111 results in /siberia/ - Off-topic Anonymous 09-01-26 13:51:05 No. 744492
The Pre-eminence of King Charles II: >His comely presence, meekness, majesty, >Do Adamantine lustre far out-vie; >If to be highly born it is great bliss, >What Prince for Birth may you compare with his? …
>Behold your King then thousands more tall >In Grace, Power, Virtues, higher than you all >When Kingship, Persons, Virtues thus you see >All meet in one, happy's that Monarchy >Not Solomon in Glory may compare - P. Dormer's Monarchia Triumphans, 1666.
THE GREAT FOUNDER / PRE-EMINENT MONARCHY As explained by Aristotle in Politics Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-01-26 13:15:00 No. 744462
<The Fundamental Rights of Sovereignty, according to Thomas Hobbes >1. The Subjects Cannot Change The Form Of Government (The form of Government is a fundamental law) >2. Soveraigne Power Cannot Be Forfeited >3. No Man Can Without Injustice Protest Against The Institution Of The Soveraigne Declared By The Major Part. >4. The Soveraigns Actions Cannot Be Justly Accused By The Subject >5. What Soever The Soveraigne Doth, Is Unpunishable By The Subject >6. The Soveraigne Is Judge Of What Is Necessary For The Peace And Defence Of His Subjects (And Judge Of What Doctrines Are Fit To Be Taught Them) >7. The Right of making Rules, whereby the Subject may every man know what is so his owne, as no other Subject can without injustice take it from him >8. To Him Also Belongeth The Right Of All Judicature And Decision Of Controversies: >9. And Of Making War, And Peace, As He Shall Think Best: >10. And Of Choosing All Counsellours, And Ministers, Both Of Peace, And Warre: >11. And Of Rewarding, And Punishing, And That (Where No Former Law hath Determined The Measure Of It) Arbitrary: >12. And Of Honour And Order And finally, Thomas Hobbes adds, with his 12 marks of Sovereignty (as Jean Bodin would have it):
<These Rights Are Indivisible Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-01-26 12:45:36 No. 744450
Hobbes / Greeks & Romans, the Universities, Schoolmen, & Parliament Men >Fourthly, there were an exceeding great number of men of the better sort, that had been so educated, as that in their youth having read the books written by famous men of the ancient Grecian and Roman commonwealths concerning their polity and great actions; in which books the popular government was extolled by that glorious name of Liberty, and monarchy disgraced by that name of Tyranny; they became thereby in love with their forms of government. And out of these men were chosen the greatest part of the House of Commons, or if they were not the greatest part, yet by advantage of their eloquence, were always able to sway the rest, especially the great haranguers, and such as pretended to learning. For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy… <For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy, whose principles are taken from the enemies of Monarchy, such as were Cicero, Seneca, Cato, and other politicians of Rome, and Aristotle of Athens, who seldom spake of Kings but as of wolves and other ravenous beasts? But how have those ministers performed their office? A great part of them, namely, the Presbyterian ministers, throughout the whole war, instigated the people against the King; so did also the Independents and other fanatic ministers. The rest, contented with their livings, preached in their parishes points of controversy, to religion impertinent, but to the breach of charity among themselves very effectual; or else eloquent things, which the people either understood not, or thouPost too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-01-26 12:40:24 No. 744448
Hobbes' Behemoth recounts the history and causes of the English Civil Wars.
He starts BEHEMOTH (the anti-Leviathan) in recounting the factions involved.
Hobbes' pessimism is my pessimism.
