Search Search is case-insensitive and based on keywords. To match exact phrases, use "quotes". Use an asterisk (*) for wildcard.
You may apply the following filters to your searches: id , thread , subject , name , flag and board (as an alternative syntax). To apply a filter, simply add to your query, for example, name:Anonymous or subject:"Some Thread" . The id , thread and board filters do not support wildcards.
60 results in /siberia/ - Off-topic Anonymous 27-07-25 16:16:52 No. 692629
>>692516 Granted the guy left a bad impression but femanon here is being histrionic.
And these femanons are the same ones whom are broke, no cooking skills, no grace, etc.
Anonymous 26-07-25 20:52:08 No. 692326
>>692230 Fucking this
It's ironic that as kids, we are the only ones able to see people as all the same.
It's only when adults tell us "no you cannot do this, it's immature" that we start stereotyping/compartmentalising others.
>>692259 Coping with aging.
Most older women are not as graceful not good looking as society stereotypes them as.
Also, twenties are not brats.
They're young adults.
The only good older women are those over sixty-five anyway.
>>692196 Is this the gay heteroandrophobe again,?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 23-07-25 16:51:36 No. 691172
>>691151 >Real kids are pudgy snotty and gross. Why do people always say this when having to differentiat between Loli and pedophilia?
You can still think kids look cute without being sexual
Most drawn porn is entirely idealized
Lolishot isn't the only one
Most women aren't as hot not graceful in real life.
But in drawn porn they're idealized as passive curvy slim and bouncy.
Anonymous 16-07-25 22:58:03 No. 689046
i'm
recognizing luffy poster so bad right now
i'm also
recognizing 🍇 poster
i'm also
recognizing grace chan
i'm also
recognizing gay misandrist
i didn't know there was a glownonymous that did that, das crazy
>>688817 very cool cat
Board ecelebs thread Anonymous 15-07-25 05:05:10 No. 688322 [Reply]
ITT: we notice some namefags and other notable posters who use this website. I will not be including myself (the luffy poster) because i am making the thread.
lets recognize >Chihuahua poster >Mr k. >rapefiend >The glownonymous with the recognizable post style that always posts in these threads >The glownonymous who posts that they were raped every day in sex and relationships general >The anon that always lectures me about what blackpill means >gay misandrist >The poster in sex and relationships general that publicly declares hes an incel that hates all women >Quebecposter >Shay >christcom flag anon >pirate flag anon Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-07-25 04:24:30 No. 686075
>>661722 Good work taking over 8chan.se/b/ Grace-anon
As a side note, shout out to the 8chan /rwby/ board for assisting with banners and having a pretty cool CSS to study.
Anonymous 13-06-25 21:53:05 No. 677779
>>677775 Celestia was going to be Queen Celestia.
Pony Grace supports Celestia because Celestia has Majesty and is the Sovereign Monarch, has the pre-eminence in this relationship.
but Grace Pony also likes the NIGHT WILL LAST FOREVER meme >>677776 /siberia/ wants Grace to support it b/c they want femdom, so Grace gets the lady's right of first night with any board tan.
Anonymous 13-06-25 21:04:49 No. 677708
>>677706 obviously pro-shah,
but right now grace is chaotic neutral & doesn't support the WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR
Anonymous 11-06-25 03:00:55 No. 676758
>>672259 >alright, I'm gonna actually read grace's monarchy theory I take big inspiration from Hobbes' Leviathan and Juche's stress on Kim Il Sung for my political views.
All linked here
>>672262 In short:
People are a colony of monarchy and form a great family, along with everything absolute monarchy. Cult of Personality, or work of one person on the people, w/ a unitary mode of politics.
This is Graceposter in a nutshell, a 21st Century Caligulan.
Anonymous 29-05-25 19:52:13 No. 671620
>>671577 A magnanimous ruler.
I'd rather echo Bodin's appraisal, the French chauvinist he is.
Though personally I align w/ the Byzantineboo's claim to the Roman Empire over the HRE.
Personally, I prefer the Rome of Antiquity and Caligula over the Holy Roman Empire and Byzantine people.
>>671589 >>671590 My only quip w/ Grace's design is I worry she looks too generic like Saber or too DnD lawful good alignment chart vibes – whereas my style of monarchy is about being a 21st century Caligulan, a Leviathan enjoyer, and shilling monarchical absolutism, I ache to be seen as too traditionalist or a neofeudalist because I get ostracized by that crowd everyday.
