Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 14:01:04 No. 1820
>>35837
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 14:09:26 No. 1821
>>35784
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 15:08:51 No. 1822
>>35832
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 15:22:30 No. 1823
>>35832 >orangetext removed >anchoring removed
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 15:24:42 No. 1824
For some reason they still have the dead links for /GET/ and /ref/ in the top bar
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 15:51:00 No. 1825
Since bunkerchan is so shit, we should start thinking about how to get people to post in leftypol.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 16:04:05 No. 1826
>>1825 Doing what we did the first time would probably help
1. Make good posts
2. Screencap posts
3. Add leftypol logo/url
4. Post around the internet
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 16:16:52 No. 1827
>>1825 Keep posting should be good.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 16:20:08 No. 1828
>>1824 what do you expect? they are trannies
trannies cannot get anything done
they are incompetent because they are trannies
have i said trannies yet to be edgy enough for the cool kids club on here?
fucking trannies man
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 16:26:26 No. 1830
>>1828 >trannies You keep using this word… I don't think it means what you think it means. Are you that same anon posting in bunkerchan shitting on ex-jannies as trannies?
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 16:38:22 No. 1831
>>1830 i'm being politically incorrect, the ruling class is shaking in its boots at the disdain i have for trannies
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 19:57:11 No. 1833
>>1824 We have been putting off deleting them until we know whether /GET/ and /ref/ want an archive of their threads.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:05:31 No. 1834
>>1833 >We have been putting off deleting them until we know whether /GET/ and /ref/ want an archive of their threads. What do you mean? /GET/ and /ref/ were deleted on bunkerchan, there is no reason why there should be a dead link on the top of the page.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:05:56 No. 1835
>>1832 Space will never recover.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:07:02 No. 1836
>>1834 Yes but leftypol started off as a copy of bunkerchan on the 21st of dec, so we have all GET and ref threads still.
Also the links are no longer dead, but link to getchan.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:13:00 No. 1837
>>1836 He meant Bunkerchan not this site.
I think you should go to bed, anon. Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:14:36 No. 1838
>>1837 It would appear that I am retarded.
Anonymous 2021-01-04 (Mon) 20:15:43 No. 1839
>>1838 I think I got confused by this post
>>1828 We are usually the trannies.
Anonymous 2021-01-05 (Tue) 19:29:05 No. 1841
>about to reply to some fag's bitching about leftypol.org >Cloudflare server error
Anonymous 2021-01-05 (Tue) 19:34:36 No. 1842
>>1841 >using a slur so liberally you're not welcome here chud
Anonymous 2021-01-05 (Tue) 19:57:48 No. 1843
>>1842 >chud >using a slur so liberally you're not welcome here, either.
porky Porky Anonymous 2021-01-05 (Tue) 23:46:17 No. 1844
>>1842 Go back to Facebook.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 00:07:34 No. 1845
>>1842 kek blow it out your ass faggot
nazi Nazi Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 01:10:13 No. 1848
add a pph counterdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 01:11:02 No. 1849
>>1848 Ask in the tech thread.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 08:51:19 No. 1850
>>1842 chud is a slur, cunt
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 09:14:16 No. 1851
>>1850 calm down chunt
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 14:55:27 No. 1856
>>1853 >can't even go a week without going down I guess they're doing "maintenance"
porky Porky sage sage 2021-01-06 (Wed) 14:58:36 No. 1857
>>1856 Or getting DDOS'd. Or pretending to be DDOS'd.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:19:36 No. 1858
>>1853 As dollars admitted, Space_ doesn't care anymore
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:23:31 No. 1859
>>1848 they won’t. they can’t admit that nobody actually gives a fuck about this board split drama
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:28:18 No. 1860
>>1842 Hey buddy I think you got the wrong door. Chapo is two blocks down.
>>1853 Embarrassing
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:29:42 No. 1863
>>1859 PPH is on the github retard
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:34:03 No. 1864
>>1863 NTA but how do you find it?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:37:22 No. 1865
>>1864 Gitbhub is on the tech sticky
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:40:09 No. 1866
I was on the side of of bunkerchan but this shit is getting obnoxious. Jannies might be tr4nnies but at least you can still post here.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:44:33 No. 1867
Will I get banned here if I shit on Trannies like they do on chapo or something? I feel like trannies have become the most protected class before the proletariat even amongst lefties
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:46:25 No. 1868
>>1867 I’m guessing you’re the guy that derailed that thread on /tech/ for a whole year? yeah, that shit should be permabannable.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:49:24 No. 1869
>>1866 I love how it keeps going down on important days, lol
>>1867 It depends on how you behave, tbh.
I'm sorry to inform you but being racist and shit was never part of "anti-idpol" That's just idpol in the other direction. The assumption always was that we, leftists, do and should support anyone who is a working class member of society, but, that when you put identity politics over class struggle you have entered the realm of liberal territory. But being ati-idpol doesn't mean being a massive piece of shit.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:49:28 No. 1870
>>1867 How about you like the rest of us not talk about trans shit?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:50:00 No. 1871
>>1866 Apologize to Jannies or never post here again.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:53:32 No. 1872
>>1869 Yup, a porky doesn't become acceptable just because they're white or BIPOC or whatever identity they have.
Also WTF is up with bunker chan? Today's the 6th when shit is about to go down. Do we seriously have to move boards again? We were just getting back to our 8chan numbers.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 15:57:14 No. 1873
>>1866 >I was on the side of of bunkerchan for what reason ? the more I read about it, the more it was painfully obvious space is a faggot and the mods were right. The only think we could have asked of them is to not prepare their split secretely, which in insight was very understandable given space reaction
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:01:11 No. 1874
>>1873 the mods were right about what?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:04:51 No. 1875
>>1874 >no idea what's going on >sides with space_ anyways adds up, retards stick with retards
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:06:49 No. 1876
>>1875 I know exactly what's going on, and the mods aren't "right" about anything. they are just bitching about not having enough power.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:08:41 No. 1877
>>1873 I felt like space could've easily handed over the site to the mods but some transaction didn't go right, I don't really hate either side and hope that you guys put away your grudges with one another.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:12:09 No. 1878
>>1877 >you guys im neither a janie or mod. I like my board clean of both lib and pol filth.
I feel like good will was only ever present on jannies side, as evidenced by getchan also getting pissed at space, and that it quickly dried up when they saw it went nowhere.
>>1876 you just sound like a retard dude
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:12:56 No. 1879
>>1878 >you just sound like a retard dude I'm describing exactly what happened, you just don't like how I'm describing it.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:13:38 No. 1880
>>1876 Bunkerchan has been down on and off for the past week or so and the post quality is getting exponentially worse. I’m not sure it’s just muh jannies trying to steal power and stop me from posting about trans people.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:14:45 No. 1881
>>1878 I am just a usertarian but I can imagine why space would need identification if he was to give mods root access to the server for bunkerchan. Just to be able to cover his ass enough and not go to prison, fairly reasonable really.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:16:32 No. 1882
>>1878 GETChan wasn't even part of the plot and he still removed all the mods there anyway.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:18:36 No. 1883
>>1880 >the post quality is getting exponentially worse this is such concern trolling and you know it, the post quality has always been shit. stop repating shit you heard just because it makes your "side" sound better
>I’m not sure it’s just muh jannies trying to steal power and stop me from posting about trans people. they're upset that Space took too long to hand over admin privileges so they made a pinned thread waving around their campaign promises hoping everyone would revolt and take their side. it's pure arrogant larp shit, and that's what pisses me off about this whole drama. you can tell they are especially larping when they refer to space as a "scab", like this is some kind of labor union. LOL. too bad nobody gave a fuck and Space took it personally and ousted them. I don't like any janny including Space but this whole drama shit is just retarded.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:22:38 No. 1884
>>1883 Space and d0llars literally hijacked a community, they should never have had that power in the first place since scabchan was just a backup site for leftypol on 8ch.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:23:08 No. 1885
>>1883 I don’t care about the personality drama either I just want a website that actually works and isn’t filled with reactionaries.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:23:44 No. 1886
>>1883 This isn't true posting quality on the site was exponentially higher prior to the raids.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:26:30 No. 1888
>>1884 like I said, it's hard for me to care
>>1885 same here, but maybe 1 in 50 to 100 bunkerchan posts are from a reactionary, that is perfectly bearable given the PPH.
there's also no reason to believe that the site would still not be working if this split never happened, it didn't seem to be a problem beforehand.
>>1886 you're talking about pre-poljak? that has nothing to do with this. the story is that ever since the mighty and great jannies left the site the posting quality has gone downhill, which just isn't true.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:27:36 No. 1889
>>1887 the idea that bunkerchan has gotten more reactionary since the split is a meme, no amount of screencaps will disprove that.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:27:39 No. 1890
>>1883 >actually being retarded Took too long?
He made false promises for the entirety since the merger you fucking mongoloid.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:28:43 No. 1891
>>1889 >reactionary likes reactionary screeching No surprise, now fuck back off. Oh wait, reactionaries are retarded and can't even make their shithole run without going down every other day.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:34:58 No. 1894
>>1893 say whatever you want about bunkerchan faggot, I don't care. but this story you're telling that bunkerchan is nothing but reactionaries ever since the glorious leader jannies left the dying site is pure mythology, there aren't more reactionaries than there used to be at all, they have always been a problem and especially been so ever since the poljak meme left bunkerchan. this is why I don't respect you people, you just make shit up to feed into this drama. it's pathetic.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:37:42 No. 1895
>>1894 if you love bunkerchan so much go post there lol
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:40:09 No. 1896
>>1894 The number of reactionaires have never changed, but they were heavily restricted with their posts by the jannies. TheThingNoticer and his ilk always gets noticed and dealt with. Weeds will always grows in gardens, but it is up to the gardeners to keep them from spoiling the garden.
Nobody cares. Stay in leftypol and be moderated or go back to bunkerchan and don't be.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:47:13 No. 1897
>>1895 The only reason people are here is because the Bunker is down
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:47:41 No. 1898
people better be banned for saying slurs if they aren't in incredibly funny postsdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:47:42 No. 1899
>>1894 Space is too lazy to defend himself (predictable) and the ex-jannies post their turbocringe autofanfic here and on twitter and bunker. So, one year from now, that's how everybody will remember it. And this story will only mutate into more fucky things over the years. Five years from now, people will remember that Space forced everybody to pay in order to post and that he donated the money to Tony Blair.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:48:16 No. 1900
>>1897 It's almost like it matters how the site is run in more ways than just purging reactionaries.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:49:18 No. 1902
>>1899 space_ has no idea what's being said about him. He never used bunkerchan.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:49:20 No. 1903
>>1899 this seems dangerously plausible and now i'm preemptively irritated by a completely imagined portrayal of a grand people's war against a poorly maintained website
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:50:48 No. 1904
>>1899 Go ahead, tell me about the /leftypol/-/leftpol/ split and how did Che retired their position as admin?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 16:59:41 No. 1905
is bunkerchan kill?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:01:10 No. 1906
>>1899 >can't cope with the shit he did >schizo fantasy drivel to gloss over it You need to go back. I'm sure d0llar is competent enough to get it up and running in now time. But there will be plenty of boot for you to lick.
