[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

"War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun." - Chairman Mao
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1784964062019-8.webp (45.34 KB, 800x450, image2-800x450.webp)

 

I've been thinking about drones, especially small FPV ones. Everyone talks about how its going to change warfare yada yada. But the really disruptive thing is that it enables individuals to target the ruling class much easier.

Think about guns for example. Before guns, you needed to have expensive armor, swords, shields, spears, bows and extensive training to be a lethal soldier. Only the elites could afford that, and that's why peasant/slave revolutions were not only few and far between, but they all were brutally put down quite easily.

Once guns came into the picture, the elites were not so safe anymore, and there came about a change in political structures to accomodate the masses more both politically and economically.

Now I think drones are another step in this direction. Indivuduals can easily build drones, and with advances in AI, then can just create a program instructing it to fly and identify a wealthy elite and kill them. With proper op-sec, someone can release a drone a mile away in a forest, set it on its kill path, and then run away.

The elites can be killed en-masse with the security forces having a very tough time trying to counter it and identify the perpetrators. Now all of this is theoretical of course, but technological acceleration is going to make this a reality much sooner than you think.

This is why I think the push for mass surveillance is happening. The elites are aware that there is a material change coming in the relative military power of organized armies and disparate dissident lone wolfs. Mass surveillance is the only way to ensure they can counter the lone wolfs.
2 posts omitted.

> But the really disruptive thing is that it enables individuals to target the ruling class much easier.
Lol, you mixed that up. Innovation in general tends to lead to concentration of power, not distribution.
The reality is:
  1. a prole can barely afford a decent drone, he can hardly buy one anonymously when everything is tracked
  2. elites live in private mansions and can easily get their own air defense
  3. elites in turn can afford endless drones, swarming with ai and allowing for more advanced surveilance on the poor, like they already have traffic control drones in some countries, China is even testing arresting people using drones, in the Ukrainian war "surrendering to a drone" has been a thing for a while now, it only takes adoption for that to become a reality in law enforcement


>>6350
Start by training in virtual reality so you get muscle memory how to steer the drone. Its quite hard until you have done it for couple of days. You dont need VR-goggles but having a proper controller is a must. After buying first drone and flying it outside try to avoid trees as rotors easily tangle in branches and it can get stuck there. Cheap drones have terrible signal so focus on having good connection.

wont radio weapons kill off drones doe

>>6352
nitpicky and elite just means "ruling class" which can include bourgeois or incredibly wealthy people who don't own means of production (like star actors and athletes)

it just occured to me that if /leftypol/ were serious then >>>/akm/ and >>>/labor/ would be the most popular boards.

>>6355
seen those fiber optic cable things?



File: 1778979050355.webp (7.65 KB, 300x150, APLA1.webp)

 

"For The Union Makes Us Strong."
A mischellanious thread for the discussion/formation of revolutionary left wing militias and co-ops.
The body was too short or empty.
The body was too short or empty.
The body was too short or empty.
The body was too short or empty.
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

Maintain party discipline. Reject adventurism.

>>6255
please share pdf, anon, thank you

idkno

>>6253
It's simply provocative bullshit by a guy other neo-Nazis thought was too much. If you want to read a good book about insurgency (one that were unfortunately written by reactionaries) read Total Resistance and The Brigade.

>>6253
Negative homes. Siege is ideological not tactical. Just neo Nazi ideological nonsense . Read old mil manuals and start shooting with your bros. A decentralized group of homies is the way to go. One of you needs help, phone up the bros. And if one of you goes down, you should hypothetically trust your boy to not squeal.

If you can't trust them not to, don't shoot with them. Don't even tell them abt your guns. These are the tards that will fold under pressure and red flag you. Don't let them.



File: 1778638517483.png (615.91 KB, 583x768, ClipboardImage.png)

 

What breaks or bends if women get drafted? Does the 'protect women' instinct finally die? Would shared foxholes bond the or poison everything?

Personal opinion is if the Queens want the crown, they need to carry the sword.
26 posts and 5 image replies omitted.

>>6238
Yet you say nothing about men being drafted for war
>>6234
Simp.
In ancient societies, women were also used in practical warfare. Even today, we still do. Women shouldn’t be limited to administrative duties.

There are countries that do female conscription

>>6232
All conscription should be ended, but if we have to have it then yes it obviously should include women

>>6345
Yeah, Israel for a very prominent example. But almost never have I have seen any of these women in actual combat. Ukraine supposedly has a lot of female troops, but never see them in actual combat. I don't really know what any of these countries do with their female troops, but my guess is they always assign them to the rear guard type work. MPs, guards, shit like that.