Grace is from 2018, so it's before my utter frustration and break w/ that half of the monarchist community and delve into all the research and political works I'd post here. I utterly detested dealing with the traditional catholics for their ultramontanism, the irate mixed constitutionalists and their maxims of the classics (like Hobbes laments, esp. egregious w/ Aristotle), the right libertarians & their contempt for absolute monarchy – it is a neverending barrage of people who hate you. I struggle to think of any demographic on the right not at odds w/ my politics since outside e-monarchist circles there's republicans and Hitlerists don't like hereditary monarchy and Nietzscheans typically have a Tocquevillist contempt for absolute monarchy, Fascists usually are republican (or belong to one of these groups), Orthodox Christians are hit or miss & while there's Tsar Nicholas II supporters there's also hatred for Emp. Peter I.
This is the reason why I've come to agree with Jean Bodin that Lordly Monarchy was necessary for the formation of states, & with Thomas Hobbes on the necessity of the arbitrary power and Sword of Commonwealth – as of late – because this dilemma has convinced me a concord of hosts is unworkable. Anonymous 29-05-25 19:01:44 No. 671590
>>671589 (me)
I meant outfits from
>>671570 for the new grace designs, not the modules from
>>671589 lol
Anonymous 17-05-25 03:58:36 No. 665644
<The Fundamental Rights of Sovereignty, according to Thomas Hobbes >1. The Subjects Cannot Change The Form Of Government (The form of Government is a fundamental law) >2. Soveraigne Power Cannot Be Forfeited >3. No Man Can Without Injustice Protest Against The Institution Of The Soveraigne Declared By The Major Part. >4. The Soveraigns Actions Cannot Be Justly Accused By The Subject >5. What Soever The Soveraigne Doth, Is Unpunishable By The Subject >6. The Soveraigne Is Judge Of What Is Necessary For The Peace And Defence Of His Subjects (And Judge Of What Doctrines Are Fit To Be Taught Them) >7. The Right of making Rules, whereby the Subject may every man know what is so his owne, as no other Subject can without injustice take it from him >8. To Him Also Belongeth The Right Of All Judicature And Decision Of Controversies: >9. And Of Making War, And Peace, As He Shall Think Best: >10. And Of Choosing All Counsellours, And Ministers, Both Of Peace, And Warre: >11. And Of Rewarding, And Punishing, And That (Where No Former Law hath Determined The Measure Of It) Arbitrary: >12. And Of Honour And Order And finally, Thomas Hobbes adds, with his 12 marks of Sovereignty (as Jean Bodin would have it):
<These Rights Are Indivisible Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:31:38 No. 665635
Hobbes / Greeks & Romans, the Universities, Schoolmen, & Parliament Men >Fourthly, there were an exceeding great number of men of the better sort, that had been so educated, as that in their youth having read the books written by famous men of the ancient Grecian and Roman commonwealths concerning their polity and great actions; in which books the popular government was extolled by that glorious name of Liberty, and monarchy disgraced by that name of Tyranny; they became thereby in love with their forms of government. And out of these men were chosen the greatest part of the House of Commons, or if they were not the greatest part, yet by advantage of their eloquence, were always able to sway the rest, especially the great haranguers, and such as pretended to learning. For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy… <For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy, whose principles are taken from the enemies of Monarchy, such as were Cicero, Seneca, Cato, and other politicians of Rome, and Aristotle of Athens, who seldom spake of Kings but as of wolves and other ravenous beasts? But how have those ministers performed their office? A great part of them, namely, the Presbyterian ministers, throughout the whole war, instigated the people against the King; so did also the Independents and other fanatic ministers. The rest, contented with their livings, preached in their parishes points of controversy, to religion impertinent, but to the breach of charity among themselves very effectual; or else eloquent things, which the people either understood not, or thouPost too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:28:13 No. 665634
<Thomas Hobbes on monarchomachists & pro-regicides >From the reading, I say, of such books, men have undertaken to kill their Kings, because the Greek and Latin writers, in their books, and discourses of Policy, make it lawfull, and laudable, for any man so to do; provided before he do it, he call him Tyrant. For they say not Regicide, that is, killing of a King, but Tyrannicide, that is, killing of a Tyrant is lawfull. Hobbes / From the same books (like Aristotle's Politics), they think in Democracies they are all freemen, but under Monarchies, all slaves >From the same books, they that live under a Monarch conceive an opinion, that the Subjects in a Popular Common-wealth enjoy Liberty; but that in a Monarchy they are all Slaves. I say, they that live under a Monarchy conceive such an opinion; not they that live under a Popular Government; for they find