Anonymous ## Mod 2021-10-28 (Thu) 23:46:50 No. 14427
>>14419 >The mods who remain on this site are all now anti-Haz (Actually I just don't give a fuck about internet trash and therefore don't care about haz shit, I just saw it as a temporary necessity to de-esacalate for site security.)
Anonymous ## Mod 2021-10-28 (Thu) 23:54:05 No. 14428
>>14426 (Not that mod) I think this touches on an idea that maybe generals shouldn't be 'everything (USA|PRC) goes in here'. For things like mainstream politics news (Biden did a thing, AOC said words) or happenings (ten Afghan threads) then yes, a general becomes good at preventing a flood of crap, but there are other events and topics that may warrant an independent thread.
But where is that damn line? I don't know. And right now it's kind of a rapid decision process; you shouldn't just merge it once it's 50 posts deep so there's pressure to make fast decisions on those borderline threads.
Anonymous ## Mod 2021-10-29 (Fri) 00:40:10 No. 14429
Last warning to remain on topic or be banned.
Anonymous ## Mod 2021-10-29 (Fri) 00:55:41 No. 14431
>>14398 >maybe we should float the idea of archiving all the boards, then merging them? that has basically been understood as an impossible option, one the mod team will realistically never take. it only pleases a minority of posters who, largely, don't use those boards, to the detriment of a good number of people who actually do and enjoy them.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 01:20:21 No. 14432
>>14430 Nah, put a picture of Alunya on it.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 03:18:10 No. 14433
mods should just clean all the non-relevant posts of this thread so we can get back on track smoothly (including this one)
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 03:52:03 No. 14434
>>14418 It might be better instead of sharing a stream key among many people to have an official twitch channel with very few operators and make use of the hosting features to share the channels of other users, but sorting out how to do that kind of thing warrants a much more in depth discussion snd community feedback.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 03:59:41 No. 14435
>>14434 I personally am against trying to make more and more 'official' channels. It doesn't need to be official to be great.
>>14418 Unironically, apathy will keep them out. Unless they know to look for it, they won't get it.
If there's a non-public way to manage it (e.g. a Matrix/element chat room, or does twitch have DMs?) then that would work too. Worst case, reset the streamkey and reshare it.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 04:03:49 No. 14436
>>14431 >a good number of people to me it looks like most boards are nearly dead. almost every thread was imported from another iteration of the site so theres no continuity and you can't ask people questions or get (you)s from pre 2020-12-20 posters. You just end up replying to ghosts and necrobumping.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 04:05:06 No. 14437
>>14435 Right, that's what I'm saying. If there's an official Twitch instead of consolidating people using one official channel, ise that channel to promote affiliated channels or just people that the userbase likes. There are other smalltime leftist twitch streamers and promoting them and interacting with them can bring more attention to the site. Better use of the social network than a single channel that doesn't connect as much to others. Connectivity is a bog deal to the algorithms and to people's eyeballs.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 04:07:46 No. 14438
>>14435 Yes, official implies the mod has to approve or be involved. Which opens a whole can of worms.
Might as well keep things unofficial.
Anonymous 2021-10-29 (Fri) 04:59:00 No. 14439
>>14376 thats funny as fuck, great idea
Anonymous 2021-10-30 (Sat) 02:01:54 No. 14440
Anyone here heard of 16chan? They have a literal /fascism/ board
Anonymous 2021-10-30 (Sat) 07:06:42 No. 14441
>>14440 >16chan >competition lmao, their /fascism/ died after anon.cafe booted their crying asses. It's literally WN + wehrabooism; if more than three of their users had actually read Mussolini I might respect them.
picrel: our alt boards have more activity than their whole site. Their competition is /mlpol/.
Anonymous 2021-10-30 (Sat) 08:58:38 No. 14442
The best way to recruit is going to be raids. That's how imageboards grow. Anons aren't going to get involved in elaborate plans that requires any effort on their part. At best you will get a small group that falls apart in a week. You need simple plans that are zero effort and lets the autists here spam their shitty memes. You have to lean into the strengths of imageboards.
Anonymous 2021-10-30 (Sat) 15:35:21 No. 14443
>>14442 Why do what /pol/ does to us? We would be infamous then.
