No.1857069
You will never be a real anarchist. You don’t abolish capitalism, you don’t abolish hierarchies, you don’t really abolish the state. You are a neoliberal twisted by Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard into a crude mockery of Kropotkin’s perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back business partners mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your childish beliefs behind closed doors.
Anarchists are utterly repulsed by you. Houndrets of years of evolution have allowed real anarchists to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even ancaps who “pass” sound uncanny and unnatural to a anarchist. Your free market is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk guy to agree with you, he’ll turn tail and bolt from your ideology the second he gets sober.
You will never have commrades. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the loneliness creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you on a state-owned graveyard, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will be able to visit your graveyard without any profit for a corporation. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is unmistakably on a state-owned graveyard.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is turning back tho, just read Kropotkin or Bakunin like a big boy.
No.1857115
Ancaps are brainless. But real anarchists are still too idealist and utopian. Could you explain the logistics of how a modern technology society could be ran completely anarchically, because I don't doubt that an agrarian society could be run this way. But for industrial and post industrial societies, I don't have much faith in it working due to the plain complexity of it all. I don't know much about this stuff though. Wouldn't it be better to get rid of unjustified hierarchies instead of getting rid of them all?
No.1857202
>>1857115The workers already know how "logistics" work. This will not change if the bosses were to vanish from the earth. They will work most certainly like they always did.
No.1857271
>>1857115you assume "anarchy" means without any hierarchy of competence, any guidance, or any plan. This is mistaken.
>>1857202They were asking about planning. Not whether bosses would exist. Workers will plan without bosses. In fact, workers who take on a "managerial" role or "delegate tasks" were never really bosses to begin with. Marx always described them as "superintendents of labor" and he was always fond of refuting the idea that bosses superintend labor. In a small business they often do, but as a firm grows larger, they give the role of superintendence of labor to specialized workers who are paid more. But those workers are not owners of capital. They are simply labor aristocrats. In a better system their role would still need to be performed, just collectively.
No.1857313
>>1857124It's a riff on an anti trans pasta.
No.1857587
Ancap smashies when?
No.1857652
real
No.1857687
I don't want to shit on anarchists but there's so many anarchists and ancaps that reach the same stupid conclusions, man…