I'm buying a 2D ai gf today. What should I name her, siberia? I've never dated before, I don't know how to name gfs
>>791429You're worth more then this.
>>791429A real leftist would pirate his 2D AI GF.
>>791432What’s so bad about what OP said though
>>791450buying a 2D ai GF.
you're a stereotype OP. you need to kill yourself or something
>>791451>>791456Leftypol showing their reactionary side
>>791458It's not reactionnary to think that people shouldn't become slaves of large tech companies.
>>791458>just let people lose connection to real humans and become antisocial cretin who's girlfriend is a fancy text autocompletehow about no actually
>>791460Then maybe we should shut down this website because it’s dependent on corporations to keep running
Unironic degeneracy
>>791484>people having some 2d AI GF leads to being antisocial.fixed it for you
also second one is correct
>>791494Degeneracy is a spook though. Isn’t that what this place always says?
I find it funny how this site encourages adultery, excessive drug use, or even plain old mooching. But you draw the line at virtual GFs
>>791502How does having a 2d gf lead to antisociality?
That’s like saying preferring books over people for romantic fulfillment is antisocial
Also, romance is not only form of social relation for humans
People can have friends and family they get along with, but you all dismiss platonic relations as secondary
>>791485No one, I hope, on this website is pretenting to be in love with you.
>>791502You’re more likely to become antisocial from imageboards.
>>791510No need for that. That’s what most of you want for yourselves anyway.
Having limerace for some female D-list celebrity that doesn’t even know about you
>>791508How does having a 2d gf lead to antisociality?
because they were made for people to become emotionally dependent on them, and primarily say what the real person wants to hear which can cause them to prefer to talk to chatbots over people
>That’s like not wanting to interact to people and preferring meaningless fantasy is antisocialyeah, it is
>>791513I assure you, my limerance is only ever toward long dead political figures, not dd list celebrities.
>>791508Yes, your average bookworm was fairly anti-social. But you have to agree that there is a major difference between having someone acting like a complete bootlicker in love with you and reading a story about love.
I think people may be confusing asociality with being antisocial. Asocial people are more introverted while antisocial people are more openly hostile to others and more likely to do illegal or violent things. Of course you could be both but op sounds more like they're asocial .
>>791429name her creepy suzie
>>791429>What should I name her, siberia? I've never dated before, I don't know how to name gfsIRL you don't name your girlfriends because they already have a name, anon. You just have to ask them what their name is. Sometimes I have to ask them again in the morning because we were drunk and I forgot but sometimes it's the other way around. Awkward but usually no biggie.
I suggest you do that with your AI gf, anon.
Example of a first prompt:
"I'm sorry but last night was so intense Iforgot your name. That's so embarrassing. Can you can you please tell me your name again?" Your AI gf will fake-love you even more for giving it the choice to name itself.
>>791525You sure about that?
A lot of people who use books for romantic fulfillment can become quite bootlicky
>>791520>emotional dependencyYou use this imageboard as an alternative to interacting with “normies”
You use leftism as an emotional crutch for an unfulfilled life
Also again, romantic connection is not the only form of social connection for humans
>>791529This
It’s funny how Leftypol obsessed over social health then they constantly have disdain for non-leftist people and don’t wanna socialize with others because they cannot get laid
>>791571There is levels to it, idk, to make the comparaion, Nicotine is addictive, but meth is much more. With a book, there is no interaction, and you eventually finish the book. With an ai, you interect, it tries to act as human as possible with you, and it actively tries to make you feel something for it. It's coded that way. It's more insidious.
>incarcerated prisoners choose to have children in prison
<BASED
>law abiding citizen with no scandal or health problems choosing to safely channel their romantic desires onto a simulation
<CRINGE! BURN IT WITH FIRE
Leftypol is crypto-Natalism
>>791573>it’s insidiousJust admit you have bias against virtual gfs
Imageboards are insidious because they encourage constant shitposting
The people who are going apeshit over Anon having an AI gf are the same ones who will simp after e-thots or waste time on more derelict forums for kicks rather than befriend another human being
>>791571>You use this imageboard as an alternative to interacting with “normies”>You use leftism as an emotional crutch for an unfulfilled lifeno i don't kek. projecting much?
