>>22596>(one can very well have a discussion without reactionary garbage people, in fact it enhances the discussion)
Gimme the bounds of non-reactionary garbage discussion so I can know what not to say once I switch to the next VPN. What are opposing viewpoints that are not ban-worthy?
Are we discussing whether or not to give hormones and trans surgery to toddlers? What is an acceptable point of discussion?
Lol at getting banned in a thread talking about how the minority of 2SLGBTQIA+ sisters wrecking the orgs they're apart of. Doesn't seem so far removed from /leftypol/.