END OF GRACE PICS
Don't stop, we need more pictures!
Especially more Grace x Alunya content, that's the only thing gives my heart sweets and is the only reason I am continuing living!
I changed my mind, we don't need more images.
That's not a new image.
is old /abdl/ stuff.
why are you posting an angry dog each post
also gib source on the tickling pic/full pic
why are you. cmon.
While Grace-chan is very cute when upset, I do not like it when she is not happy.
i dont care and stop acting smug
That was a joke in my early days in 2018.
I was always humored w/ how Hobbes referred to tyrannophobia & I inverted it and said tyrannophile.
stop being a heckin' tyrannophobic chinlet
I really adore Hobbes for it.
Only Hobbes really has this opinion.
You will find nobody like him.
>And because the name of Tyranny, signifies nothing more, nor less, than the name of Sovereignty, be it in one, or many men, saving that they that use the former word, are understood to be angry with them they call Tyrants; I think the toleration of a professed hatred of Tyranny, is a Toleration of hatred of Commonwealth in general, and another evil seed, not differing much from the former.
but grace-chan, monarchism is even more globally irrelevant than socialism
what are your thoughts on prince harry and his latest book?
I'm not a monarchist b/c of the Windsors.
I focus on the Monarch or the heir apparent more than the rest.& like many people here testifydrama like this & the press is not what I like about monarchy
Harry fell for the brown gf meme.
Royalty get a cult of personalty
& race is a part of it, like it or not.
It's the truth nobody wants to say.
>his latest book
A few points on Monarchy ached me.
Harry drew out from under the rug this:>1. He admits the Royal Family fears being abolished.>2. He focuses on the cost of the Monarchy: the Royal Family responds to this srsly.>3. "But no one wants to hear a prince argue for the existence of monarchy."
#2 is an r/monarchism-tier dilemma imo & I'd disagree w/ #3.
>>359393>I'm not a monarchist
I like King James VI & I.
He argues for Monarchy.>>359395
I am an e-monarkiddie.
Make no mistake, anon.
This anon is so aggro'd.
Guillotine posts wherever I go.
That's just how Anarchist express their loves Grace-chan. They can be such silly tsunderes sometimes, what with their Propaganda of Deed nonsense
who's the cosplayer? purely out of interest
hey high-supreme queen grace
I know you're a Caligula fangirl but I think I found the perfect flash game for you, about caesar.https://www.silvergames.com/en/caesars-day-off
<King James VI & I: Mystery of State / Mystical Reverence
>That which concerns the mystery of the King's power, is not lawful to be disputed; for that is to wade into the weakness of Princes, and take away the mystical reverence, that belongs unto them–
>Encroach not upon the Prerogative of the Crown: if there fall out a question that concerns my Prerogative or mystery of State, deal not with it, till you consult with the King or his Councell, or both: for they are transcendent matters, and must not be with over-rash willfulness; for so you may wound the King–
>I conclude then this point touching the power of Kings, with this Axiome of Divinity, That as to dispute what God may do, is Blasphemy; but quid vult Deus, that Divines may lawfully, and do ordinarily dispute and discuss; for to dispute A Posse ad Esse is both against Logic and Divinity; So is it sedition in Subjects, to dispute what a King may do in the height of his power; But just Kings will ever be willing to declare what they will do, if they will not incur the curse of God. I will not be content that my power be disputed upon; but I shall ever be willing to make the reason appear to all my doings, and rule my actions according to my Laws.
Court eulogizes Ramses II:
"We come to thee, lord of heaven, lord of earth, Re, life of the whole earth, lord of duration, of fruitful revolution, Atum for the people, lord of destiny, creator of Renenet, Khnum who fashioned the people, giver of breath into the nostrils of all, making all the gods live, pillar of heaven, support of earth, adjusting the Two Lands, lord of food, plentiful in grain, in whose steps is the harvest goddess, maker of the great, fashioner of the lowly, whose word produces food, the lord vigilant when all men sleep, whose might defends Egypt, valiant in foreign lands, who returns when he has triumphed, whose sword protects the Egyptians, beloved of truth, in which he lives by his laws, defender of the Two Lands, rich in years, great in victory, the fear of whom expels foreign lands, our king, our lord, our Sun, by the words of whose mouth Atum lives. Lo, we are now before they majesty, that thou mayest decree to us the life that thou givest, Pharaoh, breath of life, who makes all men live when he has shone on them."
>>"lord of food"
>"in whose steps is the harvest goddess"
>"whose word produces food"
<& contrast this w/ US President Joe Biden.
<w/ small stroke of his pen, he claims to build the economy & provide millions of jobs.
Those who hold those in pre-eminence generally don't weigh their conscience against them. As a modern phenomenon, the right libertarians & the Free Market. Or, /pol/ & Hitler. –A problem w/ e-monarchists I notice is they are eager to discuss when to kill the Monarch, but this isn't really a mark of pre-eminence to discuss at every instance when to kill and subject the Monarch… which I think shows a big problem w/ other monarkiddies, since they unlike the right libertarians or the Hitlerists don't uphold Monarchy to the same esteem as say the Free Marketeers or Hitlerists do. Nobody who fervently believes in their cause does this.
Royalty cannot really do what Joe Biden does. I blame it squarely on the rejection of monarchical sovereignty.
Aristotle says for a pre-eminent Monarchy:>For surely it would not be right to kill, or ostracize, or exile such a person>or require that he should take his turn in being governed [(like term limit or party coalitions)]>is in the relation of the whole to a part>he should have the supreme power>that mankind should obey him, not in turn, but always
This reminds me of a Sovereign Monarch.
Thomas Hobbes, I think, refers to it as a state of awe<Non est potestas Super Terram quae Comparetur ei. Iob. 41 . 24" (There is no power on earth to be compared to him. Job 41 . 24)
<and therefore it is no wonder if there be somewhat else required (besides Covenant) to make their Agreement constant and lasting; which is a Common Power, to keep them in awe, and to direct their actions to the Common Benefit.
<Againe, men have no pleasure, (but on the contrary a great deale of griefe) in keeping company, where there is no power able to over-awe them all.
I do not understand what itch this scratches for you tbqh but it weirds me out
built for netorare
What does that mean?
he wanna be cucked.
So, he wants to date Grace only to watch her get fucked by someone else?
I would watch alunya and grace holding hands, just that, nothing more.
I would watch alunya killing grace, just that, nothing less.>>363735
the virgin nazi vs the CHAD CHARLES II
Where did these edgy 12 years old haters come from?
Have you read up on your Roman history yet grace?
>>364261> if they ban bad thing why don't they also ban good thing?
It will always remain a mystery.
I think the 12 yos are a tally twice/thrice the age.
Only manchildren would continously obsess over this dead site.
leftypol hates when /pol/ or soyjak.party raid them
but falls in love when i raid leftypol.org
that for 7 consecutive threads in a row
they have given invitations, rolled the red carpet,
kissed the royal hand and bowed
b/c I am a generous & /kind/ raider.
<On the danger of border disputes:
>And this is the point for which we oftentimes see wars betwixt neighbour princes, for the subjects of their frontiers, who not well knowing whom to obey, submit themselves sometimes to the one and sometimes to the other: and oftentimes exempting themselves from the obeisance of both two, are ordinarily invaded and preyed upon by both the one and the other. As the country of Walachie having exempted it self from the obeisance of the Polonians, has become subject unto the Turks; and afterwards submitting it self unto the kings of Polonia, paid tribute nevertheless unto the Turk, as I have learned by the letters of Stanislaus Rasdrazetoski sent to the constable of France, bearing date the 17 of August 1553.
>Which hath also happened upon the borders of England and Scotland, where some particular men have made themselves great commanders within this twenty or thirty years, against the ancient agreements. For, for to meet with such enterprises, the English and the Scots had of ancient time agreed, That the Batable ground, (that is to say a certain part of the country so called, upon the frontiers of both realms, being five miles long, and two miles broad) should neither be til∣led, built, or dwelt upon; howbeit that it was lawful for both people there to feed their cattle: with charge that if after the sun setting, or before the sun rising, any of their beasts were there found, they should be his that so found them: which was one of the articles agreed upon by the states of Scotland, in the year 1550, and sent to Henry the second the French king, as was by him provided.
Very relatable to the Ukrainian conflict.
Borders have a lot to do w/ the nature of Sovereignty itself.
Is that a new image? It's cute.
, the pictures showcased >>364257
here will come out soon.
Amazing! I love her very much!
I want to be the one who saves Grace from the WELL DESERVED revolutionary terror! 💖
Anon deserves to be hung, drawn, and quartered.
On the pretext of high treason!
Grace wants to be the one who saves anon.
So Grace pardons anon! <3
You're welcome. ^_~
>>365675>So Grace pardons anon! <3
omg ilu bigly Gracie! 😍
>>362049>I do not understand what itch this scratches for you
I see myself as keeping the flame alive.
That flame is Absolute Monarchy & the politics of Majesty.
What kind of emotions the last two convey?
second picture should be called sheseesyourdick.jpg
Unique IPs: 26