The seducers were of diverse sorts… 1st faction: The Presbyterians >One sort were ministers; ministers, as they called themselves, of Christ; and sometimes, in their sermons to the people, God's ambassadors; pretending to have a right from God to govern every one his parish, and their assembly the whole nation. 2nd faction: The Papists / Catholics >Secondly, there were a very great number, though not comparable to the other, which notwithstanding that the Pope's power in England, both temporal and ecclesiastical, had been by Act of Parliament abolished, did still retain a belief that we ought to be governed by the Pope, whom they pretended to be the vicar of Christ, and, in the right of Christ, to be the governor of all Christian people. And these were known by the name of Papists; as the ministers I mentioned before, were commonly called Presbyterians. 3rd faction: Fifth monarchy men & other low church protestants >Thirdly, there were not a few, who in the beginning of the troubles were not only discovered, but shortly after declared themselves for a liberty in religion, and those of different opinions one from another. Some of them because they would have all congregations free and independent upon one another, were called Independents. Others that held baptism to infants, and such understood not into what they are baptized, to be ineffectual, were called therefore Anabaptists. Others that held that Christ's kingdom was at this time to begin upon the earth, were called Fifth-monarchy-men; besides diverse other sects, as Quakers, Adamites, etc, whose names and peculiar doctrines I do not well remember. And these were the enemies which arose against his Majesty from the private interpretation of the Scripture, exposed to every man's scanning in his mother-tongue. 4th faction: The Intellectuals / School-men / Educated Elite & Parliamentarians Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-01-26 11:16:29 No. 744414
Thomas Hobbes >To conclude there is nothing so absurd, that the old Philosophers (as Cicero saith, who was one of them) have not some of them maintained. And I beleeve that scarce any thing can be more absurdly said in naturall Philosophy, than that which now is called Aristotles Metaphysiques, nor more repugnant to Government, than much of that hee hath said in his Politiques; nor more ignorantly, than a great part of his Ethiques. Jean Bodin >"Moreover, from earliest memory the people of America always have retained the royal power. They do not do this because they have been taught, but from custom. They were not trained by Aristotle, but shaped by their leader, nature. Furthermore, when they hear that the rule of optimates exists in some corners of Italy or Germany, they marvel that this can be." Thomas Hobbes on monarchomachists & pro-regicides >From the reading, I say, of such books, men have undertaken to kill their Kings, because the Greek and Latin writers, in their books, and discourses of Policy, make it lawfull, and laudable, for any man so to do; provided before he do it, he call him Tyrant. For they say not Regicide, that is, killing of a King, but Tyrannicide, that is, killing of a Tyrant is lawfull. Hobbes / From the same books (like Aristotle's Politics), they think in Democracies they are all freemen, but under Monarchies, all slaves >From the same books, they that live under a Monarch conceive an opinion, that the Subjects in a Popular Common-wealth enjoy Liberty; but that Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 09-01-26 11:06:52 No. 744412
Jean Bodin on Aristotle & Monarchy Continued >For even Aristotle himself is of opinion, That Monarchs should be created by election, calling the people barbarous, which have their Kings by right of succession. And for which cause he deemed the Carthaginians more happy than the Lacedemonians, for that these had their Kings by succession from the fathers to the the sons in the stock and line of Hercules, whereas the others still had them by election and choice. But so he might call the Assyrians barbarous, the Medes, the Persians, the Egyptians, the people of Asia, the Parthians, the Armenians, the Indians, the Africans, the Turks, the Tartars, the Arabians, the Muscovites, the Celts, the Englishmen, the Scots, the Frenchmen, the Spaniards, the Peruvians, the Numidians the Ethiopians; and an infinite number of other people, who still have, and always before had, their Kings by right of succession. Yea and we find in Greece (the country of Aristotle himself) that the Athenians, the Lacedemonians, Sicyonians, the Corinthians, the Thebans, the Epirots, the Macedonians, had more than by the space of six hundred years, had their Kings by right of lawful succession, before that ambition had blinded them to change their Monarchies into Democracies and Aristocracies. Which had likewise taken place in Italy also, whereas the Hetruscians and Latins for many worlds of years had their Kings still descending from the fathers to the sons. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 03-01-26 17:53:04 No. 742601
>>2624618
furry anon is still miserable Anonymous 02-01-26 07:46:49 No. 741503 [Reply]
hi everyone it's furry anon
>going on 21 >admittedly the weirdo dating the now-going-on-36 year old trans lady >now transitioning for like three months >haven't gone anywhere >all desire to make art has been gone for years, longing to program and play guitar and make doom maps is gone. every hobby is a "used to". can't even consistently read a book. >i also hit it off with people significantly older than myself, met by way of my girlfriend, but they have yknow, lives, and shit, that have no room left. i don't really want a part in them myself, seeing as they're pretty boring - not really stay-awake types, naturally. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 29-12-25 14:17:18 No. 740490
>>740488 I could/would crush you and everything you hold dear if not for our lord to show me better. People who make mockery are the kind of weaklings who would be torn asunder without the restraining hand of our lord. Ypu live by god's grace alone.
