Search

Search

Search is case-insensitive and based on keywords. To match exact phrases, use "quotes". Use an asterisk (*) for wildcard.

You may apply the following filters to your searches: id, thread, subject, name, flag and board (as an alternative syntax). To apply a filter, simply add to your query, for example, name:Anonymous or subject:"Some Thread". The id, thread and board filters do not support wildcards.


34 results in /siberia/ - Off-topic

>>798852
> That you are likely using an LLM to make your arguments for you is evidence of your unwillingness or inability to adequately talk about this, or any, issue.

Can you show me evidence of me using an LLM?

>So, go ahead and add another notch to your "internet arguments won" chart that's posted right next to your wall. Fine by me, but I shan't continue in this Sisyphean endeavor.


I think you’re the one whose doing the “another one” thing.

> 've already said what I have to say, and I already know that it's an exercise in futility because you will not be swayed by anything, so there is no point in continuing, aside from wasting time, and honestly I wouldn't mind, if you actually had anything compelling to say, but you don't


I’ve said a lot of compelling arguments you just don’t agree with them. But ok that’s fine.

Since you accuse me of being an LLM, tell me how does an LLM type out these sentences quickly without correction?

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


>>798436
This. Most MILF fetishizers often only look at the glamorized personas of tricenarian women using special effects to make themselves look “aged gracefully”


File: 1782262041468-6-1.png (951.65 KB, 1920x1080, CivilWar1.png)

File: 1782262041468-2-2.png (960.12 KB, 1920x1080, CivilWar2.png)

File: 1782262041468-5-4.jpg (86.78 KB, 489x640, THE_END.jpg)

 

My question is simple: Why are Americans so retarded? This retardation isn't even new, it dates back to before the 20th century, ever since the dawn of the country as a whole. This year we are "Celebrating" 250 years of American retardation. Even when the US was genuinely the most progressive nation of its time (It had weak competition, to be clear) it still produced a profoundly retarded population. Now for my presentation of perhaps the most solid evidence of AmeriKKKan retardation before the 20th century: the Civil War, especially the 1864 Presidential Election.

Put simply, during the Civil War there was a large number of pro-Confederate Quislings that desperately wanted to sabotage the Union war effort by any means necessary. And take note, I am talking about the people of the Union, not the Confederacy. A neighborhood in fucking New York City symbolically seceded and joined the Confederacy during the Civil War and riots in Manhatten saw Confederate sympathizers burn down black orphanages while slaughtering abolitionists and freedmen. The North was FILLED with traitors and turncoats and Quislings and Wang Jingweis who squirmed around and lied in wait for a chance to strike and guarantee victory to the Confederacy. How much of these were there? Maybe about 20% to 30% of the population, no joke. The Democratic party of the time (Since this was, of course, before the long and gradual political realignment that we know as the party switch) represented these cowards, who were known as the "Copperheads", although they called themselves the "Peace Democrats". A large chunk of Democrats were not Copperheads though, they were instead "War Democrats" but they were mostly pro-slavery and opposed to Lincoln. The 2 factions would attempt to unite in 1864 at the Democratic National Convention, where they nominated disgraced former Commanding General of the US army George B. McClellan as their candidate for President. McClellan was an immensely incompetent retard and was responsible for a multitude of military failures, such as the Union defeat in the Peninsula Campaign and the last straw that got him fired from his position in 1862, his failure to persue the Confederate army after they were repelled at Antietam. McClellan represented the War Democrats, and promised to win the war while preserving slavery. The Democratic party platform, however, claimed that the Civil War was "A failure" and it was necessary for the US to immediately surrender to the ConfedePost too long. Click here to view the full text.




>>797252
>being afraid of cringe/embarrassment is the cause of quite a lot of social and professional problems because people are obsessed with saving face and protecting their own ego. it's frankly more cringe to be unable to take an L than just gracefully saying "my bad" and moving on lol. i think a lot of the modern "cringe is bad self-deprecation is bad"

“Cringe” is becoming normalised and even promoted as necessary for personal growth.
There’s a lot of people who say that kids who don’t have a cringe phase in adolescence become horrible people
From what I see though, it’s the opposite.

