[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Discussions, querries, feedback and complaints about the site and its administration.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon
Please give feedback on proposals, new on Mondays : /meta/
New /roulette/ topic: /spoox/ - Paranormal, horror and the occult.
New board: /AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1627514249069.jpg (203.35 KB, 1908x1217, mascots.jpg)

 No.8321

With respect to the will of the users of GETchan, I propose removing both links to /GET/ and /ref/ in the boardlist and the landing page, as well as severing most other remaining ties.
GETchan and leftypol have diverged significantly enough to have developed irreconcilable differences. But more importantly, neither site benefits from linking to one another. If anything, attempting to maintain a relationship with GETchan is ultimately a fruitless waste of time for the administrators of both sites. Furthermore, I do not expect any noticeable drop in board traffic or post quality by removing such links, and it goes without saying that if GETchan users want to use leftypol they probably know where to find us.
I understand the historical significance of GETchan to leftypol, and I'm not suggesting that we go full Orwell and memoryhole it. I'm only suggesting that we opt to remember and respect GETchan "from a distance" so to speak.

 No.8326

>GETchan and leftypol have diverged significantly enough to have developed irreconcilable differences.
No they haven't. We've had /leftypol/ users on /GET/+/ref/ and their users here for the past 6 years. The only thing irreconcilable is approximately two people who don't like the other website. Utterly trivial e-drama.
>But more importantly, neither site benefits from linking to one another.
Our link to them motivates me to check occasionally for new topics, and no-one there has said anything negative in response to me. So I'd say it benefits them.
You say there's no benefit from linking, but I say there's no benefit from removing the links. They're nice leftist boards to be aware of that fill niches that aren't suitable to be hosted here.

 No.8333

No. Only like 2 people on both sides want this.

 No.8344

What in the goddamn…?

 No.8351

>>8321
Retard.
I don't like what happened there either, but the good folks of getchan (the majority) are our friends.

 No.8435

>>8326
>>8351
>Utterly trivial e-drama.
>are our friends.
they're maps anon

 No.12964

Gay mods deleted the other GETchan thread.

 No.12974

>>8321
the only reason getchan dropped us from the webring is because leftychan would raid them if they didn't

 No.12975

As a compromise how about we remove /GET/ but keep /ref/?

 No.12982

File: 1632063565096-0.png (122.75 KB, 978x490, moody 2021.png)

File: 1632063565096-1.png (5.7 KB, 492x38, moody delete.png)

File: 1632063565096-2.png (8.42 KB, 342x80, moodys fed.png)

>>12975
This, but also remove /ref/

>>12974
The mods and admins were with them, even before they made /i/ anon

>>12964
>Gay, mods deleted the other GETchan thread.
It was m00dy
m00dy is a gay.

 No.12996

>>8435
They're not, the mods and a portion of the userbase didn't want to have them, but they couldn't realize on their own that freely allowing lolicons to post lolishit would lead to unironic pedophilia supporters hiding in plain sight.

 No.12997

File: 1632111418751.png (45.44 KB, 474x353, ClipboardImage.png)

imagine being this mad over three letters with a hyperlink

 No.13026

File: 1632183374212.png (298.85 KB, 561x511, old.png)

>>12996
>They're not
They are tho

>freely allowing lolicons to post lolishit would lead to unironic pedophilia supporters
this part only but unironically

>>12997
>hyperlink
Yes, but mostly not associating with pedo lolifags and especially now since there with leftychan

 No.13037

>>13026
>especially now since there with leftychan
You mean they're with leftychan? What the hell gave you that impression?

 No.13100

>>12982
moody was the most anti-lolicon mod on the leftypol team, but the /get/ pedophilia shit is largely agitation from outside forces. Like the pedo thread was a false flag from non getchanners. /get/chan has been our friends since forever and there are people that oppose lolicon shit on that very site If you rightfully have a problem against lolicon and pedos then why do you blame /get/chan instead of leftypol or leftychan (which has become pedo mecca)? Now you are just being a creepy faggot stalking the mods to fit your agenda against our former comrades on /get/

 No.13101

>>13037
leftychan is begging getchan for a webring and anyways they have actual pedoposters posting pics of kids

 No.13112

File: 1632342723697-0.png (3.71 KB, 510x105, li.png)