Fuck off, schizo.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:07:32 No. 1907
>>1869 Yes I agree, but usually it IS the lgbtq and trannies that derail discussions and make everything about them as wreckers. I like the idea of just not talking about it altogether, but then at least ban equally both the trannies and the tranny haters
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:07:36 No. 1908
Why does bunkerchan keep going down
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:09:41 No. 1909
>>1908 I donno, but I like the idea of at least having leftypol as a backup board until it becomes good enough to stand on its own
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:16:08 No. 1911
>>1908 cause they are extremely incompetent and lazy, what a dumb question.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:29:24 No. 1912
>>1867 >trannies are a class Read a book nigga.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:45:15 No. 1913
If we have to move here can we make it more usable? Bunkerchan's layout was great and worked pretty good on mobile.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 17:47:29 No. 1914
>>1908 The official line from the Bunkerchan mods is "routine maintenance"
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:13:13 No. 1916
just a question, will bunkerchan go down, will .org and .xyz exist at the same time, or will leftypol only be a backup site? ever since the split, bunker has been kind of inactive, and i don't wanna have to browse both sites at once. bunkerchan was comfy enough for me, why must drama ruin everything
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:17:39 No. 1917
>>1907 not really, we sometimes do this, but we usually make a separate thread for it. tranny haters on the other hand, wreck threads with
>muh degeneracy >muh woke corpos >THE TRANNERINOS ARE THE CREATION OF PORKERINO >what? what do you mean there is an anti-bigotry rule, no fair! don't you see how my seething is more important than discussion about people being unable to feed or house themselves? >LATE STAGE CAPITALISM IS WHEN SOYLENT AND MARVEL Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:19:15 No. 1918
>>1904 Before /leftypol/ and /leftpol/, there was /pol/. We were thrown out of regular /pol/ for being too racist, some left on their own volition – hence the name LEFTpol. And leftYpol came after that, it got a bit more of a spiritual Indian suprematist flavor to it (the Y stands for Yoga). Che, a beautiful trans-woman (you have seen the pic and it was posted a lot so that must be her as you know people wouldn't lie about such a thing online) wanted to introduce up/down votes on old /leftypol/. That was back in the glorious days when he were still on 7chan. But the 7chan owner, Aaron Swartz, didn't want that. I guess I need to explain the insider lingo here a bit: A "chan" is like a Chinese version of Facebook, there are many chans out there on the dark web, and they are called that because of the Asian celebrities (Jackie Chan, Chris Chan etc.) that are usually discussed in these places. To this day, chans remain mostly an Asian thing, especially in Portugal. There was a public debate between Che and the 7chan owner over the merits of the voting system. It didn't look good for Che but then she casually dropped that she used to mod on 9gag. My jaw literally hit the floor when I heard that, you know somebody from there is a real OG of cyberspace. So everybody in the chat began chanting: WE WANT VOTES TIED TO SOCIAL CREDIT! LONG LIVE CHE-XIDADA THOUGHT! But Swartz, always the power-tripping fascist, kicked out almost everybody. I'm not entirely sure who this "Space" guy is people here are talking about and suspect he and Swartz are the same person. But I know Che very well, we chat almost every day about her favorite philosophers Öcalan and Biden.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:29:55 No. 1919
>>1894 If you can't notice that the place has been overrun by reactionaries, maybe you are in good comapny. Go back.
OH WAIT, YOU CAN'T BAHAHAHHHAHAHA Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:30:38 No. 1921
everyone who still supports bunkchan at this point must be some gross nu4channer who is only even on imageboards because "lenorules xPPP"think Think
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:32:47 No. 1922
>>1919 the fact that you rely on this narrative you’re trying to spin shows how weak your convictions are. if bunkerchan had less reactionaries than leftypol.org would you care?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:41:50 No. 1923
>>1918 kek
>>1922 I wouldn't like to post on a leftist forum where the new owners have shown they have no principles, no. The fact that reactionaries abound is a result of their incompetence and their traitorous power-seize. The new bunker mods are entirely absent, incompetent, are organized like a fucking monarchy (with a scab crowned king), and nu-leftypol is the result of that.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:42:42 No. 1924
>>1902 nonsense, why would he retire his persona if he was strong and stable?
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 18:52:44 No. 1925
>>1921 tbh i see more of that sort of posting on this website than on that one on average. in fairness, mainly because i stick to this thread because it's actually active.
really there's some real narcissism of small differences shit going on here. both sites fighting against a completely imagined version of the same website with the same userbase based on higher principles which as of yet have had little to no impact on the style of discussion except to alter its speed.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:06:05 No. 1926
>>1925 You are a succdem. I forgive you for not having any appreciation for more leftist values, such as camaraderie, solidarity, democracy, etc. A lot of us don't think the site is "given" to us. It isn't precisely a service that is given to us by one or another "leader". We are part of the site, we contribute via our posts, our memes, etc. The values with which the site was run were betrayed, and hence, the community was betrayed. And a new set of values (top-down dictatorial incompetence) was forcibly put in its place.
Perhaps nothing has changed short term (which btw is a lie because PPH on flunkerchan is 50% what it usually is, and their technical incompetence has been rearing it's ugly head many times, including right now). But that is only because of the arduous gains that the community has made with regards to moderation and community upkeep. Any success scabchan has now is because they ride on the momentum built by the previous now-couped team of dedicated mods and the users who have been giving them constant feedback for years at this point.
I don't really care if you think these are small differences. I'm a leftist with basic principles, and what happened on bunkerchan should be fucking disgusting to any other leftist.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:09:46 No. 1927
>>1894 >i don't care >spends his entire time crying about his yet again downtime shithole Go back suck some nazbol cock, retard.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:17:19 No. 1928
>>1925 Yeah the narcissism of small differences thing is definitely true, its only been like two weeks so there isn't really much difference between the userbase but you already have people saying "go back" and stuff like that as if there's some big ideological differences between the two userbases. I think most of Bunkerchan's userbase is probably unaware of the split or just waiting to see where everyone else goes. I don't think there's many die hard Space_ simps
Also it sucks how this thread is the only real active thread right now, hopefully this site becomes more active over time since it seems like bunkerchan being down will be a regular thing now
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:22:06 No. 1929
>>1928 I just want to point out that I haven't seen a single soyjack on .org outside of this thread.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:30:42 No. 1930
>>1928 if there's no difference you should have no problem going back and staying there
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:34:03 No. 1931
>>1928 This is damage control, lol. There's a massive difference. The mods here are actually principled communists and space is just an opportunistic faggot fronting as a communist (as well as d0llars) doing it for nothing but the clout. One side wants even the most reactionary and low quality anons to post (this hysteria was largely generated by those very people) and the other wants to allow a place for leftists to talk about class and leftism while giving a means for righties to ask question and genuinely ask about communism. You are just a retard coping with your subpar image board and community.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:34:04 No. 1932
Every pro bunker argument seems to break down to them having more users. If you point out that the site is barely functional and more reactionaries are coming in daily you’re “spinning a narrative” to cover for jannies. No one seems to know what the jannies are trying to accomplish though, besides not letting people seethe about trannies.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:46:15 No. 1933
>>1926 Values mean less than the minute quantity of hard drive space used to store them, what matters is action and more specifically: results. For as incompetent as the bunkerchan administration remains, so long as it outperforms the results of this site the charge will remain a half truth. Bunkerchan might be at 50% of its prior PPH, but unless this place is at 50% of Bunkerchan's PPH it's a deadweight loss. It's all well and good blaming the users, but you might as well be screaming at the tides for washing away your house of sand.
You can argue with me on this as a matter of principle if you wish, I care not, the position I set out models that of the average board user most closely: They do not care about democratic centralism, indeed to their credit they probably couldn't define it. They do not care about the imagined values of semi-anonymous moderation staff. They care about using the board as a board, and so long as this board underperforms where it matters (PPH, most glaringly) it matters not a jot that it's theoretical management structure is nicer than that of the website everyone already uses. Where you imagine a malicious userbase we would be better off without, I see a lazy userbase of the sort that makes up each and every website on the web.
If this site wins over Bunkerchan, it's much more likely to be due to incompetence such as downtime than it is to the idea that this board's administration structure has the right Feng-shui. Another more competent dictatorship would be just as well placed to take over.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:49:42 No. 1935
>>1933 This sure is a long winded way of saying that you like the other site because there are more posts.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 19:52:40 No. 1936
>>1935 I don't like either. I am spelling out the principles of effective action. (And finding new and exciting ways to say "but that did not matter" in what I imagine to be Adam Curtis's voice)
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:08:16 No. 1937
>>1933 >this board's administration structure has the right Feng-shui This is what socdems actually believe.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:15:11 No. 1938
>>1933 This is like a succdem shilling for pinochet.
>The PPH went up, it's what people crave lol. That's fine, post wherever you want. We don't share values and we won't change each other's values. If you value PPH more than anything, there are other political boards that are much quicker, like 4chan or other splinter boards.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:23:12 No. 1939
>>1938 comparing space to pinochet is applies a comical level of self importance to your distaste for him
there is no "values" contest here, at least not in the way you see it. this site already has a democratic centralist (lol) leadership structure. the problem is, it does not have posters. the effective problem to deal with is: how do you get more posters, and it is the failure to effectively answer that question (combined with an impotent strategy of insulting them and imagining that they must somehow be inferior or reactionary for not immediately caring.) which will cripple this board.
PPH is not a value, it is an economic indicator.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:30:52 No. 1940
>>1939 Are you not aware of how Pinochet rose to power and the resulting "Chilean miracle"?
You are shilling for a coupist, and citing PPH as why it's better.
The parallel is:
Pinochet good because
>GDP is not a value, it is an economic indicator. And PPH plummeted, as well as quality. So not only is there less posts, a higher percentage of them are reactionary bullshit. Just check the graphs and compare it to several months ago.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:31:20 No. 1941
>Also it sucks how this thread is the only real active thread right now, juche Juche
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 20:39:53 No. 1942
>>1940 >Are you not aware of how Pinochet rose to power and the resulting "Chilean miracle"? I am aware of it in more depth than you've forgotten. Never forget how much of the so called miracle was propped up by CODELCO, which was nationalised by his predecessor.
In the metaphorical splitting in half of Chile which we're dealing with here (why the fuck did you pick Chile and not the Spanish civil war?) what I am saying to you is that all of your high minded aims and values mean nothing if you do not keep your hands on CODELCO. No copper and you will have no success.
You celebrate the decline in PPH for Bunkerchan, but you have captured little to none of that PPH for this website. It is a deadweight loss. It is copper mines hit by atom bombs. It is an avowal of failure.
>>1941 Idealism of the worst sort.
There is no major quality-quantity trade off in the long run when it comes to imageboard posting. Quantity has a quality all of its own, correctly managed.
(That must be the funniest part of this: In terms of a broad philosophy of moderation I almost certainly side with this website more, but it's an utter waste of time when there are only 20 people here to moderate in the first place.)
This board in particular would be most successful had the original plan of the janitors not been uncovered and most of the userbase was transferred over without much apparent shift. In the face of the failure to have done this, there is now a tendency to try and cope and pretend that actually a significantly slower board is a good thing and that actually we'd rather be nothing like bunkerchan, taking as our starting point 60% of bunkerchan's mangled threads, ghost posts left lingering by users who haven't moved over.
This board will be dead by 2022 if it follows the philosophy of "quantity over quality" and lets itself be content with having no posters outside the hours when Bunkerchan has crashed.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 21:07:01 No. 1943
Succdem poster is a new fag anyways. Who gives a shit what her thinks?
>>1942 Go back to your shithole, lmfao.
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 21:19:31 No. 1944
>>1943 i've forgotten more imageboard history than you've ever learned
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 21:37:38 No. 1945
>>1944 Yeah, yeah, you and every other anon on earth.
SAGE Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 21:46:41 No. 1946
>>1894 >there aren't more reactionaries then go back. I know why im here, and its not the drama
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 22:00:43 No. 1947
>>33988 before the sun engulf it so mankind will suffer for a shorter time
Anonymous 2021-01-06 (Wed) 22:04:02 No. 1948
>>1945 a british tripfag isn't going to get you out of your self created mess
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:10:30 No. 1949
>>1947 hahahaha
but it hurts to laugh too >>1948 lol. you misunderstood, the other anon was making an oldfag joke to mock you. and you didn't get it hehe.
I already explained why this site is the true leftist imageboard. If you are not a leftist, you wouldn't get it. Keep jacking off about PPH as an economic indicator, you're a neoliberal in wool clothing.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:22:51 No. 1950
>>1949 Lol, A: This is a happening right now and B: What does PPH matter when it's 99% soyjacks?
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:23:40 No. 1951
>>1949 being "the true leftist imageboard" means nothing if it's dead. but of course you have no answer to that, no practical organization to deal with the situation you currently face. you just want to masturbate to your own theoretical correctness while the world burns around you. were you anything more than an irritating sycophant, you would be an albatross around the site administration's neck.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:30:35 No. 1952
>>1951 Then help us kill bunkerchan and stop being such a fag.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:39:23 No. 1954
>>1953 what the fuck kind of newfag says "newfag" 3 times in one post
anyway, imagine wanting bunkerchan to be as completely irrelevant as that one avatarfag chan that only allows posting for like 2 hours a day. these are the lofty aspirations of the chan culture retards!
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:50:29 No. 1957
>>1952 why would i do that when (taking this thread as a sample) this site seems to have sucked up all the self important losers who're thin on marshall mcluhan and fat on delusional fantasies about the importance of imageboards while completely out of contact with how they work to the extent they can unironically believe in a quantity-quality tradeoff?
the great irony, which i've mentioned before, is that i actually prefer the moderation philosophy this site supposedly has.