Normalization of cringe and embarrassment as virtues is encouraging immaturity


>>797236
so whats your end goal then, trans people can't call themselves transhumanists anymore because it offends you how they choose to identify themselves?

>>797238
not taking yourself too seriously can be a good or bad thing entirely depending on the context. being afraid of cringe/embarrassment is the cause of quite a lot of social and professional problems because people are obsessed with saving face and protecting their own ego. it's frankly more cringe to be unable to take an L than just gracefully saying "my bad" and moving on lol. i think a lot of the modern "cringe is bad self-deprecation is bad" narrative is just a reaction to millennials overly embracing their own cringe which created second-hand embarrassment for their younger siblings. and then a bunch of alt-right influencers popped up around the time zoomers came of age that basically built an audience around harassing people for having fun while simultaneously being incapable of self-reflection. like the andrew tates, claviculars, paul brothers, etc who built their entire online identity around their unwillingness to ever admit being wrong or making a mistake. "always double down, always deny wrongdoing" as they say. it created this cultural worship for insecure manchildren who are willing to burn any social relationship to the ground just to save face if they're ever embarrassed. it's…kinda cringe?

also i've never felt like it was appropriate to be upset at someone for -not- being offended by slurs used to describe them.
it kind of reeks of privileged underaged white people trying to police the language of minorities on their behalf. they'll make it their mission creating fabricated controversies and campaigns to change language in an effort to "fix" a problem that never existed, just so they can act self-important and be at the forefront social justice discourse. because it would be too damaging to their ego to let an actual minority, an actual gay or trans person, decide how they want to feel about the words. it always has to be about them. dumb shit honestly.


>>796485
…which makes the fall from grace all the more pathetic as, for all the French talk about Americans being “cultureless”, the modern French online right tails behind the American online right such that the best French chuds can put up nowadays is “ha ha you like the be-be-see”-type cuckposting instead of putting up a veneer of intellectualism like the Nouveau Droit used to, especially on X’itter which atp is just /pol/ if it wasn’t a board. Like, the whole “woke” vs “anti-woke” dynamic has swept up European politics too as the various right wings of every European country is being homogeneised into generic white neoconservative slopulism, in a manner similar to how the American right under MAGA has been nationalised such that you barely see MAGApedes shitting on other states like they used to, let alone Europe.

In fact, the average European right-winger is either a busherite or have their brains melted by 4chan’s /pol/. It wouldn’t be an issue if it wasn’t for the fact that this is seeping into IRL as normies become more terminally online.


>>796574
You shouldn't fap to Alunya, she loves Grace, don't get between them.


>>795012
Cishet male sexuality is no longer tolerated. This is the age where you can free yourself from meatspace hebegynophilia

These feminists nowadays want men to be their sycophants in every which way.
And what’s fucked up is that women complain about chivalry is dead despite men still holding doors open for them and handling heavy duty physical tasks for them.
All because acts of chivalry aren’t as graceful and cool as in the movies


>>793981
This is another strawmen. Also women don’t age gracefully as you think especially since they bear children.


File: 1781139288713.png (23.8 KB, 1305x892, IMG_2262.png)

 

No matter how cute Grace is drawn, there is always the fattest, ugliest, uyghurest subhuman hiding behind her that would kill Lombroso with one look.




>>792714
Grace and Alunya have always had an on and off relationship

Anarchsists and monarch’s always had a forbidden live kind of affinity for each other

Every anarchist is a “monarch-in-the-making”
And every monarch has an anarchic streak


Attention whores I like:
>Prof. Palinka
>Schizononymous
>Tomdathinker
>S
>Poster with the flag of the Fourth International
Attention whores I dislike:
>Alunya Poster
>Grace


 

Lets notice and talk about
>Luffy Poster (me)
>Chihuahua Poster
>The glownonymous with a distinguishable posting style that wants to be noticed
>The glownonymous that posts that hes been raped every day in the sex and relationships general
>Glownonymous thats rude to everyone
>Doge icon poster
>Pirate poster
>pedophile poster even though he sucks and shouldnt be here out of anyone on this list
>gay misandrist
>Shay
>Tomdathinker
>Grace even though theyre a rightoid monarchist
>Bliss
>Schizononymous
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.




