THE BEST SUGGESTION THIS SITE WILL EVER HAVE:
PLEASE MAKE A /NSFW/ BOARD TO SEPARATE THE PORN THREADS FROM SIBERIA, IT'S DISGUSTING!!!! it's disgusting specially for people who visit /siberia/ for other threads such as the royal colony(doesn't matter if it's has softcore porn in it, it is ignorable and it is mainly for aesthetical/memey purposes anyways) and also other threads as well.
I feel like the mods have to bleach their eyes everytime they have to moderate siberia and see a goatsee equivalent every nanosecond there. mods, do yourselves a favor if you value your eyes lol.
thanks for listening to my honest REACTION of visiting siberia
>>31739>It's le grossWhile I'm in favor of a /nsfw/ simply because there's enough threads to justify it's own board, this however is a stupid excuse for it, and probably a reason to keep things as is.
Sex positivity, and especially kink positivity is like citronella candles, keeping the chvds and corps away. You might not like the smell of citronella, but at least you aren't being mosquito bitten as much.
>>317441. Why are you sex repulsed, consider if your reasons are reactionary in nature. The way you worded it suggest they are
2. Why do you feel like framing your suggestion through such language is going to help get your suggestion get approved, knowing this is a leftist website?
>>31744I think I overexagerated there
>>31743>While I'm in favor of a /nsfw/ simply because there's enough threads to justify it's own boardtrue true
>Sex positivity, and especially kink positivity is like citronella candles, keeping the chvds and corps away.I'm not against none of that and all of this is good for the people that enjoy this stuff, hence why I'm not against it BUT I think they should have their own space for it, to separate it from people who do not want to engage in those threads and from people who get genuinely disgusted, it would be better for both sides that like porn and dislike porn
>>31745>it's reactionary to be disgustedbro stfu
>>31745also
>>31744 was an overreaction, sorry… I guess?
also ever heard of (
https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Asexual?so=search ) ?
>>31747no the royal colony is okay lets be serious
>>31748>asexualAh okie. While not all asexual people are sex repulsed, I do agree it would help with accessibility to have it in a dedicated board for those that are.
I suppose my response was also an overreaction, so likewise I apologize.
>>31750thanks my dude, I apologize as well
>>31751>thread hiding functionbut I would have to see the thread first beforehand
>catalogbut the pictures there aren't spoilered(only if OP/mods spoils it) + it's only overboard with recent posts
>>31754it is not
>>31756except it's a satire thread and not a serious political one? can your brain process that difference? do I need to state that I'm marxist-leninist?
>maybe you should simp for her too!how bout you do it? those who even think about simping is BETA as fuck lol, like c'mon get outta here.
also I only used the royal colony as an example, I could have used literally any other thread as an example if it came to mind first.
>>31752>>31753>but I would have to see the thread first beforehandYes but then it would never appear to you after that. You also don't have to see the entire thread, only the spoilered OP.
>but the pictures there aren't spoileredSee above. You only need to look and click near the spoilered OP post.
>it's only overboard with recent postsYou can use the catalog on overboard.
>>31759>>31759>Yes but then it would never appear to you after that. You also don't have to see the entire thread, only the spoilered OP.but it's too late. my eyes, already scorched by the images that only bleach would be able to remove its burning image from my retinas.
>See above. You only need to look and click near the spoilered OP post.I mean, it isn't 100% reliable since luck also comes into play since there could be one OP post not yet spoilered in time by a mod when accessing the catalog, because sometimes some OPs won't spoil their posts
>You can use the catalog on overboard.I know
>>31745Hey you, can you do "customer support" here on /meta/?
I'll double your wage.
>>31768So that means you are saying blablabla. Cease your instinctual whining.
Just off the cuff.
Monarchy is devoid of moral implications. It's neither good nor bad. There have been good tyrants and bad tyrants.
It is pretty easy to see that nazism and racism are a moral bad.
>>31768>So a nazi general thread is allowed if the nazi acts "like a normal person"?NO
>How about a Ku Klux Klan general next with normal posters next?NO
>Or a Banderista normal thread?uh what even is that?
bruh you literally can't comprehend when something is
satire like the grace threads on siberia, grow up
>>31771why not just use a terminal web browser like elinks? it's a text based browser but i dunno if it will be able to make a post on this site, but it's also lame since you have to use mpv –vo=tct –loop <link-to-image> in another tty to make images barely visible with ascii characters simulating the pixels of the images
>>31772During summer & fall when the CP / soyjak spam gets more frequent, or when some filetype related news made me resent the existence of .webp, I would toggle off .webp in my about:config, which also hid thumbnails on here.
