>>726948The problem with most of the discourse surrounding "normalfags" is that it comes from people who do not consider themselves to fit within that lable.
The idea of a normalfag is, to begin with a statistical lie. There are certain views, tastes, behaviors, and lifestyles that are technically more common than others, but it's generally not the kind of 90/10 split that the normalfags vs nerds framing seems to imply. Any society that exists at-scale is going to be comprised of thousands of subcultures of varying sizes. Obviously some of them are going to be larger than others, but there's never going to be a singular subculture with a majority share, let alone a supermajority. And even within this, very few people fit into the platonic ideal of whatever subculture they best fit within.
What I suspect it really comes down to is that people who grew up in environments where they didn't really properly fit in with any of the subcultures available to them end up constructing this kind of generalized ideal of the what the people that rejected them look like, and the result is a bunch of random, unrelated traits attributed to an abstract "normalfag".