Sage !61KGLATVW. 2021-10-30 (Sat) 16:51:46 No. 14444
>>14442 This is true hut mods don’t want us raiding apart from that one time with the chinjack meme. I think we should raid /pol/ with the infograph showing they are pedos personally, reboot it by combining with the chin Jack, put some leftypol stamps on in
off-duty 2021-10-30 (Sat) 22:23:53 No. 14445
>>14444 At the end of the day, the real issues are:
>having dedicated 'let's raid [x] threads' that validate /pol/s paranoia >threads that are obviously false flags made by /pol/ for /pol/ The only reason its a big issue is that our userbase is relatively small (big for an English altboard, but not comparable to a board that averages (not peak, average, and
super duper overrepresented by burgers) 5,000 PPH. There's already a constant baseline of raids and complaints about post quality, so it makes sense for the site not to officially encourage a /leftypol/ raid, at least at this point in time.
But you can shitpost on /pol/ regardless of what I say. I ain't your momma. We already had a couple of former users try to bait /pol/ by false flagging as leftypol.org so it will probably be fine if you do it 4reels. Sage !61KGLATVW. 2021-10-30 (Sat) 22:46:07 No. 14446
>>14445 The point is the organisation though, doing things together
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 10:17:18 No. 14448
>>14444 >>14445 I didn't mean raiding /pol/. That's a total waste of time. We should raid sites outside of the imageboard space.
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 10:25:49 No. 14449
>>14448 >total waste of time that's an understatement
the obsession (by some people, I pray for some of them to get over it) with a place several hundred times our size is actively harmful.
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 11:43:50 No. 14450
>jannies desperately want more people to lord over
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 12:37:11 No. 14451
>PEOPLE ARE LEAVING!!! …WHAT DO YOU MEAN PEOPLE HAVE LIVES OUTSIDE THE INTERNET?!
Sage !61KGLATVW. 2021-10-31 (Sun) 16:57:15 No. 14452
>>14448 We should raid a variety of targets the beauty of /pol/ is they have very little defences and are easily triggered. The chinjack is proof of concept
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 18:27:09 No. 14453
>>14452 No we shouldn't you moron, then they'll just raid us harder then ever and the board will go down the tubes.
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 20:06:47 No. 14454
>>14453 May I ask you, for how long do you think their raid will last. I thought that the poljak one only lasted a few days.
>>14452 Personally I think that it would be better if we find a way to stick it to Agent Kochinski.
There is a pretty large group of leftist who dislike him, and I think that if we manage to start some drama with that CIA asset, we'd be able to get some of them to post here.
Sage !61KGLATVW. 2021-10-31 (Sun) 20:19:48 No. 14455
>>14453 Like the chinjack raid made the board go down the tubes … oh wait… t didn’t…
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 20:45:45 No. 14456
Appealing to disaffection towards liberalism is a better strategy than galvanizing hatred toward the right. This is true as a pitch for this site as it is a general approach in current politics. Liberalism is the first obstruction that must be removed to consolidate the left.
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 20:47:59 No. 14457
>>14456 >>14456 > Many leftists find all this talk of safe spaces and safe words and racialist identity politics distasteful and counterproductive ***yet they have no means to escape conversations dominated by it, so they begrudgingly go along with it and suppress their disagreement.
Anonymous 2021-10-31 (Sun) 21:30:23 No. 14458
>>14454 >Personally I think that it would be better if we find a way to stick it to Agent Kochinski. easiest way would be pay to viewbot him in an extremely obvious way and mass report it
Anonymous 2021-11-01 (Mon) 14:38:39 No. 14460
>>14456 Problem is many people who are 'alienated by political correctness' etc are just massive reactionary dickheads. Just look at stupidpol.
Anonymous 2021-11-03 (Wed) 03:53:43 No. 14461
>>14456 >Appealing to disaffection towards liberalism is a better strategy than galvanizing hatred toward the right No reason not to do both; however, I couldn't agree more on the rest.
Anonymous 2021-11-03 (Wed) 13:49:51 No. 14462
>>14456 Please tell us, what actions should we take towards such a strategy?
Anonymous 2021-11-03 (Wed) 22:22:53 No. 14463
>>14456 There (appears to be) a necessary balance between 'political incorrectness' and stupidity. I'm not claiming they are they same whatsoever. Absolutely not. But there is a point where /pol/ 'da jews' becomes an instant derail and the site can't fucking resist low-tier bait and will let any thread get derailed over it.
So at what point does controversial reactionary takes become incompatible with a reasonable quality standard?