"oh, oh, oh, look at USApol" yeah loser, or i could look at /leftybritpol/ which conspicuously (a) hasn't moved (b) has created more OC in one year than USApol will in one hundred and (c) isn't cucked by being a shitty cyclical
>>1955 maybe if you didn't type like you think you're hip for knowing what lainchan is you would make posts worth more than mockery
>>1956 fishing for (you)s with the daring strategy of forewarning people of their mistaken ideas so that they can't say they weren't warned when negative consequences arise from following them, with the devilish bait of telling people that their strategies aren't working and that they ought to be discussing new ones rather than what an oldfag they are for not understanding a joke about Salvia officinalis.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 00:56:18 No. 1958
>>1948 >>1957 >self important losers >he said while flag-fagging the projection lmao
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 01:30:36 No. 1963
>he's so new he doesn't even know that on this board the flag is demsoc democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 01:46:27 No. 1964
>>1957 its the bong socdem poster
>thin on marshall mcluhan that leafcuck was a meme, no one even in academia takes him seriously after the 80s
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 02:20:01 No. 1966
>>1965 is bunkerchan down? or was it? it looks up to me
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 02:22:07 No. 1967
>>1966 there's like a 13% chance bunkerchan has gone down on any day since the CIA backed coup.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 02:28:04 No. 1968
>>1966 It was down earlier, hence the sudden change in discussion ITT.
Also I forgot to add that looking at the sheer number of PPH is only half the story. The problem with no to low moderation is that shitposters and reactionaries will keep posting, conflating the PPH more. leftypol.org is slow (for now) but posts and threads are kept towards discussion and effortposting. Hell roseflag, I only liked when you were outside of /brit/pol.
That isn't to say it should stay the way it is, but naysayers coming to concern-troll about its slow pace misunderstands how boards can and should work.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 02:55:34 No. 1969
>>1964 few in academia take keynes seriously after the 1980s either, it was a mark of their irrelevance not of his.
(i could've said marx, but plenty of people take marx very seriously. if only they had a clue what he was saying…)
>>1965 >he doesn't like Therouxposting anyway nobody said PPH equates to post quality, the point is that there is no trade off between PPH and post quality. Some means of increasing PPH will reduce post quality, some means of reducing PPH will reduce post quality, some means of increasing PPH will increase post quality, and some means of increasing PPH will reduce post quality. It is an indicator, but it is a crucial indicator of health, especially when breaking off from a site with high PPH to begin with.
>>1968 >Hell roseflag, I only liked when you were outside of /brit/pol. this is actually a useful illustrative example: do you think you'd get the occasional several-thousand word essay thread about the state of the left if I wasn't kept on the site day-by-day editing quote bubbles onto images of British politicians a cheap joke? more pressingly: do you think I'd do it if I had to wait a day or two for a reply instead of 5 minutes?
Those who believe in the quantity-quality tradeoff imagine they can have the effortposts without the shitposts. They imagine that there are "effortposters" and "shitposters" as separate people, rather than them often being one and the same. They have no adequate distinction between ordinary posters having a laugh and genuine idiots, despite having a prime opportunity to adopt a moderation structure that can understand and embrace that distinction.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:10:03 No. 1970
>>1969 What I'm saying is that scabchan has gone to shit and is only getting worse. Evidently, many of the better posters came here. It is to be expected of principled socialists as I explained above. I don't care if you or others believe in principles, in part because you aren't socialist.
While it is sad that PPH is down, the silver lining is that the posting is higher quality. On the other site, average daily PPH is down at least 50%, and while PPH was relatively high today, the average user count is also significantly down
and constantly decreasing . People are noticing a significant decrease in quality as well, so a high PPH is not necessarily desirable.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:12:31 No. 1971
>>1969 If you knew anything about culture and what happened to 4chan you would realize why letting normies in ruins everything. There's nothing wrong with growing an imageboard, but, it's a delecate balance. Otherwise you end up with unironic nazis, or, in the case of leftypol, unironic nazbols. People have been warning leftypol about this since 2016. Of course there's no point in arguing with you because you will just dig your heels further down in the dirt and proclaim you are correct no matter what is said to you. Also, you are cherry picking today as on any other day PPH was literally under 100 pph at times as low as 80 pph. Before the happenings today the max was around 150 and user count has been dropping like a stone. I think that all three chans leftypol.org, getchan.net, and bunkerchan.xyz can live in harmony, but, we have to stop acting like such massive faggots to eachother and people like you coming in here with your cooping is only disadvantaging bunkerchan. it makes you people look like even bigger retards.
sage Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:20:41 No. 1972
>>1969 If you can’t see the implicit criticism of the general behind the posts in that screencap, then idk what to tell you.
t. Person who created and wrote half of the posts in the screencap
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:25:27 No. 1973
>>1970 >in part because you aren't socialist. A line you'll keep repeating from a pit of infinite ignorance.
You're looking for upsides to cheer about today, I'm looking for how things are going to look in 2022.
>>1971 Websites shape their posters much more than vice versa. "Normies" do not exist. 4chan's problems are entirely down to bad administration and moderation decisions. For someone so afraid of "unironic nazis" and "unironic nazbols" you're doing a great job of being a completely unironic reactionary. Don't reply to me again until you've washed your mouth out with bleach.
p.s. It's comically naive to imagine that Bunkerchan and .org can live in harmony in a world where they both serve the exact same role. Either one dies, one changes purpose, or one purely becomes the "yeah the other one crashed" bunker.
p.p.s. for those on the short bus: I'm not "pro Bunkerchan" here. Only a coping fool could read my posts in that light.
>>1972 i miss peak rug merchant days
you and your identical clone twin arrive in Bradford in the timeline where every member of the Labour party has been condemned to post on leftypol.org for the rest of their days.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:27:19 No. 1974
>>1971 If you knew anything about the life and death of 4chan alternatives since 7chan you would realize that elitism can be extremely self-defeating. We shouldn't be turning away people outright, we should be encouraging them to lurk moar until they transform into the kinds of posters we actually want to interact with.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:27:30 No. 1975
>>1973 >"Normies" do not exist. 4chan's problems are entirely down to bad administration and moderation decisions. Spoken like a true newfag who never witnessed project chanology.
Is this nigga really this fucking stupid?
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:28:41 No. 1976
>>1975 can we just cut to the chase here: what's your favourite encyclopedia dramatica article?
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:29:07 No. 1977
>>1974 >There's nothing wrong with growing an imageboard, but, it's a delecate balance. Motherfucking, I swear to god this society has turned you all into ADHD shit for brain riddled faggots who can barely read. Comrade, that is exactly what I was saying.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:29:21 No. 1978
>>1969 I hope you realize the general was created to curb your shitpostinf tendencies to a single thread and hence your posts outside of it had more effort in it. The moderation team already knows what you are trying to criticize them for
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:29:47 No. 1979
>>1976 Is changing the subject and attacking some ones character just something you do when you have been cornered, or, are you really this stupid?
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:30:51 No. 1980
>>1973 >>1973 I don’t. The general was the worst general in the entire board.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:33:46 No. 1981
>>1978 if this was true it would make me the most powerful poster on the site.
i'm not here to criticize the moderation team, i'm here to tell the idiots in this thread what's up.
>>1979 oh yes, absolutely, i was completely cornered by your reference to project chanology. what is that? some kind of failed chronology of 4chan like the one on that website for cool free ringtones?
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:34:25 No. 1982
>>1971 this idea that leftypol is nothing but nazbols can be disproven by spending within 5 minutes on the site.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:40:47 No. 1983
>>1982 I never said it was.
>>1981 t. Newfag who knows nothing. I rest my case. We must learn from history lest we be doomed to repeat it.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:43:11 No. 1984
>>1983 ah i see, you don't know what channology is either. you're merely pretending, it is a hoax, a ruse, like the new trollface.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:48:35 No. 1985
>>1984 >No u Oh no, I certainty do remember chanology as I have been posting since well before it. I also remember how it was the catalyst that lead us to 4chan being in the state it is in today. Stop trying to save face you little transparent faggot, kek. You have been so utterly torn apart in this thread everything you do at this point is just making you look even dumber.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:50:27 No. 1986
>>1985 if you were really there you would explain what it was.
>You have been so utterly torn apart in this thread we'll see about that in 2022 :)
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:51:44 No. 1987
>unironic nazbols as mods overturning any attempt at banning nazis >catalog full of /pol/ shit >"nothing to see here this is fine"
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:53:00 No. 1988
>>1986 I am on an anonymous imageboard. I don't have to prove anything to you, haha. It was the cancer that killed b. That was literally the moniqur. For the time. It was the split where 4chan left being the "internet hate machine" and became known for moral faggotry about saving retards from Scientology. You are only trying to save face. Go back to bunkerchan with your annoying shit takes.
Better yet go back to twitter.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 03:54:41 No. 1989
>>1988 if you're as old an oldfag as you say you are you should be the one on twitter with all your friends from somethingawful.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 04:01:59 No. 1990
>>1989 Go back to your cess pit faggot.
Whether you accept it, or, not curating content is what leads to a fine balance of growth and quality. Hell the
very mod team that is on this site now is responsible for getting bunkerchan to the levels of popularity it is at today and, even more so, in the past. Remember 8ch? The last time when leftypol was nearing 1k users? That was these mods on leftypol.org, was it not? And, it's no argument in both cases post quality was much higher than it is today. Space didn't do that d0llars didn't do it none of the new mods did that. The mods that are here on this site did that. The fact that you retards have given the site to space and his cronies who barely know what they are doing is only going to end badly, lol. You need mods who know what the community is about and how to curate the site to reflect that.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 04:05:19 No. 1991
>>1990 >curating content is what leads to a fine balance of growth and quality Which you do by deleting bad posts and giving out short bans (<2hrs) to people who post them so as to steer discussion in the right direction, not by trying to get rid of "the normies" who make the bad posts and then wondering why nobody posts on your website. You fucking moron, you imbecile. Why the fuck didn't you just drink the bleach like I told you to.
I have done nothing. You are angry at me for no reason, and you are completely incapable of explaining what chanology was because you weren't there.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 04:05:43 No. 1992
>>1981 Well you are pretending that you are the most powerful poster so it is par for the course
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 04:40:45 No. 1993
>>1991 Implicit criticism of normies doesn’t mean you want to get rid of them
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:14:19 No. 1994
>>1899 >ex-jannies post their turbocringe autofanfic here t. schizo who thinks that only jannies defend the split
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:25:44 No. 1996
>>1969 >plenty of people take marx very seriously. if only they had a clue what he was saying rich, coming from a rosa killer
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:29:08 No. 1997
>>1973 Oh, wait, I know who this faggot is. This is the blairite shill from /britpol/ threads. Just a reminder to everyone: you are arguing with an unironic anti-communist neoliberal shill who likes to clothe himself in socdem aesthetics.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:37:36 No. 1998
>>1996 >>1997 You're embarrassing yourselves. It's the same Rose flag who wrote >>20081 and they aren't a social democrat even if they use the flag.
Their flag was removed in the migration from Bunkerchan, but the thread is still on that site with the flag intact. (plus one of the first replies says "A FUCKING ROSE").
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:38:11 No. 1999
>>1994 who else cares about the split
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 06:42:15 No. 2000
>>1852 I'm convinced those people are new mods making up as much shit as possible.
If not, I don't think they know what "censorship" is, unless they're /pol/fags who are complaining about not being able to shitpost liberally.
ira IRA Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 07:00:09 No. 2001
>>2000 >I'm convinced those people are new mods making up as much shit as possible. My impression as well. At the very least lackeys. You could see the same exact attitude during the original split threads on bunkerchan. 1-3 samefags regurgitating the same lies. It wouldn't surprise me at all if one of them were Pyongang, Space, or d0llars, since I've seen first hand how dishonest and opportunistic these faggots can be.
The most repulsive thing about bunkerchan is that it's based on a lie, upheld by liers, and inhabited by a userbase that doesn't give a shit about it.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 07:04:56 No. 2002
>>34912 ira IRA
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 07:23:09 No. 2003
>>34912
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 09:40:29 No. 2006
>>2005 nooo it's not true! stop screencapping! i don't even look, it's not true! you are the nazis! this is literally censorship! WHERE IS MY FREE SCREECH!