Anonymous 26-12-25 13:20:08 No. 739250
>>739239 It's a disgrace that we are not allowed a thread for cock, penis, and balls, but we have to put up with these vile bimbos with balloon tits while scrolling
Anonymous 24-12-25 18:34:53 No. 738804
Merry Christmas, Grace-poster!
Anonymous 22-12-25 23:31:48 No. 738089
>>738004 I did sort of modify the picture, but gracefag pics are generally commissions/requests and not a drawfag.
Anonymous 18-12-25 21:53:04 No. 736491
>>736472 I too suffer from this problem.
Autism is a sign that God has cursed us.
A child born with leukemia dying gracefully at fifteen has a better fate.
Anonymous 17-12-25 01:15:12 No. 735720
>>735481 No, that is MyMy from Ongezellig.
Differences:
Grace OC Jill:
>has orange eyes >shorter hair without a bow >is an MLP EQG (Equestria Girls) OC so her pony form skin transfer to her human form MyMy is a Japanese girl larping as a real dutch woman and beloved by /co/ and soyteens.
Anonymous 16-12-25 07:41:36 No. 735481
>>735473 Isn't this Graceposter's new OC?
Anonymous 12-12-25 22:57:54 No. 734206
>>734140 >grace, do you have any thoughts on the magna carta (1215)? The Pope dismissed it and it was a remonstrance of the notables against their monarchy.
That is one instance where I support the Papists.
This must be aggro. Anon wants to aggro me.
I've been around for years, and OP
>>661723 &
>>661724 makes it clear enough I am for notions of monarchy preeminence and think mixed constitutionalism is an opinion not only absurd but treasonable–so yes, absolute monarchy is what I support full on unironically.
I hate mixed constitutionalists / so-called constitutional monarchism.
absolutism or constitutionalism? Anonymous 12-12-25 19:45:43 No. 734140
grace, do you have any thoughts on the magna carta (1215)? the distribution of power by representative councils eventually led to the parliament of 1265 in england, eventually being dominated by commoners who killed the king in 1649, and established a republic.
Tomdatinker 06-12-25 21:17:09 No. 732227
>>732219 >Where did Grace go? Hopefully for her sake not the Guillotine.
>Why does Alunya drink milk from a bowl? Do you think I can read minds or something?!?!
Anonymous 01-12-25 13:17:52 No. 730631
November is over, time to look at her Grace
Anonymous 19-11-25 19:19:48 No. 727683
The Melancholy and Lamentations of Emo Grace <"…Saving only that he [the Earl] was carried away with the stream, in a manner, of the whole nation, to think that England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; not considering that the supreme power must always be absolute, whether it be in the King or in the Parliament…" Emo Grace recites Hobbes verbatim and sulks at anon
Anonymous 19-11-25 19:14:29 No. 727682
The Melancholy and Lamentations of Emo Grace <"…Saving only that he [the Earl] was carried away with the stream, in a manner, of the whole nation, to think that England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; not considering that the supreme power must always be absolute, whether it be in the King or in the Parliament…" Emo Grace recites Hobbes verbatim and sulks at anon
Anonymous 09-11-25 15:12:34 No. 724441
>>723325 Wow! Sliwa likes taking care of cats!
That must mean he takes great care of people too!
Grace likes taking care of cats, if you know what I mean Anonymous 05-11-25 20:44:20 No. 723266
Plato Republic Book 5: >This, then, Glaucon, is the manner of the community of wives and children among the guardians. That it is consistent with the rest of our polity and by far the best way is the next point that we must get confirmed by the argument. Is not that so?” “It is, indeed,” he said. “Is not the logical first step towards such an agreement to ask ourselves what we could name as the greatest good for the constitution of a state and the proper aim of a lawgiver in his legislation, and what would be the greatest evil, and then to consider whether the proposals we have just set forth fit into the footprints of the good and do not suit those of the evil?” “By all means,” he said. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 05-11-25 20:21:33 No. 723249
>>723247 I want to unite with Grace-chan!!
Anonymous 05-11-25 19:46:50 No. 723216
OP Profile: >OP?
Anonymous 29-10-25 21:40:43 No. 721215
Grace-chan…
Anonymous 16-10-25 00:13:12 No. 717495
>>717488 Gracefag will look.