>>6239
>Women should be conscripted en masse while male conscription will end
This is the best idea right here. We should do it as reparations for all the years of the patriarchy where they weren't allowed to serve.



 

WAR FOOTAGE
Thread for posting military footage (mp4, webm, gif, etc.) and photographs of action from wars, battles and so on. Spoiler gore. The primary purpose of this thread is for pure fighting, not torture-porn, if you think gore-spam is funny you belong on 4cuck.

Non-combat military videos can also apply (vid 2 rel)
4 posts and 15 image replies omitted.

Footage from Belgorod March 29 and April 1 2022, tochka-u presumably

File: 1784225429847-3-1.jpg (77.67 KB, 1024x682, HIMARS.jpg)

File: 1784225429847-7-4.mp4 (9.33 MB, 1920x1080, Himars4.mp4)

HIMARS footage

>>6338
Spoiler this is its too NSFW


anyone has any of those videos of american soldiers in Afghanistan crying and hiding under tables?



File: 1778970854723.png (999.03 KB, 2248x706, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Is it because India is just 10 countries wearing a trench coat?

The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.

Same reason why it doesn't happen in most countries, the central government is functional enough and thus roving bandits can't gain legitimacy as a political force across the country, it happens in africa because the politician are all obvious western puppet that put money in their pockets and kill their own legitimacy because they expect to just flee if anything happens

>Is it because India is just 10 countries wearing a trench coat?
More or less, over the last 35 years there's been a growing standardization of regional identities. Currently I'd say there are roughly seven prominent cultural regions. the Hindi Heartland, the Punjabi–Himalayan region, Western India, Bengal, the Telugu–Kannada Southeast, the Tamil–Malayalam South and the English-speaking Northeast. This is just ignoring internal divisions like caste and religion.
These regions are culturally distinct enough that they can almost be thought of as separate nations. They have different languages, traditions, and historical experiences, beyond periods when they were incorporated into the same large empires. The idea of India as a single civilization is one of the few narratives that has broad support across much of the political spectrum, with both the left and the right generally embracing it.

>>6249
they didnt have a Mao. they reached the limits of national developmentalism, liberal democracy and third world socialism. the problem was the big landowners had too much power and pull in the government. they were the obstacle to do land reforms which were necessary for big industrialisation like mao started. although the indians did try.

>Glownonymous
>meow
>Only source Indian state narrative (image), reflected on Glowpedia
>Obvious incorrecteness reflected by its complete absence of activity in northeast
Sage



File: 1783039806386-5.jpg (21.13 KB, 480x360, real.jpg)

 

ITT post /AKM/ resources to help /AKM/ beginners.

It could be websites, books, videos, etc…

meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow. meow.

What do you mean? Like beginner stuff on firearms specifically? What country do you live in? America? What state?



File: 1779150865765-0.png (961.04 KB, 800x534, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779150865765-1.png (1.49 MB, 1600x1280, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779150865765-2.png (412.06 KB, 400x566, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779150865765-3.png (384.63 KB, 634x786, ClipboardImage.png)

 

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⢀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠊⢀⠄⢂⠡⢀⠐⡈⠐⠠⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⠆⡤⠔⢁⠐⡀⠂⢄⠒⠠⢁⠂⠌⣢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⡹⠀⡁⠄⢂⠐⠠⢁⠊⡀⣖⢔⡁⠄⣧⠳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⣆⡠⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣶⡇⠐⠠⠈⠄⠨⠐⡀⢂⢐⠌⠈⣿⣖⢣⢭⠱⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⡜⡳⢬⡙⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡟⠀⡁⢂⠑⡈⢁⠂⡐⠀⣾⣀⣴⣿⣧⠏⢦⢻⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠮⢃⣀⣹⠂⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⣊⣹⣿⣿⣷⣶⣦⣴⣄⡂⠄⡁⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡙⣎⠼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣐⣀⡑⠒⠊⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⣿⣿⣿⣻⢇⢣⠜⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣥⣾⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣏⢊⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠏⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡞⡳⣉⠞⣡⣀⢼⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠃⡁⠢⠀⡀⢫⢻⣧⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠀⠀⢀⡠⠠⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⡴⡓⣬⠺⡱⣘⠮⠀⠀
⠐⢎⠸⠥⠂⡐⢀⠉⣿⣿⣟⡿⣿⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡷⠉⢀⠠⠐⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠑⠞⢀⡕⢣⡚⡆⠀
⠀⠀⠑⣄⠂⡐⢀⢲⣿⣿⣯⣿⢻⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠁⠄⠂⠔⠁⡦⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⢌⢧⠜⣣⠃
⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣤⢢⣿⣿⣿⣷⣫⣯⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀⠌⠠⣡⡜⢫⣜⠜⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠏⠸⡜⣡⠀
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

fed

>>6259
At the opening stages of Ukraine V Russia, Ukraine tried this. It was mostly wasted effort that did not resolve the issues at hand.

