>>12969>One of the first things they did was make a (public) /i/.
yes and? >>12970
the majority of mods did not agree and that who is who I mean by you. >>12971>dramafagging immature assholes
the fact that jannoids would think this doesn't apply to them, particularly given the contents of this thread, is really very indicative. You can't even accept a little bit of fault. Not one janny will even come out and say "yes most of us simped Haz and yes that was wrong" they simply never admit fault. Literally look in this thread, all over the board, show me an instance of a janny admitting fault. It doesn't happen. >>12972>I'm pretty sure they will start asking for patreonbuxx like d0llars soon
based on what. There has been literally zero mention of this. >werent ruined by all the users not migrating
yeh lets just go over the same things over and over again. Jannoids censored and smeared the board and continue to do so. They would not have done this for any other reason than to sabotage it, or they wouldn't have bothered. >>12973>the overhead of making yet another process
is literally nothing. You just have to not delete it. In fact if you weren't so up tight and controlling and just let it happen you would have done less work and had less stupid arguments. There is zero overhead for you jannoids.
> unless there's a huge disconnect between the users and mods which I don't believe exists
hahahahahahahah. Lets find out then shall we, say, by letting the posters have their own room to say what they want, which is literally all that is being asked for. Otherwise we are just having to trust >I don't believe
well I believe there is a disconnect, hence the continual mod drama and 2 splits in 2 years.
>One anon wants a thread to be merged and reports it
the majority of users don't use the report function only a very small minority of users do, mods regularly complain the report queue is empty and tell people to use report more. >and the anon who made the thread doesnt want their thread merged.
probably for good reason, like, they want to discuss a specific topic not as a sub topic but in all its full glory, such as discussing 9/11 as a stand alone thing.
>There's already a feedback mechanism for users called report,
kek, see above>and when its used theres a >50% chance the mods will do something anyway, esp. if there are multiple reports.
what if you want to report a thread being merged or janny deleting some bants because they are a pussyo what then? >You're acting like the jannies are turning this into a dictatorship
it has always been one. Its a corporate board room larping as a vanguard. > the truth is they are trying their hardest to make the max # of people happy
if by this you mean the max number of jannies then yes. > by the nature of modding this will always make a small % of people unhappy they didn't get their way
we have no way to tell the number of people because you won't allow us to find out>In this case those people made a split site
you split the site. >but now they're spamming this one because they're seething, which is not fine.
you robbed a number of users of their board. >if everyone here is a "janny simp" and "redditoid"
but not everyone is, only a very small minority of users, what like 10 jannies, and then their hangers on which is no more than 10 extra people>then why not just leave>if you don't like it go back to your own country you a-rab
you literally sound exactly like a reactionary in all of the things you say. >bad faith actor
no, i've had a very consistent line for a long time, and tell the truth about it, unlike the mods, who can't even admit a majority of them simped haz and then try to tell you you are the dishonest one.
> and ruin other users experience.
the jannies have done that already>if you really wanted to make people aware of the site you would do raids that are wordfilter-evading links to leftychan.
yet another example of jannies blaming their victims for the things they do
>if you really wanted to make a union you would do this
no, you deleted the threads, its your fault there is no union>if you really wanted to advertise a site
you delete all mention. This is why I say insane. You are insane. >Your mask slipped with that "this is my fucking board" shit
it is my board, as much as it is yours, or any other users, which is what you fail to grasp, because you are a jannoid
ALSO this ENTIRE post is yet another switch of the goal posts. You realise you still haven't answered the question.
The question was predicated on YOU SAYING that you would support a union if it was truly representative. I said the best way to make it representative was to make it as big as possible, you didn't respond to that, just claimed that there is no disconnect from the users. Assuming your opinion of the board and the users and their relationship to you jannies is automatically the representative one, rather than trying to build something which resembles actual representation. The fact you posted some cat image beside your words does not change that.
So, answer the question I already asked. If you are so concerned with representation, like you claim to be, why resist efforts to create representation?