/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

>>5836
You wont be able to get ammo, genius.
I guess that's not a problem if you just want a gun, but you cannot even go and shoot cans in the woods or anything. might as well make a slingshot tbh.

Bump

>>5800
combat knife taped under your bed will be superior (if you live somewhere that isnt the US)

>>6436
>>4682
Throwing Axe. RETVRN EVRO!

>>6437
axes are cool but if you're ambushed sleeping you probably wont have much room to swing or throw one, im assuming someone is kicking in my bedroom door.

Conscription is rape and those that enforce it shoul be treated as such.

>>6377
Conscription is Reactionary if it is done by Capitalist States (and only applies to Men) but it is Progressive if it is done by Socialist States (and applies to both Men and Women), which is why the entire 18-year old population of the future Global USSR will be conscripted to join the International Red Guards in order to both purge all 18-year olds of Fascist, Liberal, and Revisionist beliefs, in order to ensure the entire population embraces the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the highest stage of Marxism, and to ensure that every 18-year old Woman is purged of all vestiges of Bourgeois Femininity and the Reactionary Patriarchal Gender Binary, so that universal Female service in the International Red Guards between the ages of 18 and 20 will become a rite of passage to transform them into Liberated Socialist Women that uphold the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the highest stage of Marxism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️ 💇‍♀️👩‍🦲!

>>6232
Conscript armies will be phased out now that war revolves around drones. Civilians building drones are more useful than soldiers.

forcing people to join the military against their will is tyrannical fascist bullshit to begin with and fascism and discrimination kind of go hand and hand, it's not like a fascist regime is going to try to be fair and egalitarian when they are dragging people out of their homes and forcing them to go fight in a war and get blown to smithereens and to sit here and pretend otherwise is just obtuse. it would be like debating over whether or not serial killers ought to be less discriminatory in their killings and not just target black people or immigrants or homeless people.

the more interesting and important discussion we should be having is about why governments discriminate the way they do when it comes to military draft or recuitment, why they choose the particular people they target, i.e. young males who are not rich or white. the race and class element are pretty self-explanatory, but why young males? most people will probably say it's because 18 year old boys are more physically fit for military service and have greater strength and stamina and dexterity than older men or women, but is that really the reason?

anyone who has worked at any job requiring physical labor knows that 18 year old boys tend to be pretty terrible at everything, weak and clumsy and constantly screwing up and breaking things and injuring themselves and getting tired and having to take frequent breaks and complaining and whining all the time. men reach the peak of their physical ability in their late 20s to mid 30s, not in their late teens. and an untrained skinny teenage boy is about as useless as an untrained skinny teenage girl when it comes to running long distances or carrying heavy equipment or climbing over obstacles. so it's not really about physical ability.

i think it's really about psychological malleability more than anything else, which is primarily a function of emotional maturity. women emotionally mature faster than men do, women tend to reach full emotional maturity by their 30s whereas men don't reach full emotional maturity until their 40s. everyone knows what teenage boys are like, any man can remember what he was like when he was 18 years old - essentially a confused, insecure, scared, naive, extremely sensitive and impressionable child desperately seeking validation and approval from others and wanting very badly to fit in and be accepted and be recognized, particularly by some kind of parental father figure. in other words, the ideaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>6255
please share pdf, anon, thank you

idkno

>>6253
It's simply provocative bullshit by a guy other neo-Nazis thought was too much. If you want to read a good book about insurgency (one that were unfortunately written by reactionaries) read Total Resistance and The Brigade.

>>6253
Negative homes. Siege is ideological not tactical. Just neo Nazi ideological nonsense . Read old mil manuals and start shooting with your bros. A decentralized group of homies is the way to go. One of you needs help, phone up the bros. And if one of you goes down, you should hypothetically trust your boy to not squeal.

If you can't trust them not to, don't shoot with them. Don't even tell them abt your guns. These are the tards that will fold under pressure and red flag you. Don't let them.

>>6261
This. Learn about the history of the SLA, Red Army Faction, and Black Panther Party to understand what NOT to do as an armed organization, specifically regarding adventurism. Avoid broaching the topic with lumpens who would ostensibly try and take advantage of the organization for criminal activity. Ask the question of whether the impetus to create a militia is due to an immediate pending need in the community (militarized police and ICE basically act as an occupying force for example, or your perfectly legal libertarian queer homestead in Colorado is accosted by thugs), or that of an individualistic nihilistic desire for violence. Your zeal can be channeled to other needs of your community first.

Do YOU have the mental and physical capacity to confidently organize with the discipline necessary to ensure that the esprit de corp reflect the revolutionary values that you, I am sure, claim to hold? Ask these questions, and then consult a trusted movement lawyer.