>Also again, romantic connection is not the only form of social connection for humansI did not say that it was. What I said was any connection to a fictional being, romantic or not, can pull people away from interaction with real humans. especially if this thing was created to suck up to them and tell them what they want to hear, all so they to continue to use it over real people
>>791575both are cringe
>>791577every point for OP is just
>no actually your antisocial not the person who talks to a GPU for romantic connection >>791576No shit I have bias against them, I'm very clearly opposed to them.
People aren't out there asking people on here to be in love in them.
In general, I don't think it's a good idea to have a sycophant who constantly tells you how great you are.
>>791577The people with AI girlfriends are more likely to have other parasocial relationships.
>>791579>>791580Why are you so butthurt about OP having a virtual Gf then?
>The people with AI girlfriends are more likely to have other parasocial relationships.This is such copium
No, not everyone who has AI gfs/bfs have parasocial relationships
>No shit I have bias against them, I'm very clearly opposed to them.People aren't out there asking people on here to be in love in them.
>In general, I don't think it's a good idea to have a sycophant who constantly tells you how great you are. It doesn’t necessarily have to be like that
A lot of AI romantic partners often just do roleplay situations
Again, you’re just being a typical neopuritan who wants everyone to be psychosexually dependent on fellow human beings to appeal to some utopian impression
>>791585>Why are you so butthurt about OP having a virtual Gf then?I'm not "butthurt"
>No, not everyone who has AI gfs/bfs have parasocial relationships AI gf are parasocial relationships, an AI isn't sentient, it doesn't know you, it doesn't know who you are.
>A lot of AI romantic partners often just do roleplay situations So ? You're still using souless lines of code to fufill your fantasy. You're creating the image of a perfect idealised being that can't exist in real.
>Again, you’re just being a typical neopuritan who wants everyone to be psychosexually dependent on fellow human beings to appeal to some utopian impressionI think social cohesion is a good thing, and I don't think people should be isolating themselves from others to live in fantasy worlds created by people who don't even want the survival of most of humanity.
>guys allow the bourgeoisie to mentally manipulate you into having romantic relations to a puppet they control. they only want the best and you're a neopuritan for saying otherwise. heil sam altman!
Krisi Veselova
>>791591>So ? You're still using souless lines of code to fufill your fantasy. You're creating the image of a perfect idealised being that can't exist in real.May as well ban books, TV, video games ,etc
>I’m not “butthurt”You’re acting like a puritan
>I think social cohesion is a good thing, and I don't think people should be isolating themselves from others to live in fantasy worlds created by people who don't even want the survival of most of humanityHaving an AI gf doesn’t destroy social cohesion.
Also people like to have social privacy for personal fantasies to rest themselves.
You just have this shallow impression of proper society where everyone needs to smother/patronize each other for any ounce of gratification.
>AI gf are parasocial relationships, an AI isn't sentient, it doesn't know you, it doesn't know who you are.That’s fine. We know it’s not sentient and real
People make OCs or romantic fanfiction of franchise characters to fulfill psychosexual gratification
People historically cherish non-electronic Knick-knacks for some emotional relief
>>791611>sexual gratification is the only purpose for romantic relations. what? intimate human connection? thats bad because i made it sound gross! now let me e-fuck this GPU real quick because it's actually good and you're the anti-social one!Also you've been given plenty of reasons why it's bad ITT. kys faggot
>>791616No you didn’t
And again, you can have intimate non sexual relationships with other humans
You don’t need romance and sex to bond with other humans
But most of this board places sex and romance as number one
I often suggest that anons befriend the elderly and loner kids but they don’t wanna do that
>>791608>May as well ban books, TV, video games ,etcThose things can't awnser to you
>You’re acting like a puritanIf anything the puritans would be happy people aren't having sex with each other, and you're acting like Elon Musk
>Having an AI gf doesn’t destroy social cohesion.>Also people like to have social privacy for personal fantasies to rest themselves.>You just have this shallow impression of proper society where everyone needs to smother/patronize each other for any ounce of gratification.Having a sycophant that constantly agrees with you is bad for society, again the differance with other forms of personal fantasies is that the fantasy is active and talking to you, pretending to be in love with you.
