>>17721>driver supportAnd how did it come to be?
>>notifications, moving iconsi>Phone had them from the start
Not true for moving icons, didn't become a thing untli 1.1.3, and notifications I admit I wrote the comment wrong. I was talking about notification center, something android 1.0 had, but not ios 1.0 (took until 5.0).
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history
>>store to download new apps>It was always planned, and was a natural extension of iTunes. Then the concept of a phone app store is not an apple inovation, making them a copier.
>Like the "risk" they took by copying the mouse from Xeroz? >This has nothing to do with the development of the iPhone, but since you mentioned it: Yes, Apple made significant improvements to Xerox's early GUIs, Bill Atkinson's clever programming that allowed macs to refresh unfocused windows being the major one. Xerox failed because they sat on their asses and even went backwards (tiling windows), what else can I say? The fact that apple copied then despite it being famously associated with apple? Or also the fact that innovations like moving apps and having a app store were also not apple innovations but are confused as?
>A team of computer scientists did a comparison of widely-used modern kernels, including proprietary ones (code was reviewed under an NDA) and there was no discrepancy in either code quality or performanceSource?
Also to comment
>>seething anger you have towards linux>Nice try. I have been mostly polite while linux enthusiasts have made some pretty deranged posts. In all the comments (from I'm assuming are yours, no trip codes to work off of and not interested in asking a mod) you post, (including this one), you always interject an insult dogmatically presented as a fact. It's also clear that you're not operating on the slightest of good faith arguing, take a look at this comment:
>Linux's so-called "lightness" comes form austerity — once you have a full-featured distro that desktop users will want to use, it's just as "heavy" as any other OS. First off, complete rubbish, just a basic search of the space required for windows 11 and linux mint for instance gets you 20gbs+ vs 8gbs respectively.
Second the argument falls under the equivocation fallacy. The original comment was talking about linux in the casual usage of an os that uses the linux kernel, and instead in an interest to attack linux you try to flip it as me talking about the other usage which is just talking about it as a kernel. Which is ironic since (I'm also assuming you're the same poster from
>>16692), you got angry over people posting the copypasta of gnu+linux, stating "I call that POS OS whatever I want to. And I call you a drooling autist. ". It doesn't matter what you call those operating systems, unless I can make it look bad, then I'll play the role of the "drooling autist". (Even if you're not the same person from that thread, if you were actually nice then you would've engaged in good faith and not throw insults).
Also not that anon
>>17722, but good comments .