/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Very important issue: >>>/siberia/719812
> Spoiler Image,189.71 KB,
There's a space missing after the comma for spoilered images.

can our beautiful mods comr up witg a plan to get rid of the fuentes shill in usapol? whether by restricting it to isg or whatever. i am so god damn tired of hearing about the musings of laura loomer and spic fuentes

>>42994
there is precisely 1 rule on this website that actually counts and gets enforced and it is rule 16. kind of insane that they managed to add more rules that don't matter, fucked up the formatting, and then still for whatever reason didn't take out the anti COVID rule which hasn't been relevant for the better part of half a decade now lmao.

>>43371
Not funny

Bump

thread bump

Bump

Bump

Tor node has already been banned since yesterday. I wish they would at least fix the post button, so you could see when the ban is set to expire.

Bump

>>43460
> rule 14g still applies. you know (or ought to know) that your posts are likely to create pointless and unconstructive arguments where people just snark at you, and on a topic that is unambiguously a question of identity politics. that is, in and of itself, sufficient grounds for your posts to be removed.
>the reason people post snark and mock you is because nobody except you is interested in having this idpol discussion.
Except it's you retards that keep creating this discussion by shitting on relentlessly anybody or any group part of the UK left that doesn't bow down to the TRA cult and all their demands to be the center of UK politics.
How can there not be a debate on Idpol when you freaks literally set fucking purity tests, that actual Socialist parties have to adhere to that Biological Women do not exist and the idea of Biological women is transphobic?
This is the fucking point, you retards are trying to force a fucking INSANE misogynistic position on behalf of a mental illness cult on the level of fucking spoonies, then have massive fucking cryfests when anybody pushes back.
I mean, how fucking dare scottish women protect their rights against a fucking cult that wanted to erase their biological existance from reality, the ultimate reactionaries according to leftybritpol.
>
/leftybritpol/ is a thread for the discussion of left-wing british politics and society. it may intersect briefly with gender issues, such as when government institutions change policy, where political parties and figures adopt a position, or where there is a major news story, but it is not a thread for engaging with gender issues in depth
Then how about you fucks shut the fuck up constantly with your trans crybullying horseshit and calling everyone on the left who doesn't play along with gender ideology some sort of reactionary sociopath traitor, while forcing your bullshit slippery sloping nonsense as insane purity tests?
Oh wait, Idpol for me but nobody else is allowed to criticize it because that's idpol otherwise.
I will continue to challenge the points you fucking retards bring up because you fucking losers are the ones CONSTANTLY trying to make this the core issue of UK leftism.

>>43465
it simply isn't true that people shit on groups or individuals who "doesn't [sic] bow down to the TRA cult and all their demands to be the center of uk politics.", people shit on groups or individuals who make arses of themselves. you can be as "gender critical" as you like and still conclude that adnan hussain's comments were a liability to your party or that getting the endorsement of prominent "gender critical" people did the communist party of britain no help at the last election.
nobody is demanding that these people adopt a radically pro-transgender policy platform. at the risk of arrogance, i would say the consensus position of the thread is that they should shut up and do nothing to attract attention over the issue one way or the other because it is boring.
the vast majority of "gender critical" demands are already government policy. they are already the consensus policy of the two parties which have governed this country for the last hundred years, plus the party most likely to displace both of them. there is nothing to be gained by loudly declaring one's agreement with the government and with most established institutions. (this applies to you too, by the way.)

you take a highly moralizing stance to issues that are more interesting when you look at them as the administrative matters that they are, suggestive of your own over-investment in the outcomes of their identity-politicking.
what "rights" were "scottish women" protecting? oh, right, their "right" to not have transwomen count as women when the scottish government sets a female quota on the boards of quangos (to which the government generally appoints wealthy cronies anyway). truly, a deeply important philosophical issue, a matter which all champions of the proletariat should rally behind instead of scorning as the worst sort of upper-class feminism, and, indeed, a very serious practical issue which i'm sure comes up regularly (wealthy transgender members of the scottish establishment politically allied to the SNP and angling for a quango job? there must be… one of them!)

you rarely challenge the points which are actually brought up. if i say that adnan hussain is an idiot for the optics of publicly agreeing with giga-zionist rosie duffield on gender issues when he could easily say nothing either way, his gender critical viPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

why is this sharty copypasta still up?

