/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

>>43304
Please remove this loli spam shit from the drive general https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2545865.html#q2547776 its completely unrelated to the thread

>>43426
ah, forget to mention here, but the "an" was the issue, the filter ignores spaces.

auygh
auygh

So if "egg" became 🥚 before that was applied then that would solve that.

an 🥚

>>42994
there is precisely 1 rule on this website that actually counts and gets enforced and it is rule 16. kind of insane that they managed to add more rules that don't matter, fucked up the formatting, and then still for whatever reason didn't take out the anti COVID rule which hasn't been relevant for the better part of half a decade now lmao.

BUMP

Making too many boards was a mistake but it's not really the reason the site is dying

Bump

>>43390
Ah I reported but forgot to bump the 'p thread, good catch.

!!!
Someone just posted it on /leftypol/

This shit is everywhere

>>43466
Was the screenshot necessary?

>>43467
I will get banned,isn't it?

this poster regularly derails the leftybritpol thread in an attempt to focus on their particular obsessions. this poster does not reply in good faith if you engage with them from, say, a transmedicalist perspective (e.g. agreeing on the "tumblr conception of gender" but remaining pro-trans regarding those who medically transition) because they are an anti-transgender obsessive rather than some innocent, good faith poster. they seemingly have a desperate need to be agreed with, and because this isn't forthcoming they post often and post terribly. their points of reference are dated (tumblr! who cares about tumblr in the 20th decade of this milennium!?) and out of touch. they operate under the misapprehension that people refuse to debate them because they're afraid of losing, rather than because it's plainly a waste of time - i think the metaphor is "like playing chess with a pigeon" - and no matter what you say, you're guaranteed to get little more than another stream of invective against the "gender cultists" and the /leftypol/ mods, absent any apparent engagement with your major points.

this user has brainworms which are foreign to this site, but held in common with the british government, british press, british judiciary, 55 tufton street (in britain, but in fairness, yankee money) and so on. their posts are composed of stock phrases and repetitive tics. they attempt to leftwash their particularly british mental illness as something held around the world: the CPC is not "gender critical", whatever their policies on trans issues, just as non-Trump presidents were not "MAGA". "gender critical" most usefully refers to the britain-centered anti-transgender movement, a sort of failed progressive-washing of a sudden reactionary turn. the only "gender critical" ""marxist"" organizations exist in Britain, the CPGB-ML and the CPB. (the former is a cult that wonders why it has no women in it, the latter is a feeble copy of the Labour party…)

i really must emphasize for the foreign reader that for all their crowing about Marx and Engels, if you ever visit /leftybritpol/ look out for how quickly this user will go to bat for the British supreme court (because it ruled 'gender critical' prejudices are a protected belief, and that the equality act secretly repealed the gender recognition act), the British government (because it's adopted a generally anti-trans stance and commissioned some anti-trans policy based evidence), the Equalities and HPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>43435
>It entirely falls apart because it brings gender down to biology. So a woman is only defined by her cunt? Cool
Gender expression is a mix of material realities in regards to biology and biological sexual dimorphism with socialization aspect in roles, clothing etc. I don't see how this is a controversial statement beyond anybody but the gender cult who believe sex (not even gender) is 100% socialized and that you can literally just change that entire lifetime of socialization on a whim, yet refuse to extend such a position to race, which is far more an arbitary social role.
>>43458
Dude, anybody who has read the leftybritpol threads can see I've engaged in good faith relentlessly, while you Gender culties literally just respond with insane fucking SNARK.
I'm the literal fucking one that took a position of a legal third gender, and the left to argue for extention of gender norms within the sexes, while you gender culties are like "NOOOO EVERYONE HAS TO PLAY ALONG WITH STEREOTYPICAL GENDER ROLES AND IF YOU SAY YOU ARE THE OPPOSITE SEX AND DRESS AESTHETICALLY LIKE A PARODY VERSION OF THE OPPOSITE SEX YOU ARE!"
You've completely misread my position on Transmedicalism, which is that Transmedicalism at least has a basis in a more materialist basis, but still doesn't deal with the numerous social and philosophical or sheer logical issues in regards to… why should we be reinforcing dysphoric conditions or forcing others to play along with literal mental illness? Should we all play along with the delusions of Schizos? You types don't even support other forms of Dysphoric expression like "Pro-Ana"/Thinspo or Diaracial.
>i include b) and f) because OP is guilty of them perennially, including within this very post, but g) is unambiguous.
God you are such a bad faith fuckhead it's actually unreal.
Again, I'VE LITERALLY ENGAGED WITH YOU FUCKTARDS POSTS AND NONSENSICAL DODGING ARGUMENTS RELENTLESSLY, meanwhile you faggots literally just post snark and mock anybody who dares question any of your positions.
Pic related, not even me, you guys couldn't even accept the reality of someones lived experience and just handwave it away despite women talking about this happening everywhere, Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>43459
you repeatedly emphasize that you get nowhere trying to discuss this topic. let's say you're right about everything there is to say about gender: fine. rule 14g still applies. you know (or ought to know) that your posts are likely to create pointless and unconstructive arguments where people just snark at you, and on a topic that is unambiguously a question of identity politics. that is, in and of itself, sufficient grounds for your posts to be removed.

