>>2576132>>2577749>>2577801>>2577826In other words, how do you take the different goals as criterias, whilst also not delving further into contradictions.
It's a bit of game theory somewhat. You can't just abolish private property because you have at some point to replace its capitalist mechanism with a new one.
This isn't contingent on local variations btw. How we do it is, but at some point there needs to be a new organization that supplants the capitalist one.
To give an example. Capitalism has private property. Whilst its management to allow for such property to exist varies, it always possesses certain characteristics that have to exist to guarantee some form of private property and commodity production : legalization of said-property, presence of trading hubs/exchange, presence of a wealth-owning class etc. Without these, private property can't exist. Thus, despite having an abstract goal (private property), and different local iterations (saudi arabia is capitalist but much different than Germany), there still remains a core which enables this type of property to exist.
We as socialist/marxists don't actually have one.