WVobbly ## Mod 2021-08-30 (Mon) 11:35:44 No. 10936
>>10933 >Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topics I feel like we're already going ahead with this with the anti-incel vote, its probably better to do it piecemeal rather than a bunch of them done as line-order items - when we do it piecemeal it is usually a reaction to actual events within the community, doing it as a line-item thing means we are likely going to be judging things and enacting certain policies without a real bearing on how they act in the community. Its better to react against their manifestation than try to preempt them and make inadequate rules, imho.
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violations I agree with the general principle but not the proposal itself, I think we should generally just opt for easier bans on "our own people" (as much as we can verify it) and save bigger bans (a week or longer) for known retards or /pol/acks, at least for the time being. The anons have been acting in good behavior so we should for the time be more lax in return.
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait taking I vote for this actually, small micro-bans for b8-taking (like an hour or so) would be a good way to ween /leftypol/ off its b8 addiction.
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in place Vote for.
Barbara_Pitt !!Kv6Q4bF05o 2021-08-31 (Tue) 14:33:13 No. 10973
>>10933 >Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topics needs more clarification
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violations yes on the condition that the ban lengths are built into the software as a drop down menu
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait taking for but needs more clarification
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in place against, would make it too easy for newfags and crossposters to evade
Anonymous 2021-08-31 (Tue) 14:40:28 No. 10978
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait taking
Anonymous 2021-08-31 (Tue) 14:44:39 No. 10979
>>10936 >I vote for this actually, small micro-bans for b8-taking (like an hour or so) would be a good way to ween /leftypol/ off its b8 addiction. I can live with this if the vanguard leadership votes in favour of it I guess
WVobbly ## Mod 2021-09-01 (Wed) 10:42:39 No. 11183
Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter to chinlet
>>10989 I can handle those manually, just give me some time.
WVobbly ## Mod 2021-09-01 (Wed) 10:48:16 No. 11185
>>11183 >FAGGOT hoisted by my own petard lel
filter c h u d to chinlet
Anonymous 2021-09-01 (Wed) 15:18:28 No. 11197
>>11183 >I can handle those manually, just give me some time Sure, I just wanted to let the mods know of this small issue. I'll send a couple reports per day to point out which threads have this issue, danks!
Barbara_Pitt ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 00:59:19 No. 11226
Proposal: Bring back 200 character minimum for OPs
Anonymous 2021-09-02 (Thu) 03:27:27 No. 11243
>>11226 Lower it to a 50 character limit. Sometimes a thread isn't that complex.
Barbara_Pitt ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 19:03:30 No. 11265
proposal: filter breadtube to fedtube, + all permutations (breadtuber to fedtuber, Breadtube, etc.)
redlidmilk ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 19:37:45 No. 11273
>>11265 Aye
>>11226 nah I think it should be how it was pre-coup. 150 characters only on /leftypol/ and /edu/
redlidmilk ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 19:38:47 No. 11274
Proposal: Bring brack the 150 character minimum for thread OPs on /leftypol/ and /edu/
Anonymous 2021-09-02 (Thu) 19:47:52 No. 11280
>>11274 >>11226 Oh good the jannies are trying to shove this shit down everyone's throats again
Pasq ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 21:00:33 No. 11285
>>11226 I am for a character limit (we need to clarify however, which boards, I suggest only /leftypol/, the others are not a big target generally for spamming threads).
I would suggest a 100 character limit as 100 is the superior number. But 200 minimum is still quite low, the difference being about half a sentence to a sentence.
>>11243 this post is 73 characters.
>>10987 They are not necessary on the alt boards as we barely have a problem with bad actors and rule breaking there.
Caballo ## Mod 2021-09-02 (Thu) 22:52:40 No. 11286
>>11226 I think the 150 character limit was a reasonable compromise.
Anonymous 2021-09-02 (Thu) 23:43:46 No. 11289
>>11286 I agree. A single sentence ain't that long.
WVobbly ## Mod 2021-09-03 (Fri) 17:34:17 No. 11320
>>11274 vote for
>>11265 vote for
antns ## Mod 2021-09-04 (Sat) 00:06:18 No. 11365
>>10933 >Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topics Who's going to write this? It takes a lot of work. Maybe we can reduce the scope to one specific subjectively moderated topic instead of "all" of them.
>Proposal: Standardize ban lengths for various rule violations Same concern as the one above. Maybe reduce the scope to create a list to make a ban list for.
>Proposal: Harsher measures against both bait making and bait taking against on bait taking. Bait taking is a physical compulsion. deleting bait takers should be fine though.
>Proposal: Include a list of the word filters in the FAQ or rules page, just somewhere accessible so people know the current word filters in place against. part of the fun is the surprise.
>>11183 For. I don't really like the FAGGOT wordfilter we have right now.
>>11226 For, any char minimum on /leftypol/ either 150 or 200 is fine for me.
## Comments (not votes)
>>10987 We do need to write down a very simple and boiled down list of rules. These rules change all the time, and it's hard to keep up even for us.
>>10973 >yes on the condition that the ban lengths are built into the software as a drop down menu heh are you implementing that :P
Anonymous ## Mod 2021-09-04 (Sat) 20:36:16 No. 11404
Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter (FAGGOT) to chinlet
Anonymous 2021-09-05 (Sun) 04:19:27 No. 11420
>>11183 >Proposal: change the FAGGOT wordfilter to chinlet This is retarded, you're literally killing a very important part of imageboard culture just to play with wordfilters,faggot is not even a homophobic slur at this point, this place is getting more politically correct every fucking day, I wonder when you will change the name of the site too.
Anonymous 2021-09-05 (Sun) 08:18:22 No. 11421
>>10933 >Proposal: Create actual policies on subjectively moderated topics clear guidelines that are visible to everyone would be helpful.
This would make moderation easier , if someone does X then they get a ban of Y length. And it would also work with the previous proposal . You could have all the common offenses and their ban lengths posted up for all to see .
Bait making, yes you need to come down harder.
Bait taking , you are at about the right level of harshness , you only really need to come down harder if it looks like the bait taker is working with the bait maker , or they are the same person.
Again having a list of current policies with a brief explanation and the punishments for various misdeeds would be a good idea.
Anonymous 2021-09-05 (Sun) 22:00:23 No. 11456
>>11420 the FAGGOT wordfilter doesn't wordfilter the word faggot, it wordfilters C H U D
to FAGGOT, all caps. a wordfilter from a few months ago is not "a very important part of imageboard culture".
also "imageboard culture" is the faggiest thing imaginable and should hold zero sway over how leftypol.org conducts itself, but that's a post for another day. Anonymous 2021-09-06 (Mon) 06:58:06 No. 11473
>>11420 Proposal:
Change the name of this Anon to fuckface, because they're being a massive pussy.
>nooo I'm being censored for saying faggot. This board is so PC :( Read the thread you fucking faggot. and if you couldn't say faggot, just get over it or cry more.
What a fucking pussy, seriously. Get a fucking grip.
Unique IPs: 16