the reason people post snark and mock you is because nobody except you is interested in having this idpol discussion. the reason mods delete your posts is because they are rule breaking even when we make the most sympathetic assumptions possible, and they are disruptive enough that someone bothers to report them. the very fact you persist in trying to start arguments on this topic when nobody's taking the bait (going so far as to ban evade to try and keep them going) makes it impossible to believe you are acting in good faith. anyone acting in good faith would move on and engage with what the thread is actually discussing.

nobody cares about that you want the left to take the gunther fehlinger-jahn position on gender roles , nobody cares about the sociology of transracialism vs transgenderism, nobody cares about the philosophical and logical issues you imagine with something that's happening anyway, nobody cares about re-litigating the boundary between mental and physical illness, nobody cares to debate the appropriateness of your comparisons, nobody cares to answer your loaded questions, nobody cares about "the reality of someones lived experience" (and you accuse other users of being tumblrites?) on an anonymous board, nobody cares about what you find AGP subreddits, and nobody cares what random trans figures on twitter are doing. these are your interests, not the interests of the wider thread.

/leftybritpol/ is a thread for the discussion of left-wing british politics and society. it may intersect briefly with gender issues, such as when government institutions change policy, where political parties and figures adopt a position, or where there is a major news story, but it is not a thread for engaging with gender issues in depth. "is being anti-trans a vote winner for labour?" is an on-topic discussion which may go in produPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

I have an idea,what if we prohibited homophobia only on /lgbt/ board?

>>43460
> rule 14g still applies. you know (or ought to know) that your posts are likely to create pointless and unconstructive arguments where people just snark at you, and on a topic that is unambiguously a question of identity politics. that is, in and of itself, sufficient grounds for your posts to be removed.
>the reason people post snark and mock you is because nobody except you is interested in having this idpol discussion.
Except it's you retards that keep creating this discussion by shitting on relentlessly anybody or any group part of the UK left that doesn't bow down to the TRA cult and all their demands to be the center of UK politics.
How can there not be a debate on Idpol when you freaks literally set fucking purity tests, that actual Socialist parties have to adhere to that Biological Women do not exist and the idea of Biological women is transphobic?
This is the fucking point, you retards are trying to force a fucking INSANE misogynistic position on behalf of a mental illness cult on the level of fucking spoonies, then have massive fucking cryfests when anybody pushes back.
I mean, how fucking dare scottish women protect their rights against a fucking cult that wanted to erase their biological existance from reality, the ultimate reactionaries according to leftybritpol.
>
/leftybritpol/ is a thread for the discussion of left-wing british politics and society. it may intersect briefly with gender issues, such as when government institutions change policy, where political parties and figures adopt a position, or where there is a major news story, but it is not a thread for engaging with gender issues in depth
Then how about you fucks shut the fuck up constantly with your trans crybullying horseshit and calling everyone on the left who doesn't play along with gender ideology some sort of reactionary sociopath traitor, while forcing your bullshit slippery sloping nonsense as insane purity tests?
Oh wait, Idpol for me but nobody else is allowed to criticize it because that's idpol otherwise.
I will continue to challenge the points you fucking retards bring up because you fucking losers are the ones CONSTANTLY trying to make this the core issue of UK leftism.

Bump

Bump

>>43368
I've had a thread or two that was getting traction on /siberia/ moved to the "appropriate" hobby board for that topic, at which point it immediately died. That's one problem: the other problem is that boards are still being added long after it was clear that without a plan or a real community asking for them or anything like that, they will go nowhere.
26 people, tops, used /lgbt/ and in the last week and only 5 used /labor/.

even if no boards are deleted, the lesson has to be learned that no new boards should be created unless there's a real plan to make a success of them: another site shutting down, a community that's been exiled, a topic that's so massively popular that it's flooding /leftypol/ or /siberia/, etc. you could even consider something really out there, like socdem flag's proposal of allowing autonomous admin/moderation of the existing dead boards, empowering someone to try to make a success of them without being distracted by keeping /leftypol/ itself running. but for the love of god, don't add more boards on a whim. at the current rate by 2040 the top bar will have picked up /woodworking/ and /birdwatching/ and /midcenturyaustrianliberalism/ boards which are visited precisely once, by an admin, to verify that they've been created correctly.

plus this >>43438

>>43455
BASED

Tor node has already been banned since yesterday. I wish they would at least fix the post button, so you could see when the ban is set to expire.

I agree,

>>43371
Not funny

Bump

thread bump

Bump