Anonymous 15-10-25 23:14:06 No. 717488
>>717215 Yo, Grace-Anon. You own 8chan.moe/b/ correct? I'm from /rwby/
We're going to be streaming RWBY on the weekends* and I'd like to make the announcement on the Meta Thread, but I'd rather avoid trolls, whaddya think?
*See:
https://8chan.moe/rwby/res/8643.html Anonymous 20-09-25 15:14:48 No. 711136
Plato Republic Book 5:
>This, then, Glaucon, is the manner of the community of wives and children among the guardians. That it is consistent with the rest of our polity and by far the best way is the next point that we must get confirmed by the argument. Is not that so?” “It is, indeed,” he said. “Is not the logical first step towards such an agreement to ask ourselves what we could name as the greatest good for the constitution of a state and the proper aim of a lawgiver in his legislation, and what would be the greatest evil, and then to consider whether the proposals we have just set forth fit into the footprints of the good and do not suit those of the evil?” “By all means,” he said. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 11-09-25 16:26:52 No. 708591
>>708486 When I finally kill myself, can I also get a Grace memorial?
Anonymous 03-09-25 09:46:10 No. 706240
Hobbes' Behemoth recounts the history and causes of the English Civil Wars.
He starts BEHEMOTH (the anti-Leviathan) in recounting the factions involved.
Hobbes' pessimism is my pessimism.
The seducers were of diverse sorts… 1st faction: The Presbyterians >One sort were ministers; ministers, as they called themselves, of Christ; and sometimes, in their sermons to the people, God's ambassadors; pretending to have a right from God to govern every one his parish, and their assembly the whole nation. 2nd faction: The Papists / Catholics >Secondly, there were a very great number, though not comparable to the other, which notwithstanding that the Pope's power in England, both temporal and ecclesiastical, had been by Act of Parliament abolished, did still retain a belief that we ought to be governed by the Pope, whom they pretended to be the vicar of Christ, and, in the right of Christ, to be the governor of all Christian people. And these were known by the name of Papists; as the ministers I mentioned before, were commonly called Presbyterians. 3rd faction: Fifth monarchy men & other low church protestants >Thirdly, there were not a few, who in the beginning of the troubles were not only discovered, but shortly after declared themselves for a liberty in religion, and those of different opinions one from another. Some of them because they would have all congregations free and independent upon one another, were called Independents. Others that held baptism to infants, and such understood not into what they are baptized, to be ineffectual, were called therefore Anabaptists. Others that held that Christ's kingdom was at this time to begin upon the earth, were called Fifth-monarchy-men; besides diverse other sects, as Quakers, Adamites, etc, whose names and peculiar doctrines I do not well remember. And these were the enemies which arose against his Majesty from the private interpretation of the Scripture, exposed to every man's scanning in his mother-tongue. 4th faction: The Intellectuals / School-men / Educated Elite & Parliamentarians Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 24-08-25 17:18:21 No. 702916
The Pre-eminence of King Charles II: >His comely presence, meekness, majesty, >Do Adamantine lustre far out-vie; >If to be highly born it is great bliss, >What Prince for Birth may you compare with his? …
>Behold your King then thousands more tall >In Grace, Power, Virtues, higher than you all >When Kingship, Persons, Virtues thus you see >All meet in one, happy's that Monarchy >Not Solomon in Glory may compare - P. Dormer's Monarchia Triumphans, 1666.
THE GREAT FOUNDER / PRE-EMINENT MONARCHY As explained by Aristotle in Politics Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 23-08-25 17:29:38 No. 702530
>>702418 what seeing Grace-chan does to a mf
Anonymous 23-08-25 09:49:13 No. 702408
>>702277 bedhair Grace
very very cute
Anonymous 18-08-25 20:56:08 No. 700822
>>700814 There's never enough of Grace!
Anonymous 18-08-25 16:10:52 No. 700577
>>700575 It is more of a pet peeve than ideological commitment from graceposter.
(though ideologically graceposter feels not aligned either)
Anonymous 18-08-25 16:07:30 No. 700575
id liek to see an episdoe where grace and alunya team up to defeat the guenon fags
Anonymous 17-08-25 21:07:43 No. 700212
>>700211 Dayum, Grace is based?
Anonymous 30-07-25 17:20:34 No. 693600
When will they add the Grace flag back?
