>>735029Communism won't do that. There are multiple huge industries built on telling us what women want, what they want at this point in time is being the hottest bitch that will seduce the highest-up man possible in the feudal hierarchy while also being humble and relatable. This does not differ between cultural contexts, media and it didn't change all that much since the ancient times. Even today, in modern contexts, the stories that women like most are about old money or direct continuation from the aristocracy of old.
I quite despise the gaslighting from people like
>>735032, that hasn't been my experience in real life or culturally, science also doesn't say that feminist or nice men have it any easier. It's just offensive how brazen the lie "left-wing" people push is. It's probably a big reason why some young men get pushed in the direction of those absolutely moronic right-wingers at first, and that is likely the intention.
China apparently banned these kinds of stories recently? Could be just fake news, but that would make sense for a communist party. What women want is just part of the currently existing superstructure to be demolished. Not even bourgeois superstructure since this was a thing since forever and bourgeois simply inherited it. This applies to men too, but I don't think anyone here would have a problem with that. What men want is also far more unstable, so that likely won't be nearly as big of an issue.