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 11:20:38 No. 2008
>>1998 I will give you a tip: just because they are more eloquent than most here doesn't mean they have any idea what they are talking about. That OP is pure banality for example. It is also fully compatible with left liberalism. The idea that the succdem isn't actually a succdem is stupid.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 16:08:52 No. 2010
>>2009 >obnoxiousness = power That is a very limited power.
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 16:30:04 No. 2011
>>2003 Is this the true power of autism?
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 16:38:26 No. 2012
>>2009 Mysterious socdem poster powers
Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 18:14:49 No. 2014
>>2009 >Poster concerned with PPH doesn't contribute in other threads Curious!
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:37:35 No. 2016
<cause you can orange text
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:38:35 No. 2017
Because more features and improvements actually get added and it doesn't go down every 2 days
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:40:44 No. 2018
>>2017 What features and improvements are being added?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:51:19 No. 2019
>>2018 >A working onion >Eepsite in the future >Warrant Canary <You's <Layout doesn't look like a child designed it And much more.
Also, SAGE
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:51:47 No. 2020
>>2018 >higher filesize upload limit >catalog sorting and resizing >(you)s added >working TOR access >better mobile support >more flags, themes and banners and more, based on user requests and suggestions.
Meanwhile on bunkerchan you have to wait 6 months for Space_ to remember that his website even exists for any changes to be made.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:53:06 No. 2021
>>2015 Because Bunkerchan looks like dogshit, and this place doesn't. Plus, Space went out to get some smokes and never came back.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:55:42 No. 2022
it's more like tenants getting fed up that their landlord never comes to fix shit and evicting them when they say one (1) bad thing about them.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 03:56:16 No. 2023
>>2015 Personally? Because I came over to Bunkerchan with the rest of GETchan and saw Space_ fuck us over in real time. I wouldn't post on Bunkerchan now even if I was the only poster who left after the jannies got fired.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:03:46 No. 2025
Way too much reactionary shit is being tolerated on bunkerchan since all the mods left. Its annoying.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:08:59 No. 2026
>>2025 I haven't been back since the split. How bad are we talking? Are we talking "fuck workers" shit, or outright Naziposting?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:10:56 No. 2027
Better infrastructure, can provide better automated raid protection.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:13:41 No. 2028
>>2026 outright Nazi shit and barely veiled Nazi shit masquerading as "Nazbol"
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:15:42 No. 2029
I don't necessarily think mods or website owners are on the side of posters. But I think it's fair to say that democracy among oligarchs is always better than autocracy of an absent dictator.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:22:20 No. 2030
>>2028 Alright, now I have two very good reasons to never visit the bunker again.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:23:01 No. 2031
(You)s and orange text. And a place with actual moderation to keep the board from descending into idpol bullshit and saturated with burger shit
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:25:21 No. 2032
>>2019 (you)s are for attention whores and should be removed
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:30:59 No. 2033
>>2032 That's just like, (you)r opinion, man.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:36:09 No. 2034
Better site, better staff, better pretty much everything.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:48:30 No. 2035
>>2026 tons of idpol shit everywhere. people don't remember, but idpol is like a fungus. if you don't get rid of it quick, it spreads fucking everywhere and is really hard to get rid of.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 04:51:48 No. 2036
>>2026 multiple incel threads, thinly veiled nazi posters - its pretty fucking bad
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 05:20:32 No. 2037
>>2026 A lot more radlib idpol than usual. There was literally a 200+ reply thread on toxic masculinity the other day.
Also, a bunch of idiots who don't read theory and think "owning the /pol/tards" is a legitimate serious political stance. I blame /pol/jack for bringing in so many /v/tards and oher dumbasses from 4chan.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 05:51:04 No. 2039
someone tried getting bunkercuck to raid a neo-nazi live stream chat
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 07:20:25 No. 2040
>>2032 Have a (You) for your troubles.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 09:29:07 No. 2042
>>2015 Because is already a better website after just three weeks?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 09:55:21 No. 2043
>>2032 There's literally not enough people for farming (You)s. The feature just makes it easier to follow conversations.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 10:55:56 No. 2044
why would you stay on an unmoderated free screech shite site run by a retard that can't even prevent the site from repeatedly going offline for several hours and a site owner that refuses to put any work into it other than having a personal fit when getting criticized and hijacking users while installing his own clique of unironic nazbols as mods just because he values personal loyalty over competence and functionality?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 13:39:08 No. 2046
>>2015 better site, better moderation. If you dont notice it, you're welcome to go back.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 14:35:54 No. 2048
Holy fucking shit bunkerchan is awful
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 14:41:31 No. 2049
>>2045 It's gone now, what was it about?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 15:00:37 No. 2050
>>2049 It was a bait thread along of the lines of "why do you bunkercucks seethe at this video" and people just kept replying.
The Anarkids are Alright 2021-01-08 (Fri) 21:26:52 No. 2051
Because bunkerchan is stupidpol with even more autism, now.syndicalism Syndicalism
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 21:39:29 No. 2052
>>2015 1. because flunkerchan has been fucking overrun with idpol-obsessed /pol/yps and stupidpolers, to the point where you have to scroll past 3-4 derail/bait posts in a thread just to get to something worth reading
2. because flunkerchan tards still can't fucking manage to get a working onionlink
3. there are more effort-posters here
4. the mods are responsive, involved, and actively trying to improve their shit
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 21:40:58 No. 2053
>>2032 uighur how does wanting to find what i posted in a thread make me an attention whore?
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 23:05:37 No. 2055
https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/1289606.html At most there's one good poster left on bunkerchan.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 23:06:36 No. 2056
>>2015 Because all the new mods on bunkerchan are extremely inactive thus there is a shit ton of /pol/fag spam on there now. Not to mention all the good mods moved to this site and none of the faggotry from nubunkerchan is here.
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 23:07:45 No. 2057
>>2039 Sounds like /b/ in 2008. It wouldn't work on there anymore because the new mods are inactive, thus bunkerchan has been invaded by /pol/yps
THE ONLY REAL LEFTIST 2021-01-08 (Fri) 23:30:00 No. 2058
>>2053 THANK YOU FOR POINTING OUT THE PRESENCE OF A GLOWUIGHUR
Anonymous 2021-01-08 (Fri) 23:56:13 No. 2059
>>2015 the site is being actively maintained unlike bunkerchan.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:01:49 No. 2061
>>2060
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:02:25 No. 2062
>anyone but space >having control of spaces private property
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:39:44 No. 2063
>>2060
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:44:52 No. 2064
ANYONE READING THIS THREAD FROM THE SHITTER?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:47:24 No. 2065
Which boards got yeeted? I know GET set their apartment on fire while moving out, but what else is gone on Bunkerchan?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:48:15 No. 2066
>>2064 that is the only time I read leftypol threads
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:48:57 No. 2067
>>2065 A jannie bombed edu and gulag on bunkerchan.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 01:50:53 No. 2068
>>2067 …One of ours, or one of Space's?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 02:02:13 No. 2069
>>2067 damn /edu/ was comfy
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 02:05:06 No. 2070
>>2067 >interesting Those boards served a purpose OP.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 02:06:03 No. 2071
>new mod goes rogue on bunkerchan <"must've been an old mod on leftypol dot org!"
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 02:11:36 No. 2073
>>2068 >>2067 Alright, apparently our own. This looks pretty shitty, but honestly Space_ deserves it. Besides, it's not like anything on Gulag was ever going to be addressed anyway.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 02:15:41 No. 2074
>>2069 It's still here on leftypol.org
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:07:29 No. 2075
Dude, where's my threads?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:08:55 No. 2076
>Every single bunkerchan thread got deleted
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:10:40 No. 2078
>>2059 PLEASE USE LYNXCHAN THE CHAN YOU GUYS ARE USING RIGHT NOW SUCKS JUST PLEASE MAKE THE SITE LAYOUT MORE LIKE BUNKERCHAN I HATE THIS DARK THEME LOOKING ASS…
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:10:56 No. 2079
>>2076 You already know. It's obvious when they posted "guys it's time to migrate now lololol" in red text
>muh plausible deniablity Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:11:04 No. 2080
You could have at least nuked bunkerchan AFTER this site was feature complete, god damn.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:11:07 No. 2081
>>2059 why is this site software so shit
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:12:47 No. 2083
this site blows because the janitors blow
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:13:19 No. 2085
yes yes very good it's dead again hello friendsdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:13:29 No. 2086
Bunkerchan has been added to the Victims of Communism repository.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:14:03 No. 2087
i don't resent the deleting of all the threads again but i'm pissed that thread creation got rate limited so i couldn't pretend i was doing a social democratic coupdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:14:48 No. 2091
>>2084 >mod has "side board" jurisdiction >nukes the entire leftypol board BO is coping hard
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:14:49 No. 2092
>>2084 Space_ is so fucking braindead. "oops I forgot to remove the mods that left and now the entire site is gone, whoopsie lol" I'm guessing he made no backups as well.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:15:39 No. 2094
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/301340681 Help me convince these idiots that Trump ban from Twitter result from capitalism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:15:45 No. 2095
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/301340681 Help me convince these idiots that Trump ban from Twitter result from capitalism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:16:13 No. 2097
>>2094 what a waste of digits
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:16:17 No. 2098
>>2094 You are trying to play chess with a pigeon my friend.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:16:48 No. 2099
>>2088 But you can.
Can someone tell me if this was a backup board, or it's bunkerchan that was a backup board?
nazbol Nazbol Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:17:58 No. 2100
>>2086 I fucking kek, lmfao.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:18:34 No. 2102
also i would like to get on the record the divide between the mods and the users of this particular thread:democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:19:53 No. 2103
>>2088 Up right, Options
Then left on the first page.
You can change the themes there.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:19:53 No. 2104
>>2101 THIS SITE SUCKS USE LYNXCHAN INSTEAD OF LAINCHAN RETRADS!!
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:19:56 No. 2105
>>2102 imagine shilling for an authority figure as childish as an Internet janitor
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:20:36 No. 2107
>>2078 Up right, Options
Then left on the first page.
You can change the themes there.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:21:07 No. 2108
>>2105 i shill only for effective action. inaction in the face of imminent defeat is the greatest sin.
well, that and being rich.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:21:12 No. 2109
>>2102 so the moral of the story is that the nuclear option works
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:21:38 No. 2111
>>2109 POSADAS PROVEN RIGHT AGAIN
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:06 No. 2115
>>2112 >>2112 no they didn't edu is right here
>>>/edu/ Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:16 No. 2116
>>2104 Bunkerchan literally looks like it was programmed by a child with crayons.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:19 No. 2117
>>2102 this is why no one will post here, you are an insufferable faggot
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:20 No. 2118
>>2112 It's still here on this site, faggot.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:25 No. 2119
>>2088 >>2099 You have to go back.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:29 No. 2120
The fact that you haven't shows you're not committed to the idea.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:33 No. 2121
>>2108 >i shill only for effective action. inaction in the face of imminent defeat is the greatest sin. aka this site has no user base so you have to leach posters, only to ban them for being the wrong posters
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:22:37 No. 2122
>>2115 please switch to lynxchan maybe even change the site name to bunkerchan
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:23:23 No. 2124
all threads appear to have cleared againthink Think
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:23:27 No. 2125
well, they officially wiped all the boards, bunkerchan is just empty now
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:23:28 No. 2126
>>2117 by here do you mean this site or this thread
please tell me it's this site
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:23:50 No. 2127
nvm, EVERY board is gonethink Think
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:24:18 No. 2128
>>2125 FUCK FUCK FUCK I WILL CUM SHIT NOW NOEL!
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:24:35 No. 2129
>>2126 anywhere where you show up it's pathetic and i remember you blew up like a child after being btfo on bunkerchan…
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:24:53 No. 2130
"help us build back better by making new threads" - space, who has not unfucked thread creation.democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:25:16 No. 2131
They have several backups, this is a minor mishap
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:26:03 No. 2134
>>2133 based mods on thot patrol
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:27:36 No. 2139
>>2136 I don't think they considered the optics of this.