Anonymous 11-07-25 13:25:34 No. 686771
>>685868 why are you so smug grace
mr. rapefiend 10-07-25 17:03:28 No. 686487
>>686358 i will have sex with grace
Anonymous 09-07-25 04:24:30 No. 686075
>>661722 Good work taking over 8chan.se/b/ Grace-anon
As a side note, shout out to the 8chan /rwby/ board for assisting with banners and having a pretty cool CSS to study.
Anonymous 30-06-25 09:04:04 No. 683436
>>683427 Perhaps Grace's cousin's oldest child would be the heir for the throne
Anonymous 24-06-25 14:17:30 No. 681742
>>681740 That is debateable but you know what is right stealing Grace's royal cattle and doing experiments on them with a big as ufo.
Anonymous 19-06-25 06:21:08 No. 679913
When I feel bad, I scroll through this thread for all the Grace pictures, she always cheers me up.
Anonymous 13-06-25 21:53:05 No. 677779
>>677775 Celestia was going to be Queen Celestia.
Pony Grace supports Celestia because Celestia has Majesty and is the Sovereign Monarch, has the pre-eminence in this relationship.
but Grace Pony also likes the NIGHT WILL LAST FOREVER meme >>677776 /siberia/ wants Grace to support it b/c they want femdom, so Grace gets the lady's right of first night with any board tan.
Anonymous 13-06-25 21:04:49 No. 677708
>>677706 obviously pro-shah,
but right now grace is chaotic neutral & doesn't support the WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR, WAR
Anonymous 13-06-25 21:02:26 No. 677706
>>677703 is grace pro shah or ayatollah
Anonymous 11-06-25 03:00:55 No. 676758
>>672259 >alright, I'm gonna actually read grace's monarchy theory I take big inspiration from Hobbes' Leviathan and Juche's stress on Kim Il Sung for my political views.
All linked here
>>672262 In short:
People are a colony of monarchy and form a great family, along with everything absolute monarchy. Cult of Personality, or work of one person on the people, w/ a unitary mode of politics.
This is Graceposter in a nutshell, a 21st Century Caligulan.
Anonymous 31-05-25 08:43:17 No. 672262
>>672259 It's not graceposter's monarchy theory but a compilation of quotes , idk the only thing graceposter affirms is
>>662123 >>662124 >>662125 >>662126 >>662128 >>662132 Anonymous 31-05-25 08:33:52 No. 672259
alright, I'm gonna actually read grace's monarchy theory
Anonymous 29-05-25 21:09:18 No. 671676
what animal are you voting for, grace chan?
Anonymous 29-05-25 19:52:13 No. 671620
>>671577 A magnanimous ruler.
I'd rather echo Bodin's appraisal, the French chauvinist he is.
Though personally I align w/ the Byzantineboo's claim to the Roman Empire over the HRE.
Personally, I prefer the Rome of Antiquity and Caligula over the Holy Roman Empire and Byzantine people.
>>671589 >>671590 My only quip w/ Grace's design is I worry she looks too generic like Saber or too DnD lawful good alignment chart vibes – whereas my style of monarchy is about being a 21st century Caligulan, a Leviathan enjoyer, and shilling monarchical absolutism, I ache to be seen as too traditionalist or a neofeudalist because I get ostracized by that crowd everyday.
Grace is from 2018, so it's before my utter frustration and break w/ that half of the monarchist community and delve into all the research and political works I'd post here. I utterly detested dealing with the traditional catholics for their ultramontanism, the irate mixed constitutionalists and their maxims of the classics (like Hobbes laments, esp. egregious w/ Aristotle), the right libertarians & their contempt for absolute monarchy – it is a neverending barrage of people who hate you. I struggle to think of any demographic on the right not at odds w/ my politics since outside e-monarchist circles there's republicans and Hitlerists don't like hereditary monarchy and Nietzscheans typically have a Tocquevillist contempt for absolute monarchy, Fascists usually are republican (or belong to one of these groups), Orthodox Christians are hit or miss & while there's Tsar Nicholas II supporters there's also hatred for Emp. Peter I.
This is the reason why I've come to agree with Jean Bodin that Lordly Monarchy was necessary for the formation of states, & with Thomas Hobbes on the necessity of the arbitrary power and Sword of Commonwealth – as of late – because this dilemma has convinced me a concord of hosts is unworkable. Anonymous 29-05-25 19:31:07 No. 671601
>>671552 We need more Grace-chan pictures. In particular, I'd really like a POV of being knighted by her.