>>792325
That isn't grace


File: 1780969494908-0.gif (2.18 MB, 1058x1245, Alunya marching.gif)

File: 1780969494908-1.png (369.62 KB, 1500x1000, 46_alunya.png)

Alunya WILL be a class traitor and the #1 Grace loyalist and sycophant.


>>791696
Don't get me wrong, I will take your criticism to heart and in stride, but I'm not going to abandon this concept and exploration of the transgressive potential of comedy, even when it deals with atrocities and human violence and tragedy.

I will do so because contrary to your assumptions, it is something I sincerely care about. I feel sorrow for everyone who has been victim to it, to the degree I can, because it is beyond comprehension really.

It is deeply personal to me as a victim, as someone who has had victims close to me confide in me, who has experienced long term romantic partnerships with other victims, and as someone who grew up being raised entirely by older, stronger, and dignified, graceful, and upright women who instilled in me values I carry to this day.

I swear to god you are the most narrow-minded leftcom to ever grace this site.


Jean Bodin on Aristotle & Monarchy Continued
>For even Aristotle himself is of opinion, That Monarchs should be created by election, calling the people barbarous, which have their Kings by right of succession. And for which cause he deemed the Carthaginians more happy than the Lacedemonians, for that these had their Kings by succession from the fathers to the the sons in the stock and line of Hercules, whereas the others still had them by election and choice. But so he might call the Assyrians barbarous, the Medes, the Persians, the Egyptians, the people of Asia, the Parthians, the Armenians, the Indians, the Africans, the Turks, the Tartars, the Arabians, the Muscovites, the Celts, the Englishmen, the Scots, the Frenchmen, the Spaniards, the Peruvians, the Numidians the Ethiopians; and an infinite number of other people, who still have, and always before had, their Kings by right of succession. Yea and we find in Greece (the country of Aristotle himself) that the Athenians, the Lacedemonians, Sicyonians, the Corinthians, the Thebans, the Epirots, the Macedonians, had more than by the space of six hundred years, had their Kings by right of lawful succession, before that ambition had blinded them to change their Monarchies into Democracies and Aristocracies. Which had likewise taken place in Italy also, whereas the Hetruscians and Latins for many worlds of years had their Kings still descending from the fathers to the sons.

<Now if so many people and nations were all barbarous, where then should humanity and civility have place? It should be only in Poland, in Denmark, and in Sweden; for that almost these people alone have their Kings by election: and yet of them none, but such as were themselves also royally descended.


>Cicero says, humanity and courtesy to have taken beginning in the lesser Asia, and from thence to have been divided unto all the other parts of the world: and yet for all that the people of Asia had no other kings, but by succession from the father to the son, or some other the nearest of kin.


>And of all the ancient kings of Greece, we find none but Timondas, who was chosen King of Corinth, and Pittacus of Nigropont. And at such time as the royal name and line sailed, oftentimes the strongest or the mightest carried it away as it chanced after the death of Alexander the
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


I saw a Grace picture on fedi


>>779821
Mods bow to Grace-poster


Hobbes / Greeks & Romans, the Universities, Schoolmen, & Parliament Men
>Fourthly, there were an exceeding great number of men of the better sort, that had been so educated, as that in their youth having read the books written by famous men of the ancient Grecian and Roman commonwealths concerning their polity and great actions; in which books the popular government was extolled by that glorious name of Liberty, and monarchy disgraced by that name of Tyranny; they became thereby in love with their forms of government. And out of these men were chosen the greatest part of the House of Commons, or if they were not the greatest part, yet by advantage of their eloquence, were always able to sway the rest, especially the great haranguers, and such as pretended to learning.

