Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:52:20 No. 2523
>>2518 Yet, you keep posting here.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:54:26 No. 2524
>>2518 it takes two to make a split. arguing over who was at fault is of limited value.
>>2519 do they even have that many new mods?
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:06:29 No. 2525
>>2524 they apparrently have 8 mods,but it's probably impossible to know even by the other mods,like they can't check post histories,or can't anchor threads.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:49:58 No. 2528
>>2527 >scabs Autism. Some of you really think posting online is an extension of the class war huh.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:53:16 No. 2529
>>2528 >There are two people in this world those who own and those who do not own. Facts is facts.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:00:15 No. 2531
>>2528 >>2530 Scabs aren't leftists. Everything is part of the class war. What happened on bunkerchan was an coup against a democratic centralist mod team to put in it's place an incompetent mod. The reason this could happen, and what happened afterwards is directly related to our mode of production and our class relations.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:02:23 No. 2532
ngl it's very frustrating watching nobody give an answer to "why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity" i mean it's a good question.democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:03:45 No. 2533
I'm having fun being a chaos agent.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:17 No. 2534
>>2532 >why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity I wonder why….
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:53 No. 2535
>>2533 lol. What are you up to?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:18:32 No. 2536
>>2535 Playing both sides, confusing the hell out of everyone, killing brain cells, the works.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:26:03 No. 2537
>>2531 >democratic centralist mod team That group got nothing to do with what democratic centralism is. The mods weren't elected, meaning it can't be a democratic centralist system. Calling it that shows you either have no idea what democratic centralism is or that you are dishonest. And I'm not proposing that mods should be elected. This doesn't work here because user accounts are not tightly coupled with real-world persons, so the whole democratic centralist idea is not applicable.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:56:14 No. 2539
>>2537 You have no idea what democratic centralism is either.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:59:48 No. 2541
>>2536 >le master agent of chaos you don't fool anyone lol
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:03:57 No. 2542
>>2539 You have no basis for that claim.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:41:16 No. 2544
not enough scorn is being poured on d0llars for turning bunkerchan's corpse into his own jonestown rather than just merging and being done with it. .democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:15:04 No. 2548
imagine the kind of person who'd donate to the bunkerchan patreon lmaodemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:19:58 No. 2549
>>2548 I'd bet good money only one or two of the people saying they'll donate actually will.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:25:13 No. 2550
>>2549 >>2548 No one actually would except maybe some glowies
brocialism Brocialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:27:23 No. 2551
>>2550 Nah, some people are definitely dumb enough to do it. I bet they'd even justify it by saying it's for the working class.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:08:46 No. 2554
>>2551 heh, if someone has not kept up with the drama and doesnt know about here, they might fall for it because having a place to shitpost is important
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:59:25 No. 2555
SCREAMING at double space guy
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:02:04 No. 2556
anyone calling leftypol "democratic centralist" is a LARPing faggot
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:06:35 No. 2557
>>2527 >muh scabs Who fucking cares?? It's not about the jannies, it's about the users, the community, you dumb fucking niggerfaggot.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:10:03 No. 2558
>>2239 >>2257 please kill yourself.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:26:29 No. 2559
okay, i know i specifically advocated against appeals to Stakhanovite attempts to get people to post more, but i'm bored so here's a proposal anyway: Undertake the commitment to make a specific number of posts per hour under a specific flag. Because of the flag, you will be aware whether or not you are keeping pace with that number of posts, rather than simply making an empty appeal to completely anonymous people to post more, with the result that nobody feels like they own a target. Also, it will hopefully lead to a wider tendency of using flags to indicate your political leanings, which is always an underappreciated bit of context you can provide to any given post. (A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example.) I suppose this is less of an appeal and more a little thought downstream of the multiplicative effect of such a specific goal when things are moving slowly: 10 people committing to make 5 posts per hour (not a huge ask when that can be as simple as linking a wikipedia article in /ITG/) is +50 PPH, a not-insignificant addition.democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:33:56 No. 2560
>>2559 How about you create interesting threads and see what happens from there?
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:43:01 No. 2561
>>2560 This.
>A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example. Pic related. Debate the argument, not the user.
juche Juche Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:53:01 No. 2562
>>2560 Interesting threads require some degree of assurance of getting a response.
Nevertheless I may experiment with making certain
types of threads.
>>2561 it's not about "debate", it's about context. lots of posts don't make an argument, but they can prompt development.
i.e. even if the hypothetical trotskyist says "based", by saying he's a trotskyist he increases the odds someone replies asking them to develop on why they agree with the purge, and even if they just say "oh, well because they were guilty" that's still a brief conversation that wouldn't otherwise have occurred.
the accusation of being sect-brained is entertaining considering that i've stated several times that part of why i use the flag i do is to filter people who can't read the argument without being distracted by the flag.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:54:28 No. 2563
>>2562 I will respond to all of them, I promise. But you have to start them.
christian_communism Christian Communism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:15:51 No. 2564
>>2562 >filter people who can't read the argument without being distracted by the flag. >A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example.???
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:21:18 No. 2566
>>2564 There's a world of difference between
"Interesting, you're a Trotskyite but you support this Stalinist purge. How come?"
and
">Trotskyite.
Opinion discarded."
All the flag does is convey additional background information. In many cases, the kind of user who makes the second response will scour your post for similar shibboleths anyway - so instead of getting angry about your flag, he'll pick out a certain unfashionable phrase (such as "problematic" in the very literal sense of "causes practical problems") or other and use that to make the same kind of inane replies.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:22:07 No. 2567
>>2565 I think the OP images weren't backed up even though the threads were, so when threads beyond a certain age were restored they were brought back without images.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:25:27 No. 2568
>>2563 You can help by starting some too.
Anonymous 2021-01-14 (Thu) 18:07:20 No. 2572
I think it’s pretty safe to say bunker is now a rightoid website.
Unique IPs: 1