Restarting the LGBT general
Homophobia is idpol
Transphobia is idpol
Sexism is idpol
Racism is idpol
Opposing any of these is not
241 posts and 36 image replies omitted.>>606308Hi I'm into raping children
And by "raping" I mean sex
And by "children" I mean young adults above 20 or atleast around my age.
Why should words having meaning?
Why ever approach anyone on the idea they can be wrong?
>>608903So true bestie
That's why when George Floyd was murdered I morally and empathetically jerked off and came all over the place.
God if only I can give your post all then reddit gold in the world, but not only I can't since it's anonymous, it would NEVER be enough 🤭
>>608964>>608903Idpol.
If you hate straight men, you may as well reject leftism because the founders of leftism were cishet males
>>609096Really?
Why do people conflate communism with leftism then?
>>609079Communism is not a religion so I don't idolize the founders of it
And the fact all of them were breeder moids doens't change the objective fact absolute majority of them are our enemies and want our elimination
>>609332>let me tell you how what you literally witnessed with your own eyes is wrongfuck off cia
>>609333everyone knows you're lying, keep lying until you get a nice spot on a lamppost or a tree of your choosing. it's a fun pasttime for all ignorant folk of all strides and steps.
>>609334Things people have witnessed with their own eyes:
-angels
-flying saucers
-bigfoot
-State of Israel
>>609334Thanks for proving my point.
You're narcissistic
>>609297
>>90% OF GAY TOPS ARE CLEARLY FUCKING PEDOPHILES
Children don't have a sexuality before puberty, so to figure out if the child rapist is straight or gay or whatever, you have to see their choise of adult partners – which is so dominated by straights that some studies even conclude that there is no such thing as a gay pedophile, (obviously not true, but really says alot).
>DUMP THEM WHEN THEY TURN 25
Ignoring that the brain always develops and 25 is a nonsensical number – the anger of that going for 18-25 doesn't make sense when people can operate cars as young as 16, and this infantization is objectively abuse since the whole point of raising children (and now young adults) is to train them to being adults.
(Not even arguing for age gap stuff, but rejecting the dogma approach of it).
Not even arguing for age gap stuff, just the dogma approach of analyzing it.
What I will put my foot down and say is that saying it's pedophilia to go for people who're post puberty, especiapially 18+, is stolen valor and pro pedophilia.
Someone search that anon's harddrive for child pornography – possible might find worse like nepio shit.
>>YOU CAN GET RID OF PEDOPHILES IN YOUR COMMUNITY ANY FUCKING TIME
I agree, leave predator.
For the rest of the people reading this post, the spectacle approach like Chris Hansen has been an objective disaster, and the real solution is getting encouraging pedophiles to come out so they can be giving medicine to cure their pedaphilia, (side effect it castrates them, but whatever).
Anyways, mods, penalize this foo.
>>609162> objective fact absolute majority of them are our enemies and want our eliminationDo they?
I don't think the majority of them really engage with anything.
Obviously trauma and straights men overly represent hate crimes (since their general class position) – but I don't see how it's productive.
Coming off as just defending the society that creates that behavior – obviously not engaging with "They were just doing their jobs" shtick – like how does that thinking rationalize why Liberia had slaves, Margret Thatcher's insanity, or even just Israel.
And that thinking is clearly rejected in different contexts.
Like what makes getting angry at straight men different than palestinains getting angry at black americans for wanting to vote for Kamala?
(Also by extention feminists doing the same with men not voting for blue trump (Kamala), and begrudgingly admitting white women as well – though no one wants to call them out for advocating for sex strike since their genocidal canidate who had barely had one good policy lost).
>>609393Yeah because pre-pubesent children being raped and having permant brain damage is different from young adults being kinda kinda taken advantage.
Also, literally missed my point of not arguing for them, but rejecting the lack of arguments of why they're bad.
100% you'd be the same type of person to hear, "1st degree murder is worse than 3rd degree murder", and go, "Duhhhhh so you're pro murder?"
Do me a favor: take a shotgun, and paint the walls with your brain.
>>609378The whole "brain development"thing is failed adults projecting their past immaturity onto the current youth.
Also, allegations of "pedophilia" nowadays is just histrionics.
It's someone whose butthurt about having to share the same adult social space with someone younger.
Anon is another typical failed adult of the post-boomer era
>>609400Fucking finally someone said this.
People, especially post-boomers, think pedophilia is going after teenagers and vicenarians and will get upset when you correct them saying it's hebephilia.
They also wanna treat eighteen to twenty five as helpless infants in sex but not when it comes to violence.
>>609400>pretty much boiling down to "it's ephibephilia bro!"socialists fought hard for the concept of "childhood" to become codified in the cultural memory, we will not be "
RETVRNing" to 12 year old marriages, xXx_14CunnyWarrior88_xXx. We will not be considering that "preparing them for life". We will not be sending them to any coal mines either. If you want to make them work, send them to help at a farm, it's the most "natural" of all labours and requires the least psychological preparation to handle.
>>609409Did you even read anons post?
He's talking about how society infantilises young adults, not advocating for child labor.
Also, it was capitalists who created childhood as we know it not socialists.
Also, kids mowed lawns and washed dishes for labor for pocket money
>>609421><even though the argument is literally "they're 16 that means they're legal"Your take away from, "Children are to be trained to be adults", was, "It's okay to have sex with them"?
Like how fucking stupid do you have to be?
Do you see someone teaching a child how to boil water and call them a groomer?
Do you see someone teaching their teenager how to drive a car and call them a child rapist?
I don't know what a worse fate, death, or living on day in your shoes and I cannot kill myself.
>>609463This is LeftyPol.
They're willfully retarded.
It goes to show what I said earlier is true.
All this moral obsession about "grooming" is just projecting ones self imposed vulnerability.
That thread made on the LeftyPol board about infantilism was spot-on
Currently watching The Boyfriend. It's sooooooo cuttteeeee. I need to talk to people about it.
>>609463>>609482Children are groomed into marriage. Since you're young, you're basically trained into marriage and having children. Even in school fairs there used to be a "marriage booth". Not to mention the imposition of gender norms on fucking babies, like piercings, dresses, bowties for female babies, and pants, hats, etc for male babies. It's normalized grooming so nobody gives a shit.
>>610693Thats not grooming that's social conditioning.
Kids are not trained for marriage at least not since the twentieth century.
If anything they're coerced into gender expectations but they're not groomed.
>>609370You know what I mean. Im talking about thr obnoxious whining and entitlement to love without having any thing to bring to the table.
Its like wanting a suitcase of millions of dollars without discerning your occupation.
>>610693>trained into […] having childreni want to beat people like you with those giant inflatable mallets they have at carnivals and fairs
marriage is socially conditioned as
>>610804 already wrote, sex (and the adjacent intimacy) is a biological need that i am not surprised is often repudiated on a board such as the one we're on
as sour as the grapes are, sex is a need, children are a side effect, we do have contraceptives for that now but for the majority of human history we did not
stop turning our relative prosperity into an ideology
(genders shouldn't be enforced either, tho)
>>610693>petit-bourgeois marry because it materially benefits both parties<this is grooming! they do it against their will!It's all so tiresome.
>>610863The inevitability of being filled with radlib losers whose conception of the world centers entirely around the idea of "propaganda" or whatever the fuck.
>>610966Idealism begets expectation
Expectation begets entitlement
Entitlement begets indignation
Indignation begets insurrection
Insurrection begets reformation
Reformation begets regression
Regression begets desperation
Desperation begets idealism
Unique IPs: 27