Search

>>33684
/GET/ doesn't count and you're shifting goalposts. It's also amusing that you use old as fuck data from the .xyz bunkerchan, but not the data from the .org version that was transferred over to.
>Do the maths, you'll end up with over 3000 posts per day on average over the year.
This is Black Book of Communism tier "math" because there absolutely was NOT 3000 PPD on bunkerchan.
This is the data from a random day in 2019, it's 45 PPH in that instance, because PPH fluctuates, and this is PPH for the entire site. Current PPH today is 87 PPH, and other days in 2020 are roughly 100 PPH for the entire site. So yes, it's not a significant drop.
https://web.archive.org/web/20191001233538/http://bunkerchan.xyz/
Your claim is nothing more than cherrypicking to fit your narrative. Eat shit.

>see someone randomly using all-caps in a rant towards a few strawman arguments
What the actual fuck are you on about? Capslock as cruise control isn't when you only make one word completely Capitalized, its when you write a sentence in all caps, you retard.
>No-one complained about things being slow
Whenever people bring up merging existing boards because they're not as big as siberia or leftypol, or as you put it "dominates" is implicitly talking about them being slow and less active than the main board. Don't be obtuse.
>half of them are so dead they'd benefit from not being separate boards with almost no casual exposure
I disagree.
>doing that again with a new /lgbt/ board in the current situation would be pretty silly
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>33409
based, if you're in favor of the /nsfw/ board pls vote for it: https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7
>>32210
<we need to attract everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yes
>why are you faggots so fucking election-brained
a revolution also needs <everyone

I disagree with OP's reasons, but I think that an /nsfw/ board should be made. I initially disagreed with an NSFW board, but my opinion has changed with time and 'study'.

I think porn threads like my muscle-girl thread or futa thread or the Alunya and Grace Fanfic thread(s). should be moved to a separate board because, like 4/b/, other topics sink NSFW threads too quickly. This is especially the case because /siberia/ is the target of a lot of spam, meaning that threads don't get the posting speed they should get, so catalog shifts very quickly because between actual good threads there are myriads of typical /b/-stuff; shitty OPs, random topics, schizophrenic shitpost rants etc. that are technically si/b/eria material but also mean threads of NSFW basis that have more effort, nuance or material get sunk as posting isn't rapid-fire there.

Finally, to use OP's logic, if I wanna look at porn or sexual topics, I don't wanna look at political schizo-posts and lame memes that kill boners. I don't wanna look at a dozen schizoshit posts I don't care about when opening catalog to find a specific thread

SO TO CONCLUDE: PLEASE MAKE AN /NSFW/ BOARD DEV-MODS!!!

>>32715
> every other month someone asks the mods here to make a separate /nsfw/ board.
There has been 1 such request

>>32701
>>32704
One of the new commie alt-sites has just put 'no porn' in their rules, and every other month someone asks the mods here to make a separate /nsfw/ board. It's real and people notice it.
We haven't reached /pol/ level NSFW/goreporn posting yet, leftypol is at least SFW on the image side of things, but that sex-obsession culture has definitely been normalized and it is a bit fukken boring.
And before anyone accuses me of being a prude, my yiff art is on MSG.

>>31837
/nsfw/ would be more flexible than /porn/ tho. Porn mostly implies live action, and not all nsfw content could even be considered pornographic in a strict sense, take the /paws/ and tf sequence threads for example.

>>31834
>I think the hypthetical /nsfw/ board would be about as active as /tech/

There should be LESS boards, in fact. This type of multiple divisions is useless and makes this place feel abandoned

>>31831
This is a general purpose imageboard prominently featuring a leftist political discussion forum, and rules that are conductive to that which apply to all boards, creating a novel environment to discuss a wide range of topics. Particularly art, which one must allow nsfw content to get a full picture of.

Your argument holds for live action stuff, since there's not really anything to discuss there–exceptions would need to be made for artistic nudity, as well as a clearly defined way to differ it from porn–but you're being disingenuous trying to pretend there is such thing a hard political / apolitical dichotomy–that there cannot be useful discussions that emerge from the later into the former, and you are being immature by calling it gross or calling any who engage in such gross in doing so.

>>31833
I think the hypthetical /nsfw/ board would be about as active as /tech/, given current nsfw activity on /siberia/, while the remaining activity would put it on par with /leftypol/. It'd be fine. Don't most people here use the overboard anyway?

>>31789
sex and porn are two different things, sex isn't pornographic, it's the act. being normal about sex would make sense if it were IRL in a nightclub, which is a completely different thing from doing it on an internet forum, which is like sitting in a chair and typing/posting content, completely different. sorry to break the fourth wall/immersion of this site for a moment there.
>puritanism
puritanism is a religious thing and this site isn't religious in the slightest, neither am I.
>>31794
pls lets keep it respectful, the anon actually gave a honest opinion here



>>31805
the raiders would disobey that though, actually I think the raiders would do it regardless of anything put into practice anyways… but I think this >>31803 approach would be better since people inside /nsfw/ wouldn't have to worry/learn about spoiling their posts, it would be easier to moderate too(but the raiders would simply post gore or whatever anywhere anyways…)



also vote for the /nsfw/ board everyone!! :
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7

>>31792
I think it would be better if porn was only visible inside the /nsfw/ board, but outside of it like in overboard/catalog, the images of /nsfw/ would be all spoiled or posts would be hidden+spoiled so that people would have to actively have the /nfsw/ board tab open to be able to see porn on this site instead of relying on the overboard in which posts of /nsfw/ would either be hidden or completely spoiled outside of /nsfw/.

HOT-TAKE LEFTYPOL NEEDS TO HEAR BUT IT'S ACTUALLY A FACT:



It actually excludes/distances ace(asexual) people ( https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Asexual ) from your site if you don't have porn separated in a safe manner like in a /nsfw/ board, so that people will only see porn if they want to, and not on accident.

shouldn't a leftist forum be inclusive? because having porn everywhere is actually a way of excluding ace(asexual) people from this site(ace people that does not want to only talk about politics in /leftypol/ but also visit the rest of the site like /siberia/ and etc)

it should be inclusive for both people that does like porn and for people that dislike porn as well.

this is real constructive criticism, no jokes.

>>31784
>>31783
no but jokes aside, banning porn would be bad for the people that like it and it is not the point, the point is making a /nsfw/ board so that they can have their own space for porn, it's not a form of banning it nope, it is a form of separating it from people that like porn and from people that dislike porn.

>>31742
>many of the most active threads are dedicated porn dumps
this is more than enough reason for a /nsfw/ board to exist. alright I'm making a poll.
VOTE if leftypol should have a /NSFW/ board:
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7

>>31744
I think I overexagerated there
>>31743
>While I'm in favor of a /nsfw/ simply because there's enough threads to justify it's own board
true true
>Sex positivity, and especially kink positivity is like citronella candles, keeping the chvds and corps away.
I'm not against none of that and all of this is good for the people that enjoy this stuff, hence why I'm not against it BUT I think they should have their own space for it, to separate it from people who do not want to engage in those threads and from people who get genuinely disgusted, it would be better for both sides that like porn and dislike porn
>>31745
>it's reactionary to be disgusted
bro stfu

>>31739
>It's le gross
While I'm in favor of a /nsfw/ simply because there's enough threads to justify it's own board, this however is a stupid excuse for it, and probably a reason to keep things as is.
Sex positivity, and especially kink positivity is like citronella candles, keeping the chvds and corps away. You might not like the smell of citronella, but at least you aren't being mosquito bitten as much.