Why did communists abandon wearing badass military uniforms in favor of bourgeois suit and ties?!?!
(I don’t know know if it is accurate to refer to Mao Suits and Stalin Tunic’s and “Military uniforms” so if I’m wrong please shut the fuck up because you know what I mean)
What a lame downgrade, I know that this is just opinion and what someone wears is nowhere near as consequential as they’re actions but still, suits just look so lame compared to military uniforms and it’s such a shame that they have been abandoned, yeah sometimes a leader will wear on there is a military parade or something but still the only communist leader who is seen wearing a military uniform more than they are not is Kim Jong Un. But still I think I know why they stopped and it’s because fascist dictators also wore military uniforms like for example Hitler, ᴉuᴉlossnW, or Ion Antonescu, so the visuals of the military uniform helped libs in their effort to try to conflate communism and fascism so in order to appeal to the west NiKKKita KKKhruSShchev decided to dress like a CEO causing military uniform to stop being worn in Non-Maoist communist countries with a few notable exceptions.
27 posts and 13 image replies omitted.>>726649>>726654OP is not against uniformity, the point of UACAG is just to promote uniformity towards anarchists, suits are only one way of it, hence the name Uniformed Anarchist-Communist Agitation Group. Then again the propaganda isn't targeted towards OP since he doesn't appear to be an anarchist-communist.
Still not great to hate on suits in an era of liberal protesters looking like shit misrepresenting whatever label they appropriate.
>>726649Do y'all just go out and slap one of these together for every strawman you come up with? Regardless, I'm a prole, you can keep your uncomfortable suits and impress the bosses yourselves, I need function and comfort to keep doin your work for you.