They even cleared the gulag board lmao
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:28:06 No. 2140
Anyway, I hope we get new users and that the mods take care of the surge of retards we will surely experience.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:28:16 No. 2141
>>2116 STFU THIS SITE LOOOKS LIKE IT WAS MADE ON ADOBE FLASH MOVE TO LYNXCHAN FAGGOTS AND DONT MAKE LEFTYPOL THE PRIMAL FOCUS CALL IT A DIFFERENT NAME I DONT KNOW LIKE BUNKERCHAN?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:28:56 No. 2142
>>2116 how is this site any better retard?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:29:26 No. 2144
>>2140 Nah, this shit is retarded. I guess I'll start my own site
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:29:54 No. 2145
https://bunkerchan.xyz/b/res/29429.html go in my thread
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:29:58 No. 2147
>>2116 how is this site any better retard?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:30:52 No. 2149
>>2116 how is this site any better retard?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:31:00 No. 2150
>>2138 I think someone already admitted to it, no?
ddr DDR Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:31:17 No. 2151
In the end, the worst threat to leftists aren't fascists, but other "leftists".
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:31:42 No. 2152
>>2151 uhh i think by that first "leftists" you mean "fascists"
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:31:51 No. 2153
>>2151 Indeed like the market "socialist" space_.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:32:28 No. 2155
NOT COOL I DON'T WANNA GO TO LEFTYPOL.ORG THAT SITE HAS A SHITTY LAYOUT AND DOESN'T USE LYNXCHAN IT ALSO HAS LEFTYPOL IN THE URL WHICH DOESNT LOOK COOL! DON'T MAKE THAT THE PRIMAL POINT IN THE URL CALL IT SOMETHING DIFFERENT? I DON'T KNOW LIKE BUNKERCHAN? YEAH THAT SOUNDS GOOD!
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:33:43 No. 2157
>Space_ “Crashing the mod team … with ONE survivor!!!” >Last Jannie “No u.”
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:33:45 No. 2158
This why I hate all Jannies, because they are all shitters.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:34:01 No. 2159
>>2143 Bunkerchan sucks and you know it, m8.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:34:57 No. 2160
>>2157 How did last jannie fuck the site up so hard that it's impossible to even post?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:35:49 No. 2161
>>2160 you can post in my thread on /b/
(this is only 20% narcissism, i'm 80% trying to inform you that posting outside /leftypol/ apparently works)
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:36:02 No. 2162
>>2160 Jannies will always find a way to fuck up.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:36:56 No. 2163
Based janny
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:37:14 No. 2164
lol gulag is gone againdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:37:45 No. 2165
I hate jannies all of them
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:37:56 No. 2166
>>2161 You've gotten so much mileage off of that reading list meme, concordefag.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:38:09 No. 2167
>>2149 More active mods, higher file size, more templates, customs css and JavaScript, voting, etc.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:38:42 No. 2168
god this place is retarded
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:39:08 No. 2169
DOWN WITH THE JUDEAN PEOPLE'S FRONT
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:39:14 No. 2170
I can't believe they actually went full posadas. Strategically it was definitely the right move, tho.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:39:15 No. 2171
>>2166 the best part is it's not even one of mine
i just think it's a very good pisstake of reading lists.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:39:26 No. 2172
HEY TO THE RETARDED JANNIES HERE USE THIS IN YOUR FOOKIN SITE!
https://gitgud.io/LynxChan/LynxChan Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:40:08 No. 2174
https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/1290724.html post in my newer, better, sexier thread.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:40:48 No. 2175
this board is literally better in every way.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:41:47 No. 2176
Can we get a dark theme along the lines of Yotsuba? Current dark is too tiny
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:41:48 No. 2177
>>2172 Use the tech thread
>>30303 Or
>>>/meta/ Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:43:48 No. 2178
WHAT HAPPENED FRIENDS?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:43:53 No. 2179
>>2176 There are like 15 options in the Options menu in the upper right corner.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:44:46 No. 2181
>>2179 yes but all the dark ones are wonky
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:45:30 No. 2183
Bunkerchan is dead. Long live leftypol.org.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:46:08 No. 2184
>>2183 >>2183 why do you want the influx of /pol/tard spam?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:46:11 No. 2185
I have a quick question, where the mods that got purged from bunkerchan the only ones that were banning the unironic nazbols and regular /pol/acks that have been infesting bunkerchan for the past few days? idk if it was just me but i noticed a generally lot more braindiseased tone for a lil bit
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:47:19 No. 2187
>>2172 stephen pls go
love lain
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:47:29 No. 2188
>>2185 All mods got purged except one, so yes, we were the ones banning nazis etc.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:49:13 No. 2189
>>2184 because it's 75% a boogyman.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:50:39 No. 2191
>>2173 if Bunkerchan was the PLA then Space_ was Puyi
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:51:31 No. 2192
>>2187 LET'S ALL LOVE LAIN.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:51:49 No. 2193
bunkerchan is dead, long live leftypol
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:52:08 No. 2194
>>2190 >soyjak.party that sounds more reddit than reddit itself
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:55:18 No. 2196
>>2178 One of the jannies who still had an account on bunkerchan nuked it.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:56:26 No. 2198
>>2197 Noooo my dead board got caught and now I have to use the dead board on a different site
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:57:39 No. 2199
>>2198 what was the point? Why all the layers of obfuscation?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 03:58:42 No. 2202
I remember this happening during the /leftpol/ split
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:00:06 No. 2204
>>2193 Just got banned from the bunker.
Still seeing Nazis all over the place.
.org wins
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:00:56 No. 2205
I go away for a hour WTF.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:01:29 No. 2206
Sectarianism can't be stopped apparently
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:01:46 No. 2207
>>2191 Percocets, Molly, Percocets
Percocets, Molly, Percocets
Rep the set, gotta rep the set
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:01:48 No. 2208
>>2199 i wanted to fuck with them and I also believed dollars was online at the time.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:02:07 No. 2209
>>2077 very simple shit
niggas delete my /dead/
niggas get ddosed
enjoy your last few hours on this shit leftoid website you fucks!
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:02:31 No. 2210
>>2208 Only children and cowards backpedal this hard
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:03:22 No. 2212
>>2203 We didn't deny doing it at any point, and you aren't explaining why you're so buttblasted.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:03:23 No. 2213
>>2209 >get ddosed Shiver me timbers
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:04:02 No. 2215
Since the nu-vols are banning and deleting my posts, I'll post it here:
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:04:39 No. 2217
>>2215 I'll wait for /dead/ to come back, fuck this cancer site
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:05:04 No. 2219
>>2217 What even happened on dead?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:05:05 No. 2220
>>2214 Lol okay fair enough, but the rest of us told you upfront when you came to the chat.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:05:07 No. 2221
>>2209 Stirner has and will always live on in the booru and in our hearts
to hold allegiences in petty groups is a massive spook u dunce
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:05:18 No. 2222
>>2219 it was pretty dead
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:06:05 No. 2224
>>2210 only little bitches post as you do.
>>2214 I call it based and redpilled.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:06:19 No. 2225
>>2211 I imagine space is asleep and will just press a button in the morning
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:06:41 No. 2226
I give this site 2 months before the mods start eating eachother alive
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:06:47 No. 2227
>>2221 well, shoulda thought about that before wiping the last board not infested by the leftoid ilk
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:07:19 No. 2228
>>2226 It's a modocracy, not a monarchy.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:07:42 No. 2230
>>2228 It's not a political system you absolute mong
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:07:59 No. 2233
It's fucking horrible. Now they're all coming here.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:08:26 No. 2235
>>2209 /dead/ has a board here.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:08:41 No. 2236
>>2232 How is this the worst outcome? Leftypol lives on.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:08:45 No. 2237
>>2232 FUCK THEM
AAAAAAAAAAAAH
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:08:54 No. 2238
>>2236 THIS WEBSITE NEEDS LYNXCHAN FAGGOT!
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:09:04 No. 2239
>>2232 I did nothing wrong. I would do it again. Migration to leftypol.org is good and I accelerated that. Space is a fucknut.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:09:13 No. 2240
>>2238 sorry for my homophobic language
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:10:25 No. 2244
>>2239 faggot just use lynxchan on this site and i will be happy ok
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:10:27 No. 2245
>>2231 >>2235 ok, im appeased
still a dick move tho to just wipe the board on bunkerchan
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:11:48 No. 2247
>>2246 yeah but this site needs lynxchan and the url doesnt need to be leftypol it needs to be bunkerchan
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:12:43 No. 2248
>>2245 you know I had to do it to 'em
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:12:56 No. 2249
I'm having fun.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:14:17 No. 2251
>>2250 even made accurate stutter sounds.. respect soyjak.party user
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:15:09 No. 2252
>>2247 >this site needs lynxchan Why Lynxchan, if I may ask?
Do you really want it to be Bunkerchan, or are you just not used to an imageboard website not having a -chan suffix in the URL?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:15:45 No. 2253
>>2239 Sorry bro, I'm not migrating to a board managed by someone who just showed to be worse than space having displayed no regard whatsoever for the leftypol community as he proceeded to nuke it.
albania Albania Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:16:38 No. 2254
2 months faggots
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:16:51 No. 2255
>>2252 >Why Lynxchan, if I may ask? its better and faster
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:16:55 No. 2256
>>2253 If you want to fellate space_ and his nazbol friends, you are free to do so.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:17:09 No. 2257
>>2253 i don't manage this board and i nuked it because it was degenerating quickly.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:17:54 No. 2259
>>2257 if it really is you, are you still nuking /leftypol/ or did they unmod you
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:18:24 No. 2260
>>2248 Congrats for deleting /edu/ and the good stuff.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:18:44 No. 2261
>>34702 >Says the reactionary
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:19:11 No. 2262
>>2239 Based. Kill Bunkerchan already, so people can come here.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:19:24 No. 2263
>>2261 >unironically saying dork twitter moment
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:19:46 No. 2264
>>2248 stfu faggot
like i dont even know what fucking drama went on between this place and /get/ or whatever and honestly, I don't care
all I wanted was to browse an image board with some postie mutuals, i never even went to another board! and you know what, this whole splitting and shitting on each other thing is the exact reason you leftist retards havent achieved anything anywhere in the last 60 years, its the same fucking vulgar tribalisting mindset
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:20:35 No. 2269
>>2259 They deleted my account and banned me lol.
Anonymous ## Mod 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:20:35 No. 2270
>>2226 For the most part, we have been working together as a democratic centralist moderation for the last two years. So I don't know why we would start to "eat ourselves alive" now, especially since we will convene with the userbase in the next weeks how to democratise this site administration.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:20:49 No. 2271
Did one mod really have all the power to delete the entirety of bunkerchan's content?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:21:09 No. 2272
>>2264 So some things happened that you can't be arsed to look into, but you still want the right to whine about it?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:22:08 No. 2273
>>2270 >we're petty enough to nuke a rival website >NOOOOOOO WE AS LEFTISTS AREN'T PRONE TO INFIGHTING cringe and 2 more months pilled
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:22:25 No. 2274
>>40254 >spams the wojacks >can't quote
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:22:41 No. 2275
>>2273 Cope harder "annox".
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:24:00 No. 2276
>>2272 right, i didnt look into it because it wasnt about me, like at all it dont interest me
fucking /dead/ has been there longer than you fucking marxist retards, it was completly seperate there was literally no reason to wipe
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:24:05 No. 2277
>>2271 Apparently yes. It was a Global Volunteer.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:25:30 No. 2278
>>2276 You can still access
>>>/dead/ with all the threads, what are your crying about?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:25:40 No. 2279
>>2271 yes, and i would do it again.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:28:43 No. 2280
>>2278 bro, /dead/ had more than one page of threads over the years
ESPECIALLY the threads about the LSR project and dialectics were really good and now its all gone
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:31:11 No. 2281
>>2271 If this doesn't wake you up to the fact that no one should have such a concentrated power over the imageboard, idk what to tell you.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:33:21 No. 2283
>>2282 You can post in it, it's an open board. What are you blabbering about?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:34:23 No. 2285
>>2280 >the LSR project >>>/dead/1672 >dialectics >>>/dead/1395 here u go
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:35:14 No. 2287
>>2280 Use the catalogue, dummy.
https://leftypol.org/dead/catalog.html Posts made between 21st of dec and now are gone unfortunately, but all threads should be there.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:35:42 No. 2289
>>2284 see
>>2285 So the question is, what is actually the problem? Can you express yourself or do you have neurological impairments?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:38:59 No. 2292
>>2291 OK so you are indeed retarded, I hope medicine will be able to help you one day.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:39:26 No. 2293
>>2226 You clearly never witness mod dynamics where people just go.
