voting pool long term, it would be the specific job of these individuals to oversee this expansion. 2) in order to solidify this, myself and soy noticer (the initial inspectorate) be inducted in the mod chat, which would give us voting rights but no mod powers. This way, through the above mentioned Union, gradually more posters, judged good faith by said inspectorate, based on their participation in union discussion, could be added to the inspectorate voting pool and therefore the democratic process of the board. 3) I suggest that this action, if voted for by a majority of the mod team, would represent a binding mandate to enter into a gradual, good faith, long term process of board democratisation as described above.<br/>*This might be sloppy I meant to write this from a laptop but needs must. I have thought through things like the constitution of the union etc

this sort of thread should go on /meta/