Anonymous 29-05-25 19:01:44 No. 671590
>>671589 (me)
I meant outfits from
>>671570 for the new grace designs, not the modules from
>>671589 lol
Anonymous 17-05-25 03:58:36 No. 665644
<The Fundamental Rights of Sovereignty, according to Thomas Hobbes >1. The Subjects Cannot Change The Form Of Government (The form of Government is a fundamental law) >2. Soveraigne Power Cannot Be Forfeited >3. No Man Can Without Injustice Protest Against The Institution Of The Soveraigne Declared By The Major Part. >4. The Soveraigns Actions Cannot Be Justly Accused By The Subject >5. What Soever The Soveraigne Doth, Is Unpunishable By The Subject >6. The Soveraigne Is Judge Of What Is Necessary For The Peace And Defence Of His Subjects (And Judge Of What Doctrines Are Fit To Be Taught Them) >7. The Right of making Rules, whereby the Subject may every man know what is so his owne, as no other Subject can without injustice take it from him >8. To Him Also Belongeth The Right Of All Judicature And Decision Of Controversies: >9. And Of Making War, And Peace, As He Shall Think Best: >10. And Of Choosing All Counsellours, And Ministers, Both Of Peace, And Warre: >11. And Of Rewarding, And Punishing, And That (Where No Former Law hath Determined The Measure Of It) Arbitrary: >12. And Of Honour And Order And finally, Thomas Hobbes adds, with his 12 marks of Sovereignty (as Jean Bodin would have it):
<These Rights Are Indivisible Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:31:38 No. 665635
Hobbes / Greeks & Romans, the Universities, Schoolmen, & Parliament Men >Fourthly, there were an exceeding great number of men of the better sort, that had been so educated, as that in their youth having read the books written by famous men of the ancient Grecian and Roman commonwealths concerning their polity and great actions; in which books the popular government was extolled by that glorious name of Liberty, and monarchy disgraced by that name of Tyranny; they became thereby in love with their forms of government. And out of these men were chosen the greatest part of the House of Commons, or if they were not the greatest part, yet by advantage of their eloquence, were always able to sway the rest, especially the great haranguers, and such as pretended to learning. For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy… <For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy, whose principles are taken from the enemies of Monarchy, such as were Cicero, Seneca, Cato, and other politicians of Rome, and Aristotle of Athens, who seldom spake of Kings but as of wolves and other ravenous beasts? But how have those ministers performed their office? A great part of them, namely, the Presbyterian ministers, throughout the whole war, instigated the people against the King; so did also the Independents and other fanatic ministers. The rest, contented with their livings, preached in their parishes points of controversy, to religion impertinent, but to the breach of charity among themselves very effectual; or else eloquent things, which the people either understood not, or thouPost too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:28:13 No. 665634
<Thomas Hobbes on monarchomachists & pro-regicides >From the reading, I say, of such books, men have undertaken to kill their Kings, because the Greek and Latin writers, in their books, and discourses of Policy, make it lawfull, and laudable, for any man so to do; provided before he do it, he call him Tyrant. For they say not Regicide, that is, killing of a King, but Tyrannicide, that is, killing of a Tyrant is lawfull. Hobbes / From the same books (like Aristotle's Politics), they think in Democracies they are all freemen, but under Monarchies, all slaves >From the same books, they that live under a Monarch conceive an opinion, that the Subjects in a Popular Common-wealth enjoy Liberty; but that in a Monarchy they are all Slaves. I say, they that live under a Monarchy conceive such an opinion; not they that live under a Popular Government; for they find no such matter. Anti-Monarchy writers, they're like Rabid Dogs <Like rabid dogs won't drink water & have a rabid hydrophobia, rabid democratical writers have a rabid tyrannophobia; <A monarchy bitten by rabid, snarling democratical writers wants nothing more than a strong, mean Monarch <Once there is that Strong Monarch, it is a self-fulfilling prophesy & they abhor their Tyrant >In sum, I cannot imagine, how anything can be more prejudicial to a Monarchy, than the allowing of such books to be publicly read, without present applying such correctives of discreet Masters, as are fit to take away their Venom; Which Venom I will not doubt to compare to the biting of a mad Dog, which is a disease the Physicians call Hydrophobia, or Fear Of Water. For as he that is so bitten, has a continual torment of thirst, and yet abhors water; and is in such an estate, as if the poison endeavoured to convert him into a Dog: So when a Monarchy is once bitten to the quick, by those Democraticall writers, that continually snarl at that estate; it wants nothing more than a strong Monarch, which nevertheless out of a certain Tyrannophobia, or fear of being strong Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 17-05-25 03:24:40 No. 665633