>>43459
Race is in fact arbitrary. I actually can personally attest to this as it's a big debate in my own family whether we qualify as Latinx because of white socializing and passing.

Yes, I'm using the word Latinx on purpose just to be a bitch about it lol. And you ask any Hispanic and will get seven different answers on if they even like the word Hispanic because some see that as giving into the white man's colonialism because it implies Spaniard, but there's no way they'd just accept being called brown aka a Jeet, or Native American. And you definitely don't wanna call a Porterican or Cuban Mexican.

So this ain't a gotcha. Race isn't real, gender isn't real. Only individuals are. Individuals invent and construct narratives around race and gender as a cope.

This actually does relate to gender in a lot of ways as what makes me white or Hispanic? My DNA? It's not like there's a lab on hand to show the cartels how Cholo I am. So we base it off stereotypes and attitudes. Aka bullshit. Which I act way more "white" considering. So all the same, because there's no way to determine a gender unless you're having sex with said person or for some other reason looking at them naked, you gotta go by how they present and how they act. Meaning a lot of trans pass for women far better than women who look butt ugly. And I am in fact correlating femininity with beauty. Not to say there can't be beauty in masculinity, but that would better be described as handsome wouldn't it? In fact even than, a sunset is beautiful, "feminine beauty" is more like…petite, or fair. Not even cute, because dogs can be cute. Cute just means non threatening and triggers emotional surrogate responses. Than again feminine characteristics are adjacent to that.

Pic isn't entirely random. Trans girlfriend looks like Marinette. This actually raises another abstract of terfs want me to "admit" we're two gay guys. But I don't feel gay. I never once grew up thinking "wow I like men". I've always been sexually attracted to feminine features so why am I gonna call myself gay when that simply isn't true? Than again terfs insist trans women call themselves men. They just seem to have a habit of wanting people to go along with their schizo demands as if we owe them anything besides a Hasan shock collar.

Also saw the image, and I'll just say they're lying. Not evePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

How is this elaborate shitpost still on meta and not siberia? OP is playing a character of a conservative while speaking full sharteen. OP is a contrarian with no coherent position.

Bump

>>43368
I've had a thread or two that was getting traction on /siberia/ moved to the "appropriate" hobby board for that topic, at which point it immediately died. That's one problem: the other problem is that boards are still being added long after it was clear that without a plan or a real community asking for them or anything like that, they will go nowhere.
26 people, tops, used /lgbt/ and in the last week and only 5 used /labor/.

even if no boards are deleted, the lesson has to be learned that no new boards should be created unless there's a real plan to make a success of them: another site shutting down, a community that's been exiled, a topic that's so massively popular that it's flooding /leftypol/ or /siberia/, etc. you could even consider something really out there, like socdem flag's proposal of allowing autonomous admin/moderation of the existing dead boards, empowering someone to try to make a success of them without being distracted by keeping /leftypol/ itself running. but for the love of god, don't add more boards on a whim. at the current rate by 2040 the top bar will have picked up /woodworking/ and /birdwatching/ and /midcenturyaustrianliberalism/ boards which are visited precisely once, by an admin, to verify that they've been created correctly.

plus this >>43438

>>43455
BASED

I see your post about there being too many boards and to that I raise you another dead board.

/music/ and /draw/ are good on their own
Shoving everything into /hobby/ sounds abysmal because certain interests will obviously outweigh other niche ones, there's a reason why /v/ is one of the fastest boards on 4cuck and was on 8chan

>>43234
>omg you guys are such snowflakes! woe is me, i'm just a poor simple jokester with mild takes teehee!
<the actual mild take from that mfer: a picture of a homosexual dying of aids with the phrase "average gay man"
you are a coward. you try to play the victim and deny responsibilities for your actions every single time. you are a coward.

Moderação shoando meus posts até aqui, foda.

>>43256

Você é um chorão de merda.

a 5 month old thread titled "thank you god for not making me peruvian"
>>>/latam/8077
is this just spanish /siberia/?

Lol,let's add karma

>>43229
Disappointed but not surprised

Fuck off.

agree
>>43377
cracker

What was the rationale behind segregating all the south american posters into a different board?

>>43337
sukondeez amerikkkan bastard

English and general discussions about latin america should be allowed there
I don't know if they aren't, I'm just afraid to post there in English

>>43478
Figuratively there ought to be symbols for the other types of transhumanism. The most broadly used symbol remains the third image.