>Yea? >should we take action? >Maybe >Okay. Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:40:11 No. 2295
>>2289 I'm having fun, hbu?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:40:42 No. 2296
>>2292 >le take your meds 2 months faggot
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:41:33 No. 2297
stop arguing about this bullshit. what's done is done.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:43:51 No. 2300
>>2294 >reminder that nobody cares about janitor feelings dilate fag
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:47:48 No. 2302
>>2297 No i want two more days of drama!
acceleration Acceleration Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 04:55:28 No. 2304
To the 'I give it two months'fags coming across:raised_fist Raised Fist
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:00:42 No. 2305
Jannies dabbed on them with the Dead Hand
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:19:35 No. 2306
and now it's doing the error 502 crap again
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:23:50 No. 2307
site fucking died again
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:30:06 No. 2309
Damn, Watermelon hit 'em with Za Hando. [spoiler]That or Space_ unplugged the site out of sheer shame and rage.[/spoiler]
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:32:36 No. 2310
they restored a backup but it's older than the average /leftypol/ posterdemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 05:33:02 No. 2311
>>34424
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 06:26:04 No. 2316
Welp, bunkerchan is back up. Funs over I guess?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 06:42:59 No. 2317
xiaoping? more like coping lmaoooooo
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 06:55:17 No. 2320
>>2318 You mean this whole time they've been moderating the community illegally???
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 07:09:19 No. 2321
is there anything uglier than when one thread gets merged with another and suddenly like 50 new posts appear but they're actually from like a week ago and when you refresh they get randomly spewed around the thread?democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:01:12 No. 2322
>>2321 having thought about it for almost an hour (or not), i have decided the answer is yes: people who were in the "just do nothing and .org will win! who wants bunkerchan posters anyway?" faction feeling all self satisfied that someone else actually took action to make people move and to embarrass bunkerchan.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:10:26 No. 2323
>>2130 >build back better Did Space seriously say that? I hope someone took a screen.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:11:03 No. 2324
>>2131 Funny how they chose to restore the 23 day old backup. The backup from before the split.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:14:19 No. 2326
>>2323 it was under a "board owner" capcode with the username "anonymous" on /gulag/ (after the first wipe, but before the subsequent one. idk if it's still up.) so i took it to be space
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:21:42 No. 2327
>>2322 >"just do nothing and .org will win" It wasn't 'just do nothing', it was 'raise us up instead of bringing them down'.
>feeling all self satisfied that someone else actually took action to make people move and to embarrass bunkerchan. No, so far I'm still disappointed by the sharp decline in post quality and all the dramafags like you. We can still recover at this point so no big deal but try speaking for yourself next time you narcissistic cunt.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 08:23:12 No. 2328
>>2327 >raise us up methods for doing so including "watchful waiting", "expectant management" and "masterly inactivity"
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 12:52:56 No. 2330
>>2329 How does communism keep getting away with this?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 12:53:27 No. 2331
>>2330 what happened to bunkerchan?
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 12:58:12 No. 2333
>>2331 It got deleted and restored to a month old image.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 13:01:44 No. 2334
>>2330 >It got deleted and restored to a month old image. why? what exactly happened
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:05:49 No. 2336
>>40569
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:06:13 No. 2337
>>40569
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:11:14 No. 2338
>Have the old leftypol BO >Does the same thing >Shocked that most users find you annoying
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:13:24 No. 2339
So you guys hated the bunker so much that you decided to spliter away and continue to shit fling and one another. Rather than just letting the site die on its own, now you have even more polarized folks and basically accomplished what I feel is pissing off people that would have over time came. posadas Posadas
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:16:28 No. 2340
>>2339 it was never about jannies vs jannies it was space_ vs basically everyone. now there is janny democratic centralism so its all good
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:19:28 No. 2341
>>2340 Well I seen what happens when you have democracy with jannies sadly. But we shall see all I gotta say is lets stop the shit flinging at one another and actually have somewhat unity with one another.
posadas Posadas Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:25:09 No. 2342
>>2341 >I seen what happens when you have democracy with jannies sadly literally has never existed until just now, since on 8ch they were under ron & jim, and on bunker they were under space_
reserve your judgement mate
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:25:23 No. 2343
>>2341 What happens?
>A working onion >Public github ??????
Jannies didn't like conspire to do this. It was just a duel mod who got a hair up his ass.
>>2339 Do I think that it was a bit tone deff? Yes. I think it would have been better as this anon said, but, on the same note, m8,
FUCK SPACE He is a lying two timing faggot and as has been said over and over again the man WILL squeal when and if the feds ever clamp down on that place. He is so terrified of the glowies that he refuses to even allow people to post fucking magnet links. Space is not one of us he is an opportunistic faggot and at least the mods here have fucking dignity and backbone.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:29:54 No. 2344
>>2341 That'll happen when people quit bitching and stop acting like this place is the Bunkerchan Help Desk.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 14:50:00 No. 2345
>>2344 Well the only way that will happen is either let this place over take the old site by bringing in new posters and not just posters from the Bunker, or you prevent backups to the bunker and prementaly delete it while having more people chimp out.
>>2343 Don't care about space never did and never will. I get it Space was the absolute worst and was basically satan himself. Fuck all that and continue building your community and site. Otherwise suffer yet another split until there is no active anti-sectarian and anti-idpol left wing left on the internet expect on some far off site no one is going to visit because no one will care.
posadas Posadas Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 17:10:22 No. 2347
>>2345 Leftypol's jannies didn't nuke Bunkerchan. They and its users were too busy building this site. When are you going to get this?
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 17:55:41 No. 2349
>>2315 >500 Internal Server Error Wow!
NazBol 2021-01-09 (Sat) 18:04:13 No. 2350
You are scum
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 19:45:40 No. 2353
ok, a question: did the mods from here do the bunkerchan shit? because if yes, then you are fucking faggots.think Think
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 19:50:13 No. 2354
>>2353 It was a mod on bunker, just a defector.
You're a faggot for still posting there.
THE ONLY REAL LEFTIST 2021-01-09 (Sat) 20:30:48 No. 2355
IM FUCKING HERE NOW
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 20:35:25 No. 2357
>>2354 >You're a faggot for still posting there. stfu, autist, I will do whatever I want
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 20:43:04 No. 2358
>>2356 Jason Unruhe lurks here…
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 21:14:31 No. 2360
>>2357 I didn't say you can't post there. I just told you that you're a faggot for doing it. I don't care if you are a faggot or not, that's just a fact.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 21:36:00 No. 2361
>>2357 Actually, you're not a faggot for posting there. You're a faggot for posting here.
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 23:42:34 No. 2363
are any of you shitposting on bunkerchan getting a glitch on thread updates? basically after posting /hitting the refresh button in stead of going>post 1 (OP) >post 2 >post 3 >post 4 >post 1 (OP) >post 2 >post 3 >post 2 >post 3 >usually post 4 doesn't even get loaded
Anonymous 2021-01-09 (Sat) 23:47:23 No. 2364
>>2363 For some reason socdem's post from the other night keeps ending up at the bottom of britleftypol if you see it outside the thread and catalog
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 06:51:24 No. 2365
is the bunker still fucked/
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 06:59:28 No. 2366
>>2365 When has it not been fucked?
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:09:45 No. 2367
Flunkerchan now has two competing /USApol/ generals since two days and jannies don't give a fuck sorting it out by closing one.ddr DDR
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:14:15 No. 2368
>>2367 lmao, one is cycled, the other is as-is
NO FUCKS GIVEN
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:16:27 No. 2369
I have been using both .org and Bunkerchan since the split and I am genuinely amazed at how you've dealt with this. The current state of Bunkerchan is embarrassing, it is full of nazis being very open about their beliefs without any of that supposed 'good faith' they are required to stay there, as well as some ridiculously shit threads spamming up the catalog. AND YET, you have done nothing but embarrass yourselves repeatedly with childish and downright stupid behaviour. You should have dealt with this much better, your little tantrums have resulted in nothing but apathy. think Think
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:20:22 No. 2370
>>2369 Tantrums? The mods just left and made another site, how is that a tantrum? Or are you referring to the recent deletion of posts on bunkerchan, which was done by one of space_'s newly hired mods after the split?
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:24:45 No. 2372
>>2369 >I have been using both .org and Bunkerchan "I am an unprincipled radleftist, please hear my words!"
"NO."
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:26:13 No. 2373
Simple fact of the matter is that since the insurrection on bunkerchan, its taken a clear nosedive in usability both technically and population wise. Meanwhile this place has gotten more active. Regardless of the morality of the act, it was effective.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:26:54 No. 2374
>>2369 I actually agree with you but people here are way too stubborn to listen.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:27:52 No. 2376
>>2373 >insurrection t. democrat labeling everyone "terrorist"
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:29:02 No. 2377
>>2374 >people here are way too stubborn to listen. correction:
>actual communists are way more principled than I am The fact is, we "don't listen" to your shit not because we're "sectarian or too stubborn," but because we are WAAAAAAAAY ahead of your horseshit.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:29:42 No. 2378
I say if you offend my sensibilities further and continue this unprofessional approach to imageboard politics then I will write a scolding post a second time.think Think
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:37:59 No. 2380
>>2379 aka. "actual communist"
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:39:35 No. 2381
>>2380 Real communists aren't nerds. Real communists have flat caps, and giant hammers, and those dungaree apron things that steelworkers wear.
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:43:13 No. 2382
>>2372 >>2377 >unprincipled radleftist <who you follow on twitter is praxis It feels like some sort of parody at this point.
>>2371 >>2375 Come on, lads. You can muster more than this.
>>2378 It's not my battle, dumby. They are not my sensibilities, are they? How do you function in the world? It's about attracting people from a cesspit and considering the moderators of THIS site and THEIR methods. I have no agency or bearing on this, dumby.
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:47:02 No. 2383
>>2381 Forgot shitposting flag
>>2382 >It's not my battle, dumby. They are not my sensibilities, are they? How do you function in the world? It's about attracting people from a cesspit and considering the moderators of THIS site and THEIR methods. I have no agency or bearing on this, dumby. Tbh it was stupid but it worked, so if it works it can't be stupid.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 15:58:34 No. 2384
Is it true you guys raided Bunkerchan and deleted the threads on purpose? Was it a planned hit by the mods or just 1 rogue mod?
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:02:55 No. 2385
>>2384 It was an action by ex-mods who this board think it is hella based.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:06:06 No. 2386
>>2385 So current mods had nothing to do with it, was it a rogue unsanctioned act? Just trying to get both sides
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:18:32 No. 2388
>>2382 Brah space literally is a fed, tho. Supporting bunkerchan is literally supporting the glowies.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:27:52 No. 2389
>>2386 Some mods stuck around or came back when all of us got purged and then shut the board down and told d0llars he was a bitch and a moron. So far all the ex-mods (whom havent already left or got burnt out) from the fallout supported the move save for one who was apprehensive of the decaying relationship between both boards.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:33:27 No. 2390
>>2384 No, we didn't. It was a bunkerchan global mod, it's not like they got hacked.
I don't understand why we should be responsible for their site security. We are all adults (at least in body and legally) so I can't be responsible for them.
I did not know about it until twelve or so hours later if you have to know.
>>2389 For the record, I don't support the move either. I am totally indifferent to it.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:39:19 No. 2391
>>2389 >save for one who was apprehensive of the decaying relationship between both boards. The only one there with some common sense.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 16:48:43 No. 2392
>>2389 Wait, now I wonder if this is actually one of ours.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 17:40:21 No. 2394
I will say this, this site is better run than bunkerchan but the rogue mod have taken out a lot of good posts (even if you hate space that much, the usertariat has no reason to trust the people on this site)
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 17:55:54 No. 2395
>>2394 >has posts deleted in bunker >complains about mods here You furry screeching schizo are too obvious. When will you get bored of your concern trolling?