Firefox likes to remove security stuff though, so after the webp vulnerability caused a lot of people to disable webp, they removed the option to force people to use webp again.
>>31742>many of the most active threads are dedicated porn dumpsthis is more than enough reason for a /nsfw/ board to exist. alright I'm making a poll.
VOTE if leftypol should have a /NSFW/ board:
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7 >>31775also vpn/tor/etc voting is disabled as it would probably be exploited I think
>>31776I mean it's just for showing what leftypol wants
and it kind of does change stuff depending on where you live, in the US it doesn't change anything at all but other places it does change things, although not radically of course
>>31778yeah no I tested and tor voting is possible even with the disable vpn option
>>31779more like "GIVE THEM A BOARD"
it would be a W for everyone
don't forget to vote! :
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7now I am busy studying for tests and this would be considered procrastination so bye lol
>>31787the internet would be way less disgusting if porn didn't exist, banning it would be better but some people like these uh… "images" that make one bleach their eyes at the retina layer
these "images" are like virtual ipecacs, and we all know what ipecac does to someone's stomach lol
>>31787see
>>31743Sharing nsfw art is a sign of a community that is capable of being normal about sex without devolving into puritainism (aka the root of anti-intellectualism, which itself is the root of reactionism)
I would agree we could ban or limit photographic / videographic porn without losing much tho.
>>31789>being normal about sexSaying that about porn LOL
Anyway, why not have an alternative CSS for viewing (no matter which board) so that all pictures are empty rectangles that only become pictures on hover?
>>31792>LOLNot an arguement.
>>31793Porn isn't allowed on /leftypol/, this is about /siberia/ and the /alt/ boards.
HOT-TAKE LEFTYPOL NEEDS TO HEAR BUT IT'S ACTUALLY A FACT:
It actually excludes/distances ace(asexual) people (
https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Asexual ) from your site if you don't have porn separated in a safe manner like in a /nsfw/ board, so that people will only see porn if they want to, and not on accident.
shouldn't a
leftist forum be inclusive? because having porn everywhere is actually a way of excluding ace(asexual) people from this site(ace people that does not want to only talk about politics in /leftypol/ but also visit the rest of the site like /siberia/ and etc)
it should be inclusive for both people that does like porn and for people that dislike porn as well.
this is real constructive criticism, no jokes.
>>31800>quit pushing this asexuality = hyper-disgust memeexcept I'm not? where did you even assume that from? my reaction is one thing, don't generalize my reaction like wtf
>[rest of the reply]…and yes, both asexuals and sexuals can be disgusted just as much, the difference is that one feels sexual attraction and the other does not, your point?(P.S: you don't need to state the obvious).
and it is not even my point at all, it is not about being grossed out or not, it is about the exclusion. which… you are kind of doing right now…
and saying that someone would literally not get affected after seeing hardcore porn is just blasphemy, if it was softcore then it would make sense for someone to not be affected. like stfu
>>31739No, not a nsfw board.
All explicit images should be spoilered though.
>>31789sex and porn are two different things, sex isn't pornographic, it's the act. being normal about sex would make sense if it were IRL in a nightclub, which is a completely different thing from doing it on an internet forum, which is like sitting in a chair and typing/posting content, completely different. sorry to break the fourth wall/immersion of this site for a moment there.
>puritanismpuritanism is a religious thing and this site isn't religious in the slightest, neither am I.
>>31794pls lets keep it respectful, the anon actually gave a honest opinion here
>>31805the raiders would disobey that though, actually I think the raiders would do it regardless of anything put into practice anyways… but I think this
>>31803 approach would be better since people inside /nsfw/ wouldn't have to worry/learn about spoiling their posts, it would be easier to moderate too(but the raiders would simply post gore or whatever anywhere anyways…)
also vote for the /nsfw/ board everyone!! :
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7 >>31801>it is about the exclusionSince you agreed that not every assxual would be repulsed by porn, then your complaint here doesn't make sense. The presence of something cannot be exclusionary unless it's offending, unlike the absence of something. It would be exclusionary if /siberia/ was a pure porn board, and likewise if it was a SFW board. But it isn't either of these.
This is the basic assumptive rationale for why every /b/ on imageboards allow both categories of porn and non-porn posts btw. I can't believe I have to spell this out loud since it's assumed everyone knows it.