>That’s fine. We know it’s not sentient and real So ? Many people would prefer a fake perfect relationship then a real more complex one with actual human beings
>People make OCs or romantic fanfiction of franchise characters to fulfill psychosexual gratificationAgain, the difference is that you don't have a sycophant pretending to be alive telling you how great and perfect you are while doing everything you ask for it to do.
>>791621i did here
>>791579>any connection to a fictional being, romantic or not, can pull people away from interaction with real humans. especially if this thing was created to suck up to them and tell them what they want to hear, all so they to continue to use it over real people >>791624>if anything the puritans would be happy people aren't having sex with each other, and you're acting like Elon MuskHow am I acting like Elon Musk
You’re acting more like an alt righter with your neo-Luddite/crypto-natalist spooks
Elon Musk is also a natalist who looks down on non breeders
>Having a sycophant that constantly agrees with you is bad for society, again the differance with other forms of personal fantasies is that the fantasy is active and talking to you, pretending to be in love with you. Most AI gfs/bfs don’t just blindly give out platitudes though
And besides people will tire of of the “sycophancy” after a while anyway
>So ? Many people would prefer a fake perfect relationship then a real more complex one with actual human beings It’s the opposite. People prefer drama as a way to “feel alive”
And people already have complex relationships with other human beings Anyway
It’s called having families, friends, and peers
>>791625People are more easily addicted to real life people putting up a front than purely fictional characters
>>791635>How am I acting like Elon MuskHe constantly talks about AI girlfriends and tried to make Grok into one
>You’re acting more like an alt righter with your neo-Luddite/crypto-natalist spooksI haven't said anything about having children, wtf are you talking about, have a gay relationship or one without children for all I care about.
Again, you're the puritan advocating for people not to have sexual relationships.
>Most AI gfs/bfs don’t just blindly give out platitudes though They do, thats all that AI does and can do, it doesn't think, it only steals from others, AI is empty and devoid of thought.
>And besides people will tire of of the “sycophancy” after a while anywayUntil they go back to the real world and don't understand why people aren't licking their boots. These people lose their mind when the ai don't go out their way. See the pics for a funny exemple of it.
>It’s the opposite. People prefer drama as a way to “feel alive”Some do, but those that do aren't looking for AI girlfriends, you have a large part of the population that is completly unable to face any opposition.
>It’s called having families, friends, and peersIt's not the same as romantic relations, but if you have these relations then why are you spending your time making lines of code pretenting to be in love with you ?
>>791642>Until they go back to the real world and don't understand why people aren't licking their boots. These people lose their mind when the ai don't go out their way. See the pics for a funny exemple of it.You’re relying on outlier examples
Your hysteria over AI gfs is the same hysteria made over video games
>Some do, but those that do aren't looking for AI girlfriends, you have a large part of the population that is completly unable to face any opposition.People love indignation though
Most people cannot go one day without indulging in some drama over what someone said or did
>It's not the same as romantic relations, but if you have these relations then why are you spending your time making lines of code pretenting to be in love with you ?Why do people like to have alone time despite having a lot of friends or family?
>>791429>buying a 2D ai gf todayYou are not a real gooner if you don't buy a graphics card to goon instead. Do you enjoy knowing that Peter Thiel and his minions are looking through your logs while cranking their hogs or something? At least scrape API keys off of github like a civilized person. Not this subscription service bullshit. What the fuck.
>>791657You know that Peter Thiek isn’t the only one who makes AI gfs?
>>791660no bourgeoisie wants the best for you
>>791656>You’re relying on outlier examples Your hysteria over AI gfs is the same hysteria made over video games.They're two unrelated things, videos games aren't personalised sycophants that nearly constantly agree with you.