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:03:30 No. 2396
>>2394 >You guys didn't kick out the furry despite OVERWHELMING support for the decision to kick him out good.
it's absolutely fucking moronic to make decisions on the basis of a strawpoll voted in only by those with strong feelings driven by watching someone fall afoul of a pointless shibboleth. (oh no! he likes the dogmen! those who we as goon–channers are sworn to oppose!)
stop letting smugfurry17.jpg live in your head rent free.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:07:12 No. 2397
>>2394 Stop being such a fucking baby lol
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:40:05 No. 2400
>>2399 >Mod applications Nice I have already applied to be a mod there. When I get accepted to mod status there, I'm going to lay low for a week or two acting like a normal mod, and then follow the example of Comrade Watermelon.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:42:21 No. 2401
>>2400 Don't share your plans comrade
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:44:46 No. 2402
>>2401 I have submitted numerous applications and intend to commit egregious vandalism
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:47:40 No. 2404
>>2400 The leftypol.org administration condemns in the strongest possible terms any destruction of Bunkerchan™ property.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 18:56:11 No. 2405
>>2400 >>2402 I haven't applied yet but I think I will.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 19:55:16 No. 2409
>>2084 lol. the mods were already removed by the time /gulag/ and /get/ and the rest of the boards were gone. this is fucking space_'s fault. i'm never going back to flunkerchan
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 20:42:32 No. 2412
>>2394 >even if you hate space that much, the usertariat has no reason to trust the people on this site This. Would have been smooth if the ebin troll mod had
copied posts to here like with the older ones. As it is, this action is in effect indistinguishable from what somebody with neonazi sympathies would have done. The mods here jerk off each other about "democracy" but is not something that actually exists for the user base (and I don't see how it could with anonymity). Space may be a dumbass and lazy, but hyper-active midwit mods with delusions about their popularity aren't better.
POST MOAR THE ONLY REAL LEFTIST 2021-01-10 (Sun) 20:44:40 No. 2413
>>2412 IM DISAPPOINTED WITH THE PACE OF POSTING HERE, IT'S REALLY NOT INCREASING
THIS MAKES YOU ALL POOR LEFTISTS
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 20:52:50 No. 2414
>>2412 The usertariat meme is fucking cringe.
The mods are basically, in this case, exploited workers who just saw their labor of the last year vanish in thin air at the drop of a hat because space; the guy who literally described himself as a king once when talking about all the imageboards he hosts on the broken ass software of lynxchan, space decided he didn't like the idea of the userbase moving and proved the fears of the mods correct.
They have ever single reason to be pissed. The posters are nothing more than consumers in this case and they are especially ignorant and newfaggoted in the case of bunkerchan. Do I think that going full Jihad against bunlerchan was the right thing to do, necessarily? No, but, I can totally understand why it was done.
If you support space and bunkerchan you are nothing more than a poser and will be vooting blue no matter who by the time you finish college. Users bitching about mod sabotage and and resigning are the children who complain about workers going on strike which means they can't get their tendies.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:04:08 No. 2415
>>2232 >You did what /pol/ dreamed of. That's space_s achievement.
He didn't do the needed maintenance, antagonized the mod team, couped them and installed incompetent scabs and /pol/acks.
Actions like this are direct result of that, just like all the repeated down times.
He forced action.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:07:00 No. 2416
>>2412 space says unironic nazbols are "leftists" and has them and open nazis in his circle of friends, who he put in charge of bunker now
you're the faggot on the nazi sympathizer end here
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:12:18 No. 2417
>>2415 >couped them in what way did he coup them?
i'm not being pedantic here, but my memory is that to the end user that mods started the coup. mods concluded the situation was untenable, made plans to copy posts over to a new board, etc, and then redirect everyone to this site.
someone leaked that, so they were bounced into action prematurely and announced everything in a sticky. then they got demodded etc on .xyz while starting this site.
from that chain of events it was the mods who started a coup. a completely justified coup, of course, but when space removed them it was less like an auto-coup and more like suppressing a coup attempt. (again: a justified one.)
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:20:54 No. 2418
>>2417 You obviously haven't been lurking very long.
Space was never part of the leftypol team officially. bunkerchan was a back up website in-case of an emergency and that emergency played out 2 years ago when 8ch went down. Space even openly declared that he had no jurisdiction over leftypol several times, or, get for that matter. Space was just waiting for the right opportunity to strike and remove the old mods so he could have control over the leftypol community himself and get high off the clout of running a big imageboard. Furthermore, the screen caps space holds of the mods talking about deleting everything was never formalized. In order for something like that to happen the modocracy would have to vote on it which never took place. Space used the hysteria as a justification for couping leftypol. He used a coup as justification for a coup and didn't call what he did a coup. Space never had the right to do what he did in the first place.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:39:11 No. 2419
>>2418 understandable. it's reasonable to call his actions a coup in that sense, but frankly i think it was naive to believe such statements of non-intervention in the first place, or to put as much faith and value in deals, agreements, etc, as the general administration of /leftypol/ seems to. if someone has root server access, they have jurisdiction whether they like it or not. space may not have had a moral right, but he had the power. [spoiler]i tend to ignore everything but who actually has control tbh.[/spoiler]
that's one of the big unstated upsides of moving from bunkerchan to .org. /leftypol/ is once again cut free of obligations and the site is administered by the same people who manage it day-to-day. once the .xyz question is put to bed leftypol will be in the best position possible moving forward as an independent community.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:41:29 No. 2420
>>2417 as
>>2418 explained, space_ claimed to be "neutral". clearly lying.
when one of his personal friends started a reactionary idpol board, he refused to take actions against him.
the merger agreements from /GET/ and /leftypol/ were that the creation of boards would be discussed among all.
he further said that he is "neutral" about /leftypol/ and its own management. this includes their plans of leaving his shit site if they so wish. this was never something he had any place in hijacking the community to force it to remain on his dysfunctional shithole site.
if you still think that a "force migration" is some kind of "illegal coup" against space_, /GET/ has discussed this publicly ever since his pyongfags stunt and openly prepared for ever since.
space even said: if you don't like it, you can leave
that's exactly what GET did
after space_ demoted their entire staff over something /leftypol/ did, which still wouldn't even have been a justification in any case for anything he did
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:43:15 No. 2421
>>2419 8ch and bunker have proven that we need imageboard juche
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:48:27 No. 2422
>>2420 man, /GET/ is based af.
>>2421 not sure what this means, but I support it.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:53:00 No. 2423
>>2416 >>2415 Space has allowed nazi filth to dominate the bunker.
Bunkerchan has fallen, and space is the reason. .org wins due to the fact it's not a nazi infested shithole.
Also, space called himself a market socialist as well, which is dumb as shit.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 21:59:52 No. 2424
As a non-staff techfag, I don't care much about the drama on the surface although watermelon made a dick move, even if it helped demonstrate incompetence .>mods care about the place and have been trying to maintain and improve it >apathetic space_ isn't allowing them to gentoo Gentoo
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:00:02 No. 2425
>>2423 If we just debate the polyps using facts and logic when they say
NIGGERS TONGUE MY ANUS YOU WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN KIKE NIGGER FAGGOT then we will win on the marketplace of ideas.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:03:29 No. 2426
>>2425 >Free market of ideas Regan was, and still is a cancer on this world.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:03:31 No. 2427
>>2424 >mods care about the place and have been trying to maintain and improve it >apathetic space_ isn't allowing them to >And I think that's a horrible waste of a future to stay there. It's been really disheartening that most people have not understood this. It's really that simple.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:04:32 No. 2428
why dont you just buy the domain from space__.porky Porky
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:09:03 No. 2429
>>2428 We did offer to take over the costs
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:10:56 No. 2430
>>2427 >tfw im centrist socdem and im still more revolutionary than half of /leftypol/ disappointing is a good word for it, yeah
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:13:41 No. 2431
>>2427 >most people have not understood this (Assuming you're lamenting how many people stayed on Bunkerchan) Your error is to frame it as a question of understanding. Users are fundamentally lazy. When modelling the behaviors of a website's users, it's more helpful to imagine them as water than as individuals. You can convince a small number of individuals to move by appealing to them on an ideological basis, but most people will only move - like water - because they've been physically redirected somehow.
Few people sit consciously "allying" themselves with space. They stick with bunkerchan due to inertia. When the site keeps crashing, or the PPH drops, or post quality takes a dive, or all the posts get deleted and thread updating breaks for some reason, then they'll start moving because the "physics" of the situation have changed - gravity now pulls them in our direction.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:16:40 No. 2433
>>2431 Yeah I agree. When we lost mod powers and thus the ability to put bunkerchan on lock while migrating the users, a split was ensured. This is why we conspired rather than going public trying to appeal to everyone to move.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:19:40 No. 2434
>>2427 >It's been really disheartening that most people have not understood this. It's really that simple. Agreed.
>>2431 True, but I still expected more from leftists.
Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:24:32 No. 2435
>>2434 >True, but I still expected more from leftists. Same, since I falsely assumed that people who moved out of the political mainstream would be aware and caring enough to do the same in the technical space.
gentoo Gentoo Anonymous 2021-01-10 (Sun) 22:57:47 No. 2436
>>2434 >True, but I still expected more from leftists. IDK why, all the evidence we have suggests that English-speaking "leftists" are fucking stupid and good for nothing.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 00:04:06 No. 2439
>>2437 english-speaking is not even an identity retard
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 00:08:15 No. 2440
>>2394 >>2412 >BOTH SIDES BAD Bitch please, if we listened to every impulsive whim of the userbase, we would exactly be like bunkerchan now. d0llars personally told me that he is just letting people have fun. There was nothing to salvage over at bunkerchan.
If there was one thing moderation has taught me is that the userbase will always whine whichever decision you make (made even worse with the anonymity to astroturf) and that sooner or later you have to drown that noise out and make decisions in spite of their input. I have always told the mod team that the userbase do not need to love or hate us, only accept us.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 00:12:24 No. 2441
>>2439 I'm guessing they meant anglosphere.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 00:38:29 No. 2442
>>2438 The place is a sinking ship, lol
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:22:20 No. 2444
>>2443 OH NO NO NO NO NO NO, LOL
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:23:32 No. 2445
>>2443 bitch why would you deliberately bring fed attention to a site you yourself posted on
fuck you
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:24:35 No. 2446
>>2443 >its been up for over an hour lol
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:24:43 No. 2447
>>2445 yeah we were completely unaware of /leftypol/ until you brought it to our attention!
*looks at the average /leftypol/ poster*
welp, you're not going to do anything. uhhh, we'll make a note if we ever need to false flag someone stealing library books i guess.
fed Fed Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:30:34 No. 2448
>>2443 Kek please say this is a host form and not the feds
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:32:17 No. 2450
>>2449 thank you for using our services
fed Fed Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:33:22 No. 2451
>>2450 lmfao. Even the glowies don't understand how tor works and they created it. Hilarious.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 01:33:33 No. 2452
>>2450 Thank you for your service
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 02:56:01 No. 2454
>>2453 What are the stats for this site?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 03:01:12 No. 2455
>>2453 it was like ~60 a week ago on weekend
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 03:52:15 No. 2459
I think it's pretty obvious that /leftypol/ is dying right now at an accelerating speed. Moderation is basically not existent, allowing for duplicate threads (there are still two /USApols/, because fuck it I guess), the only threads that are closed (anchoring still doesn't work) are just arbitrary, if any threads are being closed. As expected /pol/ is guaranteed free reign and protections. Even most of the "leftist" threads have an OP that imply a poster who has an room temperature IQ, leading me to the suspicion that most new threads are probably just /pol/ stealth threads. Top threads in the catalog right now:>/USApol/ >/USApol/ #2 >what do you think about the National Socialist German Workers Party (+300 replies!) >why do you want to take away food from kulaks (with a picture of most farmers voting Trump, and the thread only having completely pants-on-head retarded answers) >who gets the wall? exactly what happened to /leftpol/, the other board spafe_ had control over. Half the threads don't even have functioning pictures because the were retrieved from a month old back-up.ddr DDR
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:02:20 No. 2463
>>2459 critical support for Spafe_
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:04:49 No. 2465
>>2464 like half of those are me
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:12:18 No. 2467
someone is spamming bunker with links here -_-
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:15:36 No. 2468
>>2467 It's probably not very effective as I imagine everyone there knows the address but it is funny making people sperg out
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:20:03 No. 2469
>mfw >inb4 no face
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 04:31:44 No. 2471
>>2466 based lol
>>2468 it's not a good way of making people move immediately, but it's probably a good way of getting them to know the URL so that when bunkerchan is broken people decide to move.
if people are going to evangelize, i would recommend doing it in a way that isn't just spamming a link the reader has to piece back together, which always makes the place look a little bit seedy. the upside of images, even generated ones, if that you can be creative with them, which makes it more obvious that you're an anon posting in good faith (or at least for a laugh) and not just a spammer.
(it also lets you be funny with it, which if post quality on the bunker is declining winds up providing welcome contrast.)
