Hello lads, I'm looking to start a conversation on a topic that's been popping up alot recently, and will likely develop further as the technology gains more adoption. As I'm sure you know, robotic dogs from the likes of Boston Dynamics are being rolled out at police departments and military bureaus across the US, and I'd bet we see widescale adoption as the technology is fleshed out further.
So as a result, I'd like to start a conversation on the best feasible means, both expensive and DIY, to deal with these fuckers. With the advent of home-based 3D printing, easily accessible lasers, and other modern user tech, I believe there are a number of options available to us.
In the resistance against drones being used by the police in Chile, Argentina and now in Portland, lasers were used to incapacitate drone dogs during protests. However, this incapacitation *only* makes these dogs unusable at that single protest; any police department will simply repair their $75k digidog and send it back at the next protest. So, what I'm interested in is ways to make them *inoperable* for extended periods of time, whether physically or electronically. I was bouncing around the idea of somehow using very strong magnets to damage the internal electronics, but this may be unfeasible due to the size of magnet that would be needed. Other options that seem viable would be permanently damaging the optics being used by the dogs, but I'm not sure on the best option for this. As such, I'd like to open this to conversation. I'll be posting this thread here, as well as on a few other imageboards that may be interested and able to help in this discussion.
This was a mistake, lasers were used to disable flying drones, not drone dogs.
Just throw is in a trash can or cut its legs, it’s made of somewhat delicate motors and stuff.
Tie it to a pole with a rope to make it funny instead of scary. Take a picture and title it: Terminator defeated by a string.
Kidnap all the drone dogs while carrying a decent signal jammer, assuming they just operate over 3/4G or has with GPS tracking.
You got water?
What do these actually do?
>>7839>Implying the chassis isn't waterproof for a robot that's supposed to walk around outdoors
Think you mean lighter fluid or vid related>>7833
This could be a good idea actually
How much does it weigh?
Kidnap one, then have an outrageous ISIS-style propaganda execution in a livestream.
throw a net on it and be done with it
pray you don't run into one with a gun mounted on it
>>7844>pray you don't run into one with a gun mounted on it
What the fuck, are there any of these in operation right now? How could anyone think this is normal?
That one was made to troll Boston Dynamics and put a dampener on their cutesy robot shtick.
>>7843>>7847>steal a police drone>hack it with an aimbot trained to target cops only
i'm not ready to learn the ways to neturalize the robot cop dogs man
I DON'T WANT TO LEARN
WHEN WILL THE LEARNING END. IT'S NOT FUN. IT'S NOT FUN
set them on fire
basic undead stuff
>>9667>Watch old series of Robot Wars for inspiration.
I did that.>Hypno-Disc looks like it could take out a robot dog.
Holy shit could you imagine the comical relieve from seeing a militarized police robot toy getting disassembled in half a second after it touches the spinning disk.
throw it in a lake.
How about smoke, could that screw up the sensors on the device?
What about covert methods to disable these pricy toys?
Guns would draw the attention from the officers if they were used to disable these robots.
event paintball guns may work if it has optical sensors
then theyll just install little eye wipers…
paint isn't that easy to scrape off by simple wipers thoughanarcha-feminismAnarcha-Feminism
I’ve never wanted to violently destroy something more than these disgusting fucking robots
>>14353>George Soros funded street thugs will fight against government robots
Someone is not paying attention.>>9667>idk how they would deal with it apart from running away.
At some point someone will turn up to jam the radio receiver.
>>14355>At some point someone will turn up to jam the radio receiver.
With current AI optics at some point someone will figure how to camouflage themselves from the AI meaning the AI won't see them as a human but just a background object to ignore thus won't automatically target them.
>>7827>In the resistance against drones being used by the police in Chile, Argentina and now in Portland, lasers were used to incapacitate drone dogs during protests.
…There are drone dogs in Argentina and Chile?
Make ukrainian gachimuchi but with drone dogs
>>14370>With current AI optics…
It doesn't look like you're that familiar with machine learning. The model is constantly updating as the system gathers information and encounters new situations. So even if you find a way to avoid being recognized as a target today, it might correct itself tomorrow. Don't stake your life on unpredictable machine learning models.
Usually the embedded device doesn't update the model itself since the automaton lacks the processing power to do and that data is fed into a data centre and update rolled out through a server. So it would be possible to test to see if you are camouflaged by observing how a robot reacts when not aggressive (I.E will walk right into you as it doesn't see you as a solid object till it detects it physically ran into something) then it should be that way before a update roll-out.
>>14355>antifa is George Soros
back to /pol/
Just kick it
Unique IPs: 7