[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1780948005491.png (4.68 MB, 2072x1379, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Everyone agrees that humans should behave better than animals, and as we know animals for the most part only practice sexual intercourse to procreate, therefore one cannot be behave better than animals, while engaging in non-procreative sexual acts

Animals do non procreative sex as well
Humans are also animals as well

how is non-procreative sex worse than procreative sex?

>>791601
this logic is retarded

>humans should behave better (i.e. differently) than animals, therefore we shouldn't do X, because animals don't do X
Most galaxy-brained conservative.

but have you considered that this dosen't necessarily make none procreative intercourse morally wrong?

>>791606
Leftypol has become rabidly pro-natalist ever since COVID ended

>>791604
This
If anything it’s more ethical
Lots of procreative sex ends up with kids that most people don’t properly raise

>>791618
this is good

>>791618
The smart pro-natalist position would be to encourage as much non-procreative sex as possible, because the contraception will fail at least some of the time.

>>791618
I wonder if it's because the user base got older? Not that wanting to have children necessarily makes you mature but maybe more like some kind of mid or quarter age crisis.

>>791604
Because it's done merely for pleasure, and takes away man's focus from higher things, just look at the state of society today, to see what happens when people orient themselves to chasing pleasure. If everyone only had sex for procreation, then there would be no STIs, rape, abuse to women, sexual deviancy, looksmaxxing, incels, &c, &c. Ideally you wouldn't have sex at all, but without it, the human race couldn't continue

>>791641
>Because it's done merely for pleasure
And?
>If everyone only had sex for procreation, then there would be no STIs, rape, abuse to women, sexual deviancy, looksmaxxing, incels, &c, &c
You are woefully uninformed on both history and biology. Aside from "sexual deviancy" (lol) all of these things can be and have been attached to sex for procreation.
>Ideally you wouldn't have sex at all
BAHAHAHA okay man.

>>791638
This
It may also be because they feel persecuted over right wingers suggesting biotechnology for procreational efficiency

>>791641
The irony is people today are having far less sex than before
It’s not recreational sex that’s the problem
It’s just that people are miserable from FOMO

>>791645
This.
Most of our negative social consequence of sex were more prominent from a time where procreative sex was promoted as a maturity license

>>791637
A smart pro natalist country would have mandatory gene testing and consequential gene therapy to diminish likelihood of developmental disorders

>Everyone agrees that humans should behave better than animals
Taxonomical kingdom is a cell structure descriptor
Humans are not plants, fungus (except lenin), or single celled organisms.
>and as we know animals for the most part only practice sexual intercourse to procreate
Animals have sex because it feels good


Unique IPs: 8

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]