[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Discussions, querries, feedback and complaints about the site and its administration.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon


File: 1633309540318.jpg (21.73 KB, 474x474, What happened.jpg)

 No.13553

Why is this board not open for teenagers (people aged 13-17), instead users must be 18 or up to use this site? Considering that most teenagers right now are tech-savvy and that teenagers are usually open to new information, especially ideologies?
If we keep doing this then:
- we will not have a good userbase,
- this won't be trendy,
- more and more teens subscribe themselves to lib ideas,
- a surplus of degenerate young people will (surely) be created, and
- revolution is rather hard to achieve due to the previous two reasons.

 No.13554

Because porn

 No.13555

If you're dumb enough to say your age, you shouldn't be allowed.
Also, there's probably legal obligations from the server owners, see >>13554

 No.13556

>>13555
>If you're dumb enough to say your age, you shouldn't be allowed.
Yes I know, but sometimes "teen help" (e.g. As a teenager/student…) can results in bans.

 No.13557

I'm here since 16yo niqqa
You saved me from reddit

 No.13558

>>13553
>t. groomer

 No.13559

>>13558
>>t. groomer
I'm posting this criticism as a 16-year old. And I sometimes noticed people being banned simply for their age. Even if it means asking for jobs and what to do.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

 No.13560

>>13553
because there's unspoilered porn, mostly on /siberia/

 No.13561

>>13559
its legal obligations. all under aged have to be b&.

 No.13562

>>13559
Well I was just memeing. I don't think grooming is an issue because this isn't fbi.gov. But a good reason for not allowing kids is that they're stupid and immature in general. We have enough bad posters already without actively courting children. As an adult, I just don't have an in interest in talking to kids who aren't even smart enough to lie about their age.

Being "trendy" or popular is not a virtue in itself, it's a negative. The hordes of uneducated posters would overwhelm what good posters there are here and that would become the site. I'd encourage you to check out a leftist fbi.gov server that is "cool" to see what that would be like, it's not nice.

 No.13563

>>13561
>all under aged have to be b&.
ah
>But a good reason for not allowing kids is that they're stupid and immature in general. We have enough bad posters already without actively courting children. As an adult, I just don't have an in interest in talking to kids who aren't even smart enough to lie about their age.
Oh, I see.
Well sometimes there are good faith teenagers that are interested into anticapitalist thought.


Unique IPs: 8

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]