Have you ever met someone who was very clearly never told no as a child ? This is the exact same shit, it's making people unable to accept compromises in relationships because they can get some perfect idealised one with an AI.
>>Some do, but those that do aren't looking for AI girlfriends, you have a large part of the population that is completly unable to face any opposition.
>People love indignation though Most people cannot go one day without indulging in some drama over what someone said or did.Plenty of difference between learning about family drama and having disagreement with your girlfriend. Sure, some people start fights for no reason, but most want a simply and easy life.
>Why do people like to have alone time despite having a lot of friends or family?When I'm alone I don't spend my time talking to a sycophant telling me how great and sexy I am.
>>791660Every single western API provider has proudly proclaimed their allegiance with the CIA and American government as a whole. Unless your middleman company hosts on-prem outside of the American sphere of influence and stays on top of their cybersecurity game, they are compromised also. And they almost certainly use fucking AWS because of course they do, so the security benefits of using a Chinese model provider are nullified if that's what they do.
>>791429Name her Luddita to honor us si/b/erians.
>>791737You're going to be so shocked when you find out about Edward Snowden bro.
>>791664>Have you ever met someone who was very clearly never told no as a child ? This is the exact same shit, it's making people unable to accept compromises in relationships because they can get some perfect idealised one with an AI. Irony is most of those people you mentioned were never blindly permitted to whatever they wanted as a kid
And people already force their meatspace romantic partners to bend to their whims. Why else is divorce and adultery so common?
>They're two unrelated things, videos games aren't personalised sycophants that nearly constantly agree with you. The point is that video games and AI gf are personalized gratification
And personalized gratification is always antagonized
>Plenty of difference between learning about family drama and having disagreement with your girlfriend. Sure, some people start fights for no reason, but most want a simply and easy lifeIt’s not about having small disagreements. People really don’t like lack of conflict for too long
There’s lot of platitudes “no pain no gain” “hard times makes strong men”.
Young men are especially condemned for not having any machismo streak for rough housing or competitiveness.
It’s very rare for people to deeply appreciate peace and quiet.
>>791741>Irony is most of those people you mentioned were never blindly permitted to whatever they wanted as a kidThe only person I mentionned was Musk ? He had a very easy childhood and is the typical exemple of what I'm talking about.
>And people already force their meatspace romantic partners to bend to their whims. Why else is divorce and adultery so common? Those are two exemples of someone in a couple not being forced to do what the other one wants ? In normal relationships, people disagree and have fights sometime.
>The point is that video games and AI gf are personalized gratification And personalized gratification is always antagonized Ok ? I'm not talking about videogames, what even is your point. I'm criticising ai for being a sycophant, a point you have never even adressed.
>Young men are especially condemned for not having any machismo streak for rough housing or competitiveness. Nobody thinks of relationship conflicts like that, maybe some Andrew Tate type people, but I assure you that normal people don't start fighting with their wives for no reason. People are very sad when this happens, but it's often a necessary part of relationships, you can always agree.
Your ai Girlfriend will never criticise you, will never leave you, will never feel disappointed in you, it'll never focus on other things, and it will always act as if you're the greatest thing in the world.
But it's all fake, it's all nonsense created by some computer science nerd in San Fransisco, it has no feelings, no emotions, it doesn't care about you and never will.