So what if some schizo kills himself or his family or a bunch of random people? Under no circumstance can the means to overthrow the state be stripped from the proletariat, not even under a DOTP, you’re being sentimental if you disagree

>>6408
That doesn't mean you need to have handguns sold in walmart tho, you can have easy but gated access, it works much better to stop mass shooting and yet people stay armed

>Look i love guns as much as the next person but sometimes i feel like we’re pointing in the direction of either major reform or outright banning them.

it's not going to happen. there are approximately 500 million civilian-owned firearms in the united states, about 55% of which are handguns and about 15% are semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, i.e. the kinds of weapons that are banned outright in countries like the uk or australia, so about 350 million guns would have to be bought back by the government and the administrative overheads of doing this in a country as big and spread out as the united states would be enormous, potentially costing the government upwards of $10,000 per gun. it would cost trillions of dollars to do such a thing in the us, and that's not even to mention the widespread public outrage and civil unrest that would certainly result, or the fact that firearm manufacturers and sporting goods retailers are major multi-billion dollar industries in the united states with tremendous lobbying power by way of the nra and its legions of devoted followers. it will be a winter wonderland in the deepest reaches of hell before firearms are banned in the united states.

the US has a very intelligent system. Republicans are pro-gun, but their voting base are mentally ill violent sociopaths, ensuring that the most anti-revolutionary and dangerous people in the US have guns.

Democrats on the other hand defang all people that could've otherwise gotten into communist theory and domesticates them back into the system. These people are not only assimilated, but they're also convinced that guns are evil and the worst, so democrats have all the people that could be worth a shit turned into harmless reformists and all the most dangerous forces of reaction armed to the teeth.

>>6427
>Republicans are pro-gun

that's how they present themselves sure, but when it comes to people with felony convictions and undocumented or visa holding immigrants, they pretty much unanimously reject the second amendment. about a third of all black american males and a third of all immigrants are barred from owning guns, and roughly around 15-20% of americans in the lowest income quintile (<$34,510) have a felony conviction on their record, so they can't have guns. and it's important to note that even the most minor non-violent crimes, such as possession of less than a single gram of heroin or cocaine or meth, are felony offenses in almost all republican states and in most states in general, and about 80% of all felony convictions in the us are for non-violent crimes. so republicans are not really pro-gun, they are just pro-gun for middle-class white americans. it's all bullshit. republicans don't believe in anything, us politics is all just a performance, all the pro-gun shit is just marketing, it's a way to appeal to their key demographic of middle-class white people from middle america and secure funding from the nra and libertarian super pacs.

Do clay pigeon shooting shotguns are a great way to stop drones

>>6391

• Corners: Watch your 90 degree corners.
  
• Cover: The sky is the enemy. The more material between you and the sky, the better.
  
• Retreat: Do not investigate the dead or search for bodies, lest you be struck in the double tap or triple tap strike.
  
• Scatter: Crowds are bad. Be spread out.
  
• Self Control: If you heard it, it was not meant for you. Therefore retreat and don't move. Turn phone to airplane mode to make them think all radios (hence people) are dead.
  
• Digging: If you try digging people out of the structures, I lack any knowledge on how to do that, but you can and people do. Maybe you will need powered equipment or vehicles in order to do that.
  
• Hard Kill: Active interception is unlikely and deeply illegal.
  
• Soft Kill: Radio Jamming of large 20ft aerial drones is not only illegal but also not technically feasible as directional antennas are aimed from the 10KM high drone to the satellite in the sky.
  
• Synthetic Aperture Radar means you can't hide during the fog or the storms as it can still see the ground.
  
  

Did I miss anything?

real life isn't like hitscan video games where shooting something at a much higher elevation than you is the same as shooting something at ground level. you aim a gun at a high angle to try to hit some object that is 500-1000 feet above you, your gunsights/optics and all of your instincts and reckonings about distance and bullet drop and wind drift and leading the target become useless because you have no common ground reference to gauge distance and the geometry of the bullet arc becomes counterintuitive and wind speed increases significantly with altitude and in the case of aircraft the target is also probably moving really fucking fast and you have no sense of its speed or distance because it's in the sky and there's nothing around it that can be a useful frame of reference. there is a reason why the military had to invent special guns specifically designed for ground-to-air combat and why they were just dumb brute force fragmentation weapons designed to simply blanket the sky with tons of flying metal and shit hoping to hit something.

>>6422
This is why people in Ukraine carry buckshot, its either a shotgun or spray and pray with tracers

even the us and other high-tech military nations don't really know how to defend against drone attacks and are actively trying to figure out solutions. it's sort of led to a resurgence of interest in directed energy weapons research, particularly laser and microwave weapons. a very small very fast flying object is practically invulnerable to ballistic weapons, like trying to shoot a bullet with a bullet as the saying goes. hitting it with a laser beam or microwave pulse is a lot more feasible but reflective coatings and shielding could make the drones resistant to those kinds of weapons as well.

DDm4a1 ris 2 and 3
are like the coolest rifles ever made.

what is this even supposed to mean

War on Terror:

Invention of "Model T Ford"; trade deficit with Iraq, buggy and courier and knight's horses.

Inevitable terror attack; colony per oil facility, to local trade partner, for Navy ally, Greece; cleared through Great Britain, fishery.

Ok