>>18721his point is that some abstractions that trade performance for maintainability are not worth it
that thought alone is rather worthless, but the video, although it doesn't addresses it explicitly, points to a more important question:
>are our tools smart enough that we can write high-level code and expect the end product to be good?they obviously aren't but the materials conditions are so, that producing and adopting better software isn't economically viable
>does this mean that we have reached a point where capitalism is obstructing the development of the means of production?idk