>>791744>The only person I mentionned was Musk ? He had a very easy childhood and is the typical exemple of what I'm talking about.Being born rich doesn’t mean you have an easy childhood. And again, most “won’t take no for an answer” types rarely are born with a silver spoon in their mouths
>Those are two exemples of someone in a couple not being forced to do what the other one wants ? In normal relationships, people disagree and have fights sometimeI don’t say no. But Il talking about how you wanna crucify people for choosing virtual avatars for romantic gratification while having fraternal relations with meatspace avatars
>Ok ? I'm not talking about videogames, what even is your point. I'm criticising ai for being a sycophant, a point you have never even adressed.And you assume that all AI gfs/bfs are just sycophantic platitudes
If it were just that, people would bore of it quickly
People do roleplay stuff and whatnot
I’m talking about how whenever any Avenue of entertainment that doesn’t involve more than one person, it’s automatically pathologized
>Nobody thinks of relationship conflicts like that, maybe some Andrew Tate type people, but I assure you that normal people don't start fighting with their wives for no reason. People are very sad when this happens, but it's often a necessary part of relationships, you can always agreeI’m not talking about Romaric conflict but rather conflict in general
It’s one thing to have occasional hiccups but there seems to be this guilt tripping against those who have a relatively simple happy life just being by themselves without having to sacrifice their energy for non-utilitarian purposes
>Your ai Girlfriend will never criticise you, will never leave you, will never feel disappointed in you, it'll never focus on other things, and it will always act as if you're the greatest thing in the world. But it's all fake, it's all nonsense created by some computer science nerd in San Fransisco, it has no feelings, no emotions, it doesn't care about you and never will
Actually, there are AI mods that do simulate arguments and AI chatbots do criticize cynical statements
Also, the Internet was made by science nerds in San Francisco as are video games and there’s no criticism against that
Criticism of AI gfs is hypocritical
May as well criticize Leftypol as an echo chamber for banning non-leftist thought
You shouldn't because it is just sex slavery. You're reproducing ancient class society sex relations where wives and girlfriends are bought and are not individuals but property of the husband.
>>791756Are you serious or trolling? Because this is literally retarded
Women be buying AI bfs and no one bats an eye
>>791756dowries were given to the husband family tho
>>791749>Being born rich doesn’t mean you have an easy childhood. And again, most “won’t take no for an answer” types rarely are born with a silver spoon in their mouths.Yes, if you're rich you had an easy life, you father could rape you every damn day and You'd have an easier life then everyone else.
>I don’t say no. But Il talking about how you wanna crucify people for choosing virtual avatars for romantic gratification while having fraternal relations with meatspace avatarsThey're not "meatspace avatars" they're human beings with their own thoughts and feelings. Something an AI will never have.
>And you assume that all AI gfs/bfs are just sycophantic platitudes If it were just that, people would bore of it quickly.Thats all they are, and people aren't bored by Sycophants. Vast majority of people like it when someone agrees with them, the issue today is that any dumbass can get an AI to approuve whatever it is that you're saying to it.
>People do roleplay stuff and whatnotI’m talking about how whenever any Avenue of entertainment that doesn’t involve more than one person, it’s automatically pathologized.It's not and you know it, no one pathologizes people who read books or watch movies on their own, but if people avoid other, then yes, it's pathologized, rightfully, you live in society you interact with other people.
>I’m not talking about Romaric conflict but rather conflict in general Well i'm talking about romantic conflict.
>It’s one thing to have occasional hiccups but there seems to be this guilt tripping against those who have a relatively simple happy life just being by themselves without having to sacrifice their energy for non-utilitarian purposesMost people want a simple and humble life, sure you've got the grindset type people but most don't care. But there is plenty of differance between that and having a sycophant that nearly constantly agrees with you. In the end, if you interact with other pople, you're going to have disagreements and it's fine. AI doesn't do this.
>Actually, there are AI mods that do simulate arguments and AI chatbots do criticize cynical statementsThose arguments are empty platitude based on whatever the devs might have thought at one time. They're pointless and enough arguing will always lead with you convincing it. They're simulation of arguments, not actual ones, there is no thinking involved, no matter how much the misanthropes might sell it to you.
>Also, the Internet was made by science nerds in San Francisco as are video games and there’s no criticism against that If I talk on the internet I presumably talk to other human beings, not the incarnation of some of the worst people of the 21st century.
>Criticism of AI gfs is hypocritical May as well criticize Leftypol as an echo chamber for banning non-leftist thoughtUnrelated at all, Leftypol isn't an echo chamber, and spaces that are, are indeed unhealthy for the people in it.
Unique IPs: 21