/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>743603
>the release of the chihuahua files.
This.

>>744989
Rightoids only care about whiteness as an aesthetic. They are all misanthropists.

>>744956
they are looks matched, most of these couples are except for the obvious scams where 50 year old men think that a beautiful 20 year old woman is with them for love. I knew you retards would immediately start posting this when the news came out, WMAF lives in your minds rent free

>>745014
Learn how to fucking read any time.

he was also on Grindr lol

>>745021
I guess they were right and there really is no room for a straight white man in american politics anymore, of course you cant be a democrat as a straight WHITE MALE but you cant be a republican if you are a STRAIGHT white male

>>744983
Whatever that means to you still doesnt answer the question of your assumptions about self-esteem.

>>744987
self-respect* and I already did >>744916

>>745008
but he is selective about his partners, he said so.

>>745015
If you said you wouldn‘t fuck anyone who has AIDS then you have certain criteria, but fucking 50 people still makes you a cheap slut. Having a couple of preferences doesn’t not make you a cheap slut if you end up fucking 50 people anyway. Intimacy is letting a person into your most vulnerable and affectionate state, and if you distribute this intimacy to many people then it and by extension yourself are cheap. You don‘t give yourself away cheaply when you have self-respect. Plus, if he‘s gay then he probably uses drugs and has unprotected sex because he doesn‘t fear pregnancy.

>>745026
you are dripping with sexual resentment and frustration

oh yeah? if you live on my money to eat and relax that means i own you. now spread em cheeks

can i touch ur pee pee too?

No they don't, welfare queens are a myth. You're lying.

>>744877
you could reconcile this by saying that they're the most elite whites, the very top of the hierarchy (e.g. white channer > white normie > non-white), and this is part of it. (most ideologies are really just people looking for a reason to feel good about themselves in a world where it's very obvious they've got low social status)

but unresolved contradictions are also generally good for an ideology or a religion. the father is not the son, the son is not the ghost, the ghost is not the father, but they're all god… being racist on NEETbux instead of a goyslave is based, but minorities are subhuman because they're welfare queens… trump will stop the foreign wars but invading Venezuela is based… this is particularly helpful on the right because they're less bookish by the left, less annoyed by contradiction and with less need for an ideological justification - if you start from "i don't like black people, white women, liberals, etc…" and then come up with justifications for that belief ad-hoc, you get a much better model of right-wing behavior than if you start from "whites are superior" as an axiom. (if you do that, you wind up like Richard Hanania as a weird sort of open-borders dark-neoliberal because you conclude that high-autism score indians are superior to low autism score whites.)

for example: the left had to come up with theoretical justifications to explain why pivoting from social fascism theory to popular frontism was intellectually coherent. every election time you get a mountain of screeds explaining why communists should vote Democrat, Green, Labour, or indeed not vote at all. the right on the other hand didn't need any great soul-searching to accept RFK or even to think that the unrepentant Blairite JK Rowling is based. in 4chan terms, particularly outside the UK, you can see the pathetic dynamic play out where would-be nazi radicals in non-US countries justify supporting basic-bitch conservative parties. ultimately, they're defined mostly by their enemies and their resentments. (Mr. Hanania has an article on this, actually: https://www.richardhanania.com/p/conservatism-as-an-oppositional-culture )

>>744879
>particularly outside the UK
Whoops. Should say: outside the USA. The UK particularly pre-2024 is one of the cases i would cite where they go for basic conservatives.

You're trying to talk about the mentally ill from the perspective of a healthy person. See the posts:
>>744545
>>744874
They're simply degenerates with sadism and delusional ideas of grandeur.
Dissecting their delusions is the biggest mistake, because they can be anything. I'd rather think about how to treat them.

>>744879
This makes sense with how much they obsess over Schmitt's friend-enemy distinction.

The old radical right in the US was a bit more consistent on this, starting from "whites are superior and this is our homeland" and essentially seeking to overturn the changes that did away with the postwar white dominated system. There are some that still cling to this, but mainstream voices like Fuentes treat them with derision as "racialist wignats". Now their viewpoint is defined more by what it's against and internally they've adopted an inverted conservative form of the woke progressive stack. Being a white conservative Christian male citizen is at the top, but to many of them a mixed Christian conservative woman who was not born in the US is more valuable than a godless liberal white woman or even man for example.

Maybe this is just what they've adopted because objectively the time for white nationalists to attempt to counteract demographic and political change and bring white America back to what it was would have been the 1980s or 1990s, not now. Under our current system it's not surprising that this is the outcome of those changes rather than the multiracial progressive utopia where everyone looks Latino, votes for obama, and is becoming more culturally liberal every year.

I'm probably the anon you were talking to on /usapol/ the other day, and I like reading Hanania on the conservative movement for the same reasons - he's a retarded ghoul when it comes to his actual policy proposals, but his insights about right-wing infighting and his unique viewpoints among rightoids are certainly interesting. It's funny that he's become a darling to some liberals since trump 2

>>744879
Regarding Venezuela though I don't think there's as much of a contradiction. My read on the conservative movement today is that their ideal America is one where culture has been rolled back to before 1964-1965 (immigration quotas and Civil Rights) but diplomacy has gone back to before World War II. Under that way of thinking, the wars in the Middle East and support for Ukraine are bad because they're ZOGwars in service of the globalist/Jewish liberal agenda that they identify the Clinton/Bush/Obama US-as-global-policeman-and-foreign-aid-benefactor stuff with, whereas any action against Venezuela or strong-arming regarding Greenland is the US doing what it should as a regional power and carving out its sphere of influence. Maybe im reading too much into the decisions of people like Hegseth but I think the DoD renaming was meant to signify this.

>>744791
How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast yesterday?

>>744791
I think you're supposed to pretend you're one of those fucking. Plus it's easier than going out and looking or paying for it.

>>744791
It's a two-for-one deal if your bisexual.

@submarichamomi2.bsky.social

>>744791
Recently it has that effect more often. It depends on how easily I can stifle those feelings.

Ye olde fascists were losers too, anon. It's losers all the way down.

they're corny and pathetic but they are, in fact, winning

>>744931
This helmet looks cool.

>>744933
bismarck wasn't a fascist in any useful sense

>>744931
The germans maybe, ᴉuᴉlossnW and Marinetti were aesthetically pretty cool all things considered, so were the ultra-rightists in Japan. The germans are really only saved by the SS uniforms, I never got the nazi fetishism otherwise. I guess it's because the greys and the stahlhelms make for better villain uniforms than the Italian/IJA ones, which aren't too different from what the Allies had

>>740516
That helped pushed me a bit closer to suicide.

he looks cool but your memes will keep reminding me he looks like the poljack but with a chin and a career

>>744995
>are you into hentai cbt only
Yes, precisely

Fake news, women are on average only 20-30% weaker than men

>>744995
But the main problem with 3D ballbusting is that either the woman is Karen or the man is an ugly bastard

>>744998
Well that's cheating, a woman can also shoot me with a gun, so what

>>744999
>Third one
So hot, I love the paper mask. Also, are you into hentai only in general?

>>745004
Even barefoot a woman will fuck your shit up, I don't think you understand how pathetically weak your scrotum is, the first time I got busted I wanted her to use some thigh high boots, but whe was having too much fun so she took them off and her hits were so much more painful barefoot.

>>744907
No, it's the food. But she can get that too.

>>744911
Is 67 just 69 or 21 or 420 or >9000 for gen alpha?