For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy…
<For who can be a good subject in a Monarchy, whose principles are taken from the enemies of Monarchy, such as were Cicero, Seneca, Cato, and other politicians of Rome, and Aristotle of Athens, who seldom spake of Kings but as of wolves and other ravenous beasts?

>You may perhaps think a man has need of nothing else but to know the duty he owes his governor, and what right he has to order him, but a good natural wit; but it is otherwise. For it is a science, and built upon sure and clear principles, and to be learned by deep and careful study, or from masters that have deeply studied it. And who was there in the Parliament or in the nation, that could find out those evident principles, and derive from them the necessary rules of justice, and the necessary connection of justice and peace? The people have one day in seven the leisure to hear instruction, and there are ministers appointed to teach them their duty.


>But how have those ministers performed their office? A great part of them, namely, the Presbyterian ministers, throughout the whole war, instigated the people against the King; so did also the Independents and other fanatic ministers. The rest, contented with their livings, preached in their parishes points of controversy, to religion impertinent, but to the breach of charity among themselves very effectual; or else eloquent things, which the people either understood not, or thou
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1777903048945-0.png (641.61 KB, 1531x2000, Thomas Hobbes bust.png)

File: 1777903048945-1.jpg (162.94 KB, 1360x768, Aeka wet snarl.jpg)

<Thomas Hobbes on monarchomachists & pro-regicides
>From the reading, I say, of such books, men have undertaken to kill their Kings, because the Greek and Latin writers, in their books, and discourses of Policy, make it lawfull, and laudable, for any man so to do; provided before he do it, he call him Tyrant. For they say not Regicide, that is, killing of a King, but Tyrannicide, that is, killing of a Tyrant is lawfull.

<Hobbes / From the same books (like Aristotle's Politics), they think in Democracies they are all freemen, but under Monarchies, all slaves

>From the same books, they that live under a Monarch conceive an opinion, that the Subjects in a Popular Common-wealth enjoy Liberty; but that in a Monarchy they are all Slaves. I say, they that live under a Monarchy conceive such an opinion; not they that live under a Popular Government; for they find no such matter.

<Anti-Monarchy writers, they're like Rabid Dogs

<Like rabid dogs won't drink water & have a rabid hydrophobia, rabid democratical writers have a rabid tyrannophobia;
<A monarchy bitten by rabid, snarling democratical writers wants nothing more than a strong, mean Monarch
<Once there is that Strong Monarch, it is a self-fulfilling prophesy & they abhor their Tyrant
>In sum, I cannot imagine, how anything can be more prejudicial to a Monarchy, than the allowing of such books to be publicly read, without present applying such correctives of discreet Masters, as are fit to take away their Venom; Which Venom I will not doubt to compare to the biting of a mad Dog, which is a disease the Physicians call Hydrophobia, or Fear Of Water. For as he that is so bitten, has a continual torment of thirst, and yet abhors water; and is in such an estate, as if the poison endeavoured to convert him into a Dog: So when a Monarchy is once bitten to the quick, by those Democraticall writers, that continually snarl at that estate; it wants nothing more than a strong Monarch, which nevertheless out of a certain Tyrannophobia, or fear of being strongPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


<Rebellion, a condition of war
>because the nature of this offence, consists in renouncing of subjection; which is a relapse into the condition of war, commonly called Rebellion; and they that so offend, suffer not as Subjects, but as Enemies. For Rebellion, is but war renewed.

<Hurt To Revolted Subjects Is Done By Right Of War, Not By Way Of Punishment

>Lastly, Harme inflicted upon one that is a declared enemy, fals not under the name of Punishment: Because seeing they were either never subject to the Law, and therefore cannot transgresse it; or having been subject to it, and professing to be no longer so, by consequence deny they can transgresse it, all the Harmes that can be done them, must be taken as acts of Hostility. But in declared Hostility, all infliction of evill is lawfull. From whence it followeth, that if a subject shall by fact, or word, wittingly, and deliberatly deny the authority of the Representative of the Common-wealth, (whatsoever penalty hath been formerly ordained for Treason,) he may lawfully be made to suffer whatsoever the Representative will: For in denying subjection, he denyes such Punishment as by the Law hath been ordained; and therefore suffers as an enemy of the Common-wealth; that is, according to the will of the Representative. For the Punishments set down in the Law, are to Subjects, not to Enemies; such as are they, that having been by their own act Subjects, deliberately revolting, deny the Soveraign Power.