Fedposting bad.

Next off, a revolution would not be led by socialist thought, rather reactionary thought in America.

File: 1782848475308-8.png (1.16 MB, 1408x1168, molotov.png)

obligatory



File: 1646004170167-0.webm (Spoiler Image,5.43 MB, 1920x1080, Russian tanks entering Uk….webm)

File: 1646004170167-1.png (Spoiler Image,663.54 KB, 2213x1801, January prediction CSIS 1.png)

File: 1646004170167-2.png (Spoiler Image,516.39 KB, 2213x1426, January prediction CSIS 2.png)

File: 1646004170167-3.png (Spoiler Image,650.04 KB, 2213x1801, January Prediction CSIS 3.png)

File: 1646004170167-4.png (Spoiler Image,565.93 KB, 972x588, 28 February according to u….png)

 

What can we learn from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and this example of relatively modern warfare? Strategy, tactics, operations, geopolitical responses, information warfare, civilian pov and response. Anything related. Not the thread to talk about "who is in the right".
278 posts and 127 image replies omitted.

>>5264
>LMAO no.
no what ? do you deny you can shoot down a recon drone with a simple motor airplane ?

>Russia shot down those several times

even if they did, the idea was more using it into your own safe airspace. And using any missile to shoot it down, you're still paying too much.

>Jet fighters are needed, as are slower low-tech aircraft, as are SAMs. This is what combined warfare is

no shit, way to miss the point.

>rather than doing what the Su-34 and Su-25 do.

any jet fighter will be a magnitude more expensive than a regular motor plane

>only low tech aircraft

I didnt advocate for having ONLY them. But do you really need a jet for lobbing FAB-500s ?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5270
Your spacing is ass, please don't do this.
>no what ?
You realize that people can scroll up and see exactly what I'm saying "no" to right? The fact is that Ukraine has failed to shoot down drones with its trainers, since it's literally pulling WW-1 shit, with people firing handguns out of open cockpits. There's literally a Russian drone video where they try and fail to shoot it down.
>even if they did, the idea was more using it into your own safe airspace.
*laughs in long range SAM*
You realize that Ukraine has been using very long range stand-off weapons like cruise missiles and are STILL getting shot down, right? Only a few days ago an Su-35 shot down a MiG-29 - which was using a HARM missile in a long-range ground-strike - from over 200km away, with an R-37. Earlier in the war the S-300V4 set a similar record kill from a similar distance of over 200km. An S-400 shot down an Su-27 over Kiev earlier in the war from 150km away. Pantsir, Osa and Tor SPAAG/SAMs have shot down numerous low-flying missiles, drones and other aircraft.
>using any missile to shoot it down, you're still paying too much.
If you're an idiot using patriot anti-ballistic long-range missiles against drones. A single Tor missile costs maybe a couple thousand dollars. A single yak-52 costs 50-100 thousand dollars, so you're dead wrong.
>way to miss the point.
I didn't miss your point. I don't disagree in the necessity of low-tech aircraft, but not like Ukraine is doing, and frankly an attack chopper would do just as well, if not better.
>any jet fighter will be a magnitude more expensive than a regular motor plane
Any jet fighter would also be magnitudes more effective.
>do you really need a jet for lobbing FAB-500s
In an SAM-heavy air-space like Ukraine? YES.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1750208758549.gif (555.25 KB, 220x220, 1749849390053.gif)

>>2642
>The idea of it going to 2025
There is a lesson there. Stop being emotional, stop eating the propaganda slop, study everything and look closely at the serious people involved in war and political theory. Honestly I didn't need to do half of that to be sure that this stupid war would last a while so if you were wrong you really need to revamp your way of thinking

>>4897
>>4877
>>4946
Restoring files

https://archive.is/NOR5K

America seeks its McDonald’s model for missile making

<Defence groups are developing modular workshops that can mass-produce cheap missiles during wartime


>The building in north-east Virginia is squat and unremarkable. But inside, rows of missiles lie on worktops waiting to be primed by young technicians for America’s next war. 