>>31807If a site is distancing people away because they're getting absolutely disgusted isn't exclusionary then idk what is.
like ok sure not all ace people are repulsed by porn, but I am, and literally anyone that isn't somehow desensitized (probably by watching porn frequently + also someone must feel sexual attraction to do that in the first place) would be grossed out by hardcore porn, so it is still exclusionary. it does make sense to also include ace people on my complaint because you literally have to be somehow desensitized from watching hardcore porn in the first place(like why would you do that?).
>>31824OMG SO MUCH WINNING OMG OH SHIT
SO MUCH WINNINGGN!!!!1!
>>31826>you make us look badAcceptability politics always seems to re-emerge in spring.
I wonder why I noticed that? Is seasonal discourse a thing people've written about?
>>31831This is a general purpose imageboard prominently featuring a leftist political discussion forum, and rules that are conductive to that which apply to all boards, creating a novel environment to discuss a wide range of topics. Particularly art,
which one must allow nsfw content to get a full picture of.Your argument holds for live action stuff, since there's not really anything to discuss there–exceptions would need to be made for artistic nudity, as well as a clearly defined way to differ it from porn–but you're being disingenuous trying to pretend there is such thing a hard political / apolitical dichotomy–that there cannot be useful discussions that emerge from the later into the former, and you are being immature by calling it gross or calling any who engage in such gross in doing so.
>>31833I think the hypthetical /nsfw/ board would be about as active as /tech/, given current nsfw activity on /siberia/, while the remaining activity would put it on par with /leftypol/. It'd be fine. Don't most people here use the overboard anyway?
>>31835I mean sure it's novel to see the bump order popcorn around for a while, but on the other end you get stuff like 4chan where a thread can fall into the void in like 5 minutes and no one bothers to effortpost.
Maybe you could have like, a tag based imageboard-booru hybrid, but that would be a whole different experience from using an imageboard proper.
>>31757>>31772>satireit's not satire>>31739/siberia/ is the leftypol version of /b/.
NSFW content has typically been allowed on /b/.
>>31756Grace is an adopted leftypol OC.
+ I contribute to the siteSo I earned my stay.
>>32202i'm inclined to disagree on both fronts, there's no correlation for the former and it's not common enough for the latter to be true. if we really wanted to drive off channers it would be far down the list of things to try.
even then: you don't
want to drive off channers, you want to bring them in (with the wider appeal of the site as a better discussion board than *chans) while stripping the site itself of fealty to "chan culture", leaving behind a growing site independent of western imageboard culture at large.
remember: a website shapes its userbase far more than vice versa.
I disagree with OP's reasons, but I think that an /nsfw/ board should be made. I initially disagreed with an NSFW board, but my opinion has changed with time and 'study'.
I think porn threads like my muscle-girl thread or futa thread or the Alunya and Grace Fanfic thread(s). should be moved to a separate board because, like 4/b/, other topics sink NSFW threads too quickly. This is especially the case because /siberia/ is the target of a lot of spam, meaning that threads don't get the posting speed they should get, so catalog shifts very quickly because between actual good threads there are myriads of typical /b/-stuff; shitty OPs, random topics, schizophrenic shitpost rants etc. that are technically si/b/eria material but also mean threads of NSFW basis that have more effort, nuance or material get sunk as posting isn't rapid-fire there.
Finally, to use OP's logic, if I wanna look at porn or sexual topics, I don't wanna look at political schizo-posts and lame memes that kill boners. I don't wanna look at a dozen schizoshit posts I don't care about when opening catalog to find a specific thread
SO TO CONCLUDE: PLEASE MAKE AN /NSFW/ BOARD DEV-MODS!!!
>>33409based, if you're in favor of the /nsfw/ board pls vote for it:
https://strawpoll.com/1MnwOVG35n7>>32210<we need to attract everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!yes
>why are you faggots so fucking election-braineda revolution also needs <everyone
>>33448>siberia is just a dumping board and traffic doesn't matter<but I don't want it to be splitSome threads are made on siberia because other boards are /sfw/ you idiot, not because they're actually /siberia/ dump content.
>create a second dumping board. Nobody is asking for a second dumping board, you're misrepresenting the question.
>>33453>Some threads are made on siberia because other boards are /sfw/ Yeah, take the hint.
And you are exactly asking for a second dump board if you want a smut one. Think before posting, retard.
Unique IPs: 26