<The Punishment Of Innocent Subjects Is Contrary To The Law Of Nature

>All Punishments of Innocent subjects, be they great or little, are against the Law of Nature; For Punishment is only of Transgression of the Law, and therefore there can be no Punishment of the Innocent. It is therefore a violation, First, of that Law of Nature, which forbiddeth all men, in their Revenges, to look at any thing but some future good: For there can arrive no good to the Common-wealth, by Punishing the Innocent. Secondly, of that, which forbiddeth Ingratitude: For seeing all Soveraign Power, is originally given by the consent of every one of the Subjects, to the end they should as long as they are obedient, be protected thereby; the Punishment of the Innocent, is aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


Graceposter doesn't want rule by a priestly clique supported by metaphysics or ultraclericalism–but something akin DPRK-style cult of personality and particularly a strong emphasis on one ruler–wants ultraroyalism more.
It isn't that complicated, but always falls on deaf ears anyways.
It is an extremely niche, acquired taste most don't get or see any appeal to, so… I can't speak much for anyone else, let alone the other e-monarchists.
TBH, DPRK is closest to that kind of sentiment.


File: 1777497957245-0.png (170.69 KB, 768x1024, 6 Grace gesture.png)

File: 1777497957245-1.png (85.16 KB, 560x315, snarling-dog.png)

What Graceposter hates
>promoting other, more mainstream e-monarchist's brand like Lavader, Moldbug, Carlsbad/"Von Haller", etc, over my turf
>Includes other mainstream brands like JRR Tolkien "libertarian anarcho-monarchism" or perennielists like Evola or Guenon or any NRx blogspheres that are popular
>especially as if they know more or are better apt to discuss monarchy than what I serve up here
>Taking these other brands and rolling over my style with them, as if I must conform to them, etc
>being rebuffed with integralism or any vague esotericism as opposed to my own project
>posting Grace with advocacy of ceremonial monarchy or plain esotericism (graceposter doesn't want any esoteric bro NRx generic e-trad stuff, but a much stronger emphasis on absolute monarchy & familialism therein – Graceposter hates it because Graceposter resents NRx clout & metaphysicians stealing away clout away from it & feels that steals my thunder and those rightwingers lack enthusiasm for what I want).
>strong appeals to decentralization in juxtaposition to monarchy (←- Is a very irritable spot since I have a lot of resentment built up towards Tocquevillism and other ancapy monarchists and neofeudalist monarchists on this issue)


>>777768
ok, I'm not defending democracy, but still don't see how monarchy is any better.
Also why doesn't Grace have cat ears like all the others


File: 1777467872171-1.png (314.45 KB, 1669x1021, Louis XIV Quote 5.png)

File: 1777467872171-2.png (318.19 KB, 1669x1208, Louis XIV Quote PM.png)

File: 1777467872171-3.jpg (712.52 KB, 1558x2048, Louis XV Quote 1.jpg)

If people aren't for the Alexandrian Model, don't want a leader who both reigns and governs with majesty, aren't for absolute monarchy but normalfag democracyslop, etc, I really cannot relate. That is haram here.
Gracefag is -not- content with having multi-party democracy with the mere title of a king like Louis XIV says, but one-party corporatism/democratic centralism is an improvement… but if there isn't any longing to have a leader who actually leads, then it is outside the spirit of this thread.


