[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1755371202068.png (791.87 KB, 892x807, portman2.png)

 

For compliance reasons, the moderation team has voted to MANDATE spoilering all NSFW images, site-wide.

This takes effect as of now, August 16, 2025. Please take note.
120 posts and 34 image replies omitted.

>>725310
Caillou is a lucky lil canook.



 

BIRD and HEDGEHOG have WON the 2025 Animal Election!!!

Lets find out right now which one is going to be the president, and which will be the vice president by using the dice roll feature:
dice 1d2 = 1
If the number above is 1, then the president is BIRD
If the number above is 2, then the president is HEDGEHOG


The LOVECRAFTIAN party has won the most congress seats!!!

What does this mean for the future of our society?!?!??
70 posts and 30 image replies omitted.

BIRD HEDGEHOG APPROVAL IS STILL HIGH!!!

>>723129
they didn't ask for it though :C



File: 1763535009537.jpg (9 KB, 225x224, luffyannoyed.jpg)

 

>straight
>effeminate personality so everybody thinks i'm gay
18 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

>>727638
>you experience plenty of homophobia, the people doing it just don't realize it applies to you
Yeah, because hearing someone call another person a faggot is the same as being called a faggot, right?

>>727646
stupid, bad faith post.

>>727646
>hearing someone call another person a faggot is the same as being called a faggot, right?
If you are one, of course it is.

>>727555
say that your a-sexual

>gay
>effeminate personality so everybody knows i'm gay



File: 1763325529050.webp (27.93 KB, 635x644, IMG_2253.webp)

 

As much as I hate the “Pick yourself up by your bootstraps” mentality I also hate the opposite which is nihilism which is just the mentality that “We are all doomed so just give up.” You can’t have blind optimism and be a slave to the system but you also can’t have no optimism and ultimately not fight the system at all.
39 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

>>727631
yes they do

>>727631
Read mao, professional revolutionaries aren't proletarians

File: 1763576293394.jpg (133.36 KB, 857x1202, pleasure intrinsic good.jpg)

>>727649
>'happiness' is a much more broad concept than 'opiate receptors recieving'
I never claimed that that's all happiness was.
>plenty of people experience unhappiness and existential despair while on drugs
Which is a form of suffering they experience on top of the pleasure from the drugs, which brings their total net valence level down. I don't see how that's supposed to refute the general framework of utilitarianism.

>>727173
Normal people don't own a television

>>727674
The whole world isn't just zoomers.



File: 1746654820332-0.png (150.7 KB, 994x768, 1109_20250117204203.png)

File: 1746654820332-1.png (6.14 MB, 2560x1440, Grace Versailles 10.png)

File: 1746654820332-2.png (369.62 KB, 1500x1000, 46_alunya.png)

File: 1746654820332-3.png (388.01 KB, 1280x1280, pony grace OG paint.png)

 

by invitation of bronies & Tania
<Avatard RP reactionary leech is oUr fWiEnD u GuIsE
595 posts and 1082 image replies omitted.

bump

>>721140
Volume 4 update >>>/anime/29402

>>724365
Update for V4 Part II stream >>>/anime/29428

File: 1763518702879-0.png (271.39 KB, 1280x1280, OVER.png)

File: 1763518702879-1.png (1.43 MB, 1185x800, Empires rise & fall.png)

It is dumb I have to make this image, but fr.
Monarchist legitimatists…
>No, it's illegitimate!
I don't care for Bourbonists, Orléanist, or Bonapartists.
These dynasties are all long gone.
It was injustice for the Romanovs to be killed, but Nature is also cruel. Empires rise and fall. These monarchies weren't going to last forever; naturally, like with any lifeform, you'd persist and seek to maintain its longevity as much as possible (when it is a truly living regime).
Yet if it been more than 2+ generations and over 100+ years, time to bury the axe and quit.
It would be better to expect to establish a new bloodline or dynasty at this point.
Defecting to
>muh constitution
Isn't going to bring these old dynasties back, and that might as well be the Law of Nature as far as any regimes go (however decent you think they might be, their ruin is inevitable).
After a certain point, after 2+ generations of able-bodied fighters or intrigue for 100+ years, that is more than generous amount of time to seriously take a restoration effort (I know of no restoration happening after 70+ years max, so 100+ years is a generous amount of time as far as I know).
The most stupid part is these same exact people are just as eager to overthrow any said monarch in life as they are to most stupidly and most stubbornly insist upon clinging to and restoring a monarchy or dynasty in death… (If only they were as loyal when they were alive (you know, when loyalty to a regime actually truly matters) rather than when they were finally dead, but go figure).