no such matter. Anti-Monarchy writers, they're like Rabid Dogs <Like rabid dogs won't drink water & have a rabid hydrophobia, rabid democratical writers have a rabid tyrannophobia; <A monarchy bitten by rabid, snarling democratical writers wants nothing more than a strong, mean Monarch <Once there is that Strong Monarch, it is a self-fulfilling prophesy & they abhor their Tyrant >In sum, I cannot imagine, how anything can be more prejudicial to a Monarchy, than the allowing of such books to be publicly read, without present applying such correctives of discreet Masters, as are fit to take away their Venom; Which Venom I will not doubt to compare to the biting of a mad Dog, which is a disease the Physicians call Hydrophobia, or Fear Of Water. For as he that is so bitten, has a continual torment of thirst, and yet abhors water; and is in such an estate, as if the poison endeavoured to convert him into a Dog: So when a Monarchy is once bitten to the quick, by those Democraticall writers, that continually snarl at that estate; it wants nothing more than a strong Monarch, which nevertheless out of a certain Tyrannophobia, or fear of being strong Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:24:40 No. 665633
Jean Bodin on Aristotle & Monarchy Continued >For even Aristotle himself is of opinion, That Monarchs should be created by election, calling the people barbarous, which have their Kings by right of succession. And for which cause he deemed the Carthaginians more happy than the Lacedemonians, for that these had their Kings by succession from the fathers to the the sons in the stock and line of Hercules, whereas the others still had them by election and choice. But so he might call the Assyrians barbarous, the Medes, the Persians, the Egyptians, the people of Asia, the Parthians, the Armenians, the Indians, the Africans, the Turks, the Tartars, the Arabians, the Muscovites, the Celts, the Englishmen, the Scots, the Frenchmen, the Spaniards, the Peruvians, the Numidians the Ethiopians; and an infinite number of other people, who still have, and always before had, their Kings by right of succession. Yea and we find in Greece (the country of Aristotle himself) that the Athenians, the Lacedemonians, Sicyonians, the Corinthians, the Thebans, the Epirots, the Macedonians, had more than by the space of six hundred years, had their Kings by right of lawful succession, before that ambition had blinded them to change their Monarchies into Democracies and Aristocracies. Which had likewise taken place in Italy also, whereas the Hetruscians and Latins for many worlds of years had their Kings still descending from the fathers to the sons. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 08-05-25 06:42:25 No. 661880
PNGtuber gifs of Grace
https://veado.tube/ ^This can be used for PNGtuber stuff.
Anonymous 08-05-25 06:40:45 No. 661879
3D models here
Grace Model 1
>>>/draw/5190 Grace Model 2
>>>/draw/4878 Alunya Model 1
>>>/draw/4877 Anonymous 07-05-25 21:56:33 No. 661723
OP Profile: >OP? and JUCHE , lmao, sorry Luce and constitutional monarchists).
Royal Colony 13 Anonymous 07-05-25 21:53:43 No. 661722 [Reply]
by invitation of bronies & Tania <Avatard RP reactionary leech is oUr fWiEnD u GuIsE
Anonymous 28-02-25 04:20:17 No. 629256
Author Profile
In 2006, ROMANTIC FOOL saw Bikko's rise in popularity and wrote up a background on Bikko and her conception as a character.
Here's a shoddy translation by dome dude from the Discord:
About Bikko.
Please read on for more information about Bikko.
“Who is Bikko” Bikko-san is a character from “ROMANTIC FOOL since 1995” featured on this site. The name of this characters is made up of both Katakana, Hiragana, and Kanji in order to make it difficult to search/look up. When I first created Bikko, I didn’t really imagine any specific character traits based around the name. That is why I would like to take this opportunity, knowing what I know now, to talk about and discuss this character. Originally, when I started writing this stuff I was stricken with so much anxiety about whether it would be shot down or not.. Bikko was the star of “Kesson Shojo”, a fanzine released about 2 or 3 years ago.
“Composition”
Among my circle of friends, I knew of a girl who had lost one of her arms and some fingers in a tragic accident. I noticed those around her would walk ouyghshells, looking at her in a funny way and treat her differently. Despite of this, however, this girl would not let this get to her and instead carried herself with dignity and grace – I remember thinking how cool, how beautiful she was because of this. I wanted to put the respect and adoration I felt towards my friend into the character of Bikko.
However, is the narrative solely relatable to her? Aren’t we all burdened with some kind of defect? Aren’t we all missing a piece of the jigsaw in some way or another? Obviously, in the case of you and I, they can’t be seen from the exterior. I think it is important to recognize one’s deficits, accept them, swallow them and consider how you are going to live with them. I think that treating disabled people with visible “defects” as saintly figures, whom are untouchable and never gazed upon, is discriminatory
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.