No.21437
it was for repeated derailing that should be clear from context
>context
>context
ffs man
No.21438
you don't get it, I am your fairy fucking godfather
No.21440
>>21437highly subjective
OPINIONIt was a post that drew a parallelt between the Dutch thread's (admittedly!!! >>>/leftypol/1048189 ) reductionism concerning "farmers" and Hillary Clintons dislike of "deplorables."
It was a completely valid post, funny, even.
No.21441
>>21440But all this is besides the point.
Are you, mods, beholden to any rules? Because clearly you ban and delete posts extra-legally, meaning not in accordance with the rules YOU YOURSELF HAVE PASSED.
What are these rules for then?
No.21442
>>21439I fucking told you to stop derailing
there is a limit to everything
it's fine if you rant and rave but not everywhere at the same time
>>21440All I have deleted is posts ranting about moderation (I don't even know what you are talking about here)
>>21441yes, we are (we are apparently talking about a 7 minute ban, which is a warning to lay off, cause warnings don't fucking work, technically)
No.21443
>>21438and again keep that in mind
you know, I was thinking,
Why do I always get stuck with the crazies? But I get it now.
I ask again, why do you make it impossible to communicate?
No.21444
>>21442>I fucking told you to stop derailing1. wasn't derailing; ironic parallels aren't derailing by definition.
2. You didn't warn me. Banning with the """"""reason"""""""" of "-.-" isn't warning about shit.
>it's fine if you rant and rave3. But that's not what I'm doing ITT, now is it? You made me question: by what rules DO YOU, a mod, work by, because CLEARLY you don't ban anymore based on your OWN LAWS, you ban based on your fancy.
>All I have deleted is posts ranting about moderation4. Lie. You deleted an acerbic post which implied that all of those who think that "all farmers" are "kulaks" are no different from Hillary Clinton, who thinks these people are "deplorables."
Can you stop lying, plz?
No.21445
>>21444no u
the post featuring Hillary fucking Clinton is still there
No.21446
>>21445>from all of this, I pretend to get only a "no, u"Have the decency to actually pretend (if you don't actually think) that posters here have basic intelligence. It's not hard, mind you.
No.21447
>>21445>the post featuring Hillary fucking Clinton is still thereA LIE
>>>/leftypol/1048196you deleted it
good job, Hillary
No.21448
>>21444>You didn't warn me. Banning with the """"""reason"""""""" of "-.-" isn't warning about shit.yes, it it. as I said, warnings don't work, they just let you write a blue text on a post which is totally useless
so a seven minute ban is a fucking warning
let me repeat your own words
>contextI should have been more explicit cause you are totally incapable of taking more subtle clue and that is on me. but making it out like a serious issue
>>21447how many posts featuring Hillary have you made? well, it's still there
get fucked, at this point
No.21451
>>21448>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>banning a random user with the """""""""""reason""""""""""" "-." constitutes a WARNINGlmao
No.21453
Bandits, all of you. Respect your own fucking laws, ffs.
No.21454
>>21451you aren't a random user, you are a madman ranting about inconsequential shit for hours
and again I don't give a fuck about that
but don't derail random threads with that shit
you fucking know where to put your complaints
see as you are right here
again, it's just baffling
No.21458
>>21454>you aren't a random user, you are a madman2022, leftypol. What constitutes a "madman?" Drawing acerbic parallels between quote-unquote communists who label ALL farmers as "kulaks" and Hillary Clinton who labels ALL the same as "deplorables." That's my supposed sin. Fuck me for attempting to be witty. (Goes against rule number… uhm… yeah… fuck me!)
>and again I don't give a fuck about thatdon't care about you not caring to understand the situation
>you fucking know where to put your complaintsYeah, constricted to 200 characters, basically two sentences. Fuck me for wanting a community wherein after the mods fail to check post-history they ban you as supposed "reactionary" even though you are ARGUING AGAINST said views in the same thread.
Just fuck the posters for wanting a fair trial, basically.
>it's just bafflingAgreed.
No.21460
>>21458>Yeah, constricted to 200 characters, basically two sentencesno here, this board, not a random thread on /leftypol/
gonna ignore the rest cause I really don't know what you're on about
No.21464
>>21460>no here, this board, not a random thread on /leftypol/Do you even know what a "ban appeal field" is?
>gonna ignore the rest causelol, k
No.21471
this is a funny online website, there are no like, policies or laws. there's just a loose ruleset and you can be banned if the vibes are off. dont need much more of a reason than 'we don't want you here' because again this is just a funny online website, nothing more.
No.21491
this guy is getting mad over an emote X^D
No.21558
>>21491>500+ communist post history<ban "reason?"<-.-are you right in the head, supposed comrade?
No.21566
>>21436>imageboard moderators being cringeHow does this shock you OP? The mod who banned you (pask) is a literal autist who has nothing better to do all day than ban people on the small imageboard he moderates for slight infractions. Let him have his fun and just use tor like the rest of us.
No.21571
>>21566>How does this shock you OP?I get your point, tbh, but I'm naive enough to believe that supposed commie mods would act better……………………..
No.21573
>>21436I reviewed your ban history, and this ban was LITERALLY for 7 minutes. Please be less obsessed. The mod in question clearly felt you needed a timeout which is reinforced by this topic. Saging this topic as the ban has ended anyway.
No.21583
>>21574You say this but then you're the least active mod by a significant margin. All bark, no bite.
No.21592
>>21583>you're the least active mod Then you clearly don't know anything.
>All bark, no bite.In my defense, my active timezone has little people online.
No.21611
>>21583Comet isn't inactive.
Just a cock sucking lib with a false sense of authority.
No.21613
>>21573>it's okay to intimidate users without any feedback mechanism as long as it's shortBiggest load of bullshit this week.
No.21618
yeah jannies are autist but retards like op are simply the other side of the same coin lmao
No.21629
>>21613if you feel "intimidated" you also need a timeout
No.21659
>>21629Extremely short bans over nothing can be described as nothing less than a power tripping janny intimidating users.
No.21661
>>21659first, you do not know what intimidation fucking entails
second, you don't know how much some really need to take a break from garbageposting but won't
or maybe you do
No.21677
>>216611. hurr durr
2. Don't give a shit. If you can find a way to justify this then it can be used to justify much worse behavior. Jannies either have a set of consistent rules to enforce that apply to all users universally or their power is nothing more than a conduit for personal aggrandizement.
No.21682
>>21677slibbery slobe
did you read the thread?
No.21788
Lmao, what, you're expecting some transparency and accountability from this modocracy? Leftypol was done for the moment 8ch was no more. There was a choice on 8ch, there was an arbitrage by somewhat neutral admins, there were general rules for the boards, there was FREEDOM.
I still remember with amusement what an absolute fucking embarassing temper tantrum BOtroon threw when he got bitchslapped by Codemonkey for breaking the site-wide rule for planning to nuke the board. It was fucking glorious, the sheer impotent rage lmao.
These jannies don't follow any rules, mate. They are just a small clique of pathetic autists, they ban because they feel like it. That's all there is to it.
Unique IPs: 8