And again, there are politically incorrect leftist stances which are allowed, but the above is something worth thinking about. Our ban on idpol tends to omit many, but I suppose removing idpol rules is off the table as it's a core principle of the site.
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 00:12:50 No. 14464
perhaps a temporary element chat for those actually interesting in participating would be a good idea? if such is done, it should also be put into the OP so people can see it easier rather than letting it get clogged up by other messages down here
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 12:31:50 No. 14465
>>14442 >what has already been done and has lead us to this point of relative weakness, historically and recently, is what we must always do jej, like 99% of our recent recruits aren't from raiding efforts, and we went from like 200 people at the death kneel of 8chan to 600 odd people now (daily IP wise, as an average) and as per most people asking them, they aren't from /pol/ or whatever, they just came ambiently from word of mouth. raids are dead and useless cause our opposition in /pol/ is all braindead manchildren which haven't had a critical thought in their head for years, and they aren't about to start. chans overall are slowly dying, so looking beyond our own backyard is something of a necessity.
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 13:11:51 No. 14466
>>14465 >to 600 odd people now fucking janny reality manipulation must stop. there are not 600 different people visiting this website every day. if that were true, there wouldn't be two active boards on this website. unless all 600 are lifeless losers who don't read or go out but spend their time watching anime, playing video games and making memes
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 13:20:37 No. 14467
>>14466 and before you post a screenshot of statistics or peepee or whatever, remembered that you never explained how IPs and posts are counted, so the numbers are meaningless
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 13:20:59 No. 14468
>>14466 it varies day-to-day but its usually like roundabout 400 IPs to roundabout 600, with slumps and highs that mostly correlate to irl happenings or lack thereof. we don't have any way to look at the density of posts distributed through different threads but most of it is concentrated in cyclicals, which is why its not as reflective on the front page. using the overboard also usually shows decent health with the alt-boards, usually there being like 5-10 decently active threads (relative to alt-board standards) which vary on the alt-board subject.
a good example being star wars and avatar being big threads cause of the Mandalorian and the netflix release of the avatar series leading them to having a few pretty good threads, activity and quality wise, which have now gone into a lull without new content. there are a few which are slower overall but really consistent (like the HEMA thread with like 4 or 5 dedicated anons) but they are there and alive. they cater to niche audiences to which activity changes relative to content available a lot of the time, its not really the kind of activity which is easily reflected in PPH stats. but the goal of alt-boards is more fostering communities that PPH to begin with cause its just always a good idea to diversify a little bit, and relative to their predecessors on 8chan they are a lot more active than before, which is generally seen as a pretty good win.
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 20:53:07 No. 14469
lol there are like 10-30 of us posters at max depending on time of day. i wouldn't be surprised if everything else was bots
Anonymous 2021-11-04 (Thu) 21:24:24 No. 14470
>>14465 Stop conflating IP addresses with people.
Many users have constantly changing dynamic IP addresses due to ISPs cycling them. Many users are on the same IP address. It's a loose indicator.
>>14467 >you never explained how IPs and posts are counted, so the numbers are meaningless A post is counted when a user
makes a post .
You can also count/average this yourself by getting ([last current post number] minus [post made [x] hours ago] divided by [x] hours).
IP count is the number of unique IP addresses that
made posts within the given timeframe. An important note is that the Total column used to just sum the counts on each board, so if 127.3.2.1 posted on both /leftypol/ and /hobby/, it used to count as 2 in Total. Now it counts as 1.
>>14469 Which, if they're online for an average of one hour, would be 240-720 per day.
Anonymous 2021-11-05 (Fri) 03:36:06 No. 14471
>>14470 >Many users have constantly changing dynamic IP addresses due to ISPs cycling them. Many users are on the same IP address. It's a loose indicator. Many users also use the TOR node, which only counts as 1 IP, or end up having a shared local IP. We don't just use IP, we also look at PPH and other more obscure measurements as well to try and keep a general idea of overall board health.
Though, this topic is divergent from the main thread one, so I'll just leave it at that.
Anonymous 2021-11-08 (Mon) 01:11:57 No. 14533
>>14529 >how to subvert /leftypol/ <engage in arguments with anons who already know every nazi trick in the book <try learning some Marxism to debunk them amazing reverse psychology, Israeli vpn user
Anonymous 2021-11-08 (Mon) 22:32:19 No. 14562
Hi, I'm an ambassador from another site's embassy. I posted a thread here: >>>/siberia/174289
Unique IPs: 31