File: 1763579987078-0.png (96.96 KB, 705x989, Emo Grace.png)

The Melancholy and Lamentations of Emo Grace
<"…Saving only that he [the Earl] was carried away with the stream, in a manner, of the whole nation, to think that England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; not considering that the supreme power must always be absolute, whether it be in the King or in the Parliament…"

<"…Besides, I told you before, that those which were then likeliest to have their counsel asked in this business, were averse to absolute monarchy, as also to absolute democracy or aristocracy; all which governments they esteemed tyranny, and were in love with monarchy which they used to praise by the name of mixed monarchy, though it were indeed nothing else but pure anarchy…"


<"…Only that fault, which was generally in the whole nation, which was, that they thought the government of England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; and that if the King should clearly subdue this Parliament, that his power would be what he pleased, and theirs as little as he pleased: which they counted tyranny…"


Emo Grace recites Hobbes verbatim and sulks at anon



 

By the invitation of EQG chads
>no hooves
<War of all against all edition
<Gunpowder Treason Day
King James VI & I movie:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPRUFSGdI22n/
51 posts and 84 image replies omitted.

File: 1763095703498-0.png (937.21 KB, 3092x3368, Jill Drusilla Stare.png)

File: 1763095703498-1.png (72.67 KB, 512x512, Jill Drusilla MLP.png)

repost

bump

File: 1763518526598-0.png (271.39 KB, 1280x1280, OVER.png)

File: 1763518526598-1.png (1.43 MB, 1185x800, Empires rise & fall.png)

It is kind of dumb I have to make this image, but fr.
Monarchist legitimatists are dumb.
>No, it's illegitimate!
I don't care for Bourbonists, Orléanist, or Bonapartists.
These dynasties are all long gone.
It was injustice for the Romanovs to be killed, but Nature is also cruel. Empires rise and fall. These monarchies weren't going to last forever; naturally, like with any lifeform, you'd persist and seek to maintain its longevity as much as possible (when it is a truly living regime).
Yet if it been more than 2+ generations and over 100+ years, time to bury the axe and quit.
It would be better to expect to establish a new bloodline or dynasty at this point.
Defecting to
>muh constitution
Isn't going to bring these old dynasties back, and that might as well be the Law of Nature as far as any regimes go (however decent you think they might be, their ruin is inevitable).
After a certain point, after 2+ generations of able-bodied fighters or intrigue for 100+ years, that is more than generous amount of time to seriously take a restoration effort (I know of no restoration happening after 70+ years max, so 100+ years is a generous amount of time as far as I know).
The most stupid part is these same exact people are just as eager to overthrow any said monarch in life as they are to most stupidly and most stubbornly insist upon clinging to and restoring a monarchy or dynasty in death… (If only they were as loyal when they were alive (you know, when loyalty to a regime actually truly matters) rather than when they were finally dead, but go figure).

File: 1763572354110-0.png (227.03 KB, 1000x1000, 21.png)

File: 1763572354110-2.png (304.75 KB, 2048x1152, ferdinand prussia.png)

I will never understand why people who reject monarchy still make the pretense of constitutional monarchy. Far from rejecting monarchy, they become like most monarchists in general (because most are constitutional monarchists). I'd rather see people who reject monarchy move on a leader or dictator figure.
It is the lamest, most trite hoary, uninspired old Victorian 19th century anachronistic fad of Monarchy imaginable.
It isn't as if mixed constitutionalism is an innovation. I'd agree it has been the default mode throughout the Middle Ages and so on, and like Jean Bodin says since the days of Aristotle and even before Aristotle to the time of Herodotus.
I understand the appeal to universal suffrage, but even the politicians people vote for nobody settles to have as a mere figurehead – rather they expect genuine leadership and governance. This prospect mustn't block off the Sun or the longing for leadership.
I guess because Hegel liked "constitutional monarchy" but again it was a fad of the Victorian era and to be frank a very insipid fad that never really engaged with monarchy.
I anticipate when people settle for constitutional monarchy, it is their own disbelief in the institution of monarchy itself: when people truly believe, the sky is the limit and they anticipate they can move mountains with the rulers. It is a lack of confidence in institutional Christianity and High Churchism and a also a lack of confidence in the idea of royalty in general, that makes people republicans for royalty (not trusting them to ride a horse) and rather the most avid monarchists for their great statesmen instead, treating them as prophets. That is all. (Not that people were ever shy to embrace an Absolutism of their own; that was never the case). It is just that embracing constitutional monarchy means rejecting monarchical preeminence entirely.
I cannot wait for the hegemony of this idea constitutional monarchy to face its next setback or be challenged again, but for now it continues to pervade.
Out of all the socialists I have encountered (& in contempt of the Windsorite r/monarchosocialism), I have to express that Ferdinand Lassalle is the only Western socialist who has seen the light and had the balls to renounce mixed constitutionalism (in spite of denouncing absolutism throughout his political career like in his speech No Compromise which details his contempt for pseudo-constitutionalism which he took as a victPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1763579668036-0.png (96.96 KB, 705x989, Emo Grace.png)

