I am madly in love with you.
>>289246> You guys are just a bunch of misogynists.
Me? misogynists? Nahh, look how much flowers I gave to my ex.
:( I'm so sad. I can still hear her voice begin me to spare her life
Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism. At least in using this thread we're not going to the typical venues where ad revenue / tracking / page request analytics fund the exploitation of sex workers, and potentially giving the sex workers direct support.
I think the main problem with this thread is that most people aren't posting sources along with the images. (picrel by SnowyBlue1)
Also because a lot of people on here seem to think feminism is a liberal thing, rather than there existing both leftist feminism and liberal feminism. That's just an issue with imageboard culture in general, but if any board can shake that off it's this one.
>>289313>Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism
Porn is a product of capitalism, it is literal capitalist market decadence you tool.
cannot be contained no more, real socialism of the 21th century will invest in porn so good that just looking at a pic will make the person cum, there will be also 5-year plans for the creation of penis and boob enlargement pills and ending the refractory period, as well as free courses in being a SEX
master so you can fuck liberal butts and their wifes more effectively, mark my fucking words.
with Stalin"ist detected, Im glad you're on our team sir
checked, marked and capped.
>>289313>Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism.
No, All sex even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman. when a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression. Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.
You're over-theorizing here. There's no actionable praxis to be done with that conclusion until we figure out how to put souls into immortal robots. (which I'm all for, fuck needing to sleep when I could be playing minecraft.)
Also I don't know why chihuahua's post got deleted, but yeah it is kinda semantic. For most people porn just means erotica, but it was useful to the discussion to have distinct terms for erotica for it's own sake, and erotica as used in capitalism.
Oh I meant >>289376
, the quoted number was chihuahua's post but I forgor to clear that.
>>289380>You're over-theorizing here.
How so?>There's no actionable praxis to be done with that conclusion until we figure out how to put souls into immortal robots.
I don't want to wait until we live in robot age while enduring a present and future patriarchy.
I deleted the post because I read the post from the person I was quoting ( >>289329
) again and I noticed that I misinterpreted them.
The how-so is that there's no actionable praxis for that. It also places too much importance on individual gender rather than looking at patriarchy as a whole construct, a club wielded by capitalism to leverage the anxiety and arrogance of uneducated cis men against the rest of the proletariat. Surely heterosexual sex and reproduction can be carefully conducted without feeding that machine. There's a potential avenue for praxis, figuring out how that would work.>>289386
Ah okay then.
>>289388>a club wielded by capitalism to leverage the anxiety and arrogance of uneducated cis men against the rest of the proletariat.
But there is uneducated cis men in the proletariat, do you believe that there is no male domination in the working class by the working class men?>Surely heterosexual sex and reproduction can be carefully conducted without feeding that machine.
Not according to feminist theory.
That's why I said "against the rest of." Patriarchy is an attempt to create a sub-hierarchy within the working class, a divide and conquer tactic.>Not according to feminist theory.
Feminist theory is a very broad study, which authors do you mean and then what would be the praxis under such theory? No straight sex and just use sperm banks for reproduction?>>289393
Eh, I was being somi- tongue and check there. I have had a lot of bad dreams growing up to now, yeah, but they've been getting nicer lately since the pandemic has given me time away from the usual stress. (replaced with other forms of stress, but easier to cope with.)
>>289394>Patriarchy is an attempt to create a sub-hierarchy within the working class, a divide and conquer tactic.
Unless men are the real enemy.>which authors do you mean
Catherine Mackinnon, Sheila Jefferys, and Andrea Dworkin>what would be the praxis under such theory?
Generally the only solution i can think of is cultural change or getting rid of men.
Well I'll need to read into those authors before I can say anything about them. Sorry if that's a boring response, most of my feminist reading has been 3rd and 4th wave stuff. Admittedly a lot in the form of video essays since I don't have very good eyesight.
Also yeah cultural change is the way to go, 'getting rid of men' without cultural change would just result in a new shiny matriarchal club to wield against non-binary folk and men that would eventually re-emerge, since you can't really genocide a social construct.
I mean I'd love some free HRT but I think wanting it disqualifies me in that scenario.
Personally, I fully accept my execution as part of the moid genocide but only under one condition: that I'm killed by a qt misandrist choking me with her pussy until I drown on her vagina juices
>>289376>when a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system
how are you motherfuckers still falling for this obvious bait
It's a quote from an actual feminist Sheila Jefferys.
This is trobling because she obviously doesn't seem stupid.>The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade was published in 2009. In it, Jeffreys describes the globalisation of the ±, and calls marriage a form of prostitution. Jeffreys writes, "the right of men to women's bodies for sexual use has not gone, but remains an assumption at the basis of heterosexual relationships", and draws links between marriage and prostitution, such as mail-order brides, which she sees as a form of trafficking. >>289376>>Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism.>No, All sex even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman.
I generally agree with this and when horny (as a cishet male) I also quite clearly (in post-nut self-reflection) sexually objectify. This subject causes a lot of internal distress and I'm unsure how to deal with it quite frankly.
vibrator gif is the best
Is there an imdb-like resource for searching for material like this? Visual novels / erotic media created by bisexual(?) / heterosexual(?) / lesbian(?) women?
just take the miso-misandry pill and that every time you are atracted to somebody you are objectifying them, and there is no problem with this until you act like an asshole and treat them like trash for your desires.
Hmm, I haven't checked before but maybe. I'm not having much luck after a brief search engining session. Usually once I find something I check an author's other works after I'm done. Mostly find stuff through word of mouth.
Oh, if you have social media and you like an author's work, follow them as authors tend to recommend each other's works.
>>289416>it's an actual quote
jesus h. christ
That is partially what I find so strange about this, because there seems to be research pointing to male sexuality being far more "visual"/"physical" (or sexually objectifying?) vs female sexuality (I'm thinking of the study which uncovered the huge difference between homosexual males promiscuity rate vs homosexual females more affective or romantic (for lack of a better description) sensibilities). >and there is no problem with [sexually objectifying women] until you act like an asshole and treat them like trash for your desires.
An approach easier said than done, surely.
Let's unpack this. I just thought about the connection between the stupid ease of sexual reproduction as an act, as well as the Freudian 'structural model of the psyche'; specifically its description of the ego. Then I thought about Lenin being skeptical of Freud, then I found this thread about the topic: https://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?t=40744
There's something to all of this but I'm not smart enough to figure it out yet at this point in time, so I'm just outlining something general.
>most active thread is about tits
coomers ruin everything
>>289233>post Maseratixxx content from when she was pregnant
WHERE DID YOU FIND THESE FORBIDDEN RELICS?!>peak tummy and milk hnnnng
Capitalism robs us of the ability to enjoy the simple things. Think about how much time you've spent needlessly creating surplus value for porky when you could've been playing your favorite video game or pressing your face between a warm chest of someone who loves you as much as you love them. Let yourself coom, and let the coom radicalize you.
Everytime a man coom, an exploited third world POC disabled trans female rape survivor dies. Still think it's funny moids?
This is the anarchist board.
This is the monarchist board.
Good shit comrade
Anarchism is basically monarchism but everyone is king/queen and not inbred
>>289376>All sex even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman
wait until my wife hears about this
Unique IPs: 25