Jean Bodin on Aristotle & Monarchy Continued >For even Aristotle himself is of opinion, That Monarchs should be created by election, calling the people barbarous, which have their Kings by right of succession. And for which cause he deemed the Carthaginians more happy than the Lacedemonians, for that these had their Kings by succession from the fathers to the the sons in the stock and line of Hercules, whereas the others still had them by election and choice. But so he might call the Assyrians barbarous, the Medes, the Persians, the Egyptians, the people of Asia, the Parthians, the Armenians, the Indians, the Africans, the Turks, the Tartars, the Arabians, the Muscovites, the Celts, the Englishmen, the Scots, the Frenchmen, the Spaniards, the Peruvians, the Numidians the Ethiopians; and an infinite number of other people, who still have, and always before had, their Kings by right of succession. Yea and we find in Greece (the country of Aristotle himself) that the Athenians, the Lacedemonians, Sicyonians, the Corinthians, the Thebans, the Epirots, the Macedonians, had more than by the space of six hundred years, had their Kings by right of lawful succession, before that ambition had blinded them to change their Monarchies into Democracies and Aristocracies. Which had likewise taken place in Italy also, whereas the Hetruscians and Latins for many worlds of years had their Kings still descending from the fathers to the sons. Post too long. Click here to view the full text. Anonymous 08-05-25 06:42:25 No. 661880
PNGtuber gifs of Grace
https://veado.tube/ ^This can be used for PNGtuber stuff.
Anonymous 08-05-25 06:40:45 No. 661879
3D models here
Grace Model 1
>>>/draw/5190 Grace Model 2
>>>/draw/4878 Alunya Model 1
>>>/draw/4877 Anonymous 08-05-25 06:16:00 No. 661871
Can I take Grace-chan on a virtual date?
Anonymous 07-05-25 21:56:33 No. 661723
OP Profile: >OP? and JUCHE , lmao, sorry Luce and constitutional monarchists).
Royal Colony 13 Anonymous 07-05-25 21:53:43 No. 661722 [Reply]
by invitation of bronies & Tania <Avatard RP reactionary leech is oUr fWiEnD u GuIsE
Anonymous 25-04-25 19:59:18 No. 655497
>>655366 Grace chan this is always your home bro/sis.
Anonymous 28-02-25 04:20:17 No. 629256
Author Profile
In 2006, ROMANTIC FOOL saw Bikko's rise in popularity and wrote up a background on Bikko and her conception as a character.
Here's a shoddy translation by dome dude from the Discord:
About Bikko.
Please read on for more information about Bikko.
“Who is Bikko” Bikko-san is a character from “ROMANTIC FOOL since 1995” featured on this site. The name of this characters is made up of both Katakana, Hiragana, and Kanji in order to make it difficult to search/look up. When I first created Bikko, I didn’t really imagine any specific character traits based around the name. That is why I would like to take this opportunity, knowing what I know now, to talk about and discuss this character. Originally, when I started writing this stuff I was stricken with so much anxiety about whether it would be shot down or not.. Bikko was the star of “Kesson Shojo”, a fanzine released about 2 or 3 years ago.
“Composition”
Among my circle of friends, I knew of a girl who had lost one of her arms and some fingers in a tragic accident. I noticed those around her would walk ouyghshells, looking at her in a funny way and treat her differently. Despite of this, however, this girl would not let this get to her and instead carried herself with dignity and grace – I remember thinking how cool, how beautiful she was because of this. I wanted to put the respect and adoration I felt towards my friend into the character of Bikko.
However, is the narrative solely relatable to her? Aren’t we all burdened with some kind of defect? Aren’t we all missing a piece of the jigsaw in some way or another? Obviously, in the case of you and I, they can’t be seen from the exterior. I think it is important to recognize one’s deficits, accept them, swallow them and consider how you are going to live with them. I think that treating disabled people with visible “defects” as saintly figures, whom are untouchable and never gazed upon, is discriminatory
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.