The Melancholy and Lamentations of Emo Grace
<"…Saving only that he [the Earl] was carried away with the stream, in a manner, of the whole nation, to think that England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; not considering that the supreme power must always be absolute, whether it be in the King or in the Parliament…"

<"…Besides, I told you before, that those which were then likeliest to have their counsel asked in this business, were averse to absolute monarchy, as also to absolute democracy or aristocracy; all which governments they esteemed tyranny, and were in love with monarchy which they used to praise by the name of mixed monarchy, though it were indeed nothing else but pure anarchy…"


<"…Only that fault, which was generally in the whole nation, which was, that they thought the government of England was not an absolute, but a mixed monarchy; and that if the King should clearly subdue this Parliament, that his power would be what he pleased, and theirs as little as he pleased: which they counted tyranny…"


Emo Grace recites Hobbes verbatim and sulks at anon



File: 1742577924419-0.jpg (374.37 KB, 1170x1735, 1729807942955.jpg)

File: 1742577924419-1.png (150.24 KB, 794x894, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1742577924419-2.png (624 KB, 640x801, ClipboardImage.png)

 

tell me your most unhinged historical larpy sex fetish. don't tell me you have none, all imageboard addicts and history lovers have a few. sharing the few larps i caught in my lifetime

a girl fantasizing about being a european queen owning a harem of male slaves eating her out

a guy fantasizing about being a roman soldier and fucking boudica, or letting her take out all her anger and frustration on him with severe rape

being enlaved by dacian female raiders

fucking roman girls in toga while disscussing philosophy

being an icelandic skinny guy and getting captured and sold into gay slavery in the ottoman harem

young stalin

young drugged out hitler
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
299 posts and 151 image replies omitted.

>>710365
the reconquista was mostly hispanoids (christian) killing other hispanoids (muslims)

File: 1762603268897-0.png (662.53 KB, 960x640, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1762603268897-1.png (225.61 KB, 680x976, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1762603268897-2.jpg (105.71 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)

how did the average NEETS live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average incel and femcel live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average hot chad and hot chadette live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average femboy and boymoder live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average popculture soiboy live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average /nightwalks/ doomer live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average chud chinlet live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?

how did the average normie live life like in the early 1900s until WW1?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>724001
pre-ww1 orgy with all of these people drool emoji

File: 1763517774939-0.png (3.79 MB, 1468x1708, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1763517774939-1.png (1.03 MB, 1219x1222, ClipboardImage.png)

its ogre romaboo, in real life, im the savage thirdie big uygha, and you're the firstie crakkka

File: 1763579438804.png (Spoiler Image,1009.09 KB, 800x559, ClipboardImage.png)

you on the left



File: 1761486391001.jpg (270.35 KB, 1200x1577, media_G2nImPfa4AE-Fit.jpg)

 

Previous thread >>708795
406 posts and 71 image replies omitted.

>>727605
Why are Americans so obsessed with black/white sex, either being pro or against? Sorta rhetorical question, I know.
It is weird that it is such a big taboo in the US that "interracial" is treated as a fetish.
Of course in here in Europe it is something "different" but not to the point that having sex with someone with a different skin colour is that much far apart from having sex with someone with a different hair colour. It might be exotic but not to the point people have a term, such as "interracial" as if it was a different cathegory of sexual intercourse.

>>727655
I don't know. Maybe because back in the day the only ones who could get away with interracial sex were rich white men who owned slaves. Everyone else would be shamed or worse for it. Maybe it's some kind of forbidden fruit to most Americans.

>>727657
I know. As I mentioned, it was more of a rhetoric question.

>>727468
it happens, but its not really a trend. what usually happens is that women will just change their worldview to fit her boyfriend's. so if shes dating a commie she will become a commie, then they break up and she starts dating an ancap and will do a total 160 on her beliefs

>>727655
>Of course in here in Europe it is something "different" but not to the point that having sex with someone with a different skin colour is that much far apart from having sex with someone with a different hair colour.
You have no idea what you are talking about. A significant portion of people do comment on interracial relationships. That‘s the case even when such a word like „interracial“ doesn‘t exist in the language of said particular European country, because at the very least they have a term for „black person“ and the prejudices connected to such a notion. It‘s probably worse in the US, but it‘s not true that a differing skin color is treated with as little significance as differing hair color. If you aren‘t a black person in Europe you know shit about how much skin color still leads to experiences with racism to date.



 

Where is the first few seconds from?

Nevermind it was a few clicks a way
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WFSceeof9RI





File: 1763201348876.jpg (338.74 KB, 2000x1326, 1000020350.jpg)

 

Rate my laptop, bros
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

File: 1763282931854.png (2.29 MB, 1239x1922, BlueLove.png)

>>726481
False. If anything it's about pure love.

Tranime

>>726679
Kinda true. The story haa transition elements. Beast to human.

File: 1763577377277.mp4 (5.58 MB, 1024x576, 4_5826597988608248058.mp4)





Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
Previous[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home