>“This is all set up for if we have to go very fast,” said Doug Denneny, a greying veteran whose defence group Co-Aspire rents the warehouse. He strides past a dozen workstations where warheads would be slotted into open-bellied missiles.


>The workshop is designed to solve a simple problem: the US does not produce enough missiles, and those that it does are eye-wateringly expensive. As the country’s munitions stockpiles dwindled during the conflict with Iran, finding ways to produce quickly, cheaply and at scale has become an increasingly urgent challenge.


>Working at full surge capacity, it would currently take the Pentagon years rather than months to replace missiles fired at Iran. America produces only 600 Tomahawks every year, and they cost about $2.6mn apiece. The PrSM and JASSM, two other mainstays, each cost around $1.6mn and $1.9mn.


>“The American arsenal is based exclusively on expensive, exquisite and hard-to-produce weapons systems,” said Michael Horowitz, a former Pentagon official responsible for defence innovation. “We have entered a different era of warfare, and now the US needs to change.”  

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1636731375575.png (4.53 MB, 2806x2637, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Meme thread for /AK/
Post memes, stories, funny shit and /k/ screencaps.
154 posts and 167 image replies omitted.

ANARCHO FASCISMO WAVE THE F U T U R E!


ONE FUTURE ORGANIZATION, SCENEMO FASCIST MANIFESTO!

Is this not poetic, ironic, unironic, hateful and beautiful?

File: 1782663669770-6.jpg (380.25 KB, 1248x832, 8OiK4(1).jpg)


File: 1782663842719-8.jpg (312.11 KB, 1248x710, 8OiK4(1).jpg)

I like him do you?

>>6316
See this wouldn't be a bad sentiment if America's "Warriors" weren't acting on imperialist orders and not actually defending America from shit. No shit people want benefits if they're essentially going to be congressionally-sanctioned mercenaries



File: 1699691134304-0.jpg (467.41 KB, 3200x1680, gorry.jpg)

File: 1699691134304-1.webm (5.51 MB, 576x320, hardt.webm)

 

(Just in case some /leftypol/ tourist starts yelling 'glow fed', I'm not American, this is purely out of curiosity, if anyone were serious they wouldn't be discussing it on a public pan-african permagrowth-designing forum, and it's not my fault if your opsec is atrociously shit)

The vid rel (from Examined Life) was posted a while ago, the punchline being the El Salvadorean telling the pessimistic American 'don't you have mountains in the US?' 'It's easy, you go to the mountains, you start an armed cell, you create revolution.' A recent reply retorted, absurdly, that the government would 'just McNuke' them.

It got me thinking a bit, the US despite MacArthur's efforts didn't iNuke any country since Japan and I suspect it would be very unlikely to do it on a civilized part of their own mainland. And ultimately, even in the modern age, the US has failed to really utilize their weaponry dominance. It's easy for the naive eye to look at drones, gun-dogs, tanks and planes and forget just how effective asymmetric warfare can be against superpowers.

The questions:
- Is creating a base of operations onnamountains a viable tactic in the US?
- Are there any modern US examples of successful guerilla tactics, urban or rural? Possible examples could include organized crime or rural compounds.
- How is asymmetric warfare changed by proximity? US wars in Asia and further have a noticeable supply issue with distance.
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>3997
do you even live in America?

>>3972
The rex from Iraq tell us that if you try to ambush soldiers you tend to die and you will suffer 8 losses per soldier you kill, but plant IEDs and you will kill 3 soldiers per insurgent shot.

This information is already public, I can not be held responsible for what someone might do with it.

File: 1711989348001.png (525.51 KB, 692x677, 1605999505626.png)

The US seems to lose to guerillas or revolutionaries more often than it would like to. Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Cuba, Nicaragua. Which begs the question: what are some countries that the US/West cannot afford to "lose". I am talking about countries that the US would do ANYTHING to prevent from "falling" or "turning sides", like do occupation of Poland or Manchuria levels of violence to maintain influence or whatever.

>>4670
Their immediate neighbour Canada would be the most obvious and easiest answer.

Following close behind would be Japan and South Korea in that order.

Potential countries the US might go crazy for are the UK, France, Germany and Australia.

Not sure where to put Mexico tbh.

>>4670
Israel?



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
Previous[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 ]
| Catalog | Home