No.10936
>>10933>Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topicsI feel like we're already going ahead with this with the anti-incel vote, its probably better to do it piecemeal rather than a bunch of them done as line-order items - when we do it piecemeal it is usually a reaction to actual events within the community, doing it as a line-item thing means we are likely going to be judging things and enacting certain policies without a real bearing on how they act in the community. Its better to react against their manifestation than try to preempt them and make inadequate rules, imho.
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violationsI agree with the general principle but not the proposal itself, I think we should generally just opt for easier bans on "our own people" (as much as we can verify it) and save bigger bans (a week or longer) for known retards or /pol/acks, at least for the time being. The anons have been acting in good behavior so we should for the time be more lax in return.
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait takingI vote for this actually, small micro-bans for b8-taking (like an hour or so) would be a good way to ween /leftypol/ off its b8 addiction.
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in placeVote for.
No.10973
>>10933>Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topicsneeds more clarification
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violationsyes on the condition that the ban lengths are built into the software as a drop down menu
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait takingfor but needs more clarification
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in placeagainst, would make it too easy for newfags and crossposters to evade
No.10978
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait taking
==NOOOOOOOOO plz no NOT MY FUN Don't take it away=
No.10979
>>10936>I vote for this actually, small micro-bans for b8-taking (like an hour or so) would be a good way to ween /leftypol/ off its b8 addiction.I can live with this if the vanguard leadership votes in favour of it I guess
No.11183
Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter to chinlet
>>10989I can handle those manually, just give me some time.
No.11185
>>11183>FAGGOT hoisted by my own petard lel
filter c h u d to chinlet
No.11197
>>11183>I can handle those manually, just give me some timeSure, I just wanted to let the mods know of this small issue. I'll send a couple reports per day to point out which threads have this issue, danks!
No.11226
Proposal: Bring back 200 character minimum for OPs
No.11243
>>11226Lower it to a 50 character limit. Sometimes a thread isn't that complex.
No.11265
proposal: filter breadtube to fedtube, + all permutations (breadtuber to fedtuber, Breadtube, etc.)
No.11273
>>11265Aye
>>11226nah I think it should be how it was pre-coup. 150 characters only on /leftypol/ and /edu/
No.11274
Proposal: Bring brack the 150 character minimum for thread OPs on /leftypol/ and /edu/
No.11280
>>11274>>11226Oh good the jannies are trying to shove this shit down everyone's throats again
No.11285
>>11226I am for a character limit (we need to clarify however, which boards, I suggest only /leftypol/, the others are not a big target generally for spamming threads).
I would suggest a 100 character limit as 100 is the superior number. But 200 minimum is still quite low, the difference being about half a sentence to a sentence.
>>11243this post is 73 characters.
>>10987They are not necessary on the alt boards as we barely have a problem with bad actors and rule breaking there.
No.11286
>>11226I think the 150 character limit was a reasonable compromise.
No.11289
>>11286I agree. A single sentence ain't that long.
No.11320
>>11274vote for
>>11265vote for
No.11365
>>10933>Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topicsWho's going to write this? It takes a lot of work. Maybe we can reduce the scope to one specific subjectively moderated topic instead of "all" of them.
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violationsSame concern as the one above. Maybe reduce the scope to create a list to make a ban list for.
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait takingagainst on bait taking. Bait taking is a physical compulsion. deleting bait takers should be fine though.
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in placeagainst. part of the fun is the surprise.
>>11183For. I don't really like the FAGGOT wordfilter we have right now.
>>11226For, any char minimum on /leftypol/ either 150 or 200 is fine for me.
## Comments (not votes)
>>10987We do need to write down a very simple and boiled down list of rules. These rules change all the time, and it's hard to keep up even for us.
>>10973>yes on the condition that the ban lengths are built into the software as a drop down menuheh are you implementing that :P
No.11404
Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter (FAGGOT) to chinlet
For: Wvobbly, Antinous, Barbara_Pitt, Caballo
–
Proposal: Bring back 200 character limit for OPs
For: Barbara_Pitt, Pask, Antinous
VERSUS!
Proposal: Institute 150 character limit for OPs
For: Redlidmilk, Caballo, Antinous, Wvobbly, Pask
–
Proposal: filter breadtube to fedtube, + all permutations (breadtuber to fedtuber, Breadtube, etc.)
For: Barbara_Pitt, Redlidmilk, Wvobbly
These proposals will be negotiated and go into voting next week.
No.11420
>>11183>Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter to chinletThis is retarded, you're literally killing a very important part of imageboard culture just to play with wordfilters,faggot is not even a homophobic slur at this point, this place is getting more politically correct every fucking day, I wonder when you will change the name of the site too.
No.11421
>>10933>Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topicsclear guidelines that are visible to everyone would be helpful.
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violationsThis would make moderation easier , if someone does X then they get a ban of Y length. And it would also work with the previous proposal . You could have all the common offenses and their ban lengths posted up for all to see .
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait takingBait making, yes you need to come down harder.
Bait taking , you are at about the right level of harshness , you only really need to come down harder if it looks like the bait taker is working with the bait maker , or they are the same person.
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in placeAgain having a list of current policies with a brief explanation and the punishments for various misdeeds would be a good idea.
No.11456
>>11420the FAGGOT wordfilter doesn't wordfilter the word faggot, it wordfilters C H U D
to FAGGOT, all caps. a wordfilter from a few months ago is not "a very important part of imageboard culture".
also "imageboard culture" is the faggiest thing imaginable and should hold zero sway over how leftypol.org conducts itself, but that's a post for another day. No.11473
>>11420Proposal:
Change the name of this Anon to fuckface, because they're being a massive pussy.
>nooo I'm being censored for saying faggot. This board is so PC :( Read the thread you fucking faggot. and if you couldn't say faggot, just get over it or cry more.
What a fucking pussy, seriously. Get a fucking grip.
Unique IPs: 16