….and I wish you a revolutionary birthday, dear Grace-poster <3


File: 1777399880365.jpg (40.16 KB, 463x612, chihuahua birthday2.jpg)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY GRACEPOSTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳
🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉
🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳
🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉
🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳
🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉
🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳
🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉
🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳🎉🥳
may u continue being VERY COOL for the rest of ur life!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!??!!?!??!??!?!


youre my favorite imageboard microcelebrity grace poster
i think about you sexually
happy birthday ^_^


File: 1777379708041-0.png (48.73 KB, 1024x768, birthday_bydori.png)

Graceposter birthday


Plato Republic Book 5:
>This, then, Glaucon, is the manner of the community of wives and children among the guardians. That it is consistent with the rest of our polity and by far the best way is the next point that we must get confirmed by the argument. Is not that so?” “It is, indeed,” he said. “Is not the logical first step towards such an agreement to ask ourselves what we could name as the greatest good for the constitution of a state and the proper aim of a lawgiver in his legislation, and what would be the greatest evil, and then to consider whether the proposals we have just set forth fit into the footprints of the good and do not suit those of the evil?” “By all means,” he said.

>“Do we know of any greater evil for a state than the thing that divides it and makes it many instead of one, or a greater good than that which binds it together and makes it one?”


>“We do not.”


>“Is not, then, the community of pleasure and pain the tie that binds, when, so far as may be, all the citizens rejoice and grieve alike at the same births and deaths?”


>“But the individualization of these feelings is a dissolvent, when some grieve exceedingly and others rejoice at the same happenings to the city and its inhabitants?” “Of course.” “And the chief cause of this is when the citizens do not utter in unison such words as ‘mine’ and ‘not mine,’ and similarly with regard to the word ‘alien’?


>“Precisely so.”


>“That city, then, is best ordered in which the greatest number use the expression ‘mine’ and ‘not mine’ of the same things in the same way.”


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1777378292909-0.jpg (841.48 KB, 1178x1024, MLP Leviathan.jpg)

File: 1777378292909-1.jpg (180.15 KB, 640x640, 1653069979672.jpg)

Graceposter's Political Ideology
I'm coining a term for my ideology of Monarchy:
Monarchia Natio Coloniae / Dynastic Patriotism.
Meaning, the cultivation of a people with Monarchy (to make them more united & as a greater family).
(I might have butchered the Latin, but it is the thought that counts).
That is my political ideology.
When I say colony in Monarchia Natio Coloniae my intent is a cultivation of politics, to make a people & politics a colony of monarchy. Not colony in the context of foreign lands, but the establishment of politics from Monarchy.
This way, there is a dynastic patriotism.
My two inspirations are Hobbes' Leviathan and North Korea Juche.


OP Profile:
>OP?
OP is a monarchist on leftypol.org.

>What kind of Monarchist is Graceposter?

A modern day absolute monarchist & invested in the late 1500s & 1600s kind of absolutism, hereditary rule / dynasties, & the pre-eminent notion of monarchy as opposed to mixed constitutionalism / limited or mixed monarchy, formally called constitutional monarchy & constitutional monarchism.

My notion of monarchy is not really traditional medievalist Christian royal monarchy, but more like Alexandrian model, Absolutism, State Shinto/North Korea/hereditary dictatorship–a hereditary monarchy with a kind of familialism/dynastic patriotism like North Korea somewhat has (but not completely).
Corgism:
>Politics as a colony of an absolute monarchy and people form a great family; a cult of personality for a community of pleasures & pains.

My notion of monarchy is like a singer on the stage, sings a life into people–if I had to sum up the way I think, and why I demand one singer, one teacher–is because I want the most direct attention drawn to a cult of personality to breathe a soul into people.
Adding more singers–like the saying "Too many cooks spoil the broth" is exactly the undertone of how I see it and why I want one monarch alone to sing.
Too many cooks risks replicating the condition of a people that a singer is there to resolve – the masses without a singer are like an amorphous blob, with no identity, no culture, no frame of mind, etc.
A singer on a stage makes a community of pleasures and pains that Plato lauds.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1776866536001-1.jpg (108.99 KB, 1080x1080, glass trump.jpg)

graceposter was right about everything