Search

Search

Search is case-insensitive and based on keywords. To match exact phrases, use "quotes". Use an asterisk (*) for wildcard.

You may apply the following filters to your searches: id, thread, subject, and name. To apply a filter, simply add to your query, for example, name:Anonymous or subject:"Some Thread". Wildcards cannot be used in filters.


3 results in /leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

 No.629499

>>629496
I'll admit I'm not very knowledgeable in this matter.
I posted in the QTDDTOT thread looking for sources on this topic, so I would very much appreciate it if anyone could supply such info
k thx


File: 1636273033241.png (497.75 KB, 2480x2728, idea_sketch.png)

 No.586055[Reply]

This is a multi-faceted question, regarding the construction of arguments or even proofs, and regarding technical organization of and presentation of information, among potential other things.

The bottom line is this:
Is it possible to make a user-friendly website that concretely debunks an entire concept?
One idea being that you can introduce and/or refute 80+% of people just by linking to an appropriate page on this website.

Consider the following existing formats of refutation and education, where I annotate perceived pros and cons:
1) thread conversations (e.g. real conversations, chat-rooms, imageboards)
A person raises a question, people reply to them and they reply back
>pro: personalized answers. the answers are likely to address the question properly
>pro: iterative. the conversation can continue to refute counter-arguments and details not clarified in the original answer/s
<con: usually redundant, waste of time. most people new to a topic or idea ask the same or similar questions. "We have this thread every week". it's tiresome and wasteful to answer the same base questions hundreds of times.
<con: impromptu self-made answers. real-time responses are usually not well-formed, which may not be well-thought out and is usually open to dumb 'gotchas'. furthermore, they are likely to be shallow.

2) "read a book" (e.g. some forums, some programmers)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1622844213997.jpeg (41.93 KB, 742x560, 8e6.jpeg)

 No.296564[Reply]

QTDDTOT - Questions that don't need their own thread. The last one died, so here post your questions here.

I'll start, why is a centralized authority important to achieving communism and why is this seen a positive aspect.