>>2597739I think you mistake something anon, Fukuyama isn't necessarily advocating for capitalist social relations (although that is part of his thrust), which indeed is unable to response to long term disruptions as Marx remarked. Rather Fukuyama is defending what i called the worldview of capitalism, where people are atomized individuals who picked their own identities and the ultimate goal of this identity building is "being true to yourself/your conscience". (This applies to trads too, being a trad in a secular society isn't being a trad, it's being an individual, real medieval trads adjust their beliefs based on their village and shit).
Fukuyama's argument is that nobody wants to move away from this atomizing way of life into the more collective ones like Marx's conception of the overwhelming uniform mass of the declassed, because we all deep down want our special snowflake identities to be validated and thus we benefit from the current liberal idpol status.
For example, third worldists do not want to abandon religion and insist on keeping as part of the struggle against capitalism. First worlders do not want to sacrifice the treats they get even though the third world workers outnumber them and thus the latter should've been accorded more importance than the former. Gay and queer comrades do not want to hide their identities and throw it under the bus even though that will objectively make our movement more palatable to heteronormative workers that way outnumber queer people in this world. This is called intersectionality, and i'm not saying that it is bad, in fact i benefit from this arrangement (i am a religious/spiritual third worldists), but intersectionality imo is just living proof that Fukuyama is right about nobody wanting to move on from the atomized individual models of liberalism