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 05:09:40 No. 2473
>>2460 Space_ did the same thing on every board on 8chan to advertise Spacechan. Now he will taste his own medicine.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 07:33:01 No. 2474
nazbols are so fucking tiring to argue with on old site
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 08:00:04 No. 2475
>>2474 then why do you do it?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 08:04:58 No. 2476
>>2475 Why does anyone reply back to accusatory statements on any forum?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 10:44:30 No. 2477
>>2476 yeah I'm gonna have to back down and call myself a hypocrite; I wasted maybe half an hour replying to a stubborn Qonspiritard who thinks leftism is an identical synonym of progressive liberalism and that three people correcting their misdefinition with examples and dictionary definitions is leftist trickery.
and I think I know why I replied.
partly out of hopeless optimism, giving them the benefit of the doubt that they could learn
then out of the fun of trolling an idiot to see what they would say next
but overall I felt the need to refute because it was a community I legitimately value and I don't want to see it turn into another generic braindead /pol/ nest
how about you?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 10:54:55 No. 2479
>>2478 A mod defected and deleted every post and file on bunkerchan. Space_ restored everything from a month old backup, but the backup only had posts and not files.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 11:39:01 No. 2482
>>2478 Auto refresh seems to have been broken since then, and the site frequently throws errors
I don't think any of the new mods know how to code
think Think Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 14:42:21 No. 2484
>>2414 >The usertariat meme is fucking cringe. Most posters aren't mods. The self-image of mods is not the same as the impression users have of mods.
>The mods are basically, in this case, exploited workers You saying shit like this have no right to call other things cringe. The site owner isn't selling anything.
>The posters are nothing more than consumers Go make a site without posters then and moderate the vacuum there.
>>2416 >nazis in his circle of friends Proofs? Do you mean straight people with that?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 15:20:36 No. 2485
>>2434 leftist are humans
humans are easily swayed by material conditions
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 15:39:33 No. 2487
>>2486 this site isn't slow?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 15:43:58 No. 2488
>retards just now realizing no one actually cares about their gay e-drama
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 16:32:20 No. 2489
>>2484 >Most posters aren't mods. The self-image of mods is not the same as the impression users have of mods. Never said they were nore did I imply mods even think this way. It's just a fact
The site owner is still propitiator of the webspace. Do you think you need be producing something to be borg? Space is basically a glorified landlord.
Doesn't alter the facts.
Go lurk the IRC and ask bkeys how he feels about the civil war irc.rizon.net/6697 #bunkerchan
Stop sucking spaces cock you retard.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:16:00 No. 2496
>>2489 It was not about slavery
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:20:28 No. 2497
>>2493 Fucking do it. Reuniting the community is more important than continuing this stupid and essentially personal drama.
But make them come here. This site isn't even done and it's already much better in terms of performance and design.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:20:36 No. 2498
>>2489 >Space is basically a glorified landlord. There is no money in this so all you words about exploited jannies are retarded.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:37:02 No. 2499
>>2497 >reunite reunite from where? the bunker is dead. the choices are now reddit or this alleged new vaporware site that will never happen.
Dollars wants to add a donation button to pay someone to set up the site for him. It's done for free here. Why would people pay for that shit?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:44:48 No. 2500
>>2493 the first step would be for him and space to livestream their suicide
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 17:48:27 No. 2502
>>2498 he literally wants to monetized user data and said so while refusing any other funding ideas because he doesn't want to be open about how much it would actually cost and keep things in his hands
any talk about him leaving the site is just hot air and the usual lies out of his nazi mouth
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:11:14 No. 2503
>>2501 Ich hab Kapital 1 bis 3 auf Deutsch gelesen im Gegensatz zu dir, du absoluter Turbospast. Lass es bleiben mit deinen behinderten Vergleichen.
>>2502 >literally wants to He isn't doing it and you know that and he wasn't doing that at any point and you know that and the one thing he proposed had nothing to do with selling user data and you know that as well. A hypothetical bad thing that isn't actually happening and that wasn't happening and that isn't about to happen is not an argument.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:16:35 No. 2504
>fucking up his own site and failing to implement what he literally announced to the other mods while trying to buy their complicity with a 50/50 deal means he actually never meant to do it
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:22:10 No. 2505
are the mods here actually conducing negotiations?democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
THE ONLY REAL LEFTIST 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:27:14 No. 2506
>>2505 BASED USER INPUT POSTER YOU ARE ALMOST A REAL LEFTIST, BUT UNLIKE MR YOU CONE SHORT
Watermelon !0RS5ZiSuC2 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:33:05 No. 2507
>>2505 Dollars won't negotiate, he started the thread for sympathy points or to make it look like he was open to it. He's a massive childish moron and that's been made clear to everyone in that thread by now.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:34:43 No. 2508
>>2507 he's not willing to negociate,or not to negociate with (you) ?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:35:17 No. 2509
>>2505 >>2506 To what end? bunkerchan is nothing but polacks and nazbols and is dying with technical errors slowly, if space_ wont just stop paying for it.
They wont be able to make a new site since all the technical people came here and AFAIK they dont have the money to hire someone
the bunker is doomed, and even if we dont get any more users from there id be happy since its mostly the assholes left now anyway
Watermelon !0RS5ZiSuC2 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:35:36 No. 2510
>>2508 he hasn't made any effort with anyone else at all.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:35:57 No. 2511
>>2507 The thread just proves that their incompetence has left the 400 worst posters on the site remaining
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:36:10 No. 2512
>>2510 oh,so he's bullshitting when he speaks about ComradeRat etc ? good to know.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:36:28 No. 2513
>>2507 bruh, He doesn't want to talk with (you) because you nuked the site .
you should ask another mod to negotiate.
Watermelon !0RS5ZiSuC2 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:38:06 No. 2514
>>2512 yeah, he is probably.
>>2513 I have asked them to do this on the bunkerchan thread.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:43:13 No. 2516
>>2509 >To what end? bunkerchan is nothing but polacks and nazbols This is a self serving belief. There are a large number of posters left behind who are neither nazbol nor polack, plus undoubtedly a large number of lurkers with no idea what's going on. Since the thread deletion there has been a big uptick in actual /pol/ posting, but it's mostly a mark of poor moderation being unable to cover the cracks, rather than a fundamental deficiency of the normal userbase.
(I don't like to namedrop tripcodes, but take Sage: Whatever else your view, he's neither nazbol nor polack, and he's not moved. You can assume this situation applies over and over again to anons as well. )
Getting the URL to start redirecting everyone here and then moderating away the
actual /pol/ morons would be a much better solution than just dumping 60% of the userbase overboard.
As I've said in the other thread to those who think this site is doomed: Even if that's true, it will take longer to die than you think it will, and it will cause both sides to hemorrhage activity in the meantime.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:44:29 No. 2517
>>2503 Here's the terms.
Redirect bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/ to leftypol.org
d0llars kills himself live on stream.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:46:20 No. 2518
>>2516 Don't tell the jannies here this, they just want to feel vindicated that this dead ass website isn't their own fault. They literally had all the cards but blew it up in the last minute and thus alienated everyone.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:46:21 No. 2519
>>2516 It's more that the new mods are undisciplined infantile leftists who don't understand theory, or, how to navigate the thing nuances between what should and should not be allowed.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:49:54 No. 2521
>>2518 >You're site is dead your site is dead They literally keep saying this from a site that is about the shut down completely.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:52:20 No. 2523
>>2518 Yet, you keep posting here.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:54:26 No. 2524
>>2518 it takes two to make a split. arguing over who was at fault is of limited value.
>>2519 do they even have that many new mods?
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:06:29 No. 2525
>>2524 they apparrently have 8 mods,but it's probably impossible to know even by the other mods,like they can't check post histories,or can't anchor threads.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:49:58 No. 2528
>>2527 >scabs Autism. Some of you really think posting online is an extension of the class war huh.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:53:16 No. 2529
>>2528 >There are two people in this world those who own and those who do not own. Facts is facts.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:00:15 No. 2531
>>2528 >>2530 Scabs aren't leftists. Everything is part of the class war. What happened on bunkerchan was an coup against a democratic centralist mod team to put in it's place an incompetent mod. The reason this could happen, and what happened afterwards is directly related to our mode of production and our class relations.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:02:23 No. 2532
ngl it's very frustrating watching nobody give an answer to "why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity"democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:03:45 No. 2533
I'm having fun being a chaos agent.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:17 No. 2534
>>2532 >why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity I wonder why….
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:53 No. 2535
>>2533 lol. What are you up to?
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:18:32 No. 2536
>>2535 Playing both sides, confusing the hell out of everyone, killing brain cells, the works.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:26:03 No. 2537
>>2531 >democratic centralist mod team That group got nothing to do with what democratic centralism is. The mods weren't elected, meaning it can't be a democratic centralist system. Calling it that shows you either have no idea what democratic centralism is or that you are dishonest. And I'm not proposing that mods should be elected. This doesn't work here because user accounts are not tightly coupled with real-world persons, so the whole democratic centralist idea is not applicable.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:56:14 No. 2539
>>2537 You have no idea what democratic centralism is either.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:59:48 No. 2541
>>2536 >le master agent of chaos you don't fool anyone lol
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:03:57 No. 2542
>>2539 You have no basis for that claim.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:41:16 No. 2544
not enough scorn is being poured on d0llars for turning bunkerchan's corpse into his own jonestown rather than just merging and being done with it. .democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:15:04 No. 2548
imagine the kind of person who'd donate to the bunkerchan patreon lmaodemocratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:19:58 No. 2549
>>2548 I'd bet good money only one or two of the people saying they'll donate actually will.
Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:25:13 No. 2550
>>2549 >>2548 No one actually would except maybe some glowies
brocialism Brocialism Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:27:23 No. 2551
>>2550 Nah, some people are definitely dumb enough to do it. I bet they'd even justify it by saying it's for the working class.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:08:46 No. 2554
>>2551 heh, if someone has not kept up with the drama and doesnt know about here, they might fall for it because having a place to shitpost is important
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:59:25 No. 2555
SCREAMING at double space guy
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:02:04 No. 2556
anyone calling leftypol "democratic centralist" is a LARPing faggot
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:06:35 No. 2557
>>2527 >muh scabs Who fucking cares?? It's not about the jannies, it's about the users, the community, you dumb fucking niggerfaggot.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:10:03 No. 2558
>>2239 >>2257 please kill yourself.
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:26:29 No. 2559
okay, i know i specifically advocated against appeals to Stakhanovite attempts to get people to post more, but i'm bored so here's a proposal anyway:democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:33:56 No. 2560
>>2559 How about you create interesting threads and see what happens from there?
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:43:01 No. 2561
>>2560 This.
>A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example. Pic related. Debate the argument, not the user.
juche Juche Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:53:01 No. 2562
>>2560 Interesting threads require some degree of assurance of getting a response.
Nevertheless I may experiment with making certain
types of threads.
>>2561 it's not about "debate", it's about context. lots of posts don't make an argument, but they can prompt development.
i.e. even if the hypothetical trotskyist says "based", by saying he's a trotskyist he increases the odds someone replies asking them to develop on why they agree with the purge, and even if they just say "oh, well because they were guilty" that's still a brief conversation that wouldn't otherwise have occurred.
the accusation of being sect-brained is entertaining considering that i've stated several times that part of why i use the flag i do is to filter people who can't read the argument without being distracted by the flag.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:54:28 No. 2563
>>2562 I will respond to all of them, I promise. But you have to start them.
christian_communism Christian Communism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:15:51 No. 2564
>>2562 ???
Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:21:18 No. 2566
>>2564 There's a world of difference between
"Interesting, you're a Trotskyite but you support this Stalinist purge. How come?"
and
">Trotskyite.
Opinion discarded."
All the flag does is convey additional background information. In many cases, the kind of user who makes the second response will scour your post for similar shibboleths anyway - so instead of getting angry about your flag, he'll pick out a certain unfashionable phrase (such as "problematic" in the very literal sense of "causes practical problems") or other and use that to make the same kind of inane replies.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:22:07 No. 2567
>>2565 I think the OP images weren't backed up even though the threads were, so when threads beyond a certain age were restored they were brought back without images.
democratic_socialism Democratic Socialism Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:25:27 No. 2568
>>2563 You can help by starting some too.
Anonymous 2021-01-14 (Thu) 18:07:20 No. 2572
I think it’s pretty safe to say bunker is now a rightoid website.
Unique IPs: 1