File: 1632342723697-1.png (55.62 KB, 545x260, c.png)

>>13037
>You mean they're with leftychan? What the hell gave you that impression?
There were screenshot of the admin being supportive of leftychan, they choosed there side

>>13100
>moody was the most anti-lolicon mod on the leftypol team
It was still sus and so are the mods defending /get/ with deletion as well

> Now you are just being a creepy faggot stalking
Because anon asked or wanted to back up the claim and the logs are public for "ruthless" criticism like this

>/get/chan has been our friends
Which is bad

>since forever and there are people that oppose lolicon shit
Which they get ignored and no one does anything about it

>blame /get/chan
>instead of leftypol or leftychan
>become pedo mecca
Because they were the first

 No.13147

>>13112
>pics
If those screenshots are from the infamous "pedo thread" than the "spurdo" is also an impersonation afaik.

>Which they get ignored and no one does anything about it
So don't lump in the anti pedo users with the pedo ones. Go to getchan and pressure them if you want them to get rid of the lolicon.
Leftypol used to allow it here.
>Because they were the first
wdym? Leftypol had allowed lolicon since 8chan no? It was on bunker at least and me and probably you and other people were complaining then to no avail. If you really want to point the finger you should not miss leftychan who currently allows lolicon and Comatoast is a vehement defender of it to the point of struggle sessions. Leftychan also allegedly hosts borderline/illegal "jail bait" pictures as well

 No.13155

File: 1632495953680-0.png (Spoiler Image, 12.02 KB, 502x48, shit.png)

File: 1632495953680-1.png (Spoiler Image, 96.9 KB, 837x820, 1628915881744-0.png)

File: 1632495953680-2.png (Spoiler Image, 110.85 KB, 826x862, 1628915881744-1.png)

File: 1632495953680-3.png (Spoiler Image, 124.97 KB, 852x864, 1628915881744-2.png)

File: 1632495953680-4.png (Spoiler Image, 99.02 KB, 841x875, 1628915881744-3.png)

>>13147
>If those screenshots are from the infamous "pedo thread"
It's from 2019 anon, the pdf of the other thread is available and has nothing to do with this.
They were the first

>"spurdo" is also an impersonation afaik.
/Get/ is full of namefags and avatarfags, this is unlikely since spurdo was mod at the time, if they were a faker then the /get/ mod would've done something about it

>So don't lump in the anti pedo users with the pedo ones.
That's what you did, there where a few people that wanted no lolicon like any other chan but again they got ignored and nothing was done as the mods allowed it. Don't used them for your defense


>Leftypol used to allow it here.
>Leftypol had allowed lolicon since 8chan
which is bad.
at least leftypol kinda deleted it from time to time since the lolifags were mostly bait from /pol/

>should not miss leftychan
Never said i was?

>Comatoast is a vehement defender of it
>Leftychan also allegedly hosts borderline/illegal "jail bait"
If it's true then it's not surprising, Not surprising since Comatoast and Leftychan are defenders for /get/chan

 No.13166

>>13155
Hmm, that's quite ironic, seeing as leftychan shitters are always screeching about "muh pedo avatarfags". That's mainly why I didn't believe you.
To me it looks like both the average user and the staff of both sites have different opinions about the other site.

 No.13238

>>13147
>If you really want to point the finger you should not miss leftychan who currently allows lolicon
I think it's more than just allowing. I visited their /b/ a couple of weeks ago (I occasionally enjoy a nice chaotic /b/) and the ass thread was filled with loli. I don't care if it's an image, the idea and normalization is still disturbing as fuck. Requesting mods preempt any loli/pedo debate derails as off-topic. Unconstructive and ruins threads.

 No.13274

>>13238
>Requesting mods preempt any loli/pedo debate derails as off-topic. Unconstructive and ruins threads.
no you.

 No.13275

>>13166
>leftychan shitters are always screeching about "muh pedo avatarfags"
> the average user and the staff of both sites have different opinions
both the users here and over in leftychan were saying that, the community was same on both sites for the first few weeks

 No.14106

>>13155
>Comatoast and Leftychan are defenders for /get/chan
Then why have they removed the link to GETchan?


Unique IPs: 13
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /