[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon
siberia archives


File: 1702223272896-0.png (232.13 KB, 500x333, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1702223272896-1.webm (3.85 MB, 540x960, 1641722787987.webm)

File: 1702223272896-2.png (3.09 MB, 1080x1350, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.479105[Last 50 Posts]

>be me
>arab/turk
>into black women
>my family, particularly my mom doesn't want me to marry or even think of dating a woman with the slightest melamine
>nooo society will look down on you and your black wife!
>nooo you will ruin muh family genetics
>nooo your children will turn out ugly and get bullied
>nooo you will face racism in Europe! marry an Aryan woman instead!

feels bad man

 No.479106

Do turks consider themselves white?

 No.479108

>>479106
in terms of race, we have American brainrot. the further you go west, the more racist the country gets, our Mexicans that we blame shit on are the syrians and kurds

 No.479111

>>479108
Interesting

 No.479112

and? is your family in control of who you date or something? why should we care about any of this?

 No.479117

she really is pretty for real

 No.479120

File: 1702225090659-0.png (1.12 MB, 736x920, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1702225090659-1.webm (1.83 MB, 540x960, 1701913313256.webm)

File: 1702225090659-2.jpg (881.5 KB, 2338x4096, 1619088200673.jpg)

File: 1702225090659-3.webm (867.26 KB, 640x800, 1638754356618.webm)

>>479112
>is your family in control of who you date or something?
they tend to push their nose into who I date, it's a long family tradition, my uncle had an arranged marriage, and so my grandparents
>why should we care about any of this?
I wanted to vent

 No.479124

File: 1702225762273-0.jpg (498.23 KB, 1080x1350, 1685671497956.jpg)

File: 1702225762273-1.jpg (295.11 KB, 1024x1024, 1685670827917.jpg)

File: 1702225762273-2.jpg (288.82 KB, 1024x1024, 1685670635326.jpg)

File: 1702225762273-3.jpg (49.51 KB, 736x736, 1701786329557830.jpg)

File: 1702225762273-4.jpg (295.61 KB, 586x970, 1685676986396.jpg)


 No.479125

>>479106
The beauty of whiteness is that everyone outside of Africa consider themselves white, or at least "whiter than those savages down south, unlike us civilized paler skinned people"

 No.479126

>>479108
Would your parents be happier if you married another turk or a white woman?

 No.479127

>>479125
First thing i think of is italy. Northern italy is "white" while the south is a mediteranean jungle.

 No.479128

>>479126
correct, that is their wish
>>479127
i guess its because Sicilians and southern Italians have more arab loanwords in their vocabulary

 No.479129

File: 1702226442230-0.jpg (1.38 MB, 1045x3399, 17001461978971.jpg)

File: 1702226442230-1.png (444.98 KB, 641x346, ClipboardImage.png)

serbs are karaboga

 No.479130

>>479127
Yeah, and the Swiss will say that they're White and everyone south of the river Po is brown greek

 No.479131

Perhaps you can find a north African Muslima then at least you can marry them on the pretense of them being 'muslim'.

 No.479132

File: 1702226875600-0.jpg (427.17 KB, 2048x1702, 1702078229954473.jpg)

File: 1702226875600-1.png (2.4 MB, 1024x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1702226875600-2.jpg (53.25 KB, 600x751, 1702078712056969.jpg)

File: 1702226875600-3.jpg (536.41 KB, 828x1030, 1702078656709992.jpg)


 No.479133

who got webms?

>>479131
good idea but it won't work.
shes a Muslim in name only and rarely goes to the mosque, they don't care about religion afaik, only race

 No.479143

File: 1702228556127-0.jpg (111.51 KB, 1080x1350, 1702148083967101.jpg)

File: 1702228556127-1.jpg (477.79 KB, 877x1150, 1701887999631630.jpg)

File: 1702228556127-3.png (440 KB, 540x764, 1701656491864789.png)

File: 1702228556127-4.jpg (934.33 KB, 1440x1799, 1701656459939806.jpg)


 No.479156

whatever you do, DO BOT GO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR BLACK QUEENS.


Black Yankee women are the worst type youll ever meet.

 No.479173

>>479120
I ain't gonna lie that's both funny and ironic af that there's a video with a black woman with text written in Greek given your situation. I guess if you really want to fuck with your family marry a black woman who is also Greek.

 No.479178

File: 1702230735459.webm (5.58 MB, 720x1280, 1699295936214492.webm)


 No.479180

File: 1702230797327.webm (5.9 MB, 576x1024, 1699295867185716.webm)


 No.479181

>>479156
you sound sure, I'm going to take your advice and stay away from America, maybe I'll go to bong land or Yoruba for ebony queens

>>479173
that will give them all a simultaneous heart attack lmao
doubt I can find an African woman in Greece anyhow, maybe Germany, definitely Paris

 No.479182

File: 1702230841085.webm (3.04 MB, 720x720, 1699295825661366.webm)


 No.479185

>>479182
>>479180
>>479178
PRAYERS ANSWERED

 No.479186

File: 1702230912134.mp4 (2.41 MB, 576x1024, 1691067871099.mp4)


 No.479187

File: 1702230976660-1.jpg (96.23 KB, 1076x962, 1701461101196321.jpg)

File: 1702230976660-2.jpg (138.38 KB, 750x931, 1701402979876467.jpg)

File: 1702230976660-3.jpg (111.97 KB, 1080x1080, 1701402486586702.jpg)

File: 1702230976660-4.webm (5.9 MB, 576x1024, 1702230797327.webm)


 No.479188

>>479105
What happens if you tell her she's a dumb racist cunt?

 No.479191

>>479188
I did. She didn't take kindly to it.

 No.479192

File: 1702231201166.jpg (54.94 KB, 800x800, 1702069235571277.jpg)

she cute

 No.479194


 No.479201

File: 1702231874717.jpg (1.03 MB, 1920x1382, Black-Woman-NOLA.jpg)

>>479167
You sure about that anon? I mean some of the prettiest women I've seen are in New Orleans which is a very black city with a huge percentage of people who are of west African descent.

As a sidenote Louisiana is Quebec but chad if you ask me. You got a mixture of West African, French, and Native culture which is unique and unironically deserves to be preserved/not get as Anglofied. Honestly, I wish more people spoke Cajun French and Kouri-Vini but the Yanks straight up fucked shit up by banning/discriminating against people who spoke those languages. I know there's French immersion schools in Louisiana now but there's nothing unique about creating more people who speak fucking Parisian French tbh. Parisians can go fuck themselves honestly and are the worst Francophones next to the Quebecois.

 No.479202

>>479201
i need to play Mafia 3, loved the atmosphere of not-new orleans

 No.479203

File: 1702232143271-0.webm (Spoiler Image, 3.88 MB, 400x720, 1684249561686.webm)

File: 1702232143271-1.jpg (Spoiler Image, 107 KB, 750x882, 1629425939248.jpg)

File: 1702232143271-2.jpg (Spoiler Image, 92.4 KB, 640x799, 1655941184943.jpg)


 No.479204

>>479201
americanization is a terrible process for any culture trying to maintain unique traditions or identity. louisiana, much like the rest of the US south, chicanos, people who say "pop" instead of "soda", et cetera are all fading away in favor of a more general american identity. it's pretty sad tbh

 No.479206

>>479105
lol just marry a black woman if thats what you like, your parents sound racist

 No.479207

File: 1702232672189-0.webm (Spoiler Image, 1.27 MB, 720x1280, 1660019352473.webm)

File: 1702232672189-1.webm (Spoiler Image, 346.56 KB, 720x1280, 1684251670798.webm)

File: 1702232672189-2.webm (Spoiler Image, 3.88 MB, 400x720, 1684249561686.webm)

File: 1702232672189-3.jpg (Spoiler Image, 107 KB, 750x882, 1629425939248.jpg)

File: 1702232672189-4.jpg (Spoiler Image, 92.4 KB, 640x799, 1655941184943.jpg)

>>479204
shay, vanguard of the South, I got to ask, do you prefer butta or booba and why?

 No.479209

>>479204
i say soft drink or the specific type of drink: coke, cola, 7-up, canada dry, etc

 No.479210

>>479207
i dont know to be honest. im a virgin

 No.479213

>>479210
leave the neo-nazi groupchats and download grindr

 No.479214

File: 1702233396026-0.jpg (109.12 KB, 537x630, 1684376919250.jpg)

File: 1702233396026-1.jpg (377.33 KB, 1080x1349, 1598420304299.jpg)

File: 1702233396026-2.jpg (357.5 KB, 1000x1455, 1609862530699.jpg)

File: 1702233396026-3.jpg (229.53 KB, 1080x2160, 1684178088218.jpg)

File: 1702233396026-4.jpg (1.36 MB, 3872x2592, 1529888870940.jpg)


 No.479215

>>479213
my body pillow suits me fine

 No.479221

>>479207
Braaapp

 No.479234

>>479105
Is it true that black women are THICCer on average?

 No.479236

>>479214
Mmm, ambatukam.

 No.479245

>>479234
that's a stereotype, it's like saying all Asian women are petite or all Scandanavian white women have jawlines

 No.479250

File: 1702236783421-0.jpg (104.04 KB, 1080x1350, 1607807794807.jpg)

File: 1702236783421-1.webm (2.6 MB, 640x640, 1661526567513.webm)

File: 1702236783421-2.webm (526.17 KB, 640x640, 1667776659603.webm)

File: 1702236783421-3.png (701.84 KB, 500x661, ClipboardImage.png)

who lesbo here?

 No.479268

>>479181
>doubt I can find an African woman in Greece anyhow, maybe Germany, definitely Paris

It's probably harder but I do remember that there is a small Ethiopian Diaspora in Greece as well as a Greek Diaspora in Ethiopia which makes sense since the two regions have been in contact for a long time and they are both majority Orthodox Christian.

 No.479269

>>479245
You do realize that a stereotype denotes that something is common, right? What you meant was myth or presumption. Also, traits can be common in demographics. Given the diet and beauty ideals of East Asians many of their women will be petite.

 No.479275

>>479269
that's what i meant by stereotype, it's common, but exceptions exist

 No.479277

>>479245
>all Scandanavian white women have jawlines
I have literally never heard this in my life, what?

 No.479280

File: 1702240645670.jpg (298.91 KB, 2480x1508, 1666188566206104.jpg)


 No.479283

>>479277
You’ve never heard the joke about how all trans women have to do to pass is say they’re Swedish?

 No.479288

File: 1702241307597.jpg (371.54 KB, 1536x2048, 1699181952596507.jpg)

>>479156
I've been to Houston and Philadelphia, plenty of beautiful kweens there

 No.479293

>>479105
>black woman fetish
If you can't stand up to your family and protect the woman you choose from racist abuse, you'll be a bad partner. If you can be a good partner, you should figure out which country in Africa you'd like to live in and choose a woman there to settle down with.

 No.479297

File: 1702242643748.jpg (75.07 KB, 750x450, Kigali-City-750x450.jpg)

>>479293
Botswana, Rwanda, Ghana, Namibia, and South Africa are supposed to be decent from what I've heard. I know also Lagos, Nigeria has been developing very rapidly but the country is still very unstable even in comparison to South Africa. And I mean Nigeria has been under a military dictatorship which the country only is beginning to recover from. Honestly, I would put my bets on Rwanda though most of its improvements have been in the capital. It seems to be doing well despite having a really fucked up genocide in recent history.

 No.479306

>>479297
>rwanda
is Kagame /ourguy/?

 No.479315


✊😜

 No.479321

>>479269
>You do realize that a stereotype denotes that something is common
yes, and it's always wrong in that assumption

 No.479401

What do I have to do to get a black wife?

 No.479404

File: 1702257219929.jpg (102.29 KB, 1080x1080, 1627483440943.jpg)

>>479401
live in a place where they can be found?

 No.479406

im a karaboga with bbc but my family doesnt want me to date black women because they say i need to go out and conquer as many aryan women as possible to spread the karaboga seed and raise a massive army in europe to take over the whiteoid menace from the inside.

 No.479407

>>479406
good luck

 No.479420

>thread is full of pics and videos I've posted on this site before.
KEK

 No.479430

>>479234
Such a stupid stereotype. There's skinny little toothpick looking like black women. They seem to usually be the darkest. Which is great cause I fucking love those ones

 No.479445

>>479308
stfu

 No.480339

i "revived" the /ebon/ board on .moe but uploads started glitching for me so I couldn't post anything.

 No.480348


 No.480399

Why is your fetish for black women anyone's business? I know for a fact there are black women in Turkey anyway so don't play this "what do I have to do" crap. You know already and your just baiting us all to feed you black girl fetish porn you dirty allahsız.

 No.482098

>into black women
>spam black women porn
>all the attractive women have the facial features of white women
tale as old as time

 No.482121

File: 1702755854740.jpg (63.21 KB, 1044x783, based on what.jpg)

>>482098
>facial features of white women
What did he mean by this? If the facial features are on a black woman, they are the facial features of a black woman.

 No.482133

File: 1702759179612-0.webm (520.43 KB, 480x854, 1696897173963748.webm)

File: 1702759179612-1.webm (853.64 KB, 720x1280, 1693226579363167.webm)

File: 1702759179612-2.webm (2.06 MB, 576x1024, 1678055127830985.webm)

>>482098
You are retarded.

>>482121
4chinlets believe all black people must look like West African/Bantu, i.e. pronounced jaw, lips and wide noses.

 No.482171

>>482098
Black women existed before white woman, so by your logic, white woman are imitators.

 No.482186

>>479204
I was thinking about this the other day. Americans love to claim that they're Irish and so on, but why is this? I came up with a hypothesis that American culture has become so watered-down that they are desperate for something to distinguish themselves from the billions of other people around the world who've adopted the same watered-down American culture. They latch on to symbols like Shamrocks and holidays like St. Patrick's day because it's the closest thing to a solid cultural grounding that they have, lest they become "world citizens" who are completely untethered from any kind of tribe or shared tradition.

This leads us onto my hypothesis on what American culture actually is (or was), but I've already derailed this thread for long enough.

 No.482213

>>482121
>>482133
>Facial features exclusive to 1 race
This shits so fucking tired. There's literally black and white people with epicanthic eye folds

 No.482255

>>482213
The facial feature exclusive to white women is being pretty.

 No.482261

>>482186
Culture is reactionary, and Americans have the greatest revolutionary potential for lacking one (joking but like not really tbh)

 No.482262

>>482213
Unless she literally looks like a racist caricature, she's Fake Black.

 No.482296

What is this, a crossover episode?

 No.482303

>be me
>white southern male
>grow up without any particular attraction to any subset of women in particular
>move out of the South
>become absurdly attracted to black women all of a sudden
>they're into me too, for whatever reason
>bang multiple black women over the course of a few years
>family is racist but kind of soft racist (like they say the n word but they didn't have a problem with me taking black women to school dances when I was younger, friendly to black people in public)
>mom makes joke about how me and my brother should give her mixed race grandchildren
>what
>suddenly remember when I was a kid my dad used to hang out with a black woman a lot and I would go along with them places
>remember my mom getting really mad about it for some reason and calling her to tell her not to ever come around again
>wtf
>never speak to my dad about it, end up dating a white woman while amassing a major collection of interracial black woman/white guy porn
>gf one day says something about how she thought I would be into black women, despite me never saying a word to her about any of this
>what

so like, what's up with southern whites? and how does everyone know without me having ever said anything?

 No.482389

>>482261
I disagree, and I'm going to attempt to explain why.

There is nothing inherently reactionary about, for example, a NY pizza. The reactionary element would come from saying that only Italian pizza is 'authentic', and all American ones are pale imitations of the real thing. In fact, Pizza is both American and Italian. It was imported by Italian (and Sicilian?) immigrants, who continued making it amongst themselves in geographically isolated parts of the US, which is how you end up with the differences between Chicago and NY pizza, for example.

Now, the shit you get from Pizza Hut has been homogenised to within an inch of its life. This, for me, represents the goal of Liberal multiculturalism and integration, and I believe that this is where reactoids are half right - they understand that people losing their identity isn't a good thing, but of course, the only people they can think to blame are da jooz. Their solution is to ban all immigration and corral people into celebrating, eating, singing, and playing the exact same shit as them, and in the process, eliminating all naturally existing variations of so-called 'national' traditions. A Leftist attitude to integration should be to encourage people to carry on their cultural practises as, fundamentally, someone putting the jam on their scone before the cream doesn't actually stop you from doing it the other way around.

This may actually be more of a problem with nationalism overall, as the drive to have a national identity urges the aforementioned process of cultural ossification along.

 No.482390

>>482133
>pronounced jaw, lips and wide noses
those are features typically associated with black people. they wont all look like that, but the vast majority will. you can whitewash a good chunk of the women here and theyd look identical to a white woman.

 No.482392

>>482390
>those are features typically associated with black people.
With African-Americans. "Black people" outside of the USA are very-very diverse.

 No.482396

File: 1702843762528-0.jpg (166.13 KB, 1080x1349, 1697472353601658.jpg)

File: 1702843762528-1.webm (1008.6 KB, 640x480, 1701367732185008.webm)

File: 1702843762528-3.webm (3.92 MB, 356x640, post_rion_2.webm)

>>482389 (me)
anyway, here are some hot black ladies. Also, 99% sure that the first pic in the OP is a race-swapped Scarlet Johansson

 No.482420

>>482396
awooga

 No.482594

Anyone ever actually fuck a black girl? Best sex Ive ever had was an Asian. White chicks is fine, but black girls do be bringing it

 No.482608

File: 1702877592159.mp4 (11.77 MB, 852x480, dbi5u6b89.mp4)

>>>479250
Hot

 No.482626

>>482303
Thomas Motherfucking Jefferson!

 No.482627

>>482594
I grew up with and eventually fucked the token "black" chick but she was a very dark and curly haired Filipino. idk if that counts but im thinking i got an asian/black twofer

 No.482983

>>482390
>they wont all look like that, but the vast majority will
>the vast majority
Turbo burger post.

 No.482984

>>479105
Nice ass.

Can I slapp it?

 No.482992

File: 1702970471315-0.jpg (104.63 KB, 683x1024, 0dY25X0.jpg)

File: 1702970471315-1.jpg (204.05 KB, 960x960, 1542709064528.jpg)

File: 1702970471315-2.jpg (210.69 KB, 1024x1280, 1543366022842.jpg)

File: 1702970471315-3.jpg (148.07 KB, 960x960, 1559031027409.jpg)

File: 1702970471315-4.jpg (121.36 KB, 1180x1191, 1610491362840.jpg)

Good thread, Also sorry to hear about that OP, but you should date who you want, parent's preferences be damned. Just make sure it's actually someone you want to spend time with.

 No.482994

>>482390
You’ve never been outside of burgerland have you

 No.485239

>>482992
Goddamn, a classic big afro on a curvy chick is a hell of a combo.

 No.487565

Black chicks from Africa or Haiti have some of the sexiest accents I've every heard.

 No.487643

As an Brazilian my prime directive is to racemix

Her insta/tiktok is Zurilym

 No.487644

>whitest woman in Argentina

 No.487646

Imagine being a euro in 19th century Africa and this is the first woman you see. how can non black women even compete?

 No.487651

>>487646
this is a well-fed, fit woman in the modern day so your colonialist porn fantasy isn't real

 No.487680

>>487643
she's rly cute

 No.487764

Reading this as a black Muslim woman is funny ngl, how random. I probably should’ve sage this but oh well lol

 No.487767

All these women are beautiful.

However, as a fair warning, please please please stay away from Yankee Negresses.
Especially those from Dixieland.

Black women born amd raised outside of North America are safe and beautiful.

 No.487770

>>487644
>back shot
>sideboob on the TV
does she know?

 No.487771

>>487767
Nuh huh I love black kweens from all over the world

 No.487886

>>487764
Didnt realise we had black people here
I Always thought the average siberian Is a white first worlder who read too much Karl Marx

 No.487889

>>487886
>white first worlder
WHITE THIRD-WORLDERS ASSEMBLE!!

 No.487894

>>487889
white second worlders is where it's at

 No.487905

>>487886
>Didnt realise we had black people here
Still whiter than /pol/ somehow.

 No.487906

>>487886
Wasn't there some uygha posting here… Afroplasm?

 No.487907

>>487906
yes, but I remember he posted his face once, and he was the lightest ever

 No.487913

>>487894
There are first-party games, there are third-party games but where are all the second-party game, HMMMMMM???

 No.487914

>>487913
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_developer#Second-party_developers
>Second-party developer is a colloquial term often used by gaming enthusiasts and media to describe game studios that take development contracts from platform holders and develop games exclusive to that platform, i.e. a non-owned developer making games for a first-party company

 No.487916

>>487913
come to think of it, we have first-person shooters, third person shooters but no second person shooter, game developers are lazy

 No.487917

>>487916
killcams exist

 No.487918


 No.487919

>>487918
based, Driver San Francisco is the GOAT.

 No.487922

>>487916
Second person would be RTS, no?

 No.487925

>>487922
No, RTS is third-person. Interactive fiction is second-person.
>you open a lid and drop a huge dump into the toilet

 No.487959

>>479430
those usually arent American.

But yea I notice that the thicc black girls usually tend to be lighter skinned

 No.488118


 No.488920

File: 1704581663875.jpg (70.75 KB, 921x1024, 1704563911770606.jpg)

>magnum comercial had a black girl eating a vanilla ice cream and a white girl eating a black ice cream

What did they mean by that?

 No.488926

>>488920
Color contrast white/black ; black/white makes advertisers think they're artists (they're not)

 No.488933

>>488926
Some say that the purpose of art is to cause and express emotion (it made me horny) i guess they are good artists

 No.488964

>>488933
>>488920
white on black does look good tbf

 No.488966

File: 1704585895238.png (251.04 KB, 500x505, ClipboardImage.png)

>>488920
>pokiemane (a moroccan) ate a red corndog

What did she mean by this?

 No.489464


 No.489466

>>488966
Native Americans are the opposite of Berbers, of course. Maybe the mirror actually.

 No.489468

>>488966
red rocket 💄

 No.492062

File: 1705257105236.jpg (559.29 KB, 2003x1612, Racial brotherhood pron.jpg)

>>488920
Encouraging both sides interracial?

 No.497113

File: 1706413431073-0.png (1.54 MB, 720x950, 1628714988320-0.png)

File: 1706413431073-1.png (6.98 MB, 2048x1702, 1628714988320-1.png)

File: 1706413431073-2.jpg (458.03 KB, 2048x1356, 1628714988320-2.jpg)


 No.497560

>>487886
Imageboards are a melting pot, you'll find every group on here

 No.497564

>>492062
That sexy forehead needs to painted with cum

 No.497566

File: 1706475782513.png (1.23 MB, 736x981, ClipboardImage.png)

>>487886
I for one am a quarterblack first worlder who reads too much Karl Marx

 No.497582

>>497566
What a cutie. If only I was more handsome I would totally eat him up.

 No.497592

>>487907
He was half Anglo IIRC

 No.500315

>>487886
we've always been pretty diverse even though we're whiter than /pol/ (to their rage).

 No.503021

>>479105
Following up on this thread, I'm the black muslim femanon from earlier and I'm curious as to why you don't just get two wives? My dad actually has multiple wives and it's commonplace in my culture, is it taboo in yours? 

 No.503022

>>503021
Are you from the first or second wife?

 No.503025

>>503021
Not OP but yeah it's not culturally normal to have multiple wives. See the Soviet film White Sun of the Desert and you may get what I mean. I mean it's an attractive idea, but frankly speaking its not practical in the Northern Hemisphere, not to mention I fear to think how I'd handle 2 jealous women, let alone a harem.

 No.503026

lets face it the average poster on here is struggling to have a date or relationship let alone more than one wife 😭

 No.503036

>>503022
The first wife
>>503025
I suppose if you live in the west it would result in strange looks, I'm guessing the OP lives in Europe so it would probably draw ire taking part in this cultural practice. Personally, I have no qualms with it and can't see any downside. I'll be sure to check out that flick though, thanks for the suggestion.

 No.503092

>>488966
>Marrocans in my black women thread

 No.503097

Woe men

 No.503099

File: 1707779355003.png (261.93 KB, 415x425, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503025
>I fear to think how I'd handle 2 jealous women, let alone a harem.
divide and conquer, my king

 No.503102

>>503036
>draw ire
It's not legal in a lot of places, although obviously you don't have to be married on paper.

 No.503104

>>503102
You can easily just have a Nikkah and skip out on making it legal via paper, I've seen that happen before

 No.503118

>>503099
It's easier in the old country, women are more level-headed there. In the USA and Europe its not so easy. But fair point, as the Russian saying goes, if to steal then a million, if to love then a Queen.

>>503036
You're welcome for the recommendation, it is a Soviet classic, and thank your for your candid response.

 No.503145

File: 1707791025168-0.png (45.15 KB, 540x540, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1707791025168-1.png (146.78 KB, 600x600, ClipboardImage.png)

>leftypol when a cishet white guy advocates marriage
<leftypol when a black muslim girl advocates for polygamy

 No.503147

>>503021
Tbh polygamy will still get you weird looks in my part of the Islamicate. I never see anyone irl in my country practicing polygamy outside of Arab diasporas and people in very rural areas. I imagine its weirder in Turkey which is literally jut an European country

 No.503150

File: 1707792317392.png (399.39 KB, 760x540, strawball.png)


 No.503151

>>503150
Which first or second part? Going to anti-marriage rants. Yes absolutely. Second part yeah too, I thought it was funny how nobody responded with "polygamy" is reactionary or whatever the fuck else, just, "oh it may be impractical or not accepted everywhere."

 No.503153

>>503151
>I thought it was funny how nobody responded with "polygamy" is reactionary or whatever the fuck else, just, "oh it may be impractical or not accepted everywhere."
Answering a question as asked, not celebrating or glorifying polygamy like you imply. Funny how people just talking to a black woman leads you to bust out derogatory racialized memes but I guess that's not surprising for this thread. Bound to attract some folks with fetishistic and reductive racial attitudes.

 No.503279

File: 1707846084034.png (1.75 MB, 1500x1500, ClipboardImage.png)

Man do I love 80s 'fros on black chicks

 No.503286

>>503145
I wish it was true but sadly there are too many ConSocs on this site.

But yeah, marriage is slavery and retarded, fuck marriage. No exceptions.

 No.503290

>>503286
>ConSocs
Oh look libfags have created a new buzzword to use since calling people red fash or tankie is too obvious. Go back.
>M-marriage is slavery, really!
t.incel

 No.503292

>>503153
>Answering a question as asked, not celebrating or glorifying polygamy like you imply. Funny how people just talking to a black woman leads you to bust out derogatory racialized memes
That's how you are acting. The question of polygamy isn't whether you can get away with it or not.
>but I guess that's not surprising for this thread. Bound to attract some folks with fetishistic and reductive racial attitudes.
That's literally what this thread is. Also, the original suggestion in question of, if your parents don't want you to marry a negro just get her as your second wife is exactly that whether that anon really is a Black Muslim woman or not.

 No.503295

>>503292
>That's how you are acting
NTA but you're projecting and deflecting (again) because you got caught projecting your racism.
>The question of polygamy isn't whether you can get away with it or not.
Stop being obtuse
>That's literally what this thread is
No, it isn't. It's not a thread about Whites dominating whites or some siht, its a thread about beautiful black chicks, which is a matter of taste. That's not the same as a fetish, moron.
>the original suggestion in question of, if your parents don't want you to marry a negro just get her as your second wife is exactly that whether that anon really is a Black Muslim woman or not.
What the fuck does this mean

 No.503297

>>503295
>Whites dominating blacks or blacks dominating whites
Fucking deleted half the sentence lol.

 No.503301

>>503295
>>503297
This is a fetish thread whether you want to call it that or not. A fetish doesn't have to involve domination your tard. We got the foot fetish thread, muscle girl fetish thread, etc. and this thread. Have your fetish.
>What the fuck does this mean
Her suggestion was racist and also sexist.

Also my comment that you reacted to wasn't about her but about all of your reactions.

 No.503302

>>503301
>This is a fetish thread
Sure schizo, sure.
>A fetish doesn't have to involve domination
Didn't say that, I said it's not a specific sexual fetish that can be linked. Liking black chicks isn't anymore of a fetish than liking white chicks or asian chicks, retardo.
>We got the foot fetish thread, muscle girl fetish thread
Yes because those ARE specific sexual fetishes, not just skin-color threads, moron.
>Her suggestion was racist and also sexist.
No you entitled first-world faggot. If it is a consenting relationship having another spouse would not be either racist or sexist, its none of your business.
>my comment that you reacted to wasn't about her but about all of your reactions.
And your comment was provocative liberal garbage, spouting typically entitled first-world opinions.

 No.503304

>>503290
>Oh look libfags have created a new buzzword to use since calling people red fash or tankie is too obvious.
Get your delusional brainworms out of your head. Just because I dislike marriage doesn't mean I'm "le SJW." I despise SJWs but that doesn't mean I have to like puritan boomers either. I don't like decadence and consoomerism too but that doesn't mean you have to be so zealotted about it.
>calling people red fash or tankie is too obvious
Please. I'm not Voosh. If I wanted to call you a tankie, I'd call you a tankie.
>t.incel
Read Engels, you pseud.

 No.503305

>>503302
>Didn't say that, I said it's not a specific sexual fetish that can be linked. Liking black chicks isn't anymore of a fetish than liking white chicks or asian chicks, retardo.
Why do you think I would say that? Asian fetish, White fetish, Lantinx fetish, long hair fetish, short hair fetish. It's a fetish.
>No you entitled first-world faggot. If it is a consenting relationship having another spouse would not be either racist or sexist, its none of your business.
Entitled to what? My opinion? It's my business to opine on just as you are opining on my posts you backwards third world faggot.

 No.503309

>>503301
Why is liking anything other than the most standard stuff considered a fetish nowadays? Like, liking something doesn't equal hyperfixation.

 No.503310

>>503304
NTA but
>Get your delusional brainworms out of your head
LOL, you got caught and now you're seething
> doesn't mean I'm "le SJW."
Anon said nothing about SJW and your hurried need to claim to hate them and also "muh boomers" tells me you're a fucking /pol/fag incel trying to pretend to be leftist, because only /pol/ uses these 2016-era buzzwords anymore. LMFAO
>I don't like decadence and consoomerism
Suuuure.
>I'm not [irrellevant ECeleb nobody talks about anymore]
>I'd totally call you tankies!
LOL sure.
>Read Engels
1) Argument by Authority
2) Engels is speaking of the Nuclear family within the context of families in the capitalist system he was describing in the 1890s, this is not the same as today, nor does it encompass other cultures as it was Eurocentric, furthermore Engels and Marx were not infallible. You're the pseud because you can't think for yourself. Anyway, I'm out, keep bitching to one another.

 No.503313

>>503305
>latinx
This is the one who needs to go back, not me.

Marriage is bourgeois, I'll die on this hill, uyghas.

 No.503314

>>503309
I think you're drawing too many connotations from the word fetish. Why does it have to be a hyperfixation? When you go on a porn site you'd see the categories: foot stuff, muscle girls, Black girls, Asian girls, big tits, whatever. You've made a thread about a specific preference it's a fetish. You can be into many fetishes and "hyperfixated" on none of them.

 No.503315

File: 1707848715271.png (850.28 KB, 1000x667, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503305
>Entitled to what
<being this intentionally obtuse
Your opinion is entitled because you're a cultural ignorant retard that thinks you know better than "le stoopid"
You're the same people that will shit-talk the proletariat at the drop of a hat because you don't care about the working class and are just LARPing.
>Why do you think I would say that
<I talked about le racism but you can't parry me before I screech about muh Blacked and Bleached shit!
Take a long walk off an unfinished bridge, liberal.

 No.503316

>>503315
I don't respect regressive viewpoints because it's "your culture" you dumb faggot. Slavery is also your culture and I don't respect that either.

 No.503318

>>503316
>It's regressive because I say so!
<"your" culture
It's not my culture, I have an entirely different one, but I'm not going to screech reactionary because a man and a few women organize their marriage in a specific way to prevent conflict.
>slavery is also your culture
Nope and false equivalency, suck less dick and stop projecting bitch.

 No.503320

>>503318
LMAO. So you're just a projecting first world liberal faggot aren't you?

 No.503323

File: 1707849132461-3.jpg (62.37 KB, 523x960, Gq6PhiM.jpg)

File: 1707849132461-4.jpg (67.13 KB, 600x1020, jPPIngJ.jpg)

>>503301
It would be fine if you just showed up and said "polygamy is bad" and most of us would agree with it. The problem is that you're insinuating that because nobody else raised this point (which for most people is a non-issue) that we were somehow in favor of and/or celebrating polygamy. If you're talking to somebody from another culture about their different experience, it's generally more useful and respectful to just explain your POV and not shit on them for theirs from a position of (at least implicit) cultural chauvinism. Even if your culture is right and theirs is wrong (rarely that simple), you're not going to win someone over by acting that way. This has been repeatedly demonstrated with various forms of social activism by westerners in the global south.
>This is a fetish thread whether you want to call it that or not.
To some probably, but fetishes an preferences are different things. Some people just like certain features like dark skin because it looks nice, not because of some symbolic attachment to it. Because of the way that racism works, you are generally not going to see a lot of non-white women in most contexts like this and often have to specify. For black women in particular (and black men for that matter), the history of racial fetishism has restricted the sexualized presentation to a fairly narrow band meant to contribute to dehumanizing stereotypes. Content that falls outside of this trend helps to correct it (whether intentional or not), so you could argue these posts are working against racial fetishism as a larger trend even (maybe especially) if someone engages with it as a fetish.

 No.503324

>>503320
LMAO I knew you'd pull a "No U"
No I am not a first-worlder, The world isn't divided into America and "de black harem countries". Nice try, cope harder you flailing lib.

 No.503325

File: 1707849193980.jpg (116.64 KB, 798x798, 1675874766725.jpg)

huge fight in the black woman thread

 No.503327

>>503323
Lol I know that's how you see your fetish thread. As a feat of social activism to celebrate Black women in porn kek. Just fucking do you, don't make it so fucking weird.

 No.503328

>>503310
>LOL, you got caught and now you're seething
No, you're just retarded, kys.
>only /pol/ uses these 2016-era buzzwords anymore. LMFAO
The stereotype of old people as boring killjoys existed way before 4chan. And not like the Ok Boomer Girl doesn't exist.
>I'd totally call you tankies!
I don't give a shit about your political opinions, I'm simply pointing out the obvious.

Marriage is bourgeoise regardless of what Engels said. It ties people to property, it was born from property relations, and keeping it is pointless other than "muh trudishun." There is no need for legal marriage in the communist extended family.

 No.503330

>>503314
>You've made a thread
I'm not the OP though.
>You can be into many fetishes
That's called "kinks."

 No.503331

>>503327
>don't make it so fucking weird.
You are the one derailing the thread to argue about polygamy and lecture people on fetishism without knowing what the word means.

 No.503332

>>503331
The thread isn't derailed because the OP is about the weird Turk guy. Then polygamy was brought up in response to OP and I replied to that.

 No.503333

>>503328
>E-everyone is retarded but me!
LOL more projection
>The stereotype of old people as boring killjo
Imagine pretending to be this obtuse when caught. Nobody uses "SJW" and nobody cries "boomer" here because its old lingo, a dead meme that only 4chan /pol/-fags continue to use or reddit (same thing now). Go back
>I don't give a shit about your political opinions
Sure, which is why you're so ass-mad about "muh ConSocs!" or whatever nonsense you're bleating.
>simply pointing out the obvious
No, you're constituting your entitled, personal opinion as fact and seething when people do not accept it.
>Marriage is bourgeoise regardless of what Engels said
<It's just bourg because I said it is okay!?
Ah so now Engels is irrelevant? Nice backstepping. And Marriage as a concept has existed across numerous societies for Millenia, long before capitalism even existed.
>it was born from property relati
It was born from socio-economic need based on historical materialism, which itself originated from how human society developed from tribal hunter-gatherer groups where males and females paired up, and as people became civilized they laid down rules to prevent conflict as to who was with whom. That's why even in something as ancient as the bible, among the 10 Commandments is forbidding adultery.
>keeping it is pointless other than "muh trudishun.
no, retard, because in the typical incel ignorance of your kind (/pol/fags) you completely misunderstand what marriage is and what use it has. Marriage today is a wholly different beast to marriage a century ago, or two centuries ago. Read a fucking book.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/shaw/works/guide3.htm

 No.503334

>>503331
>You are the one derailing the thread to argue about polygamy and lecture people on fetishism without knowing what the word means.
Anyways I wasn't the one lecturing anyone on fetishism. Someone accused me for I don't know what reason of fetishism. Ctrl+F shows that many people have already accurately pointed out that OP is in fact fetishizing Black women. But whatever, I'm not upset by peoples fetishes.

 No.503336

>>503333
>Um, you're projecting! You're seething, haha, I win!
Don't waste my time.

 No.503340

File: 1707850915261.png (850.85 KB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503334
>Anyways I wasn't the one lecturing anyone on fetishism
Yes you were, your phrasing has been antagonistic this entire time.
>whatever, I'm not upset by peoples fetishes
I'm not upset, I'm not, that's why I keep bringing this nonsequitur up over and over!

>>503336
you're wasting everyone's time because you ARE in fact seething, with non-arguments and baizuo idealism. Do yourself a favor and stop.

 No.503341

File: 1707850979336.png (1.33 MB, 1440x1920, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503337
100% FR

 No.503346

>>503340
>Yes you were, your phrasing has been antagonistic this entire time.
Only as antagonistic as the posts I was replying to.
>I'm not upset, I'm not, that's why I keep bringing this nonsequitur up over and over!
I'm not bringing anything up I'm replying to you dumb faggot. You're the one writing tomes to explain why your fetish thread is some kind of project or social justice:
>To some probably, but fetishes an preferences are different things. Some people just like certain features like dark skin because it looks nice, not because of some symbolic attachment to it. Because of the way that racism works, you are generally not going to see a lot of non-white women in most contexts like this and often have to specify. For black women in particular (and black men for that matter), the history of racial fetishism has restricted the sexualized presentation to a fairly narrow band meant to contribute to dehumanizing stereotypes. Content that falls outside of this trend helps to correct it (whether intentional or not), so you could argue these posts are working against racial fetishism as a larger trend even (maybe especially) if someone engages with it as a fetish.

 No.503347

>>503334
>>503332
>But whatever, I'm not upset by peoples fetishes.
You are clearly upset, and very insistent on reducing black women's romantic and sex appeal to a fetish.
>the OP
This is a recurring thread on /siberia/. That's just some personal anecdote related to the thread, and he's talking about the social stigma attached to being with a black woman, not "black women are so hot because [body part] and [stereotype]" or something, or even why he finds black women appealing.

 No.503348

>>503347
>You are clearly upset, and very insistent on reducing black women's romantic and sex appeal to a fetish.
See that's how you interpret what I'm saying because you're like: I'm doing something good for the world by posting in yet another smut thread on siberia. Kek.

 No.503349

File: 1707851586765.png (199.36 KB, 480x253, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503346
>Only as antagonistic as the posts I was replying to.
Sure bud
>I'm not bringing anything up
Faggot you claimed it IS a fetish (wrongly) after an anon dismissed your reductive, entitled bullshit, and ever since you keep bringing it up, over an over, when its irrelevant to the topic you claim to be discussing, polygamy and marriage.
>You're the one writing tomes to explain why your fetish thread is some kind of project or social justice:
1) Not my post, not everyone responding to your nonsense is the same person, retard.
2) That's not social justice, /pol/-fag, that's analysis of normalization and reduction of racism through exposure of attraction.
/pol/faggots are obsessed with "muh social justice" when leftypol has never advertised for that to begin with. Fuck off.

>>503348
Not that anon but
>You called me out for my bullshit, so let me make a strawman false eqiuvalency to try to drag you down to my level.
God your pathetic.

 No.503351

File: 1707851659511-0.jpg (425.4 KB, 1600x1205, 1401271852284.jpg)

File: 1707851659511-1.jpeg (49.89 KB, 485x600, 1459233565171-1.jpeg)

File: 1707851659511-2.jpg (38.78 KB, 361x500, 1460030274685-4.jpg)

File: 1707851659511-3.jpg (94.8 KB, 1080x1521, 1621757121658-3.jpg)

File: 1707851659511-4.jpg (245.83 KB, 1274x1576, E10CDF7.jpg)

>>503346
>misuse a term
>get told what it actually means
>FUCKING SJW TRIGGERED LIBCUCK
You're not being subtle. We can tell you are just here to mald about black history month or whatever.

 No.503354

>>503351
>You're not being subtle. We can tell you are just here to mald about black history month or whatever.
I didn't know this was a Black History Month thread. Hahaha.

Jesus fucking Christ.

 No.503356

>>503354
>I didn't know this was a Black History Month thread.
It isn't. It was made in december. February is just when you decided to show up.

 No.503357

>>503356
You guys are so weird. Why can't you just jackoff to Black women without making it about the "normalization and reduction of racism through exposure of attraction?"

 No.503358

>>503292
Personally, I don't see how it's in any way racist or sexist, but perhaps it’s because this behavior is so woven into my community thus my cultural prejudices are impairing my judgment. Actually, I would prefer if my future husband married another woman so I could focus on other things instead of the countless obligations foisted upon me as a muslim housewife. It’s strange that my posts have made you question whether or not I'm a black Muslim woman.

 No.503359

>>503356
Man, imagine if it was a BHM thread. A very /siberia/n way to celebrate black culture.

 No.503361

File: 1707852945506-0.webm (244.48 KB, 540x288, 1632241396625-0.webm)

File: 1707852945506-1.webm (1.33 MB, 608x1080, 1633092101978-0.webm)

File: 1707852945506-2.webm (2.73 MB, 853x480, 1633449650799-1.webm)

File: 1707852945506-3.webm (1.04 MB, 608x1080, 1633967858268-2.webm)

File: 1707852945506-4.jpg (624.77 KB, 922x1037, 1636446215357-3.jpg)

>>503357
Nobody "made it about" that. You tried to make it about fetishism and were told off.

 No.503362

>>503361
I'm pretty sure black women having bigger butts is more than just a stereotype…

 No.503369

>>503358
It's considered sexist because it generally puts the women subordinate to the man, since he "owns" more than one woman as "property" representing a worse version of patriarchal relations than monogamy. In practice life is usually a bit more nuanced than that. It's common for westerners to engage in a form of "feminist chuavinism" you could call it where they posture as being from a superior culture and use practices like this to paint Others as backwards regarding sexism. Even where there's some truth to this, it's deployed in a cynical way that does nothing for the women in those cultures. That is probably a factor in how it's just one person who's trying to make a big deal about it while the rest of us aren't. Nobody is going to triumph over polygamy on behalf of Muslim women by posting here.

IDK why that anon brought racism into it. Maybe they meant that OP as a Turk taking mutliple wives from another racial group would be some kind of racist harem? But based on the other posts it's probably just having racism on the brain.

>Actually, I would prefer if my future husband married another woman so I could focus on other things instead of the countless obligations foisted upon me as a muslim housewife.

Yeah that would count as cultural biases affecting judgment. The housewife expectations are enough of a burden that you'd prefer having your husband's attention split with another woman to relieve some of it. In another culture, the expectations would be different (even equal in some cases), so this tradeoff wouldn't exist.

 No.503374

>>503369
NTA but that's an interesting point you bring up about polyGYNY specifically (because polygamy is very gendered in Islamic countries). But being surrounded by women is something no finsexual can resist, it feels nice getting so much attention.

 No.503383

>>503369
>IDK why that anon brought racism into it. Maybe they meant that OP as a Turk taking mutliple wives from another racial group would be some kind of racist harem? But based on the other posts it's probably just having racism on the brain.
Racist that the solution of not being good enough for his racist parents is to take a wife that satisfies his parent's racial prejudice so he can take another wife to satisfy his fetish. To have his wife that won't
> ruin muh family genetics
>And make children that will turn out ugly and get bullied

So he will have the good wife and the despicable negress wife. I would say this solution is kind of fucked if you ask me.

The fuck you mean I have racism on the brain? Literally the fucking OP and the topic of discussion.

 No.503384

>>503374
It's way less common to have polyandry historically. Polygamy is overwhelmingly polygyny. Even when you have both, the dynamics are usually different because of how there are different gender roles. Modern free love movements, polyamory, etc are less like that but still tend to retain some remnants of traditional gendered expectations.

 No.503385

>>503383
The racism there is the other people being racist. OP is asking how to deal with it.

 No.503386

>>503385
And I am saying the solution is continuing the fucking racism making that solution itself racist. But forget that word. What an awful situation for this hypothetical black 2nd wife in this solution to be in. J
ust tell your parents to fuck off. Fucking disown them you spineless coward OP. That's the obvious solution.

 No.503388

>>503386
And awful for the hypothetical non black wife too for that matter. Get a wife just to ge your beard? Call it cultural differences but that is some sick shit to me and mot how you treat people. Sorry if I'm being culturally insensitive and entitled.

 No.503389

>>503386
>>503388
I don't think it's going to be a solution for OP regardless, so it's kind of ridiculous to get up in arms over it.

 No.503391

>>503389
Of couse, why I keep saying hypothetical. I'm not up in arms. I'm just stating my fucking opinion. Jesus Christ I didn't say kys or you get the wall or whatever stupid shit is standard fare responses. I just said my fucking opinion and then the faggots ITT try to play the "you are a Western cultural chauvinist trying to inject your concepts of human decency on the poor Muslims you racist." Bruh fuck you and fuck you and fuck your culture if that's what it is.

 No.503395

>>503369
> That is probably a factor in how it's just one person who's trying to make a big deal about it while the rest of us aren't. Nobody is going to triumph over polygamy on behalf of Muslim women by posting here.
You keep imagining shit in stupid ways. You are the one who keeps talking about c
"Winning people over" and now "triumphing." This level of projection is crazy. I have no end goal in mind as you clearly do. I am not working carefully to any such goal. I just fucking state my opinion as it is. You could all he the same person, you could all be chatbots. I don't ask anyone to be or think anything. It's my opinion however I have articulated it ehen I hit new reply, take it or leave it as you see fit.

 No.503416

>>503391
I’m not gonna pretend like my culture isn’t backwards in a lot of aspects but those were the cards I was dealt. I mean worse stuff happens like FGM and child marriage so polygamy doesn’t seem so bad to me.

 No.503421

>>503325
literally me

 No.503450

File: 1707872180009.png (872.95 KB, 800x499, ClipboardImage.png)

>>503389
>>503383
>>503391
>>503388
>>503386
>>503395
Jesus Christ are you still malding? I left this thread hours ago and you still can't stop this white-saviour complex bitching and moaning. Shut the fuck up and let people appreciate black women in peace.

 No.503733

I truly hope the Turkish anon doesn’t actually follow through on my advice, I was saying it in jest. I don’t actually condone polygamy even though it’s commonplace in my culture, I personally think it’s an antiquated tradition that’s rooted in male gratification. Thanks for all the (you)s and free entertainment, I needed something to read after a recent board I frequented was shut down. Was this in poor taste? Probably but I was bored, I actually expected this site to be partially dead so I’m surprised there was so much activity. I’ll stop derailing this thread now, I hope this doesn’t result in me getting banned.

 No.503737

>>503733
>I truly hope the Turkish anon doesn’t actually follow through on my advice
it's okay anon, wasn't planning to, polygamy isn't my thing

 No.503749

>>503737
I’m curious though are you a Levantine or Khaleeji Arab? I know in the levant they hold unsavory opinions about black people but a good friend I have from the gulf told me that’s not applicable to his region. You don’t have to answer if it’s too personal, I’m surprised Turkish people are racist tbh. I’ve been there countless times and had an absolutely amazing time.

 No.503786

>>503749
>Levantine or Khaleeji Arab?
Dad's family is Egyptian, I'd say I'm closer to the Levant than to the Khaleej, that is how Egyptian Arabs see themselves, we're our own cultural thing mostly. neither the Levant nor the Gulf. not even that culturally close to the rest of North Africa

 No.503790

>>503786
i feel like there's a huge irony in my family being made of different ethnicities and yet still looking down on interracial relations except on the basis of skin color

 No.503793

>>503790
>Race is when skin tone.
>Japanese are yellow.
>They just are, ogay?
>Look, MAYBE they are a bit pale.
>Okay, FINE. They're honorary whites. With a yellow-ish tint.
>Wut? There are dark-skinned Japs? Wtf?
>BLAH-BLAH-BLAH, WHATEVER! The race isn't about the skin color, it's about the facial features and stuff.
>I JUST HATE MULTICULTURALISM, OKAY!!? IDGAF HOW PEOPLE LOOK!!

 No.503911

>>503790
It is indeed ironic, and I empathize with your situation. Dealing with such circumstances can be frustrating. In my case, my parents prioritize my partner being Muslim rather than focusing on their race, which is a common sentiment among many East Africans. Personally, I suggest prioritizing your own happiness and living life on your own terms. Although it may be challenging, most parents eventually come to accept their children's choices. It is important not to let your family pressure you into marrying someone with whom you are not compatible, as it will only lead to a miserable life.

 No.504068

>>503026
You know I’ve always been curious as to why guys who gravitate to imageboards struggle with this, however, many of them appear to be mentally unstable which has prevented me from directly asking them about it. It’s even a meme at this point that since most of them can’t get gfs they become the gf, on the contrary, women who use imageboards seem to be more well adjusted from what I’ve seen. Why do you think that is? Any insight?

 No.504442

I still find it hilarious they used the
>Slay queen
Phrase towards me, wrong stereotype pal

 No.504460

>>504068
Not as many men would be bothered by a woman being some imageboard weeb as women would be bothered by a man being the same.

 No.504512

File: 1708104752175-0.webm (556.43 KB, 640x640, 1707977569685676.webm)

File: 1708104752175-2.webm (1.14 MB, 1080x1920, 1703560359383235.webm)

File: 1708104752175-3.webm (2.39 MB, 720x1280, 1686497748800042.webm)

BLACK
FEMALE
SUPREMACY

 No.504522

>>479105
I'm still impressed with that black woman's gigantic ass.
>>504512
BUT JAPANESE GIRLS- *plays the videos* *goes fullscreen* *zooms in* *zooms closer* *zooms closer* I mean, I agree on a tie…

 No.504523

>>504522 (me)
I NEED- No, I DEMAND MORE ASS!!

 No.504559

>>479120
Dem tiddies

 No.504597

>>503147
I’m curious Muslim anon, as a fellow Muslim do you think frequenting Chan sites damages your iman? I’ve been using imageboards for 10+ years at this point and as I’m getting older I don’t see much merit in using them anymore. This site actually seems pretty fascinating but the vast majority of imageboards are just cesspools.

 No.504599

>>503279
those kinda fros are more of a 60s/70s thing

 No.504604

>>504597
imam more like gaymam lol
fuck it

a god that's worth worshipping is the kind of god who don't care the about the gay shit we get up to, as long as we treat each other with kindness and love

 No.504706

>>487764
also a black muslim woman reading this…we probably come from the same country hmm. we really are everywhere

 No.504708

Another miserably failed black women appreciation thread, bravo.

 No.504714

>>504597
Admittedly being a chantard does affect my view of Aqeedah, or rather just running in 'this circle' (i.e leftist social analysis) in general. But i came from a rather secularized, left leaning family in the first place (dad had a few run ins with the SWP while studying in UK, never see him take anything spiritual seriously) so shameful as it is it doesn't give the same unconscious ennui you might experience from going to the chans

 No.504715

>>504714
There really are no genuine muslims on here

 No.504717

>>504715
Well duh this is a communist imageboard

 No.504822

>>504706
That’s wild, is it in East Africa? Man, I’m shocked by how terminally online our ethnicity is because I’ve come across our people on the most obscure forums you could imagine. I don’t currently live there though but rather a more westernized nation.
>>504714
Thanks for the response, you seem like you have a great head on your shoulders.

 No.504923

>>504822
Yes, I am also East African. Do you browse female image boards? Lolcow and such? I think those are the only places were we don’t have an online presence although I came across an east african muslim girl on a fujo board so I might be wrong. I live in the west too, I’ve never been to africa.

 No.504941

>>504923
Yeah I do, I’ve been on those sites for ages. It’s insane coming across another East African girl on here, what are the chances! I’m an adult though, I feel like you might be a youngin. If you’re over the age of 21 maybe we should connect on d**scord, drop your tag, my username starts with random.

 No.504944

>>504941
I’m 21. Is that okay? My fbi.gov is 1508s

 No.504945

>>504944
meant d**scord

 No.504956

>>504944
Yeah that’s fine, I sent the request

 No.504958

>>504708
I appreciate that black women itt are meeting each other, which in itself makes the thread better than the previous ones combined.

 No.504973

vulgar thrust

 No.504992

>>504584
>platonic object
Great, an idealist.

I don't "mediate" friendship through the "ego," you have friends because it's pleasing to you, because you desire to have friends. And how is something that's pleasing to you not in your interest? That's the point of having self-interests: attaining pleasure and happiness and avoiding pain. It's pure id, not ego.

 No.505017

>>504992
No, actually, I'm completely anhedonic, so I don't experience any enjoyment from friendship, I consciously maintain friendships to please a hypothetical model of a person who enjoys such things, because I have consciously arrived at the conclusion that it would be beneficial for that hypothetical person, whom I use as a stand-in for myself and others.

It is the only truly infallible mode of being, because it doesn't rely on the fickle and arbitrary nature of pleasure and enjoyment, which different people experience or even don't experience depending on their neurological quirks.

Egoism is just solipsism with extra steps. Your subjective experiences and thoughts are just the arbitrary churnings of an ancient lizard brain, they should not be used as a point of reference. Instead, one should identify with their Mask: the construct with which they present and interface with society, not the internal guts and bowels of your inner mind, which are inevitably gross and monstrous when fully revealed.

 No.505035

>>505017
>completely anhedonic
How complete are we talking here?

 No.505044

>>505017
>I consciously maintain friendships to please a hypothetical model of a person who enjoys such things
This is beyond spooked. That's ultra-spooked, you are downright obsessed with social norms.
>It is the only truly infallible mode of being, because it doesn't rely on the fickle and arbitrary nature of pleasure and enjoyment
You still operate on a desire. A desire to avoid making mistakes. Thus you shun emotions, you're avoiding pain. You cannot escape.
>which are inevitably gross and monstrous when fully revealed
What an infallible being operating on pure emotions, I see. None of this matters, whether my internal guts are disgusting to you is not important to me, it's pointless to care about such things because it's coming from a moralistic viewpoint. And metaphysical solipsism has nothing in common with egoism. Nothing.

 No.505142

>>505044
Nope, has nothing to do with social norms, or avoiding mistakes.
I have just consciously decided to do this one thing, so I'm doing it. I am free.

It is you who is, in fact, spooked, because you think it matters whether you enjoy something or not, or that you should do something because you enjoy it, and not do something because you don't enjoy it. Which is a bio-neurological spook in itself.

Also, I find it funny that your own example of having friends was epicly based and pleasing muh ego, but if I do it for some other reason than direct neurochemical pleasure, it's suddenly spooked.
Are you sure you're not a hedonist?

 No.505143

>>505137
>I have just consciously decided to do this one thing, so I'm doing it. I am free.
Nobody does something without a reason. Surely you're doing this detachment because it's pleasing to you, you gain enjoyment from theidea that you're free, that makes you feel safe and your belief system consistent. You cling to Marxian metaphysics because it satisfies your desires and gives your life order but if you introduce some unpredictable element like egoism the whole system starts shaking so you run away back into security.

 No.505144

>>505142
>if I do it for some other reason than direct neurochemical pleasure, it's suddenly spooked
Well, you're an egoist. But a spooked one. There is no contradiction.

 No.505154

>>505143
>Nobody does something without a reason
Your belief in a necessity of some compelling requirement to do anything is a spook. You have invented for yourself a slavedriver in the form of "what pleases my ego"
Me, I can decide to do things even if I don't believe in them, or even if they don't bring me any direct enjoyment.
Like, one day I just decided to be a marxist (as if it even matters if you're privately a marxist or anything).
You, on the other hand, are constantly paranoid about being chained by ideas, and that paranoia itself is what chains you and narrows your freedom.

>>505144
You are spooked by egoism.

 No.505171

>>505154
>ego
Why do you keep using this word?
>or even if they don't bring me any direct enjoyment
>direct
Gotcha. Long-term goals are egoistic too. You seem to operate on the egoist strawman, you think an egoist is egocentric, decadent, narcissistic and narrow-minded. This definition of egoism is very narrow, it confines the egoist to desire only what this definition allows. Not that different from you, just the reverse.
>that paranoia itself is what chains you and narrows your freedom
No more than your ideas chain you. I'd argue that your ideas chain you even more. In order to do things without a reason you literally have to stop thinking, our brains are wired to operate on causes and effects.
>You are spooked by egoism.
Egoism isn't a spook because its point is to dissolve spooks, not create another idea that restricts one's desire.
<But scruples, which thought created, now exist and can certainly be eliminated through thought. But this thought, this critique, achieves this aim only when it is egoistic thought, egoistic critique, i.e., when egoism or self-interest is asserted against scruples or against the uninteresting, when self-interest is openly professed, and the egoist criticizes from the egoistic viewpoint, rather than from the christian, socialist, humanist, human, free thought, spiritual, etc., viewpoint (i.e., like a christian, a socialist, etc.), because the self-interest of the unique, thus your self-interest, gets trampled underfoot precisely in the sacred, or human, world, and this same world, which Hess and Szeliga for example, reproach as being egoist, on the contrary has bound the egoist to the whipping post for thousands of years and fanatically sacrificed egoism to every “sacred” thing that has rained down from the realm of thought and faith. We don’t live in an egoistic world, but in a world that is completely sacred down to its lowest scrap of property.

 No.505174

So, egoists think that the exact same behaviors and thoughts are qualitatively different depending if you do it for egoist or non-egoist reasons, and something only "counts" if it's done for egoist reasons, despite the outcome being the same.

Isn't that in itself a kind of morality. Even worse, it's idealism.
Kinda like how in christianity, you can be a good person or whatever, but it doesn't "count" unless it is done "through christ".

It is a moral requirement that whatever you do is done in an "unspooked" manner, like you have to wear a mental condom before you engage with the scary, scary ideas.

 No.505182

>>505171
>you literally have to stop thinking
Yes, and that's a good thing. Thoughts are a spook. They're empty.
They're just random noise that bubbles out of the recesses of your brain, they should not be taken too seriously.

>Gotcha. Long-term goals are egoistic too.

It's not about temporal distance, but conceptual distance.
I have a construct in my mind, for whose imagined enjoyment I attend to, which in turn pleases me, but in a cosmic kinda way.
The only difference between me and you is that I externalize that construct, while you fully identify with it, which makes you spooked.

The whole thing about pleasure is a semantic game anyway, everyone does everything for either pleasure or pain avoidance reasons, so everyone is actually an egoist, I just don't see the necessity in adopting a certain type of properly licensed Brand of Egoism(tm), where you behave in the same manner as everyone else, except you have the ghost of striner or whatever telling you what's the correct and incorrect way of being an egoist.

 No.505184

>>505174
>So, egoists think that the exact same behaviors and thoughts are qualitatively different depending if you do it for egoist or non-egoist reasons, and something only "counts" if it's done for egoist reasons, despite the outcome being the same.
Okay, Hess.
<Hess asks: “First of all, what is egoism in general, and what is the difference between the egoistic life and the life of love?” This question already reveals his kinship with the other two. How can one assert such a contrast between egoistic life and the life of love against Stirner, since for him the two get along quite well?

 No.505186

black woman thread btw

 No.505188

>>505184
They get along, but one is a superficial requirement placed on top of the other.
Just as being a Christian gets along with any behavior, as long as it's done "through christ".

I'm not saying there's contrast or conflict between the two, I'm saying that one is not necessary at all, and you can have just the one.
Why be conceptually an Egoist, rather than being a regular old egoist as everyone already is?
What's the point of this veil of Egoism through which everything must be mediated?

 No.505189

File: 1708243499789-0.png (1.98 MB, 1280x1600, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1708243499789-1.png (589.85 KB, 707x894, ClipboardImage.png)

>>505186
post nut clarity caused these bozos to start arguing about egoism lmfao

 No.505190

>>505182
>Thoughts are a spook
Oh, please.
>They're just random noise that bubbles out of the recesses of your brain, they should not be taken too seriously
You really think you don't think just because you don't use words?
>I have a construct in my mind, for whose imagined enjoyment I attend to, which in turn pleases me, but in a cosmic kinda way.
>The only difference between me and you is that I externalize that construct, while you fully identify with it, which makes you spooked.
I don't identify with egoism, we're both egoists, you're just in denial.

 No.505191

>>505188
>They get along, but one is a superficial requirement placed on top of the other
Ah, you're referring to your own metaphysics here, lmao? Egoism is not a requirement, love is already egoistic.

 No.505192


 No.505193

>>505190
>>505191
I'm an egoist (as is everyone), but you're an Egoist(tm).

Egoism is not a requirement, but Egoism(tm) is, to licensed and brand certified Egoists(tm). Love is egoistic, but that's not enough, it also has to be Egoistic(tm) for an Egoist(tm), otherwise it's the bad-wrong "spooked" kind of love.

You wear the ghost of Stirner like a condom on your mind, through which you mediate all your experiences.

 No.505195

>>505193
There's no capital E egoism but there is conscious egoism and it's not a requirement either if you enjoy your delusions so much.

Nothing matters.

 No.505196

>>505195 (me)
People will naturally come to egoism once they realize how pointless it is to serve sacred ideas. Which is what the spook book is for.

 No.505197

>>505196 (me)
>egoism
*conscious egoism

 No.505198

>>505195
If nothing matters, so does being a conscious egoist not matter.

>>505196
Not any more pointless than serving non-sacred ideas.

Lmao this philosophy is just pointless mental masturbation equivalent to rotating a cube in your mind for fun.

"Nothing matters unless it doesn't matter in a way I approve of"

 No.505356

Spook boy gets eaten by aggro buddhist
Huh that's new

 No.505427

>tfw will never be able to marry a black queen

 No.505439

>>505427
This is the fifteenth time I've seen someone post about never being able to do something that is completely achievable, like learning an instrument or language. Just do it. It's not hard

 No.505473

>>505198
>If nothing matters, so does being a conscious egoist not matter.
Yes. But why not? It frees your desire, you can do what you really want instead of being restricted by imagined concepts.
>Not any more pointless than serving non-sacred ideas.
You don't "serve" non-sacred ideas. Servitude implies slavery. You're enslaved to fixed ideas. Non-fixed ideas are as rich and diverse as life itself because conscious egoists embrace life instead of some abstractions. If non-fixed ideas are always changing and fleeting, how can you say that you serve them if you dispose of them when they're no longer useful?
>"Nothing matters unless it doesn't matter in a way I approve of"
No. Nothing matters. I just choose to act like that because I like to do what I want, not act out of habit or tradition or social pressure or whatever other pointless restriction, it pleases me to act like that. You can act however you want, you are already an egoist, a phrase-maker. It'll always be an expression of your self-interests. I simply don't need to justify my decisions to myself with higher causes.

 No.505516

not a good day/evening/night for you is it spook boy

 No.505563

File: 1708354069861.webm (11.49 MB, 1280x720, big.webm)

>>480339
fatter

 No.505742

>>505721
15 minute yap fest by some obviously resentful guy. Only thing he said with actual substance was near the end where he said they don't wash their hair, which I don't get because there's tons of shampoo made specifically for weaves and also targeting the hair underneath with tools.

 No.505877

>>505734
You do realize someone like him wouldn’t see you as any different from black Americans right? Racists don’t care, they hate anyone who doesn’t look like them. Don’t ever pander to racist people, they don’t deserve any sympathy and should be treated like the subhuman they are.

 No.505881

>>504068
those young women already have good prospects thats why.


Theres few young womn whom lack romantic prospects.


Now, when they hit forty, the tables reverse.

 No.505884

sexpat thread

 No.506104

>>480339
You mean https://8chan.moe/ebon/ ?
It works fine for me.

 No.507529

File: 1708968762360-0.png (591.02 KB, 640x677, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1708968762361-1.png (1.91 MB, 785x1184, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1708968762361-2.png (1.05 MB, 840x560, ClipboardImage.png)

>JUNGLE FEVER THREAD
REVIVE!

 No.507531

>>505884
>sexpat thread
Speaking of anyone make an OkCupid account recently? They made it more like tinder now where you get likes and etc. I got 300 likes in 2 days of making account and it was almost entirely African woman kek.

 No.507542

>>507531
I got the same, I'm not white so it was like 20.


Unique IPs: 104

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]